On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
To make things thing even more complicated I agree the need of a name
with a sounding image, which will help mod_perl to grow into corporate
computing (our future jobs).
Recently I had a discussion with a Java programmer, who said that
:: I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't
:: think an underscore is very collaborative with art. The _
:: has always been irritating me a little.
I don't see any reason why the underscore can't be incorporated
discreetly. I had an idea that we could have the dp together
:: I agree here. But then, TMTOWTDI is a big part of Perl
:: culture. I suggest a democratic solution: present the logo
:: and the favorite logo-based button as the logo and button.
:: Then, also present a page which has some alternate buttons
:: on it, including the two winners of the
:: A thought - what about putting the suggestion of an
:: underscore by putting bars underneath the d and p of
:: modperl? Just a suggestion to Michael as presumably he is
:: revisting the design for the buttons.
I had a similar idea - a single bar under the dp yet keeping the dp
together.
Could you make it flaming? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Jonathan M. Hollin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The New mod_perl logo - results now in...
OK, here's my
Mark Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
I think that we need
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Steve Piner wrote:
I definitely agree with this. I'd like to see some more colour
variations (maybe just background colours even) to allow it to fit into
a site's design better.
Jonathan asked whether we should have just one button, or several. I'd
say just one theme,
DRI really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
DRrealized that the logo uses modperl, whereas mod_perl's name is
DRmod_perl, with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
BMIt's a graphic design so I don't see that it needs to follow the Apache
BMmodule
Application R* Language'?
On and on just some funny thoughts :-)
BR Christian
== beginn original ==
Date: Freitag, 15. März 2002, 11:03:59
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The New mod_perl logo - results now in...
Fellow mod_perl hackers...
It is with great pleasure that I am able to introduce
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 08:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I had a discussion with a Java programmer, who said that
mod_perl is a try to save the obsolete language Perl. His argument was
that only Java programmers are searched, especially here in Europe.
Interesting. I have a friend
Fellow mod_perl hackers...
It is with great pleasure that I am able to introduce you to the new
mod_perl logo. So, without further ado, point your web-browsers at:
http://beverley2.digital-word.com/mod_perl/winner/
The winning logo, designed by Michael Demers (mike [at] inteo.com), won
by a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
I think that we need one theme of buttons, to ensure
In article 001401c1cc08$bab4f2b0$b1a1a8c2@orpheus,
Jonathan M. Hollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I request your comments on this idea...
Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo? Could Michael
be persuaded to create one if not?
I'm inclined to think a new logo is
:: I think that we need one theme of buttons, to ensure
:: consistent branding. As per my comments when I voted
:: stated, I'd love to see some buttons/logos based on the
:: winning logo. In particular:
::
:: - A square button that's just made up of the square cog logo
:: - A square
:: Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo?
:: Could Michael be persuaded to create one if not?
::
:: I'm inclined to think a new logo is little use if you're not
:: consistent with the imagery it uses. Tying a button design
:: into that imagery is, IMO, essential.
I will
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
:: Is the logo available in a vector file format so that we can
:: easily make
:: scaled copies of it? Or are we restricted to the pixel banners that
:: currently exist?
All I have is non-vector JPEG. Again, I'll ask Michael.
If we can find
Hi
( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
TMTOWTDI, of course- multiple buttons!
--
\js
:: Was there a button in the same style as the winning logo?
:: Could Michael be persuaded to create one if not?
::
:: I'm inclined to think a new logo is little use if you're not
:: consistent with the imagery it uses. Tying a button design
:: into that imagery is, IMO, essential.
Michael
I think buttons based on the new logo are the way to go.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan M. Hollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:17 AM
To: 'Andrew Green'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] The New mod_perl logo - results now
All,
I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
realized that the logo uses modperl, whereas mod_perl's name is
mod_perl, with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
I've always been annoyed at how often the spelling gets modified, and it
seems that
David Ranney wrote:
All,
I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
realized that the logo uses modperl, whereas mod_perl's name is
mod_perl, with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
I've always been annoyed at how often the spelling gets
Hi there,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, David Ranney wrote:
I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it. However, I just
realized that the logo uses modperl, whereas mod_perl's name is
mod_perl, with the underscore. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
I've always been annoyed at how
At 10:46 PM 3/15/2002, John Saylor wrote:
Hi
( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
:: I really like the new logo, and in fact I voted for it.
:: However, I just realized that the logo uses modperl,
:: whereas mod_perl's name is mod_perl, with the underscore.
:: Does anyone else see this as a problem? I've always been
:: annoyed at how often the spelling gets modified, and
Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
Fellow mod_perl hackers...
It is with great pleasure that I am able to introduce you to the new
mod_perl logo. So, without further ado, point your web-browsers at:
http://beverley2.digital-word.com/mod_perl/winner/
The winning logo, designed by Michael
The underscore really belongs to the C/C++ language and isn't really
so much of a standard in Perl.
Not true. From perlstyle:
While short identifiers like $gotit are probably ok,
use underscores to separate words. It is generally
easier to read $var_names_like_this than
At 04:33 PM 03/15/02 -0500, Georgy Vladimirov wrote:
I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't think an
underscore is very collaborative with art. The _ has always been
irritating me a little.
I know that there is history and nostalgia involved here but dropping
an underscore at
Hello,
WKA single button that matches the logo will be simplier, and more
WKdistinct. Too many choices is making it harder for the newcomers.
I agree here. But then, TMTOWTDI is a big part of Perl culture. I suggest
a democratic solution: present the logo and the favorite logo-based button
as
Georgy Vladimirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually like the logo without the underscore. I don't think an
underscore is very collaborative with art. The _ has always been
irritating me a little.
I know that there is history and nostalgia involved here but dropping
an underscore at least
29 matches
Mail list logo
