the folder lists" -specifically-?
Ooops, sorry O:-)
I mean columns in the folder list, like Pine. If you have a lot of
folders (as I do), the ways to see and read them all in a sane manner are,
basicly, two: (1) making directories to store the folders, or (2) having columns
in your fold
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 01:25:31AM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> I mean columns in the folder list, like Pine. If you have a lot of
> folders (as I do), the ways to see and read them all in a sane manner are,
> basicly, two: (1) making directories to store the folders, or (
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
> display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default
> (is it customisable?), this provides lots of information which is
Yes. See the section abo
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
> > display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default
> > (is it customisable?),
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
> > > display is just a directo
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:29:48PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > Aha, thanks, a great improvement!
> >
> But it's still only a single column so doesn't really help all that
> much, I still can't see more than 20 or so folder names on
Can anyone tell me where I can find a definitive list of options
available in muttrc?
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
--
John
named whatever the sender's email
address is rather than based on the mailing list name (located in the To: header). I
know that if the list has a Reply To: header, it works. What I'm wondering is there a
way for me to set something in the .muttrc so that it will see these types o
Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: procmail mailing list URL?
> Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:40:39 +0200
Interesting date header... you have jumped very far in the future!
Thus spake Paulius Danielius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> There was mentioned sometime ago about procmail mailing list.
> May somebody post the URL again.
http://www.procmail.org/era/lists.html
--
| oneiros ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | OpenPGP Sup
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:04:01PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: procmail mailing list URL?
> > Date: Sat, 2
Hi,
how can I sort the list of available mailboxes ( c - ? or TAB ) by date,
recent first?
For now this looks like a simple "ls -l", but should be a "ls -lt".
I use mutt version mutt-1.0pre3i.
Shame on me if this is a FAQ.
Gruss Olaf
--
$ man 1 current_release
BUG
Is is possible to have mail from mailing lists coloured according to a
color index recipe:
a la
color index brightmagentablack ~l # List mail
thanx
--
Eric Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
00 27 21 4265311
It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.
hello,
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending news to
some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want to implement the
list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt interactively, all i can do is to
use commandline options.
There are two
hello,
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending news to
some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want to implement the
list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt interactively, all i can do is to
use commandline options.
There are two
er suited. Have you looked
> at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a
> batch mode.
>
> > the subscriber will find To: header is not for them, a bit confusing.
>
> They shouldn't be confused if the header says that it was addres
er suited. Have you looked
> at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a
> batch mode.
>
> > the subscriber will find To: header is not for them, a bit confusing.
>
> They shouldn't be confused if the header says that it was addres
Harry --
I can't think of a lot of answers for your question except that, if
you would consider an "afterwards" sorting tool, you could could make
a single macro that pumps all tagged messages through procmail (perhaps
with a special .procmailrc file) to be sorted into their proper folders...
:
Thanks a lot for all the replies to my prev. message for a macro
to delete all messages.
I have another q.:
I am trying to setup a distribution list of about 6 users, that I
send mail to most of the time. I do not have a constant net connection
and am a dialup user. My config. is Mandrake
If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:19 pm
Subject: combined reply &
Marianne Albin proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
>option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
You've got it devant-derriere ;) Lists was the old one - you'll have to
use "subscr
Marianne Albin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000:
> If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
> option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
Even so, I've never gotten "list-reply" to do a regular re
/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -oem -oi'
>my_hdr Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is there any way to do this, or am i doomed to actually go to yahoo to use
this mailing list??
thanks
peter
--
Peter Jaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cs.oberlin.edu/~pjaques
klezmer&balk
Hey, all!
Is there a way to pass the list of recipients in the Compose window to
a filter? For example, I have a macro that maps 'P' to 'Fgpg -sea -r "
to do non-PGP/MIME encryption. Is there a way to make P map to 'Fgpg
-sea -r $RECIPIENTS", where $RECIPIENTS i
Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder
> ever gets a 'N' flag, regardless of whether or not it contains new
&
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> > show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folde
* Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> > > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> > > show me whi
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:21:30PM -0800, Mike E wrote:
> Now, is there a way to set all the files in my maildir as
> folders so I don't have to update this everytime I add a
> new mailing list, etc?
>
> Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle.
> I gues
On Thu, 09 Nov 2000, Mike E wrote:
> Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle. I guess
> that's what I get for being on dozens of mailing lists. :)
No, the reason to be on dozens of mailing lists is to give you
work to do on your .muttrc to keep it up to date. :-)
--
Greg Mathe
John Indra proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or
> not?
> Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message.
maybe you just have a full mailbox?
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus
Hi,
>Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or
>not?
We're discussing even things we shouldn't.
>Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message.
Did you receive your own?
Thorsten
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
|We're discussing even things we shouldn't.
:)
|Did you receive your own?
Yes... then this list is alive for all this time. My mistake then, sorry...
|Thorsten
Regards,
John
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Nope, no one here.
--
"Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:12:54PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 00-12-15, Jonathan Gift wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> >
> >Nope, no one here.
Sorry, joke. You were asking if anyone was in the list. Answering
Whenever I post to this list, I get an undeliverable mail-receipt,
saying
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too many "Received" headers - suspected mail loop
This has begun about a week (or two) ago. How to deal with the
situation?
Andre Berger[[EMAIL
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:12:12PM +0800, ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> Hi mutt-users,
>
> I have three Q about my mutt-1.25i
>
> 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key
> to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't
> have to type
ZHENG, You-Zhong proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key
> to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't
> have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alias mutt to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2)Also after I read the
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:12:12PM +0800, ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key
> to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't
> have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For every subscribed mailing-list I use a di
ZHENG, You-Zhong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on
04/30/2001:
> 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key
> to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't
> have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A macro will do this nicely
On 04-30-2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> lists was in older mutts. in mutt 1.2.x you use "subscribe"
So why bother just renaming lists to subscribe?
zhengyz
ZHENG, You-Zhong proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 04-30-2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > lists was in older mutts. in mutt 1.2.x you use "subscribe"
> So why bother just renaming lists to subscribe?
Please read the mutt documentation (should be there on your pc) for why.
--
S
ists, the %L index_format won't work,
but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns.
There must be some reasons for mutt author to add the new
subscribe keyword,
zhengyz
I still can't get it.
> It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work,
> but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns.
> There must be some reasons for mutt author to add the new
> subscribe keyword,
Well, one significant difference
Mr. Wade muttered:
> ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it.
> > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work,
> > but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns.
> >
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:28:09PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Mr. Wade muttered:
> > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it.
> > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work,
>
Michael Tatge wrote:
> Mr. Wade muttered:
> > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it.
> > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work,
> > > but list-reply key works
Mr. Wade muttered:
> Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Mr. Wade muttered:
> > > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote:
> > > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it.
> > > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mutt-users] :
> I have a mailing list that I send information out on every week or two.
> These are clients and customers who have asked to be kept informed of new
> virus and malware alerts, so the mail is all one way and majordomo is not
> the tool for this.
No
* On [010529 19:40] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very simply, a mailing list to hold 50 email addresses that I can send as
> one message to all 50 recipients, as in an address book would do the job best.
> I'm sure this must be possible, but for the life o
* Ankit Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [18:00 21/07/01]:
> hi.
> is it possible to get the mailing list instead of the sender's name in the
> index? i am not talking about the mailing list address, which i can get by
> using %L, but want the list name which i have defined
For some reason I was unsubed from this list without warning. Anyone
know why that would be?
Anyway, according to http://mutt.netliberte.org, the muttrc builder code
is under the GPL. I thought at one point, he had a link to download the
code but that seems to have vanished.
does anyone have an
I defined some aliases in my .muttrc .
Last time i used mutt, i hit some(?) keys
and mutt displayed a list of my aliases like:
1. lars
2. nin
3.
...
This overview is a nice thing when i forget an alias,
but i didn't recognize how i invoked it and i didn't
find anything in the manua
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
>
> (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
that email?
--
Bruno
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
>
> Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> that email?
All I s
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:53:18AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
> >
> > This messages is as seen in the list in one of the threads:
>
> [...]
>
> > Cc: "FreeBSD Questio
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:12:46 CET
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 17:13:10 +0100
From: @prodigy.net.mx
Subject: NEMCIJA
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder why it didn't show up in the attachments list even though
Thus spake Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the
> > end of that email?
>
> All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;)
I saw neither.
--
Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (pre
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> >
> > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> > that email?
>
> All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;)
Strange, the email I got from gbnet.net _definitely_ had a big virus
a
se it was rejected on my mail gateway.
Yes, Rich's message was infected with the SirCam virus. The pgp sig was
attachment 3, the virus was attachment 4. You can inspect the complete
message at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users&m=100480801725434&w=2
This is quite in
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 01:13:46PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> % >
> % > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
> %
> % Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> % that email?
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:27:58PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > >
> > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> > > that email?
> >
> > All I saw was his PGP signature atta
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the
> > mail, not Outhouse...
>
> That User-Agent header could have been spoofed...
Before I stick my foot any farther into my mouth, I sh
Rob --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
% On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox
with:
% > > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the
% > > mail, not Outhouse...
% >
% > That User-Agent header could have been spoofed...
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
>
> Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> that email?
>
> --
> Bruno
---end quot
Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> Mmm, oops.
> I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address,
> so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses
work (and people tend to send to both).
just add both to your subscribe line and you'
stingly
> enough, though, I had to pump the message through less to find it, and
> then there were some other headers at the top. To wit:
> I wonder why it didn't show up in the attachments list even though it
> looked like a valid MIME separator between the sig and this stuff
4. You can inspect the complete
> message at
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users&m=100480801725434&w=2
>
> This is quite interesting. Attachment 4 is a complete message to the list
> moderator (Steve K), so I'm wondering where and how exactly it got at
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:40:11AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Cliff Sarginson wrote:
>
> > Mmm, oops.
> > I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address,
> > so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses
> work (an
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Rich Lafferty (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Those who saw it and thought "This last part wasn't signed! It must
> not be from Rich!" get brownie points. Those that didn't need to read
> their PGP manuals again :-)
Should we be worried that this entire mess
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
charlie
Charles Jie wrote:
> I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading the answer or comment
(to an unknown question, because I deleted the original posting in the
meantime) ist more painful than ignoring superfluou
Hello Mutt-Users
There seems to be something wrong with the list today. I didn't get one
mail from the list today although there seem to be several mails posted as I
see on the archiv. Anything wrong with my subscription? Or just a
problem with the web?
--
cu
--== Jerri ==--
Hom
somewhat different but related:
wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char
consistently?
some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
imre
Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
> wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently?
> some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>'
just because I think it's a good character for quoting (it looks like an
arrow
* Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> somewhat different but related:
>
> wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char
> consistently?
> some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
>
> imre
>
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str="> " # change this and
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
> > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently?
> > some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
>
> This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>'
> just because I thin
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
This is quoted text: >
This is quoted text: > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker ch
Nick Croft wrote:
> As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
> set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
i also like the bit from the muttrc man page:
You are strongly encouraged not to change this
value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatica
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
>
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
> This is quoted text: >
> This is quot
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
> Charles Jie wrote:
> > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> > programs.
>
> But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just rea
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
>
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text: > somewhat diffe
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
> From: "J. Scott Dorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
>
> Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via
Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
>
> Just wondered how you good people did this?
if you have the Trash patch applied, you can do something lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 18:52
* Will Yardley said
> Nick Wilson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> > the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
> >
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> s
port it
We had the "chitchat" on the suse-linux-e list as well. One of the
list users now hosts an OT suse-list and it has helped keep the off
topic posts off the main list.
Regards,
Dallam
--
Dallam Wych [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024: A89A2371 "Ipsa scientia potestas est&quo
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-users would have a
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> This is quoted text: - End forwarded message -
>
> So what do you think?
> (I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!)
You die. You die and go to hell!
Just kidding ;)
> 9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
> > 9o)
>
> BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
> set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
I have have this:
set indent_string="> " # Dont' be a moron. Leave it as is.
igor
--
Uptime : 31 days, 28 min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urg
me to move threads to the other list.
- --
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- -
I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG!
GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu
Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org
> > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> > stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
&g
Greetings,
I'm trying out mutt v. 1.3.27i and am finding it to be quite nice so far.
However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of
mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N' indicators next to mailboxes
which contain unread mail. Is t
Is there a way to tell Mutt to never PGP-sign messages to a certain
address, but continue to sign them otherwise, other than just remembering
to hit "pf" before sending?
msg25435/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
the reply-to address in header.
tks
--
Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
Registered at: http://counter.li.org
7:36pm up 3:05, 6 users, load
l
well, this page allows subscription -
but no unsubscriptions. (singing:)
"you can check out any time you like -
but you can never leave..." hehe
> I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt
> to the old subscription address but the mailing
> list manager
> % Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
> % multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
>
> While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
> through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> t
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
email where I was told, that I wasn't subscribed to mutt-users. Here's
301 - 400 of 1349 matches
Mail list logo
