I agree with most of what is being said here... but for me MSX can go in
one of two ways to be successfull...
1) To have amazing graphics and sound - just like when MSX was first
released - the other big computer was the PC with CGA and the speaker, and
it was much more expensive than the MSX
2)
Daniel Zorita wrote:
> Well, more discussion about the New MSX:
Zorita has a fairly clear-minded point of
view on this issue. But I'd like to stress
a rather clouded point:
> Money is not a trouble for MSXers. POWER is the trouble for MSXers.
While you may think USD600 is not much to
ask for a
Well, more discussion about the New MSX:
Maybe I seem to refuse the idea of a new MSX. That's wrong. I like very
much a new MSX. But I dream on a NICE new MSX. The news from ASCII (very
short, unfortunatelly) give us the idea of a "Turbo- MSX 2+". If that is the
only chance, well, I accept. But
> > Going out to the street, get nacked, and dance until the new MSX appears
??
>
> No. This is Takamichi's mission. :)
Please tell me street address, city, nation, etc, and MOST importantly,
distance to nearest police station so I will be able to estimate how long I
can stay out of bound (from wh
Hello to all
> > Well, it's better to say that this is the ONLY OFFICIAL news in 10
years.
> > But you don't must to forget the huge efforts of amateur groups during
this
> > time.
> Of course. Who has forgotten the amateur groups?
> I think that if ASCII havenĀ“t seen the work of amateur groups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yes, so, let's start to deal them as a company. Ask them to
> > put a lot of money for developing. Can you imagine "Intel"
> > makes a emulator of PENTIUM-4 before building it ?
> I agree that it's a weird decision. Because, if I can buy (some people will
> prefer to
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Daniel Zorita wrote:
> Well, it's better to say that this is the ONLY OFFICIAL news in 10 years.
> But you don't must to forget the huge efforts of amateur groups during this
> time.
They are not forgetting these amateur groups. The fact that ASCII wants to
make a new MSX is
> Anne is very good at evoking reactions.
> I fell for it last time, but this time I won't bite... ;)
Damned, you understand my intentions.hehehe ;-)
Anne
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
Daniel Zorita wrote:
> The news about MSX, is very interesting, and we are happy.
> But some things are still not clear, and could be done better.
Unfortunately, things are what they are, not what we want it to be...
> I pretended to WARN people, to not forget the MSX story dur
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> First at all, to say that my previous message was "a bit" exagerated. As
> someone asked us "to react" about the "new MSX" news, that's what I did.
Anne is very good at evoking reactions.
I fell for it last time, but this time I won't bite... ;)
> Yes, so, l
Hi, again.
First at all, to say that my previous message was "a bit" exagerated. As
someone asked us "to react" about the "new MSX" news, that's what I did.
The news about MSX, is very interesting, and we are happy. But some things
are still not clear, and could be done better.
I pretended
Daniel Zorita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Isn't this just great?!?!
> > Ag0ny had an official interview with ASCII. So it seems, ASCII indeed has
> > again commercial plans in some form with the MSX-system
> > I dare to say this is the most interesting news we had in more then 10
> > years.
>
> W
At 17:03 19-8-00 +0200, you wrote:
> > Well, that's all. Excuse me for my attitude today. But I get tired about
> > "secrets", and about the idea that ALL WE HAVE DONE THESE YEARS CAN BE
> > FORGOT IN ONLY A DAY. And that the new MSX may be a "MSX Turbo-R-Plus".
> >
> >
> > Daniel Zorita.
> Well, that's all. Excuse me for my attitude today. But I get tired about
> "secrets", and about the idea that ALL WE HAVE DONE THESE YEARS CAN BE
> FORGOT IN ONLY A DAY. And that the new MSX may be a "MSX Turbo-R-Plus".
>
>
> Daniel Zorita.
I like your attitude!! hehehe
Anne
P
14 matches
Mail list logo