[OT] Re[2]: temporal directory used by apache/mod-perl?

2003-06-18 Thread Mike P. Mikhailov
Hello Hector Pizarro, Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 12:21:54 AM, you wrote: HP Apache::Request has a bug, it doesn't throw an error code when the file is HP partially uploaded. That's why I'm using Apache read() instead. Any idea HP how tosetup the temporal directory for mod-perl without

doc discrepancy?

2003-06-18 Thread Shannon Eric Peevey
Hi! Just doing some late night reading, and found something in the second paragraph under the PerlAuthenHandler heading in the following webpage: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/http.html#PerlAuthenHandler !--- Otherwise the handler returns *|Apache::AUTH_REQUIRED|* to indicate

Re: mod_perl slower than expected? - Test Code!

2003-06-18 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Trevor Phillips wrote: Whether it's i686 or i386 - both mod_perl and FastCGI are using the same compile of perl - so what difference should there be? Must have got my wires crossed somewhere - I thought you must be using different Perls. 73, Ged.

Re: mp2: right place to unescape HTML?

2003-06-18 Thread Carl Brewer
Stas Bekman wrote: Carl Brewer wrote: I'm using Stas's read_post() call from the test directory in mp1.99-10-dev, and am using it to grab POST data of the form of an email address .. this is giving me this : read_post returned : username=carl%40somewherepassword=foo Escaped the @ ... of

Re: mp2: Session method not seeming to set extra records?

2003-06-18 Thread Carl Brewer
Carl Brewer wrote: I'm an idiot :) It's important that the user accessing a MySQL database to do any work with Apache::Session::MySQL or Session have update permission as well as insert, select and delete on the sessions table. Carl

RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread jaco.greyling
Hey Sorry - it took 30 mins to receive the confirmation (wasn't sure if it went through successfully the 1st time)... Anyway, I don't have a BUG to report - all I want to know is, is it SAVE to run non-LFS Apache with LFS Perl using mod_perl LFS. It works...sure...but I'm not sure what the

Perl 6 + mod_perl

2003-06-18 Thread Nigel Hamilton
Hi, I've just been reading Stas + Eric's new book - it looks great - well done to everyone involved! The Apache 2.0, mp2 section is really interesting and when things stabilise here at turbo10.com we will change over to it in production. While reading this

Re: doc discrepancy?

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Shannon Eric Peevey wrote: Hi! Just doing some late night reading, and found something in the second paragraph under the PerlAuthenHandler heading in the following webpage: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/http.html#PerlAuthenHandler !--- Otherwise the handler returns

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to release its 1.2's version). Please try it out: http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz Test it with mod_perl 1.0: perl Makefile.PL

MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Sergeant
Anyone got any experience of doing MS SQL Server from mod_perl on Linux (via the FreeTDS drivers)? Any gotchas I should be aware of? I have a very high performance requirements application (millions of hits/day) and I need to know the architecture can cope with it (the alternative being

ANNOUNCE: Cache::Mmap 0.07

2003-06-18 Thread Peter Haworth
Anyone running 0.05 on perl 5.6.0 or later should upgrade to this version, unless they are absolutely sure that none of their cached data contains UTF8 encoded characters. I didn't think my data did, but my caches were exhibiting some very peculiar behaviour because of it. From the README: This

Re: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Sorry - it took 30 mins to receive the confirmation (wasn't sure if it went through successfully the 1st time)... Anyway, I don't have a BUG to report - all I want to know is, is it SAVE to run non-LFS Apache with LFS Perl using mod_perl LFS. It

RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread jaco.greyling
Thanks for your prompt response! We did compile Apache with CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 but we're trying to move away from this now, because of vendors like IBM and Oracle not willing to re-compile (websphere mods and mod_ossos) with the same flags. Thus without

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
[Xavier, please keep reports on the list so others won't have to duplicate the effort for reported platforms/setups ;) thanks ] Xavier Noria wrote: On Wednesday 18 June 2003 11:13, Stas Bekman wrote: I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on

Re: MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Matt Sergeant wrote: Anyone got any experience of doing MS SQL Server from mod_perl on Linux (via the FreeTDS drivers)? Not under mod_perl, but I think the experience is still relevant. Any gotchas I should be aware of? I have a very high performance requirements application (millions of

Re: mod_perl slower than expected? - Test Code!

2003-06-18 Thread Joe Schaefer
Trevor Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] On my main dev box, ab gives an average of 8.8secs for the mod_perl run, and 7.2secs for the FastCGI run. The internal timer and printed output reflects these results too. How does the cgi/command-line version stack up? AFAICT your test isn't

Re: MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Cosimo Streppone wrote: Any gotchas I should be aware of? I have a very high performance requirements application (millions of hits/day) and I need to know the architecture can cope with it (the alternative being PostgreSQL). Sorry if I mention obvious things, but I

Re: mod_perl slower than expected? - Test Code!

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Schaefer wrote: Trevor Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] On my main dev box, ab gives an average of 8.8secs for the mod_perl run, and 7.2secs for the FastCGI run. The internal timer and printed output reflects these results too. How does the cgi/command-line version stack up?

RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus without re-compiling my whole Perl 5.8.0 build I need to come up with a solution. I really don't see why you don't recompile your Perl. It's not a big deal and it's going to be a lot safer that way. Sorry for my ignorance but it

Re: mod_perl slower than expected? - Test Code!

2003-06-18 Thread Trevor Phillips
Stas Bekman wrote: Joe Schaefer wrote: I doubt that this makes any difference. I think what makes the difference is the fact that the mod_perl handler is setup via .htaccess. Have you tried setting it in httpd.conf? Otherwise it's parsed on each request, no surprises that it's slower. Eh? How

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi Stas, On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Please try it out: http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz Neat! 73, Ged. Script started on Wed Jun 18 13:29:03 2003 hurricane:~/src/Apache-Test-1.03-dev$ t/TEST -times=10 -order=random *** setting ulimit to allow core files

RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread jaco.greyling
Ok - This comes from the Makefile.PL: sub uselargefiles_check { return unless $] = 5.006 and $Config{uselargefiles} and $PERL_USELARGEFILES and $USE_APXS; local $Apache::src::APXS = $WITH_APXS; my $cflags = Apache::src-new-apxs('-q' = 'CFLAGS') || ''; return if $cflags =~

mod_perl 2 and file upload how-to

2003-06-18 Thread Alejandro Galue
Hello, I need help in file uploading with mod_perl 2. Apache::Request is not compatible with mod_perl 2, and I want to know how can I upload file widthout using CGI.pm Please send me an example if possible. Thanks, Alejandro.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Today at 7:13pm, SB=Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SB Please try it out: SB http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz SB 1) Gentoo Linux 1.4 (2.4.20-ck6), perl 5.8.0, apache 2.0.46, mod_perl 1.9909 2) Redhat Linux 8.0 (2.4.18), perl 5.8.0, apache 2.0.44, mod_perl 1.9908

Re: MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread Andy Wardley
Matt Sergeant wrote: Anyone got any experience of doing MS SQL Server from mod_perl on Linux (via the FreeTDS drivers)? Only a little, but I know that Simon Matthews ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has done a lot. ISTR he switched from Postgres to SQL Server (from mod_perl front end, via FreeTDS) and

RE: MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread FARRINGTON, RYAN
Title: RE: MS SQL Server omg... linux people using MS SQL servers? shame on you... =) -Original Message- From: Andy Wardley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:15 AM To: Matt Sergeant Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MS SQL Server Matt Sergeant wrote:

RE: non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread jaco.greyling
Hi, mod_perl does not look different between 2 builds (lfs and non-lfs apache) - our assumption that mod_perl shares memory with Apache might just be wrong or there is a way for mod_perl to make system calls with lfs against perl and non-lfs against apache. Hence we need a developer feedback

Re: [OT] Re[2]: temporal directory used by apache/mod-perl?

2003-06-18 Thread Hector Pizarro
That will do it, thanks! Hello Hector Pizarro, Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 12:21:54 AM, you wrote: HP Apache::Request has a bug, it doesn't throw an error code when the file is HP partially uploaded. That's why I'm using Apache read() instead. Any idea HP how tosetup the temporal directory

RE: MS SQL Server [x-adr]

2003-06-18 Thread Garrett Goebel
Title: RE: MS SQL Server [x-adr] Matt Sergeant wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Cosimo Streppone wrote: 1) lack of placeholders support with DBD::Sybase + Freetds layer. I used freetds 0.53, but 0.61 had the same problem for me. Ah, that explains why people are using unixODBC with the TDS

RE: MS SQL Server

2003-06-18 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, FARRINGTON, RYAN wrote: omg... linux people using MS SQL servers? shame on you... =) I hold in one hand the option of taking a pager home with me. In the other hand is using MS SQL Server and giving support over to our 24/7 DBAs. Which would you choose? -- !-- Matt --

non-LFS Apache 1.3.27 w/ LFS Perl 5.8.0 (using mod_perl)

2003-06-18 Thread Jaco Greyling
All Sorry if this question goes out to the wrong discussion group, but I've been told if anyone could answer this then it'll be someone on this forum :) Ok, here goes... We use Perl 5.6.x and Perl 5.8.0 with LFS. We also use mod_perl 1.27 with LFS and Apache 1.3.27 (with LFS). To make a long

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to release its 1.2's version). Please try it out: http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz Thank you all very much for

Re: mod_perl 2 and file upload how-to

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Alejandro Galue wrote: Hello, I need help in file uploading with mod_perl 2. Apache::Request is not compatible with mod_perl 2, and I want to know how can I upload file widthout using CGI.pm Please send me an example if possible. Simply copy the relevant code from CGI.pm. Alternatively if you

Few Important Questions

2003-06-18 Thread Mustafa Tan
Hi Everybody, mod_perl is a great software. Thanks for everybody who spent time on it and make it available. When you send a reply to this, can you also describe how we can help, as an individiual, to support mod_perl and people behind it financially. Now here are some of my questions. I am