Hi all,
Just want to share something I read today (fairly old news) at ApacheLounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1907
Since many (most?) people who use Apache from Apache Lounge also use
mod_fcgid and/or mod_perl, it seems that 2.2.5 will remain the best
Apache version to
Foo JH wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just want to share something I read today (fairly old news) at
> ApacheLounge:
> http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1907
>
> Since many (most?) people who use Apache from Apache Lounge also use
> mod_fcgid and/or mod_perl, it seems that 2.2.5 will remain
Right. Except there is no 2.2.5;
2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this
version can get it at ApacheLounge.
Of course 2.2.4 essentially worked, while 2.2.7 will give the modperl'ers
on Windows something they have BEGGED for forever, the chance to see parsing
error
Foo JH wrote:
>
>> Right. Except there is no 2.2.5;
> 2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this
> version can get it at ApacheLounge.
They can get it from SVN too, that doesn't mean it's an ASF version.
The ASF specifically rejected it, which makes it's persistence a pr
be a
problem of Apache for Windows, or a Windows issue, or a hardware issue, but
I don't know how to
test it.
Thank you for any idea.
Octavian
- Original Message -
From: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
> apachelounge, but they still don't work.
Simply put; Apache 2.2.4 did work.
The one-off build at AL of 2.2.6 isn't 2.2.6; 2.2.5 represents an aborted
attempted at a release, none of the above r
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apachelounge, but they still don't work.
I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and
Foo JH wrote:
> Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
>> under
>> windows and I think this thread might help me.
>>
>> I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
>> apachelounge, but they still don't work.
> I
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apacheloun
ver it is strange that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
Thank you.
Octavian
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> And I tried starting the server, but it appeared an error window "Visual
> Studio just in time debugger" and it also printed the following errors
> in the command prompt:
That's a crash. Studio will give you all the info but it's harder to
navigate, for some informati
;
To: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Foo JH"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> Well, I've uninstalled VS6 and VS.net, but this message still appears,
> so I have no where to go in Tools/Options/...
You didn't bother to finish reading;
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
Which tells you how to enable/override drwtsn32 as your default e
Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with
the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy.
Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and
libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy.
I
I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's
mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't
work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled
with VC6) may be another example of the dangers
of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8.
Point taken.
Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalyst, so I can't pinpoint the
problem. But if your tests are good with a clean install of Apache2 +
mp2, you may want to check compiler used to build Catalyst (see Randy's
email on the VC used for ActivePerl, Apache, and modperl). I suppose
Catalyst is n
---
From: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalys
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Well, I've uninstalled VS6 and VS.net, but this message still appears,
so I have no where to go in Tools/Options/...
You didn't bother to finish reading;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
Which tells you ho
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> Yes I've enabled DrWatson and I put the files with symbols in Apache
> directory, however I can't find something that could help me in the
> DrWatson log file.
Good. Don't actually interrupt the program (the example using -g {PID}
to force the program to die). Your s
and do not know who to contact.
Kind regards,
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:01:17 +0300
Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Hi Thomas,
D]>
To: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Foo JH"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Well
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
I've tried installing ActivePerl 5.8.8 built 820 and with mod_perl 2.03 and
Apache 2.2.4 the web server can start and works fine.
Could Active Perl 5.8.8 build 822 have a problem?
Are the same versions of all modules being used with both
Acti
22 matches
Mail list logo
