On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Bill Moseley wrote:
This is probably more of a Friday topic:
Simon Cozens discusses "Microperl" in the current The Perl Journal.
I don't build mod_rewrite into a mod_perl Apache as I like rewriting with
mod_perl much better. But it doesn't make much s
you mean but this is MicroPerl, not Perl. I don't know how much
difference it makes, but it's certainly smaller. I'm afraid I can't help
with embedding it though. I like the idea, not just for rewrites (I'm quite
happy with mod_rewrite most of the time) but for all the conf stuff. It
doesn't have
At 18:35 16/11/2000 +0100, Fabrice Scemama wrote:
ok so what about miniperl, which is used when building perl?
I think using whichever of the small perls that are used during build (or
were thought about to use during build) could potentially be interesting.
-- robin b.
As a computer, I find
At 18:35 16/11/2000 +0100, Fabrice Scemama wrote:
ok so what about miniperl, which is used when building perl?
Is your question, what about embedding miniperl rather than microperl ? I
don't know enough about the diffs to decide, and anyway I couldn't do the
job myself. I was just supporting
?
Is your question, what about embedding miniperl rather than microperl ? I
don't know enough about the diffs to decide, and anyway I couldn't do the
job myself. I was just supporting bill's idea as one that I think could be
interesting, should anyone have tuits to spare on testing this out
At 08:53 17/11/2000 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
However, at the same time... I do know that when I go to the Microsoft
World I get really annoyed at the fact that VBScript syntax means different
things to different apps including IIS. And that it's so different from VB,
I can't believe
This is probably more of a Friday topic:
Simon Cozens discusses "Microperl" in the current The Perl Journal.
I don't build mod_rewrite into a mod_perl Apache as I like rewriting with
mod_perl much better. But it doesn't make much sense to go that route for
a light-weight front-en
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moseley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:30 PM
Subject: Microperl
I don't build mod_rewrite into a mod_perl Apache as I like rewriting with
mod_perl much better. But it doesn't make much s
At 07:38 PM 11/15/00 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moseley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:30 PM
Subject: Microperl
I don't build mod_rewrite into a mod_perl Apache as I like rewriting with
mod
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moseley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Les Mikesell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Microperl
I don't build mod_rewrite into a mod_perl Apache as I like rewriting
with
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
I know what you mean but this is MicroPerl, not Perl. I don't know how much
difference it makes, but it's certainly smaller. I'm afraid I can't help
with embedding it though. I like the idea, not just for rewrites (I'm quite
happy with mod_rewrite
11 matches
Mail list logo
