Hello here to everybody who helped me when i was in troubles...
I write this just to tell you where i am now, i hope it will help you to
understand something new in the linker (???) subject.
So, my problem was, that i was unable to compile modperl 2 with apache 2.
Not exactly will you say, i was
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
[...]
My mistake
was that i removed perl, and so everything which has been previously
configured with default perl version was broken and unable to work with the
new perl installation i made...
for the future, you can always install perl to a special directory (e.g.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:47:33PM +0200, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Please do:
cd src/modules/perl/
rm mod_perl.so
make -f Makefile.modperl
Here we go:
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.modperl
rm
Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:47:33PM +0200, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Please do:
cd src/modules/perl/
rm mod_perl.so
make -f Makefile.modperl
Here we go:
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.modperl
rm
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:26:43AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
This problem is probably caused by a bogus libperl.a on your system
somewhere. What does:
ls -l /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE/libperl.* /usr/lib/libperl.* \
/usr/local/lib/libperl.*
give?
IMHO, it's
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:26:43AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
This problem is probably caused by a bogus libperl.a on your system
somewhere. What does:
ls -l /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE/libperl.* /usr/lib/libperl.* \
/usr/local/lib/libperl.*
give?
IMHO, it's
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a
dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it
must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statically.
I doubt that this is
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a
dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it
must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statically.
I doubt that
Hi Pierre,
You're in the right place. I run Apache with Debian and have had
troubles in the past with compiling mod_perl due to having two copies of
libperl.so[1]; I think this would more likely be the case if you have
compiled Perl yourself.
William
[1]
Hi Pierre,
Hello William,
I run Apache with Debian and have had
troubles in the past with compiling mod_perl due to having two copies of
libperl.so[1]; I think this would more likely be the case if you have
compiled Perl yourself.
We discussed about all this with Stas and we arrived at the
Hello Nick,
If you want mod_perl for Apache2 in Debian, I'd suggest you use a
packaged
version; it's a lot easier.
My problem is, that i CANT get the debian package because i compiled
installed apache manualy. Few weeks ago i tryed to override some debian
dependency packages, and the result
Hello all,
I am totally new to mod_perl mailing list so maybe
i am not posting in the right place.
I recently installed a debian woody on a pentium
based box. I also managed to install Apache 2 (with php and some others modules)
and it works perfectly as i was waiting it to do :)
I red
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Hello all,
I am totally new to mod_perl mailing list so maybe i am not posting in the right place.
You are posting it to the right place, Martin.
I recently installed a debian woody on a pentium based box. I also managed to install
Apache 2 (with php and some others modules)
Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MARTIN Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [mp2] Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Hello all,
I am totally new to mod_perl mailing list so maybe i am not posting in
the right
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Hello again,
Here are the needed informations, this time CCed to all the mailing list:
[one more tip: when you reply on the top (which is not the best thing to
do) please don't quote the whole previous email. The best technique is to
remove all irrelevant parts of the
Hmm, can you please paste the arguments you passed to perl Makefile.PL? I
can't figure out why the above output doesn't show a link to libperl.so
To configure i just did:
perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2 MP_INST_APACHE2=1
Is there a step before that i forgot?
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Hmm, can you please paste the arguments you passed to perl Makefile.PL? I
can't figure out why the above output doesn't show a link to libperl.so
To configure i just did:
perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2 MP_INST_APACHE2=1
Is there a step before that i forgot?
what happens if you do:
nm src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so | grep PL_
U PL_curcop
U PL_curinterp
U PL_curpad
U PL_curstack
U PL_curstackinfo
U PL_curstash
U PL_defoutgv
U PL_defstash
U PL_diehook
U PL_egid
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
what happens if you do:
nm src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so | grep PL_
U PL_curcop
OK, so we now know that perl wasn't linked statically. If it was it'd have
been shown as resolved (usually T instead of U)
and this:
ldd -r src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so
OUCH
Output is
Please do:
cd src/modules/perl/
rm mod_perl.so
make -f Makefile.modperl
Here we go:
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.modperl
rm -f mod_perl.so
cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib \
\
mod_perl.lo
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
Please do:
cd src/modules/perl/
rm mod_perl.so
make -f Makefile.modperl
Here we go:
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so
/data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.modperl
rm -f mod_perl.so
cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib \
[...]
I think your linker is broken. I say that because it included the linking
directives:
-L/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE -lperl
but the resulting mod_perl.so doesn't show it up. It should have
complained if it didn't find it. Try upgrading your linker (cc) and try
rebuilding mod_perl again.
MARTIN Pierre wrote:
I think your linker is broken. I say that because it included the linking
directives:
-L/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE -lperl
but the resulting mod_perl.so doesn't show it up. It should have
complained if it didn't find it. Try upgrading your linker (cc) and try
rebuilding
On 12/10/2004, at 11:46 AM, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
I think your linker is broken. I say that because it included the
linking
directives:
-L/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE -lperl
but the resulting mod_perl.so doesn't show it up. It should have
complained if it didn't find it. Try upgrading your linker
24 matches
Mail list logo
