On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Paul Lindner wrote:
I think that this may be a problem with the use of Perl sections.
I believe your original post had something like this:
Perl
use Apache::DProf
use Apache::DB
Apache::DB-init();
/Perl
Nope. That was Perrin Harkins, but I tried it too!
What will happen if the client's DNS caches the domain name to an IP, which
is then dead ? If I understand it corrently, the current system can work
only if there is something like NAT in front of the machines, which
dynaimcally forward each request. Won't it ?
Peter Bi
- Original
At 03:48 18.04.2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
Friends,
I know Apache/Mod_Perl on OS other than Windows to be the trend du juor.
However, I am in jitters seeing this explicit warning given in
http://www.perl.com web-portal.
NOTE: it is not recommended to use Windows for production Apache/mod_perl
Hi there!
I can't manage very well with Apache and mod_perl. I have made an
installation of mod_perl WITHOUT building a new httpd daemon (NO_HTTPD=1),
undergoing all the steps until the end (perl MAKEFILE_PL, make, make
install). After that, I read on the Stas Bekman's guide at
Darragh Sherwin wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give up
with mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
It build configured Apache with following options :
./configure --with-mpm=prefork
Hi all,
I'm a little confused (honestly). I want to handle parameter errors in a
content handler. When there's a parameter missing in the URL, my handler
returns HTTP_BAD_REQUEST.
Now Apache sees the HTTP_BAD_REQUEST return value from my handler and
generates an error (HTML) document.
How
Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of mine, be construed as there
are NO takers out there who have their Web Sites in Production, running out of Apache
1.XX and Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
Primarily we are a Microsoft shop, and I would like to answer this question to
Bas A. Schulte wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little confused (honestly). I want to handle parameter errors in a
content handler. When there's a parameter missing in the URL, my handler
returns HTTP_BAD_REQUEST.
Now Apache sees the HTTP_BAD_REQUEST return value from my handler and
generates
At 16:57 18.04.2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of mine, be
construed as there are NO takers out there who have their Web Sites in
Production, running out of Apache 1.XX and Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
Primarily we are a Microsoft shop, and I
Hi,
Stas Bekman wrote:
Darragh Sherwin wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give
up with mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
It build configured Apache with following options :
./configure --with-mpm=prefork
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Darragh Sherwin wrote:
I did this with the enviromental varible CFLAGS=-DUSE_ITHREADS
...
MP_CCOPTS=-DUSE_ITHREADS
you can't do that. and that is the source of your problems.
if you are going to use a threaded mpm, *perl* needs to be built with
ithreads enabled.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Also why do you need to use MP_AP_PREFIX? Use MP_APXS= instead. You
don't need Apache sources to build mod_perl as DSO.
MP_AP_PREFIX is not the source tree, it is the install tree. all modperl
needs is the include/ directory from the install tree, it
I implemented Apache::AuthCookieDBI for the logins to my web site.
AuthCookieDBI requires Apache::DBI. This all works great.
I have also started using embperl. This seems to work fairly good as well
except it inherited the Apache::DBI from my AuthCookieDBI implementation.
Now I get 6
Hi,
I'm looking for a two-way cipher to obfuscate URL parameters
safely and succinctly (not too many extra characters).
# For example, something that converts this URL:
$url = 'http://www.foo.com?a=1212u=http://www.foo1.com?a=12323';
# to an encoded URL with the
# For example, something that converts this URL:
$url = 'http://www.foo.com?a=1212u=http://www.foo1.com?a=12323';
# that looks like this:
http://www.foo.com?params=aJHKJHKJHKJHHGHFTDTDGDFDFGDGHDHG879879
Why are you trying to do this? What's the goal here?
xoox,
Nigel Hamilton writes:
http://www.foo.com?params=aJHKJHKJHKJHHGHFTDTDGDFDFGDGHDHG879879
A built-in checksum would be a bonus ... any ideas?
You can use any of the Crypt::CBC ciphers. We then use a modified
MIME::Base64 encoding which is more compact than encrypt_hex
and
# For example, something that converts this URL:
$url = 'http://www.foo.com?a=1212u=http://www.foo1.com?a=12323';
# that looks like this:
http://www.foo.com?params=aJHKJHKJHKJHHGHFTDTDGDFDFGDGHDHG879879
Why are you trying to do this? What's the goal here?
HI,
Apache::Onanox is a framework for multi-user websites. It supports user
customisation and theming. It has a document management facility.
It is currently in beta testing. It is my final project for my
university degree and I'm looking for feedback to put into my report. If
you try it out, I'd
What version apache/mod_perl are you running? Also, were these intel
solaris 7 servers or sparc?
We've recently started trying to migrate a number of Solaris 7 machines to
Solaris 8, and everything seemed fine for a while.
We have each box running its own static, dynamic (mod_perl) and ssl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:19:09AM -0700, Fernando Munoz wrote:
Thanks for your input Stas. I followed (step-by-step) the installation
suggested in the guide and I ended with the same message after ..
# perl Makefile.PL USE_APACI=1 EVERYTHING=1 \
DO_HTTPD=1 SSL_BASE=/usr/local/ssl \
We're running Apache 1.3.12, as for the mod_perl version, it's not
reported in the logs when the servers start and there doesn't seem to be
any source lying around, so I'm not sure how to determine its version
number. If you could point me in the right direction on that, I'd
appreciate it.
Nevermind about mod_perl version number, looks like we're running 1.24
Brian Nilsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Marc Slagle wrote:
What version apache/mod_perl are you running? Also, were these intel
solaris 7 servers or sparc?
We've recently started trying to
We've recently started trying to migrate a number of Solaris 7 machines to
Solaris 8, and everything seemed fine for a while.
We have each box running its own static, dynamic (mod_perl) and ssl
servers, and everything runs fine for 3-7 hours after starting the server.
Eventually, however, the
Hi
( 02.04.18 17:32 -0500 ) Nigel Hamilton:
I'm looking for a two-way cipher to obfuscate URL parameters
safely and succinctly (not too many extra characters).
If you just want to obfuscate, you can do a rot13, with special
substitutions for non alpha charachters. Or any other 'roll
Well I tried your suggestion and it didn't work at first but, after revising
my steps I noticed that $LD_LIBRARY_PATH did not have /usr/local/ssl/lib
(where libssl libraries live) so I push that path there and ssl passed.
Unfortunately I got a different problem now ..
=== src/modules/ssl
===
Fernando Munoz wrote:
Well I tried your suggestion and it didn't work at first but, after revising
my steps I noticed that $LD_LIBRARY_PATH did not have /usr/local/ssl/lib
(where libssl libraries live) so I push that path there and ssl passed.
Unfortunately I got a different problem now ..
Hello,
JSIf you just want to obfuscate, you can do a rot13, with special
JSsubstitutions for non alpha charachters. Or any other 'roll your own'
JSsolution [XOR against 'snakeoil' then URL encode what needs it].
For simple obfuscation, I would prefer Base64 (using MIME::Base64 in
Perl). It's
Thank you... cant believe I missed that... was to excited about the ability to do my
own auth program
I added
allow from x.x.x.x
and it worked great
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
How can i restart the named
service via mod_perl.
The script will be activated via a web
page.
My apache is configured to use "User: apache,
Group: apache"
Is ther any other way except usine "User
root"directive in my httpd.conf file
Hamid
You could use sudo and give the apache user permission to run, as root,
whichever command you use to restart the server.
Steve
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Abd El-Hameed Mohammed wrote:
Hi,
How can i restart the named service via mod_perl.
The script will be activated via a web page.
My apache
or you would be safer running your name server as named as opposed to root.
STEVE
You could use sudo and give the apache user permission to run, as root,
whichever command you use to restart the server.
Steve
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Abd El-Hameed Mohammed wrote:
Hi,
How can i restart
Nigel Hamilton wrote:
I'm looking for a two-way cipher to obfuscate URL parameters
safely and succinctly (not too many extra characters).
Try Crypt::CBC.
- Perrin
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or you would be safer running your name server as named as opposed
to root.
STEVE
It should be run as named, but trying to start and stop it as the named
user won't get you very far if you plan on using port 53. :-)
We had problems with that combination of apache/mod_perl, on solaris 8 as
well. We switched to mod_perl 1.25 and that fixed our problems. Since then
we have also moved to newer versions of apache. I would build a newer
version of apache/mod_perl on one of the systems and then leave the
Folks,
I don't seem to be able to make pnotes, notes or subprocess_env work. I
am trying to pass a value from a handler to another, and from what I
have read in the Eagle, and cook book, the request ought to be the main
one in order for the pnotes, ... to work. So Here is the snippet of my
code:
* Rasoul Hajikhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-18 16:29]:
I don't seem to be able to make pnotes, notes or subprocess_env work.
I am trying to pass a value from a handler to another, and from what I
have read in the Eagle, and cook book, the request ought to be the
main one in order for the
* Stephen Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-18 15:34]:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or you would be safer running your name server as named as opposed
to root.
STEVE
It should be run as named, but trying to start and stop it as the
named user won't get you very far if
Hi,
I read about this the other day... lemesee where did I read this...
Oh yes! In Web Security, Privacy and Commerce by Simson Garfinkel,
p. 453-454.
The perl code is on those pages.
Elizabeth
Nigel Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'm looking for a two-way cipher to
Thank you very much Stas and Mark !... Everything went fine and I have a
fresh Apache+mod_perl+mod_ssl running is this box. I noticed though that
after rebooting I need to push again the path into $LD_LIBRARY_PATH for
apache to run ??? any suggestion ?. But again Thanks so much.
-Original
I recently applied the glibc updates described at
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2002-056.html to a system
running Apache 1.2.22/modperl 1.2.26 on a Perl 5.6.1/Redhat Linux 7.2
system.
All seemed well until I updated Apache::Cookie to the latest version and
restarted apache.
Edward Moon wrote:
I recently applied the glibc updates described at
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2002-056.html to a system
running Apache 1.2.22/modperl 1.2.26 on a Perl 5.6.1/Redhat Linux 7.2
system.
All seemed well until I updated Apache::Cookie to the latest version and
I did that Stas. I forgot to mention that I updated Apache::Cookie via
CPAN.
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
[snip]
looks like you have a broken or missing binary package. It says exactly
what's your problem - it cannot find the library. Check that you have
the right symlinks
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:15:15PM -0500, Salvador Ortiz Garcia babbled thus:
Subject: Re: Problem with Perl sections in httpd.conf, mod_perl 1.26
From: Salvador Ortiz Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PinkFreud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3
Date: 18
Hi,
Wasn't there just a thread on throttling a few weeks ago?
I had a machine hit hard yesterday with a spider that ignored robots.txt.
Load average was over 90 on a dual CPU Enterprise 3500 running Solaris 2.6.
It's a mod_perl server, but has a few CGI scripts that it handles, and the
On Friday 19 April 2002 6:55 am, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi,
Wasn't there just a thread on throttling a few weeks ago?
I had a machine hit hard yesterday with a spider that ignored robots.txt.
I thought the standard practice these days was to put some URL at an
un-reachable place (by a human),
45 matches
Mail list logo
