Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Tommy Barr <tommymb...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:21 AM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] Heritage charges Just noticed that from this weekend Heritage Auctions is charging a mini

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

V. EDU" <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Glenn Taranto <exit82afi...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Glenn Taranto <exit82afi...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM To: "MoPo-L@LISTSERV. EDU" <MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Herita

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Does anyone know a place in Los Angeles that sells magazine sleeves? I have dozens of Vanity Fair Magazines I was to start listing on eBay. Thanks, Glenn On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art < sa...@comic-art.com> wrote: > don't be silly Tommy. I'm happy to discuss

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

ks‎ and >> greed. Starting with a poster for American Madness, sorry no bias intended. >> >> Simon >> >> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. >> From: Richard C Evans >> Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2016 11:33 >> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU‎ >

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

C Evans > Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2016 11:33 > To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU‎ > Reply To: evan...@mac.com > Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges > > Really, expectation of capitalism to be more benign here? > > Hadn't noticed that. > > I just think most people don

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

for chiming in and offering an “official” response. It is appreciated. From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Smith, Grey - 1367Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 7:13 AMTo: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDUSubject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Sorry for the delay in responding. I’ve been

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

an “official” response. It is >> appreciated. >> >> >> >> From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Smith, >> Grey - 1367 >> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 7:13 AM >> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU >> Subject: Re: [MOPO

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

aturday, June 18, 2016 10:21 AM *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Pardon my cynicism but listing 10 posters in bulk with a value, say, of $10 each, might raise a bid of $100, which would give HA $19.50 in buyers'

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Pardon my cynicism but listing 10 posters in bulk with a value, say, of $10 each, might raise a bid of $100, which would give HA $19.50 in buyers' premium. Listing them separately and attracting bids of around $10 each gives HA buyers' premium

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:21:37 +0100 From: tommymb...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Pardon my cynicism but listing 10 posters in bulk with a value, say, of $10 each, might raise a bid of $100, which would give HA $19.50 in buyers' premium

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

[mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Smith, > Grey - 1367 > *Sent:* Saturday, June 18, 2016 7:13 AM > *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges > > > > Sorry for the delay in responding. I’ve been preparing my July catalog so > my

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Grey, Thanks so much for chiming in and offering an “official” response. It is appreciated. From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Smith, Grey - 1367 Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 7:13 AM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

ioning them in bulk lots that would bring at least $100 > hammer per lot. > > > > > > > > *From:* MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of *filip > de volder > *Sent:* Saturday, June 18, 2016 6:52 AM > *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU >

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

0, without automatically auctioning them in bulk lots that would bring at least $100 hammer per lot. From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of filip de volder Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 6:52 AM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges exactely Tom

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

2016 23:07:08 +0100 From: tommymb...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sorry, but that's missing the point. HA do not have to sell posters for low amounts, they are choosing to do it, and then asking the buyer to pay for their decision. If I want to sell

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

don't be silly Tommy. I'm happy to discuss anything with anyone. different viewpoints are great however I fail to see any reason for you to call me an apologist for Heritage. We're discussing something here, I'm expressing my viewpoint and my viewpoint only. I haven't spoken to Grey about

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

o List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Susan Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 6:58 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Hey, Give the guy the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he's not in the office for the past couple of days. I know he has kids c

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Rich, I've always enjoyed doing business with you so hope we're not going to fall out over this, but I don't really understand why you fell the need to be the apologist for HA. My original question was not about the BP per se, but about the increase from $14 to $19, and that's what I was seeking

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

.. Sue Hollywood Poster Frames Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:44:39 +0100 From: tommymb...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 'Grey doesn't have time to mess with the group. he's making money for his employer' Really? We know HA access this site

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

>> done that. Very well.And if you focus on the consumer first, you will >> always win.(Steve Jobs lesson) >> >> Thank you all for your thoughts. I enjoy these type of discussions as I >> learn more about the hobby and the business of posters. &g

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

why does he need to respond Tommy? Those of you who don't like the BP can bid or not if you choose, HA isn't going to eliminate the BP because some people don't like it so what comment would he make? they have a BP. It's not a hidden cost. When I buy something, my only concern is getting it

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

'Grey doesn't have time to mess with the group. he's making money for his employer' Really? We know HA access this site as they promote their listings here, but he is so busy making money that he simply ignores a forum of collector/dealers, possibly some of his best clients, when his business

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

As an aside, I've no idea what HA charge in commission to consign a poster that realises (say) $5, is it 75% of the net sell price (ex BP)? Is it really a quick buck to send a cheap poster to HA? I believe $5 posters are only going to come in with collections and they will not accept

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

/Tommy Barr wrote: "HA do not have to sell posters for low amounts, they are choosing to do it, and then asking the buyer to pay for their decision."/ The bidder does not have to bid for the poster either, when he does bid he is agreeing with HA charges - and that was their decision, no one

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

unlike HA who have no outlay other than the cost of listing the item. sorry Tommy, that is such a simplistic definition of the work involved in A) listing material for sale.. and B) being in business I wish it was as simple as snapping my fingers, but first you have to gather (in HA's

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Sorry, but that's missing the point. HA do not have to sell posters for low amounts, they are choosing to do it, and then asking the buyer to pay for their decision. If I want to sell a poster for $10 I don't say the poster will cost you $10 but I also want a further $19 for my trouble.I could try

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

David is correct. Who wants to work for NOTHING? Thanks, David. Kirby McDaniel > On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:37 PM, David wrote: > > Have read all comments I guess the overriding point is going to be one of > cost. Like everyone, it costs the same to handle a $200 poster as

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Have read all comments I guess the overriding point is going to be one of cost. Like everyone, it costs the same to handle a $200 poster as it does a $20 and so rather than turn away business at the bottom end HA are are simply going to charge you for it - why shouldn't they? How many dealers

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Simon > > From: Helmut Hamm > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:38 PM > To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU > Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges > > >> I’ve noticed in the past some private dealers getting nice items on their >> sites and I’m damn sure they haven't be

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

they want so they consign those items to Heritage..not good for small business.” Simon From: Helmut Hamm Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:38 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges I’ve noticed in the past some private dealers getting nice items

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

> I’ve noticed in the past some private dealers getting nice items on their > sites and I’m damn sure they haven't been able to sell them at the price they > want so they consign those items to Heritage..not good for small business. Unfortunately, that seems to be true. Too many people just

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

M To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Kirby, I agree with Rich entirely here. We all resent rising prices, but Heritage is just one of millions of business experiecing rising costs. that may well be true, but the problem lies elsewhere: Like any other corporati

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Kirby, > > I agree with Rich entirely here. We all resent rising prices, but Heritage > is just one of millions of business experiecing rising costs. that may well be true, but the problem lies elsewhere: Like any other corporation, Heritage is determined to make MORE money every year.

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

rs. > > Best, > > Ira > > > > > > From: MoPo List < mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Simon Oram < > fab5fre...@btinternet.com> > Reply-To: Simon Oram < fab5fre...@btinternet.com> > Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:41 AM > To: "

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

) or with the question , hey didn't i get badly ripped off in the past by some greedy bastards ? filip Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:43:49 -0500 From: ki...@movieart.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU I agree with Rich entirely here. We all resent rising prices, but Heritage

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

ut the hobby and the business of posters. >> >> Best, >> >> Ira >> >> >> >> >> >> From: MoPo List < mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU >> <mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>> on behalf of Simon Oram < >> fab5fre..

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:41 AM To: "<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU" <<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Yes I think Wim pointed out by what you wro

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

, 2016 at 10:41 AM To: "MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>" <MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Yes I think Wim pointed out by what you wrote Ira..”dominant” by defi

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

a possibility that people only trust them with it. Simon From: Wim Jansen Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:09 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges I would say as a animation collector too, I was very impressed with their recent animation auction. They have

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

st <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Simon Oram > <fab5fre...@btinternet.com> > Reply-To: "fab5fre...@btinternet.com" <fab5fre...@btinternet.com> > Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:41 AM > To: "MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU" <MoPo

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>" <MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges Agree..I think it was good to start with now, it seems the film poster business has lost allot because of them? an

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

GreenwoodSubject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges I'm sure they justified it to their shareholders in the normal way...growth must come at a cost...to the users.  And I imagine they were pleased with this news.  The non-stop greed in this world is really intense these days!  Thankfully this hobby

Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Tommy Barr <tommymb...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:21 AM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] Heritage charges Just noticed that from this weekend Heritage Auctions

[MOPO] Heritage charges

Just noticed that from this weekend Heritage Auctions is charging a minimum buyer's commission of $19, an increase of 36%. I just wonder how they justify that? Tommy Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com