Il Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:39 AM
Jan van Thiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I'm just deducing the current system doesn't work yet, because of
personal misunderstanding between people.
Or full agreement, like when an instrument is played by a secretary. Sorry
if it seems rude but it simply
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:34:18 +0200, Brian Gurtler wrote:
Stefan Kestenholz wrote:
brian: Is it true that this artist performed the vacuum cleaner on many
occasions, and this is documented in bootlegs/released recordings? if
that is the case, then we should add it.
yes it's true.
i am
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:31:39 +0200, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Ok, I've added this and http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1228 to
the instrument tree.
Some people will probably disagree, so please tell me, I'll ask someone
to remove my link editor privs and won't do it anymore.
What?
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Don Redman wrote:
And I am strongly opposed to removing your RelType editor privileges.
Agreed. So far all Luks' actions were following valid bugs or
instructions from the style secretary.
--
--ruaok Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing
incessant whining?
and you call Me confrontational..
Robert Kaye wrote:
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Don Redman wrote:
Well, then I'd say we should add this now and let Brian add the
appropriate Relationships.
I mean if we finally have a rule, we should use it :-)
Yes, but
Luks
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Jan van Thiel wrote:
I think that if e.g. inhouseuk (sorry to (ab)use your name, just
giving an example), a moderator with a spotless record, had requested
these, they would've been added almost instantaneously.
I disagree.
If a moderator with a perfect record
looks whose whining now..
Robert Kaye wrote:
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Jan van Thiel wrote:
I think that if e.g. inhouseuk (sorry to (ab)use your name, just
giving an example), a moderator with a spotless record, had requested
these, they would've been added almost instantaneously.
I
Please post only if you have something to say. This is certainly nothing of
interest, and documents why you are facing unwillingness if you request
something.
g0llum
Behalf Of Brian Gurtler
Sent: Dienstag, 28. März 2006 05:59
looks whose whining now..
theres no need for Robert call for and end of discussion yet at the same
time to continue calling me or anyone else involved in the discussion a
whiner. if he doesn't want those reactions he should keep the flame bait
to himself.
-Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please post only if you have
I respect Don but as I said before, I'm just really tired of
waiting months to get this instrument (or any other instrument) added.
-b
Apologies. I misunderstood the comment.
I have to admit that it is sometimes hard to understand why changes like
that take such a lot of time, or
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current Recording Engineer debate is a good example: Simon thought he
was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but Steve put forward
a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it as a veto) and spared another
discussion.
I've just
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:47:10 +0200, Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current Recording Engineer debate is a good example: Simon
thought he was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but
Steve put forward a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it as
We really need to get this implemented. I'd suggest to load it onto test
after the next server update. Then we should test it and then move it over to
the main server.
The vacuum cleaner can be added to the test tree, be discussed to death, and
then finally make it to the main server,
On Mar 22, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Brian Gurtler wrote:
mos thingy is live.
now can we have our vacuum cleaner?
You have not demonstrated 5 uses of a vacuum cleaner in published works.
There was an ambiguity over the 5 references -- I would like to see 5
published albums reference the instrument
LOL
yes, give the position to someone that has no spine and will back down
at any argument presented to them.
you know that i'm only confrontational when confronted.. and i believe
most people that don't have thier head in the coulds on IRC realize that
as well.
-Brian
btw-- what exactly ARE the
LOL
yes, give the position to someone that has no spine and will
back down at any argument presented to them.
you know that i'm only confrontational when confronted.. and
i believe most people that don't have thier head in the
coulds on IRC realize that as well.
-Brian
btw-- what
I've been waiting over 3 months for an instrument to be added
to MB and jumped through way too many bullshit hoops to get
to where we are now.
i'm just looking for it to be added without any further hoops
like i was told by Redman that it would be once Mos thingy
went live. It's been
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Gurtler
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:20 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] add instrument request: vacuum cleaner
Don Redman wrote:
On Mon
Brian Gurtler wrote:
I've entered this into trac a while ago (12/13/05) and now it's in MB limbo
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/63
anyhow.. not to get too far ahead of myself, i don't see any reason to
be bashful with what instruments can be added into MB. Slowing down the
addition of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i seriously doubt that jon fishman is the only person that has used a
vacuum cleaner as an instrument, and also theres nothing stopping anyone
from using it as an instrument in the future.
why does everything have to be a big part of the db just to be
On 3/2/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More votes on this, please!
I haven't replied to this thread so far, because I thought it was a
trivial question. Guess not.
My input: if an instrument exists and someone can show a MB example
where he/she can add it and intends to add it, it
Forget the vacuum cleaner. Take this another example: Jean Michel Jarre
invented
an instrument called Laser Harp. As far as i know he is the only person who
plays
it. Is that enough reason to exclude a real instrument?
Michel (mcymd)
On 2 Mar 2006 at 19:02, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Brian
22 matches
Mail list logo
