On Sunday 15 March 2009 22:47:43 Bill Hart wrote:
> It depends on how long it takes versus a service release.
>
> Bill.
>
> 2009/3/15 Jason Moxham :
> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:46 Cactus wrote:
> >> On Mar 15, 4:45 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:29:31 Jason Moxham
It depends on how long it takes versus a service release.
Bill.
2009/3/15 Jason Moxham :
>
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:46 Cactus wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 4:45 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
>> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:29:31 Jason Moxham wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22:31 Bill Hart wrot
On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:46 Cactus wrote:
> On Mar 15, 4:45 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:29:31 Jason Moxham wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22:31 Bill Hart wrote:
> > > > I actually don't know what make dist does, never used it. But
> > > > assuming it makes
mpbsd is currently broken, but we don't know of anyone who uses it, or
even what it is used for, so we have considered this a minor issue for
now. We have a ticket to fix it.
Note that if you do make, then configure --enable-cxx or configure
--enable-fat, you must at least do make clean before do
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> We are essentially just doing:
>
> ./configure
> make
> make check
>
> And we are also running the following on a random selection of machines:
>
> make clean
> ./configure --enable-cxx
> make
> make check
Ok so I will do this on some systems
On Mar 15, 7:06 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> No problems from here. These are the links I am using:
>
> hhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-1.0.tar.gz
This one worked (less the extra h)
Brian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
No problems from here. These are the links I am using:
hhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-1.0.tar.gz
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir.pdf
The first will initiate a file download, the second will sit there for
ages and eventually open the pdf doc in your browser if
On Mar 15, 6:53 pm, Cactus wrote:
> On Mar 15, 6:48 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > Brian,
>
> > I just redid make dist to include this update. Tarball now contains
> > the new/changed files.
>
> Thanks Bill,
>
> I was assuming that I should test the Windows stuff.
But I can't access it anyway - i
Perhaps Jeff may be able to also assist with that. Though it looks
like he already did, really. I don't know if there were code changes
to the Windows code/build since then.
Bill.
2009/3/15 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Mar 15, 6:48 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>> Brian,
>>
>> I just redid make dist to include t
On Mar 15, 6:48 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I just redid make dist to include this update. Tarball now contains
> the new/changed files.
Thanks Bill,
I was assuming that I should test the Windows stuff.
Brian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Brian,
I just redid make dist to include this update. Tarball now contains
the new/changed files.
Bill.
2009/3/15 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Mar 15, 5:31 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
>> On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:53 Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> > I've updated the version numbers to 1.0.0 and made the followi
OK, I'll take mark.
In case you don't have it, there is a script in my home directory on
SkyNet called set_paths. If you don't run it the default gcc/cc on the
machine is run (if there is one).
If you do run it (source set_paths) it sets everything up to test mpir
using gcc. On Sun machines, if
On Sunday 15 March 2009 18:36:43 Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 18:31:30 Bill Hart wrote:
> > OK, here is the tarball for release candidate 1:
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-trunk/doc/mpir-1.0.tar.g
> >z
> >
> > and the doc:
> >
> > http://sage.math.washing
We are essentially just doing:
./configure
make
make check
And we are also running the following on a random selection of machines:
make clean
./configure --enable-cxx
make
make check
For x86/x86_64 machines you can also then do:
make clean
./configure --enable-fat
make
make check
We should
On Sunday 15 March 2009 18:31:30 Bill Hart wrote:
> OK, here is the tarball for release candidate 1:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-trunk/doc/mpir-1.0.tar.gz
>
> and the doc:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir.pdf
>
> I don't really like the way that it cons
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> OK, here is the tarball for release candidate 1:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-trunk/doc/mpir-1.0.tar.gz
So what is the best way to help test the tar ball. Is there a
specific script or something to help run the required
OK, here is the tarball for release candidate 1:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-trunk/doc/mpir-1.0.tar.gz
and the doc:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir.pdf
I don't really like the way that it considers its version string to be
1.0 instead of 1.0.0 but I guess
On Mar 15, 5:31 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:53 Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > I've updated the version numbers to 1.0.0 and made the following
> > updates to documentation:
>
> > Added K8 and K10 to list of processors with assembly support on p2
> > Section 2, p3 blurb about
2009/3/15 Jason Moxham :
>
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:53 Bill Hart wrote:
>> I've updated the version numbers to 1.0.0 and made the following
>> updates to documentation:
>>
>> Added K8 and K10 to list of processors with assembly support on p2
>> Section 2, p3 blurb about --gmp-compat
>> Sect
On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:23:53 Bill Hart wrote:
> I've updated the version numbers to 1.0.0 and made the following
> updates to documentation:
>
> Added K8 and K10 to list of processors with assembly support on p2
> Section 2, p3 blurb about --gmp-compat
> Section 2.1 added --gmp-compat to the l
I've updated the version numbers to 1.0.0 and made the following
updates to documentation:
Added K8 and K10 to list of processors with assembly support on p2
Section 2, p3 blurb about --gmp-compat
Section 2.1 added --gmp-compat to the list of options
Removed amd64 and added k10 and nocona to list
On Mar 15, 4:45 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:29:31 Jason Moxham wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22:31 Bill Hart wrote:
> > > I actually don't know what make dist does, never used it. But assuming
> > > it makes a tarball, we need to have it make a single tarb
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:29:31 Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22:31 Bill Hart wrote:
> > I actually don't know what make dist does, never used it. But assuming
> > it makes a tarball, we need to have it make a single tarball for both
> > Windows and linux. It's important that w
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22:31 Bill Hart wrote:
> I actually don't know what make dist does, never used it. But assuming
> it makes a tarball, we need to have it make a single tarball for both
> Windows and linux. It's important that we don't split the project, in
> my opinion.
>
> Bill.
Done i
I actually don't know what make dist does, never used it. But assuming
it makes a tarball, we need to have it make a single tarball for both
Windows and linux. It's important that we don't split the project, in
my opinion.
Bill.
2009/3/15 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Mar 15, 4:02 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
On Mar 15, 4:02 pm, Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:04:09 Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 14/03/2009, Jason Moxham wrote:
> > > On Saturday 14 March 2009 13:46:51 Bill Hart wrote:
> > >> I've been working on converting Paul Zimmermann's implementation of
> > >> the Bodrato-Zan
On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:04:09 Bill Hart wrote:
> On 14/03/2009, Jason Moxham wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 March 2009 13:46:51 Bill Hart wrote:
> >> I've been working on converting Paul Zimmermann's implementation of
> >> the Bodrato-Zanoni Toom-4 algorithm to the mpn_level.
> >>
> >> I've uploa
On 14/03/2009, Jason Moxham wrote:
>
> On Saturday 14 March 2009 13:46:51 Bill Hart wrote:
>> I've been working on converting Paul Zimmermann's implementation of
>> the Bodrato-Zanoni Toom-4 algorithm to the mpn_level.
>>
>> I've uploaded the current code to the files section. I'm pretty much
>>
On Saturday 14 March 2009 13:46:51 Bill Hart wrote:
> I've been working on converting Paul Zimmermann's implementation of
> the Bodrato-Zanoni Toom-4 algorithm to the mpn_level.
>
> I've uploaded the current code to the files section. I'm pretty much
> just going to convert the relevant functions
29 matches
Mail list logo
