Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-20 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
the folder lists" -specifically-? Ooops, sorry O:-) I mean columns in the folder list, like Pine. If you have a lot of folders (as I do), the ways to see and read them all in a sane manner are, basicly, two: (1) making directories to store the folders, or (2) having columns in your fold

Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-20 Thread Chris Green
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 01:25:31AM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > I mean columns in the folder list, like Pine. If you have a lot of > folders (as I do), the ways to see and read them all in a sane manner are, > basicly, two: (1) making directories to store the folders, or (

Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-21 Thread Jimmy Mäkelä
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders' > display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default > (is it customisable?), this provides lots of information which is Yes. See the section abo

Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-22 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders' > > display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default > > (is it customisable?),

Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-22 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders' > > > display is just a directo

Re: Columns in folder list

1999-09-23 Thread Jimmy Mäkelä
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:29:48PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > Aha, thanks, a great improvement! > > > But it's still only a single column so doesn't really help all that > much, I still can't see more than 20 or so folder names on

List of options in muttrc

1999-10-11 Thread John Poltorak
Can anyone tell me where I can find a definitive list of options available in muttrc? Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk -- John

Mailing List and Attachment Problems

1999-12-29 Thread Jon Walthour
named whatever the sender's email address is rather than based on the mailing list name (located in the To: header). I know that if the list has a Reply To: header, it works. What I'm wondering is there a way for me to set something in the .muttrc so that it will see these types o

Re: procmail mailing list URL?

1999-12-31 Thread David DeSimone
Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: procmail mailing list URL? > Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:40:39 +0200 Interesting date header... you have jumped very far in the future!

Re: procmail mailing list URL?

1999-12-31 Thread oneiros
Thus spake Paulius Danielius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > There was mentioned sometime ago about procmail mailing list. > May somebody post the URL again. http://www.procmail.org/era/lists.html -- | oneiros ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | OpenPGP Sup

Re: procmail mailing list URL?

1999-12-31 Thread Paulius Danielius
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:04:01PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: Paulius Danielius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: procmail mailing list URL? > > Date: Sat, 2

sort mailbox list by date

2000-01-25 Thread Olaf Hering
Hi, how can I sort the list of available mailboxes ( c - ? or TAB ) by date, recent first? For now this looks like a simple "ls -l", but should be a "ls -lt". I use mutt version mutt-1.0pre3i. Shame on me if this is a FAQ. Gruss Olaf -- $ man 1 current_release BUG

color index for list mail

2000-02-17 Thread Eric Smith
Is is possible to have mail from mailing lists coloured according to a color index recipe: a la color index brightmagentablack ~l # List mail thanx -- Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 00 27 21 4265311 It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.

Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-03-28 Thread sjp
hello, I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt interactively, all i can do is to use commandline options. There are two

Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-03-28 Thread sjp
hello, I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt interactively, all i can do is to use commandline options. There are two

Re:Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-04-01 Thread sjp
er suited. Have you looked > at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a > batch mode. > > > the subscriber will find To: header is not for them, a bit confusing. > > They shouldn't be confused if the header says that it was addres

Re:Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-04-01 Thread sjp
er suited. Have you looked > at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a > batch mode. > > > the subscriber will find To: header is not for them, a bit confusing. > > They shouldn't be confused if the header says that it was addres

Re: Saving mailing list messages

2000-04-10 Thread David T-G
Harry -- I can't think of a lot of answers for your question except that, if you would consider an "afterwards" sorting tool, you could could make a single macro that pumps all tagged messages through procmail (perhaps with a special .procmailrc file) to be sorted into their proper folders... :

small mailing list using mutt

2000-05-02 Thread prabhakar + nitika
Thanks a lot for all the replies to my prev. message for a macro to delete all messages. I have another q.: I am trying to setup a distribution list of about 6 users, that I send mail to most of the time. I do not have a constant net connection and am a dialup user. My config. is Mandrake

Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Marianne Albin
If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:19 pm Subject: combined reply &

Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marianne Albin proclaimed on mutt-users that: >If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" >option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. You've got it devant-derriere ;) Lists was the old one - you'll have to use "subscr

Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marianne Albin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000: > If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" > option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. Even so, I've never gotten "list-reply" to do a regular re

mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-02 Thread Peter Jaques
/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -oem -oi' >my_hdr Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is there any way to do this, or am i doomed to actually go to yahoo to use this mailing list?? thanks peter -- Peter Jaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://cs.oberlin.edu/~pjaques klezmer&balk

Pass recipient list to filter

2000-10-08 Thread Nathan Saper
Hey, all! Is there a way to pass the list of recipients in the Compose window to a filter? For example, I have a macro that maps 'P' to 'Fgpg -sea -r " to do non-PGP/MIME encryption. Is there a way to make P map to 'Fgpg -sea -r $RECIPIENTS", where $RECIPIENTS i

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to > show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder > ever gets a 'N' flag, regardless of whether or not it contains new &

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Bruce DeVisser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: > > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to > > show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folde

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Mike E
* Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: > > > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to > > > show me whi

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-11 Thread Bruce DeVisser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:21:30PM -0800, Mike E wrote: > Now, is there a way to set all the files in my maildir as > folders so I don't have to update this everytime I add a > new mailing list, etc? > > Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle. > I gues

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-13 Thread lang
On Thu, 09 Nov 2000, Mike E wrote: > Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle. I guess > that's what I get for being on dozens of mailing lists. :) No, the reason to be on dozens of mailing lists is to give you work to do on your .muttrc to keep it up to date. :-) -- Greg Mathe

Re: Is this list active

2000-12-15 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
John Indra proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or > not? > Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message. maybe you just have a full mailbox? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus

Re: Is this list active

2000-12-15 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, >Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or >not? We're discussing even things we shouldn't. >Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message. Did you receive your own? Thorsten

Re: Is this list active

2000-12-15 Thread John Indra
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: |We're discussing even things we shouldn't. :) |Did you receive your own? Yes... then this list is alive for all this time. My mistake then, sorry... |Thorsten Regards, John

Re: Is this list active

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Gift
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: Nope, no one here. -- "Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"

Re: Is this list active

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Gift
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:12:54PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: > Hi, > > On 00-12-15, Jonathan Gift wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: > > > >Nope, no one here. Sorry, joke. You were asking if anyone was in the list. Answering

Pb with this mailing list

2001-04-15 Thread Andre Berger
Whenever I post to this list, I get an undeliverable mail-receipt, saying [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too many "Received" headers - suspected mail loop This has begun about a week (or two) ago. How to deal with the situation? Andre Berger[[EMAIL

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-04-30 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:12:12PM +0800, ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > Hi mutt-users, > > I have three Q about my mutt-1.25i > > 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key > to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't > have to type

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-04-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
ZHENG, You-Zhong proclaimed on mutt-users that: > 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key > to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't > have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias mutt to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2)Also after I read the

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-04-30 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:12:12PM +0800, ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key > to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't > have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For every subscribed mailing-list I use a di

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-04-30 Thread darren chamberlain
ZHENG, You-Zhong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 04/30/2001: > 1)I use 'L' to reply to mailing list, is there any fast key > to quickly post in mailing list? e.g. There for I don't > have to type To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A macro will do this nicely

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-01 Thread ZHENG, You-Zhong
On 04-30-2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > lists was in older mutts. in mutt 1.2.x you use "subscribe" So why bother just renaming lists to subscribe? zhengyz

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-01 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
ZHENG, You-Zhong proclaimed on mutt-users that: > On 04-30-2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > lists was in older mutts. in mutt 1.2.x you use "subscribe" > So why bother just renaming lists to subscribe? Please read the mutt documentation (should be there on your pc) for why. -- S

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-03 Thread ZHENG, You-Zhong
ists, the %L index_format won't work, but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns. There must be some reasons for mutt author to add the new subscribe keyword, zhengyz

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-03 Thread Mr. Wade
I still can't get it. > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work, > but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns. > There must be some reasons for mutt author to add the new > subscribe keyword, Well, one significant difference

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-03 Thread Michael Tatge
Mr. Wade muttered: > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it. > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work, > > but list-reply key works in both lists and subscribe patterns. > >

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-04 Thread Tim Legant
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:28:09PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Mr. Wade muttered: > > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it. > > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work, >

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-04 Thread Mr. Wade
Michael Tatge wrote: > Mr. Wade muttered: > > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it. > > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't work, > > > but list-reply key works

Re: Post in Mailing List

2001-05-05 Thread Michael Tatge
Mr. Wade muttered: > Michael Tatge wrote: > > Mr. Wade muttered: > > > ZHENG, You-Zhong wrote: > > > > I've read the sec 4.8 in mutt manual, but I still can't get it. > > > > It seems if you use lists, the %L index_format won't w

Re: Making a mailing list

2001-05-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mutt-users] : > I have a mailing list that I send information out on every week or two. > These are clients and customers who have asked to be kept informed of new > virus and malware alerts, so the mail is all one way and majordomo is not > the tool for this. No

Re: Making a mailing list

2001-05-29 Thread Lawrence Mitchell
* On [010529 19:40] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very simply, a mailing list to hold 50 email addresses that I can send as > one message to all 50 recipients, as in an address book would do the job best. > I'm sure this must be possible, but for the life o

Re: List name in index

2001-07-21 Thread Ankit Mohan
* Ankit Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [18:00 21/07/01]: > hi. > is it possible to get the mailing list instead of the sender's name in the > index? i am not talking about the mailing list address, which i can get by > using %L, but want the list name which i have defined

list wierdness and muttrc builder

2001-10-25 Thread Carl B . Constantine
For some reason I was unsubed from this list without warning. Anyone know why that would be? Anyway, according to http://mutt.netliberte.org, the muttrc builder code is under the GPL. I thought at one point, he had a link to download the code but that seems to have vanished. does anyone have an

list of aliases in .muttrc

2001-10-29 Thread Stefan Antoni
I defined some aliases in my .muttrc . Last time i used mutt, i hit some(?) keys and mutt displayed a list of my aliases like: 1. lars 2. nin 3. ... This overview is a nice thing when i forget an alias, but i didn't recognize how i invoked it and i didn't find anything in the manua

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":) Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of that email? -- Bruno

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with: > On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":) > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > that email? All I s

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:53:18AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >wrote: > > > > This messages is as seen in the list in one of the threads: > > [...] > > > Cc: "FreeBSD Questio

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread David T-G
EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:12:46 CET Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 17:13:10 +0100 From: @prodigy.net.mx Subject: NEMCIJA To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wonder why it didn't show up in the attachments list even though

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Justin R. Miller
Thus spake Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the > > end of that email? > > All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;) I saw neither. -- Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (pre

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > > that email? > > All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;) Strange, the email I got from gbnet.net _definitely_ had a big virus a

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Lars Hecking
se it was rejected on my mail gateway. Yes, Rich's message was infected with the SirCam virus. The pgp sig was attachment 3, the virus was attachment 4. You can inspect the complete message at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users&m=100480801725434&w=2 This is quite in

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 01:13:46PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with: > % On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > % > > % > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":) > % > % Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > % that email?

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:27:58PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with: > On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > > > > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > > > that email? > > > > All I saw was his PGP signature atta

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox with: > > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the > > mail, not Outhouse... > > That User-Agent header could have been spoofed... Before I stick my foot any farther into my mouth, I sh

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said... % On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox with: % > > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the % > > mail, not Outhouse... % > % > That User-Agent header could have been spoofed...

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread MuttER
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":) > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > that email? > > -- > Bruno ---end quot

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Will Yardley
Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Mmm, oops. > I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address, > so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw. [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses work (and people tend to send to both). just add both to your subscribe line and you'

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-03 Thread Byrial Jensen
stingly > enough, though, I had to pump the message through less to find it, and > then there were some other headers at the top. To wit: > I wonder why it didn't show up in the attachments list even though it > looked like a valid MIME separator between the sig and this stuff

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-04 Thread Rich Lafferty
4. You can inspect the complete > message at > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users&m=100480801725434&w=2 > > This is quite interesting. Attachment 4 is a complete message to the list > moderator (Steve K), so I'm wondering where and how exactly it got at

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-04 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:40:11AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > Mmm, oops. > > I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address, > > so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses > work (an

Re: List processing in Mutt

2001-11-04 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Rich Lafferty (dis)graced my inbox with: > Those who saw it and thought "This last part wasn't signed! It must > not be from Rich!" get brownie points. Those that didn't need to read > their PGP manuals again :-) Should we be worried that this entire mess

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-09 Thread Charles Jie
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his programs. charlie

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-09 Thread Volker Moell
Charles Jie wrote: > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his > programs. But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading the answer or comment (to an unknown question, because I deleted the original posting in the meantime) ist more painful than ignoring superfluou

Something wrong with the list?

2002-01-10 Thread Gerhard Siegesmund
Hello Mutt-Users There seems to be something wrong with the list today. I didn't get one mail from the list today although there seem to be several mails posted as I see on the archiv. Anything wrong with my subscription? Or just a problem with the web? -- cu --== Jerri ==-- Hom

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Imre Vida
somewhat different but related: wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently? some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike imre

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Imre Vida spake thus: > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently? > some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>' just because I think it's a good character for quoting (it looks like an arrow

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Nick Croft
* Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > somewhat different but related: > > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char > consistently? > some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike > > imre > As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc: set indent_str="> " # change this and

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Knute
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Imre Vida spake thus: > > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently? > > some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike > > This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>' > just because I thin

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Knute
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote: This is quoted text: This is quoted text: This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related: This is quoted text: > This is quoted text: > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker ch

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-10 Thread Will Yardley
Nick Croft wrote: > As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc: > set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-) i also like the bit from the muttrc man page: You are strongly encouraged not to change this value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatica

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Anh Lai
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ... > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote: > > This is quoted text: > This is quoted text: > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related: > This is quoted text: > > This is quot

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Charles Jie
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-) best, charlie On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote: > Charles Jie wrote: > > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his > > programs. > > But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just rea

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Knute
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote: > > > ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ... > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote: > > > > This is quoted text: > > This is quoted text: > > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This is quoted text: > somewhat diffe

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread J. Scott Dorr
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote: > > ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ... > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote: > > > > This is quoted text: > > This is quoted text: > > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This is quoted text:

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800 > From: "J. Scott Dorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette > > Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via

Re: Archiving my list mail

2002-01-11 Thread Will Yardley
Nick Wilson wrote: > > I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all > the other rubbish to make it easier to search through. > > Just wondered how you good people did this? if you have the Trash patch applied, you can do something lik

Re: Archiving my list mail

2002-01-11 Thread Nick Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 11-01-02 at 18:52 * Will Yardley said > Nick Wilson wrote: > > > > I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all > > the other rubbish to make it easier to search through. > >

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT > s

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Dallam
port it We had the "chitchat" on the suse-linux-e list as well. One of the list users now hosts an OT suse-list and it has helped keep the off topic posts off the main list. Regards, Dallam -- Dallam Wych [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024: A89A2371 "Ipsa scientia potestas est&quo

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus: > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT > stuff to mutt-users would have a

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Knute spake thus: > This is quoted text: - End forwarded message - > > So what do you think? > (I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!) You die. You die and go to hell! Just kidding ;) > 9o) BTW, what the heck is that thing? -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Jonathan Irving
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]: > > 9o) > > BTW, what the heck is that thing? He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously. -- http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center msg22976/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-12 Thread Igor Pruchanskiy
> As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc: > set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-) I have have this: set indent_string="> " # Dont' be a moron. Leave it as is. igor -- Uptime : 31 days, 28 min

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-12 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly: > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urg

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-12 Thread Derek D. Martin
me to move threads to the other list. - -- Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-12 Thread Igor Pruchanskiy
> > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to > > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating > > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT > > stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go. &g

'N' indicator in folder list

2002-01-28 Thread Peter R. Wood - Lists
Greetings, I'm trying out mutt v. 1.3.27i and am finding it to be quite nice so far. However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N' indicators next to mailboxes which contain unread mail. Is t

Per-list configuration of PGP?

2002-03-13 Thread Shawn McMahon
Is there a way to tell Mutt to never PGP-sign messages to a certain address, but continue to sign them otherwise, other than just remembering to hit "pf" before sending? msg25435/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

am I having list probs

2002-03-14 Thread pat
Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at the reply-to address in header. tks -- Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 Registered at: http://counter.li.org 7:36pm up 3:05, 6 users, load

Re: unsubscribing -> contact list owner?

2002-03-16 Thread Sven Guckes
l well, this page allows subscription - but no unsubscriptions. (singing:) "you can check out any time you like - but you can never leave..." hehe > I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt > to the old subscription address but the mailing > list manager

gbnet.net was Re: List-Reply

2002-04-18 Thread V K
> % Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have > % multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh. > > While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks > through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED], > t

about 'mutt-users' mailing list

2002-06-03 Thread Jussi Ekholm
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an email where I was told, that I wasn't subscribed to mutt-users. Here's

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >