Greetings.
Stas so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please
Stas ask winXX
Stas users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the
Stas volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the
Stas new doc and then the future patches. For 2.0 you
Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
Greetings.
Stas so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please
Stas ask winXX
Stas users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the
Stas volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send
me the
Stas new doc
Hi there,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
I sure can co-maintain such a document. The co part is a good idea for
several reasons - the most cogent being that I am not a native speaker
Heck, you write English better than many Englishmen I know...
73,
Ged.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
Greetings.
Randy That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
Randy a few comments below appear below ...
Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
with the possible exception of what follows.
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
Greetings.
Randy That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
Randy a few comments below appear below ...
Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
with the possible exception
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Don't modify the guide, just throw some random and structured winXX
notes into a new doc,and we just add it to the guide as a new chapter.
Then people start sending patches and polish it, like the rest of the
chapters. The new 2.0 docs generation will
Greetings.
Randy That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
Randy a few comments below appear below ...
Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
with the possible exception of what follows.
Randy I got confused about which is the first and which
Greetings.
This
documentationpatchaddressesthe single thread snafu
on Win32.
Comments, corrections and additions
(even subtractions) welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc
does this fit?)
Cheers,
alf
modperl_multithread_NT.pod
Description: Binary data
Greetings.
[following Stas' suggestion I have subscribed to the list and
posted the patch there, so I am crossposting]
Do you know if FastCGI is multi-threaded or multi-process on
Windows?
Multi process. Each process speaks tomod_fastcgi over a
named pipe. As you mention, this (being
Greetings.
[...]
This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32.
Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions)
welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this
fit?)
Nice, but please repost it inlined. Otherwise people won't be able to
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
Greetings.
[...]
This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32.
Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions)
welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this
fit?)
Nice, but
So mod_perl has a slight speed edge over fastcgi (which is overthrottled a
little with four servers).
Really? Maybe this is because multi-process handling isn't as fast on NT.
Does it change much if you vary the number of servers?
My goal is to give some kind of useful suggestion to people
Greetings.
So mod_perl has a slight speed edge over fastcgi (which is overthrottled
a
little with four servers).
Really? Maybe this is because multi-process handling isn't as fast on NT.
Does it change much if you vary the number of servers?
Well, I am getting a little wary of the numbers I
Hi,
I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during in
a
perlmonks discussion.
I was the one who suggested it. Why don't you take a shot at writing
it? The modperl.pod seems like the logical place to patch. Then Stas
could add your information to the guide as well. If
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Hi,
I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during
in a perlmonks discussion.
I was the one who suggested it. Why don't you take a shot at writing
it? The modperl.pod seems like the logical place to patch. Then Stas
could
[this probably belong to the list]
I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during in a
perlmonks discussion.
I feel that mod_perl's single threadedness on the Win32 platforms really
warrants some more prominence in the docs. (How about 18pt bold red
warning on page 1?
16 matches
Mail list logo
