Hi,
Just upgraded to 0.9.7 from 0.9.5. My impression
is that 0.9.7 is faster (Linux). Several points
about it:
After the install, it was not with the
modern skin, but the classical. I have
always used the modern, and the previous
upgrades correctly detected that.
Am 22.12.2001 09:59 schrieb Minko Markov:
> Anyone feeling that 0.9.7 is buggy? I will keep
> both 0.9.5 and 0.9.7 trees for the moment.
So far I haven't encountered any serious problems. 0.9.7 seems very
stable and fast.
- Holger
Minko Markov wrote:
> The "Preferences" dialog box has an
> annoying bug. When I start opening
> the fields (like Navigator, Advanced),
> no scrollbar shows
This is the single most frequently reported bug in bugzilla. It has 76
duplicates. It exists at least sin
Minko Markov wrote:
>
>
>
> Subject:
>
> 0.9.7: fast, but seems buggy
> From:
>
> Minko Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
>
> Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:59:28 GMT
>
>
Minko Markov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just upgraded to 0.9.7 from 0.9.5. My impression
> is that 0.9.7 is faster (Linux). Several points
> about it:
>
> After the install, it was not with the
> modern skin, but the classical. I have
> always used the modern, and the previous
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Minko Markov) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Try www.britishairways.com, it offers
>login with ID and password. With 0.9.5,
>it worked fine. 0.9.7 seems unable to
>log me in: after typing the ID and the
>pass, I can't proceed. Neither "Re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David W. Fenton) writes:
..
> Others have answered your other questions, but this one remains
> unanswered.
>
> Did you install the Security Manager? If you didn't, you won't have
> any SSL/HTTPS support.
I have not installed any security manager explicitly.
However, wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Minko Markov) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>The problem that you quoted, namely logging at
>britishairways.com, is not an ssl issue. How come
>I could log with 0.9.5? Try it, even with empty
>ID and pass. The browser just does not react to
>clicking the arrow ("proceed") butto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David W. Fenton) writes:
> Mozilla 0.9.3 had worked fine, because, apparently, I'd installed
> the security manager. When I re-installed and included the security
> manager, it then worked.
It is not so apparent to me that this is the reason.
Maybe, maybe not, but th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Minko Markov) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David W. Fenton) writes:
>
>
>> Mozilla 0.9.3 had worked fine, because, apparently, I'd
>> installed the security manager. When I re-installed and included
>> the security manager, it then worked.
>
>It is
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Minko Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is not so apparent to me that this is the reason.
>Maybe, maybe not, but the lack of error message like
>"you must have the security manager installed before
>proceeding" suggests the reason is something else,
>most likel
Minko Markov wrote:
>
> How can one check whether this security manager is
> installed? I mean, it is pointless arguing about
> that here, if one can check that in a second.
http://gemal.dk/browserspy/psm.html
--
/Jonas
Jonas Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Minko Markov wrote:
>
> > How can one check whether this security manager is
...
>
> http://gemal.dk/browserspy/psm.html
>
> --
> /Jonas
VariableSetting
Minko Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Try www.britishairways.com, it offers
> login with ID and password. With 0.9.5,
> it worked fine. 0.9.7 seems unable to
> log me in: after typing the ID and the
> pass, I can't p
14 matches
Mail list logo
