On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
> However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
> button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
> we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
I think that we need one "theme" of buttons, to ens
In article <001401c1cc08$bab4f2b0$b1a1a8c2@orpheus>,
Jonathan M. Hollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I request your comments on this idea...
Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo? Could Michael
be persuaded to create one if not?
I'm inclined to think a new logo i
:: I think that we need one "theme" of buttons, to ensure
:: consistent branding. As per my comments when I voted
:: stated, I'd love to see some buttons/logos based on the
:: winning logo. In particular:
::
:: - A square button that's just made up of the square cog logo
:: - A square butt
:: Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo?
:: Could Michael be persuaded to create one if not?
::
:: I'm inclined to think a new logo is little use if you're not
:: consistent with the imagery it uses. Tying a button design
:: into that imagery is, IMO, essential.
I will f
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
> :: Is the logo available in a vector file format so that we can
> :: easily make
> :: scaled copies of it? Or are we restricted to the pixel banners that
> :: currently exist?
>
> All I have is non-vector JPEG. Again, I'll ask Michael.
If we can
Hi
( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
> However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
> button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
> we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
TMTOWTDI, of course- multiple buttons!
--
\js
:: Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo?
:: Could Michael be persuaded to create one if not?
::
:: I'm inclined to think a new logo is little use if you're not
:: consistent with the imagery it uses. Tying a button design
:: into that imagery is, IMO, essential.
Michael
I think buttons based on the new logo are the way to go.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan M. Hollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:17 AM
> To: 'Andrew Green'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE
All,
I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
realized that the logo uses "modperl", whereas mod_perl's name is
"mod_perl", with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
I've always been annoyed at how often the spelling gets modified, and it
seems t
David Ranney wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
> realized that the logo uses "modperl", whereas mod_perl's name is
> "mod_perl", with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
> I've always been annoyed at how often the spel
Hi there,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, David Ranney wrote:
> I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
> realized that the logo uses "modperl", whereas mod_perl's name is
> "mod_perl", with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
> I've always been annoyed a
At 10:46 PM 3/15/2002, John Saylor wrote:
>Hi
>
>( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
> > However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
> > button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
> > we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
:: I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it.
:: However, I just realized that the logo uses "modperl",
:: whereas mod_perl's name is "mod_perl", with the underscore.
:: Does anyone else see this as a problem? I've always been
:: annoyed at how often the spelling gets modified, an
"Jonathan M. Hollin" wrote:
>
> Fellow mod_perl hackers...
>
> It is with great pleasure that I am able to introduce you to the new
> mod_perl logo. So, without further ado, point your web-browsers at:
>
> http://beverley2.digital-word.com/mod_perl/winner/
>
> The winning logo, designed by Mi
> The underscore really belongs to the "C/C++" language and isn't really
> so much of a standard in Perl.
Not true. From perlstyle:
While short identifiers like $gotit are probably ok,
use underscores to separate words. It is generally
easier to read $var_names_like_this than $VarName
At 04:33 PM 03/15/02 -0500, Georgy Vladimirov wrote:
>I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't think an
>underscore is very collaborative with art. The "_" has always been
>irritating me a little.
>
>I know that there is history and nostalgia involved here but dropping
>an undersco
Hello,
WK>A single button that matches the logo will be simplier, and more
WK>distinct. Too many choices is making it harder for the newcomers.
I agree here. But then, TMTOWTDI is a big part of Perl culture. I suggest
a democratic solution: present the logo and the favorite logo-based button
as
DR>I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
DR>realized that the logo uses "modperl", whereas mod_perl's name is
DR>"mod_perl", with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
BM>It's a graphic design so I don't see that it needs to follow the Apache
BM
> A thought - what about putting the suggestion of an underscore by
> putting bars underneath the d and p of "modperl"? Just a suggestion
> to Michael as presumably he is revisting the design for the buttons.
This is a funny discussion. Although not my favorite Logo has been
elected, I confirm th
OK, here's my attempt at SVGing the logo. Works in Adobe's SVG viewer
(Linux and Windows). I'll work on animating it next (making the cog spin).
--
<:->Get a smart net
mod_perl logo
Michael Demers' mod_perl logo
mod
perl
Mark Fowler wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
>
> > However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
> > button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
> > we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
>
> I think that
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Steve Piner wrote:
> I definitely agree with this. I'd like to see some more colour
> variations (maybe just background colours even) to allow it to fit into
> a site's design better.
>
> Jonathan asked whether we should have just one button, or several. I'd
> say just one th
:: I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't
:: think an underscore is very collaborative with art. The "_"
:: has always been irritating me a little.
I don't see any reason why the underscore can't be incorporated
"discreetly". I had an idea that we could have the "dp" together
:: I agree here. But then, TMTOWTDI is a big part of Perl
:: culture. I suggest a democratic solution: present the logo
:: and the favorite logo-based button as "the" logo and button.
:: Then, also present a page which has some alternate buttons
:: on it, including the two winners of the prese
:: A thought - what about putting the suggestion of an
:: underscore by putting bars underneath the d and p of
:: "modperl"? Just a suggestion to Michael as presumably he is
:: revisting the design for the buttons.
I had a similar idea - a single bar under the "dp" yet keeping the "dp"
togethe
Could you make it flaming? ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Jonathan M. Hollin
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The New "mod_perl" logo -
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> To make things thing even more complicated I agree the need of a name
> with a sounding image, which will help mod_perl to grow into corporate
> computing (our future jobs).
>
> Recently I had a discussion with a Java programmer, who said that
"Georgy Vladimirov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't think an
> underscore is very collaborative with art. The "_" has always been
> irritating me a little.
>
> I know that there is history and nostalgia involved here but dropping
> an undersco
28 matches
Mail list logo
