Re: Mozilla 9X won't open

2001-07-05 Thread *NaNcY*
On 6 Jul 2001 00:32:38 GMT, Christopher Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >And it came to pass that *NaNcY* wrote: > >> When I try to open Mozilla, I will only get the opening red >> logo followed by "THIS PROGRAM PREFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACTION" >> with these details: >> MOZILLA caused an invalid pag

Re: 0.9.2 ESPN Game Cast Java problem!

2001-07-05 Thread Klaus Krtschil
Trask wrote: > Java does not seem to support 'Game Cast' on ESPN. > http://baseball.espn.go.com/mlb/scoreboard > > Locks win98 solid on my pathetic system (pII 233, 125 mb ram). > > Does Game Cast work for you? Got a solution? > > [Please post responses to the newsgroup - Thanks!] > > Trask

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 19:04:35 -0400, Cexy© <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That reminds me, a co-worker yelled over my cube that she was sending me > an important email, she needed status on a order, so I said OK! Well when > I opened it was a whole page of wingdings I printed it out and folded > it

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread jesus X
JTK wrote: > > Netscape should, if we read the license, > *IF*. You should do this, as I demonstrate below. > So where's the code for that sweet AIM program? Yeah. AIM is not part of the browser, thus would not be required to have available source code, even if NS were required to release thei

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread jesus X
Gervase Markham wrote: > > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to > > 6.x are added/refined, etc. > > That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source > releas

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread jesus X
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > 9600? > > You can't use a 56K modem? Maybe he IS using a 56k modem. Maybe he's out in the English country side with a laptop, and the ISP is so far away and the line so noisy that 9600 is all he can get. -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless crue

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Cevpx
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > 9600? > > You can't use a 56K modem? These folks are gonna be asking for donations soon, just wait. ;)

Re: Mozilla 9X won't open

2001-07-05 Thread Christopher Jahn
And it came to pass that *NaNcY* wrote: > When I try to open Mozilla, I will only get the opening red > logo followed by "THIS PROGRAM PREFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACTION" > with these details: > MOZILLA caused an invalid page fault in > module GKLAYOUT.DLL at 016f:60363173. > Registers: > EAX=

Mozilla 9X won't open

2001-07-05 Thread *NaNcY*
When I try to open Mozilla, I will only get the opening red logo followed by "THIS PROGRAM PREFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACTION" with these details: MOZILLA caused an invalid page fault in module GKLAYOUT.DLL at 016f:60363173. Registers: EAX= CS=016f EIP=60363173 EFLGS=00010246 EBX=025531e0 SS=017

Re: Problem loading pages when launched from another app

2001-07-05 Thread Christopher Jahn
And it came to pass that Dave Sieber wrote: > I'm running the latest nightly build on Windows 2000. When > another app tries to launch an HTML page, Mozilla comes up > blank -- it doesn't load the page. For instance, running > AbiWord and choosing "Help Contents", Mozilla (already > running or no

Re: Export of email addresses

2001-07-05 Thread Christopher Jahn
And it came to pass that Andre Wohnig wrote: > Christopher Jahn wrote: > >> And it came to pass that Andre Wohnig wrote: >> >>>2. I have still problems with my printer defaults. Somebody >>>told me that mozilla uses the standard printer. But >>>everytime i use mozilla i have to adjust all the t

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
9600? You can't use a 56K modem? Gervase Markham wrote: > > > Sorry to disagree but, this medium is all about fun. > > Downloading bloated HTML messages over a 9600bps connection at 10p per > minute is not fun. > > Gerv --

Re: Mozilla's RH Negative Blood - Reptilian ORIGINS!!!

2001-07-05 Thread Dramar Ankalle
Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My money's (metaphorically speaking) on the tripartite > merger of the "global, military/industrial complex", the > "entertainment industry", and the cybernetics of the > iconolastic, on

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Gervase Markham wrote: >> >> No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches >> from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to >> 6.x are added/refined, etc. > > That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Cexy©
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:49:47 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Holger Metzger) wrote: >On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:39:00 -0400, Cevpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't either. I believe Comic Sans is a Microsoft font anyway. Maybe >> it would be illegal to use it on Linux? Don't know... just wondering

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Cexy©
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 16:55:38 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans-Peter Fischer) wrote: >On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:24:00 GMT "Cexy©" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>No I am talking about using something other than this boring Font! No >>sound or pictures but Comic Sans for example, what is the big deal about >

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread DeMoN_LaG
JTK wrote: > Gervase Markham wrote: > >>>No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches >>>from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to >>>6.x are added/refined, etc. >>> >>That's not true; >> > > That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it M

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread JTK
Gervase Markham wrote: > > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to > > 6.x are added/refined, etc. > > That's not true; That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr. Markham. Do not

Re: Resetting master password

2001-07-05 Thread Bob
I found the answer to my question in one version of the Mozilla Help file, and am posting it here in case anyone else might also need this information. I couldn't exactly follow the instructions, but it comes close. * To reset the Personal Security Password for the PSM Private Keys secu

Re: setting up a roaming profile

2001-07-05 Thread RM
if you're really interested in roaming profiles for not just mozilla, but all apps, then you should look into ypbind (oops, are you on linux?). Christopher Jahn wrote: > [posted and mailed] > > And it came to pass that Hugo Bouckaert wrote: > > >>Hi >> >>I want to set up roaming profiles

Re: Mozilla's RH Negative Blood - Reptilian ORIGINS!!!

2001-07-05 Thread Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen
My money's (metaphorically speaking) on the tripartite merger of the "global, military/industrial complex", the "entertainment industry", and the cybernetics of the iconolastic, ontologically minded, A.I. expediting physicist-laborers who are plucking "superluminal volocities attained by practical

Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Quoted Text, when "start my reply above the quoted text" is selected in prefs

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 16:19:35 -0400, J.B. Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has the same problem in both places -- when replying the quoted text > "disappears" and inexperienced RECIPIENTS don't know why or what to do > about it. You are right. I didn't think this through. Concerning the disa

Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Quoted Text, when "start my reply above the quoted text" is selected in prefs

2001-07-05 Thread J.B. Moreno
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Holger Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:33:51 +0200, Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *Blocking* posters from having their sigs under their mails is not that > > important (i.e., not necessary). Having the option to choose wh

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:39:00 -0400, Cevpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't either. I believe Comic Sans is a Microsoft font anyway. Maybe > it would be illegal to use it on Linux? Don't know... just wondering > though. Hmmm... interesting. Do we have to care? :) > btw; Donna the Cyber S

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Cevpx
Holger Metzger wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:16:49 -0400, Cevpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hans-Peter Fischer wrote: >>>On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:24:00 GMT "Cexy©" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> No I am talking about using something other than this boring Font! No sound or pictures but C

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sorry to disagree but, this medium is all about fun. > > Downloading bloated HTML messages over a 9600bps connection at 10p per > minute is not fun. > Reading html news with a text console reader is no fun either. Holger -- Human beings, who are a

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:16:49 -0400, Cevpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hans-Peter Fischer wrote: > >> On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:24:00 GMT "Cexy©" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>No I am talking about using something other than this boring Font! No >>>sound or pictures but Comic Sans for example, w

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Cevpx
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:24:00 GMT "Cexy©" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>No I am talking about using something other than this boring Font! No >>sound or pictures but Comic Sans for example, what is the big deal about >>that, and maybe in a nice dark blue color > >

Re: mozilla 0.9.2 chokes on this file

2001-07-05 Thread Gervase Markham
> In a certain LUG I came across an indication > of a possible bug in Mozilla 0.9.2 Someone > was complaining his mozilla died when opening > this trivial html file: You need http://www.mozilla.org/quality/help/bug-form.html :-) Gerv

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Gervase Markham
> No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to > 6.x are added/refined, etc. That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source releases (at the same time it makes binary r

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Gervase Markham
> Sorry to disagree but, this medium is all about fun. Downloading bloated HTML messages over a 9600bps connection at 10p per minute is not fun. Gerv

Problem loading pages when launched from another app

2001-07-05 Thread Dave Sieber
I'm running the latest nightly build on Windows 2000. When another app tries to launch an HTML page, Mozilla comes up blank -- it doesn't load the page. For instance, running AbiWord and choosing "Help Contents", Mozilla (already running or not) comes up, but it's just blank. If choosing a lin

Re: SIG formatting . . html? text?

2001-07-05 Thread Hans-Peter Fischer
On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:24:00 GMT "Cexy©" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >No I am talking about using something other than this boring Font! No >sound or pictures but Comic Sans for example, what is the big deal about >that, and maybe in a nice dark blue color Posting in Comic Sans won't make your m

Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Quoted Text, when "start my reply above the quoted text" is selected in prefs

2001-07-05 Thread Holger Metzger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:33:51 +0200, Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *Blocking* posters from having their sigs under their mails is not that > important (i.e., not necessary). Having the option to choose where your > sig goes IS important - but you knew that, you were just chosing to be

Start a CGI.pm program without toolbars by double clicking an icon.

2001-07-05 Thread Ted Wart
Hi I asked this in the authoring cgi newsgroup and realized it should be asked here. How to I double click an icon on the desktop and have the browser start up with no tool bars.Like in a javascript popup frame. TIA, TW - Ted Wart

Re: Export of email addresses

2001-07-05 Thread Andre Wohnig
Christopher Jahn wrote: > And it came to pass that Andre Wohnig wrote: > >>2. I have still problems with my printer defaults. Somebody >>told me that mozilla uses the standard printer. But >>everytime i use mozilla i have to adjust all the things like >>paper size, print command (-P blabla). Can

Re: Export of email addresses

2001-07-05 Thread Christopher Jahn
And it came to pass that Andre Wohnig wrote: > Hi * > > 1. Could somebody tell me how i can export my email > addresses in Mozilla? I haven´t found anything like the > export function in netscape. > There is currently no EXPORT function in Mozilla. It's the program's biggest failing. > 2.

Re: java problem with 9.2 in linux

2001-07-05 Thread Brett Northcott
> > try setting the $JAVA_HOME env variable. Also, your link seems wrong. > My link on my system is libjavaplugin_oji.so --> > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/ns600/libjavapluginoji.so > > Also, I'm using the JDK instead of the JRE. (i.e. my JAVA_HOME is > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1). > > Also, get

Re: An annoying crash with 0.9.2

2001-07-05 Thread David Hallowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Using windows 2K > > goto http://www.independent.co.uk/ > > run the mouse cursor up and down the list on the left of the screen > > crashes consistantly > If you're using a talkback build (if not then you should get one :)) then make sure you submit a talkback r

Re: java problem with 9.2 in linux

2001-07-05 Thread James Barwick
Andrew Williams wrote: > Hello, > > I had java 1.3.0 plugin running under an oldish CVS build of mozilla. Today I > decided to upgrade to 9.2 but I got the following error message when I started > it up: > > INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Could not load > /usr/local/share/j2re1.3.0/lib/i386/l

Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Greg Miller
Bren.. wrote: > i'd wait.. i'm sure netscape will throw out another release in a month. Saw a comment on a Bugzilla bug that indicated that NS planned to build the first NS6.1 RTM candidate this past tuesday. Won't be very long now until 6.1 is released. -- http://www.classic-games.com/

Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Quoted Text, when "start my reply above the quoted text" is selected in prefs

2001-07-05 Thread Peter Lairo
Nick Ambrose wrote: > Peter Lairo wrote: > >> THe whole idea of the sig being preformat (whatever that is) is >> stupid. It has messed up my mails more than once. If replying on top >> (which you consider to be wrong, but is done frequently anyhow), then >> the user should be allowed to decid