Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)

2002-04-12 Thread Kai Weber
+ David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, but your entire muttrc could be > > source "/some/cool/script|" > > and you could have that cool script look thru your procmail file(s) and > define your hooks, including a default hook, as well as do everything > else... Yes, I see the point. This is a

Automatic encryption of emails if key available possible?

2002-04-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi! I have another question: Is the automatic encryption of emails if a key is available possible? I think about somethink set pgp_always_encrypt_when_key_available=yes set pgp_always_encrypt_use_dsa_keys=yes So every email is encrypted if the keys are available, and if there is a DSA and a RSA

Re: Automatic encryption of emails if key available possible?

2002-04-12 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.04.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Norbert Preining" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I have another question: Is the automatic encryption of emails > if a key is available possible? I think about somethink Not really: mutt won't know whether the key is available until it trie

Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)

2002-04-12 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.04.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Kai Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder > name is used. Most of the stuff is done by $MATCH. > > But a script for doing "subscribe" and "list" informations for .muttrc > wou

Re: [OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list

2002-04-12 Thread Simon White
11-Apr-02 at 12:21, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > begin 755 soapbox > I haven't noticed this list to be different from any other in this > regard, except that Sven is rabid about this topic and posts to this > list a lot. Yeah, agree there. Did Sven catch his rabid attitude from so

Re: [OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list

2002-04-12 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
There are also some reasons why not to cc: to person when replying to list. I prefer to receive msgs in list order. Generally, mailing lists do not have the highest priority in a work day, thus I read/reply when I have time (like now at 01:20 I should be in bed...). Duplicate removal removes the c

Re: [OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/11/02 19:46:13 CEST] wrote: > 11-Apr-02 at 12:21, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as > intended. This usually means a CC: to the person that posted as long as > they set up their headers that way.

ugly thread tree display

2002-04-12 Thread Katie Bechtold
I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up: 1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook? 1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq> 1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq> 1120 L Jan 16 Philip Wittamore (0.5K) x tq> 1121 sL Jan 16 Benjamin Smit

Re: ugly thread tree display

2002-04-12 Thread Katie Bechtold
Doh! The solution was to set ascii_chars=yes. That was it. Just goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :) Apologies to all. -- Katie Bechtold http://www.katie-and-rob.org/katie/ msg27096/pgp0.pgp

Re: ugly thread tree display

2002-04-12 Thread Luke Ross
Hi, On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:27:02AM -0400, Katie Bechtold wrote: > I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up: > > 1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook? > 1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq> > 1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq> >

Re: ugly thread tree display

2002-04-12 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Katie Bechtold spake thus: > Just > goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to > find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :) You too??! Lol, I do that all the time ;) > Apologies to all. Don't sweat it. -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mails are always tagged as old but unread

2002-04-12 Thread chris
Hello everybody, I solved the problem with the Messages that seemed to be old, although i never had a look at them. I just made a procmail recipe which filters the Status: and X-Status: headers. Here it is, just in case somebody might need ist someday: :0 fhw |formail -I "Status" -I "X-Status"

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-12 Thread David DeSimone
Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt > does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). Use 'strace' to watch the mutt process and log system calls, then find out what mutt is trying to do when it hang

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread David DeSimone
Ian Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s > > and these in .muttrc > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" > auto_view text/html > > But I get this: > mailcap entry for type text/html not found Auto_view only looks for mailcap entries with the

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread s. keeling
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:54:29PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: > At Thu, Apr 11 2002 [12:01 +0100], Ian Chilton aroused my curiosity with: > > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s > > Try something like: > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s; copiousoutput > > and read section 5.3 "MIME Viewer configuration wit

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread s. keeling
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 06:43:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > Ian Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap > > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s > > > > and these in .muttrc > > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" > > auto_view text/html > > > > But I get this: > > mailcap

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David DeSimone [04/13/02 01:40:19 CEST] wrote: > Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt > > does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). > Use 'strace' to watch the mutt process and log sy

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin s. keeling quotation: > > One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily > report spam to spamcop, which means I have to pass an ID and password. > This is possible with lynx -auth=uname:passwd. With w3m or links, it > would be something like w3m http://uname:[EMAIL PR

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 02:10:27 CEST] wrote: > That's the background. So in my ~/.mailcap, I tried "links %s; > copiousoutput": > [-- Autoview using /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --] > [-- Autoview stderr of /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --] >

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread s. keeling
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:27:21PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin s. keeling quotation: > > > > One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily > > report spam to spamcop, which means I have to pass an ID and password. > > This is possible with lynx -auth=uname:passwd. W

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread s. keeling
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > * s. keeling [04/13/02 02:10:27 CEST] wrote: > > That's the background. So in my ~/.mailcap, I tried "links %s; > > copiousoutput": > > > Here's (relevant parts of) my ~/.mailcap: > > > text/html; w3m -cookie %s; co

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 03:11:49 CEST] wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > Try 'w3m -dump' for autoview. > Thanks Rocco. Problem solved. Much appreciated. No problem. I didn't mention the manpages for those 3 text-mode browsers. Maybe you shou

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Patrick
* s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-02 19:46]: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:27:21PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote: > > begin s. keeling quotation: > > > > > > One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily > > > report spam to spamcop, which means I have to pass an ID and pa

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Patrick spake thus: > I use a small footprint limited feature web browser called dillo for > this final action to spamcop. Works great and is very small an

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Patrick
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-02 22:32]: > Alas! Patrick spake thus: > > I use a small footprint limited feature web browser called dillo for > > this final action to spamcop. Works great and is very small and quick. > > It is available at: sourceforge.netprojects/dillo/ > > I l

Writing a memo to myself

2002-04-12 Thread Philip Mak
Scenario: I want to write a memo to myself that appears in my inbox. What's the easiest/fastest way to do this? Right now I'm doing "m", "pmak", "" and then typing it. A side effect of this is that the memo ends up in my sent-mail folder too. Oh, is it a bug that when I press "y" to send a messa

Re: Writing a memo to myself

2002-04-12 Thread Robert Conde
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:19:11AM -0400, Philip Mak wrote: > Scenario: I want to write a memo to myself that appears in my inbox. > What's the easiest/fastest way to do this? Try putting this in your .muttrc send-hook pmak "unset record" macro index m ":push mpmak\r\r\rn" Hitting m (or alt-m

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread David T-G
Hello -- ...and then s. keeling said... % ... % % One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily I think I've pretty much solved this wrinkle. Assuming you've gone to get a spamcop mail reporting ID, then you might find [zero] [11:59pm] ~> grep spam .mutt/muttrc | cat

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--CdrF4e02JqNVZeln Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Patrick spake thus: > > I love dillo, it's so freaking fast. All it needs is just a few more > > features (like ftp support and bookmark heirarchies), and i