Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 10Oct2022 17:00, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: Firefox 105.0.3 on Ubuntu 22.04. It seems the switch to snap has many disadvantages. Yes and no. I like a bit of restraint. But it's good if the reasons are made apparent to the user. Example, on MacOS apps actually need to go through the OS

Re: Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-10 08:42, José María Mateos wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > The problem was related to the target dir (/tmp/mutt_attach). Although > > it was accessible by the current user, Firefox was not able to display > > files at file:///tmp/mut

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread José María Mateos
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: The problem was related to the target dir (/tmp/mutt_attach). Although it was accessible by the current user, Firefox was not able to display files at file:///tmp/mutt_attach/file.html – while Epiphany was. Whatever the rea

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-10 08:58, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 09Oct2022 09:35, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Yes, I did use Chris Green's helper script, and it does work with > > Epiphany, but not with Firefox. > > Maybe it would prefer a "file:///path/to/file.html" URL? > > Try some things by hand with

Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-09 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 09Oct2022 09:35, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: Yes, I did use Chris Green's helper script, and it does work with Epiphany, but not with Firefox. Maybe it would prefer a "file:///path/to/file.html" URL? Try some things by hand with the "open" command, see what works. You're aware that "op

Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-09 Thread Chris Green
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 08:18:12AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 08Oct2022 21:55, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > >Thank you! This works well with Epiphany, but Firefox still fails > >(which > >I do not care about, as long as I have a working browser option). > > My recollection is that th

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-09 08:18, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 08Oct2022 21:55, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Thank you! This works well with Epiphany, but Firefox still fails (which > > I do not care about, as long as I have a working browser option). > > My recollection is that this is a timing issue. T

Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 08Oct2022 21:55, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: Thank you! This works well with Epiphany, but Firefox still fails (which I do not care about, as long as I have a working browser option). My recollection is that this is a timing issue. To run the viewer mutt goes: - make a temp file conta

Re: Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-08 11:52, Chris Green wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 12:06:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > On 2022-10-08 09:34, Chris Green wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I recently configured mutt on a

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Chris Green
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 12:06:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > On 2022-10-08 09:34, Chris Green wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML > > > messages

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-08 09:34, Chris Green wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML > > messages in the default browser. mailcap contains the following lines: > > > > text/html; op

Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Chris Green
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > Hi, > > I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML > messages in the default browser. mailcap contains the following lines: > > text/html; open %s; > text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; co

Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML messages in the default browser. mailcap contains the following lines: text/html; open %s; text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput application/pdf; open %s; copiousoutput w3m is used automatically (auto_vi

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-11-22 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:41:11AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:39:13AM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote: For docx file, I think I have exactly the same thing: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;open -a preview -n -W %s; nametemplate=

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-26 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
ctual browsers directly, you > could write a script that presented you with a list of > options, and you enter your choice. That way, you could > have more that two options. If always having to select > a browser manually is too inefficient, you could > continue to invoke w3m when view

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-25 Thread Greg Marks
> I have the following set up in my .mailcap: > >text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput > > so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I > am wondering is it possible to have an option for viewing using > midori/firefox for the cases where w3m is not enough?

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-25 Thread raf
efox instead? > > > > TIA! > > Rather than invoking actual browsers directly, you > could write a script that presented you with a list of > options, and you enter your choice. That way, you could > have more that two options. If always having to select > a browser m

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-25 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
se firefox instead? > > TIA! Rather than invoking actual browsers directly, you could write a script that presented you with a list of options, and you enter your choice. That way, you could have more that two options. If always having to select a browser manually is too inefficient, you could con

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-25 Thread raf
ctly, you could write a script that presented you with a list of options, and you enter your choice. That way, you could have more that two options. If always having to select a browser manually is too inefficient, you could continue to invoke w3m when viewing html, and invoke this menu-based browser chooser when "printing" html. cheers, raf

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-25 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:39:13AM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote: For docx file, I think I have exactly the same thing: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;open -a preview -n -W %s; nametemplate=%s.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessing

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Kenichi Asai
> text/html; mutt_bgrun /usr/bin/firefox %s >/dev/null 2>&1; needsterminal > text/html; elinks -dump ; copiousoutput This is almost what I am doing. However, it works for text/html but not for docx file, apparently. For text/html, I have: text/html; open -a safari -n -W %s; nametemplate=%s.htm

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote: >> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I >> have the following set up in my .mailcap: >> text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput >> so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, howeve

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Wim
Hi, On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote: > Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I > have the following set up in my .mailcap: > > text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput > > so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, h

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 24Oct2020 20:54, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote: >Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I >have the following set up in my .mailcap: > >text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput > >so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, howeve

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* mutt users list [10-24-20 16:54]: > Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like > it). I have the following set up in my .mailcap: > > text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput > > so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I am > wond

Re: is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread José María Mateos
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 08:54:18PM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote: Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I have the following set up in my .mailcap: text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput so it converts things using w3m more or

is it possible to have two options for viewing html mail?

2020-10-24 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I have the following set up in my .mailcap: text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I am wondering is it possible to have an option for viewing

Re: Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-20 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 20Jul2015 16:11, m...@raf.org wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: In particular, I maintain a mutt group "htmlers" to track specific senders which send useless plain text components. Keeps the condition readable. [...] another approach is to automatically run emails through a filter that replace

Re: Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-20 Thread mutt
Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 16Jul2015 13:02, Chris Down wrote: > >I eventually worked this out[0]. > > > >I had previously tried using a message-hook to set > >alternative_order, but that didn't work because I didn't realise > >that alternative_order *appends*, it doesn't overwrite the existing >

Re: Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-17 Thread Chris Down
Cameron Simpson writes: In particular, I maintain a mutt group "htmlers" to track specific senders which send useless plain text components. Keeps the condition readable. That's a great idea, thanks a lot for bringing that up.

Re: Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-16 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 16Jul2015 13:02, Chris Down wrote: I eventually worked this out[0]. I had previously tried using a message-hook to set alternative_order, but that didn't work because I didn't realise that alternative_order *appends*, it doesn't overwrite the existing alternative_order. So, the basic sol

Re: Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-16 Thread Chris Down
I eventually worked this out[0]. I had previously tried using a message-hook to set alternative_order, but that didn't work because I didn't realise that alternative_order *appends*, it doesn't overwrite the existing alternative_order. So, the basic solution is to call unalternative_order eve

Forcing viewing HTML for certain senders

2015-07-16 Thread Chris Down
Is there some way to force viewing HTML for certain senders? I tend to prefer reading plain text over HTML (which I auto_view with w3m), but some senders send stupidly broken e-mails as plain text, and the only reasonable thing to do is view the HTML content instead. For example, some senders

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2015-01-01 Thread Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
On 2013-12-14, Chris Down wrote: > > Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m > (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these > instances, I would like to be able to somehow view these in my browser. > Right now my procedure is this: > > - Go to attac

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-15 Thread Chris Down
On 2013-12-15 12:32:40 +, Christian Ebert wrote: > You can just use it without the --safe option? Right -- my point was about doing it without an external script. For now catting it to a file and opening it in chromium is sufficient, but it has some annoying caveats (charset, unsafe stuff)...

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Chris Down on Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 12:00:45 +0800 > On 2013-12-14 14:08:35 +, Christian Ebert wrote: >> Shameless plug: https://bitbucket.org/blacktrash/muttils has a >> viewhtmlmsg script which can be bound to a key. > > This looks pretty nice, thanks. Some of the checks it does see

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Chris Down
On 2013-12-14 14:08:35 +, Christian Ebert wrote: > Shameless plug: https://bitbucket.org/blacktrash/muttils has a > viewhtmlmsg script which can be bound to a key. This looks pretty nice, thanks. Some of the checks it does seem quite useful. Perhaps some of it could be mitigated in-browser ins

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Chris Down
On 2013-12-14 18:03:57 -0500, Tim Gray wrote: > I use Christian's script for complex html messages, particularly ones that > have images attached in the email. However, it's a bit slower sometimes > then just opening up the html attachment via mailcap. Thankfully I only plan to do this in instanc

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27 PM +0800, Chris Down wrote: My browser is Chromium, but I think any generic solution should be adaptable. I use Christian's script for complex html messages, particularly ones that have images attached in the email. However, it's a bit slower sometimes then just open

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Omen Wild
Quoting Chris Down on Sat, Dec 14 20:27: > > Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m > (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these > instances, I would like to be able to somehow view these in my browser. > Right now my procedure is this: muttils

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Will Fiveash
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 02:08:35PM +, Christian Ebert wrote: >* Chris Down on Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 20:27:09 +0800 >> Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m >> (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these >> instances, I would like to b

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Christian Ebert
* Chris Down on Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 20:27:09 +0800 > Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m > (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these > instances, I would like to be able to somehow view these in my browser. > Right now my procedure

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Chris Down
On 2013-12-14 07:43:31 -0500, Peter Davis wrote: > If you Google "pipe to browser," you'll find various tools that will > do this for you. I use one on the Mac called simply "browser," but > there are others. Then in mutt you could simply view the list of parts > ('v' command) and pipe the html ('|

Re: Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Peter Davis
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:09PM +0800, Chris Down wrote: > Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m > (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these > instances, I would like to be able to somehow view these in my browser. > Right now my procedure is

Viewing HTML in a "real" browser

2013-12-14 Thread Chris Down
Occasionally I get complex HTML e-mails that don't quite work in w3m (which is what I have in my mailcap to view text/html). In these instances, I would like to be able to somehow view these in my browser. Right now my procedure is this: - Go to attach - Save the html part as /tmp/foo.html - Open

Re: Viewing html documents

2012-02-24 Thread Ranousse
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:01, Paul wrote: > On Friday, 24 February, 2012 at 11:14:04 GMT, Ranousse wrote: > >After an upgrade to Mutt 1.5.21 (Debian backports), it does not work > >anymore. Pressing enter in the attachment window shows the html file as > >a text file (source file). > > Try 'm', f

Re: Viewing html documents

2012-02-24 Thread Paul
On Friday, 24 February, 2012 at 11:14:04 GMT, Ranousse wrote: After an upgrade to Mutt 1.5.21 (Debian backports), it does not work anymore. Pressing enter in the attachment window shows the html file as a text file (source file). Try 'm', for view-mailcap, instead of enter. -- .

Viewing html documents

2012-02-24 Thread Ranousse
On Debian squeeze (Mutt 1.5.20), I used to have the following line in mutt mailcap file text/html; w3m '%s'; nametemplate=%s.html Thus if I received an html message that was not readable by mutt, I went to the attachment window and could see the message with w3m. After an upgrade t

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-10 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Michael, * Michael Ludwig on Sunday, April 10, 2011 at 23:07:41 +0200 > Michael Ludwig schrieb am 10.04.2011 um 22:46 (+0200): >> Christian Ebert schrieb am 02.04.2011 um 14:11 (+0100): >>> https://bitbucket.org/blacktrash/muttils/ >> >> What would I have to do to get this to work on Windows/C

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 10.04.2011 um 23:07 (+0200): > Looks like I'd have to modify viewhtmlmsg (which runs in Cygwin, just > like Mutt) to use the Cygwin path notation to pass the path in Windows > notation to Windows apps. Had a look at the source: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/muttils/v

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 10.04.2011 um 22:46 (+0200): > Christian Ebert schrieb am 02.04.2011 um 14:11 (+0100): > > * Leonardo M. Ramé on Friday, April 01, 2011 at 17:40:08 -0300 > > > > > > How can I let Mutt force showing the images? > > > > If you're not afraid of Python you can try out viewh

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Christian Ebert schrieb am 02.04.2011 um 14:11 (+0100): > * Leonardo M. Ramé on Friday, April 01, 2011 at 17:40:08 -0300 > > Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the > > attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. > > > > When I select the main html file

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Jason Helfman on Monday, 04 April 2011: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:48:01PM -0700, Jason Helfman thus spake: > >On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:29:37PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >>It looks like it installed everything correctly EXCEPT for viewhtmlmsg. > >> > >>-- > >>.o. | Sterling (Chip)

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Jason Helfman
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:48:01PM -0700, Jason Helfman thus spake: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:29:37PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: It looks like it installed everything correctly EXCEPT for viewhtmlmsg. -- .o. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com ..o | sterl...@camdensof

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Jason Helfman
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:29:37PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: It looks like it installed everything correctly EXCEPT for viewhtmlmsg. -- .o. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com ..o | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com ooo | 2048R/D6DBAF91 |

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Jason Helfman on Monday, 04 April 2011: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:35:37PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >Quoth Jason Helfman on Monday, 04 April 2011: > >>On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >>>Quoth Jason Helfman on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > On Sat,

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Jason Helfman
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:35:37PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: Quoth Jason Helfman on Monday, 04 April 2011: On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: >Quoth Jason Helfman on Saturday, 02 April 2011: >>On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: >

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Jason Helfman on Monday, 04 April 2011: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >Quoth Jason Helfman on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > >>On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >>>Quoth Will Fiveash on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > On Sat

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-04 Thread Jason Helfman
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: Quoth Jason Helfman on Saturday, 02 April 2011: On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: >Quoth Will Fiveash on Saturday, 02 April 2011: >>On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: >>> On A

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-03 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Jason Helfman on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: > >Quoth Will Fiveash on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > >>On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > >>> On Apr 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > >>> >

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Jason Helfman
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Chip Camden thus spake: Quoth Will Fiveash on Saturday, 02 April 2011: On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > On Apr 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > >If you're not afraid of Python you can try out viewhtmlmsg fro

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Will Fiveash on Saturday, 02 April 2011: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > > On Apr 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > > >If you're not afraid of Python you can try out viewhtmlmsg from > > >my muttils package: > > > > Thanks for reminding me abo

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Leonardo M . Ramé
On 2011-04-02 14:11:19 +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > * Leonardo M. Ramé on Friday, April 01, 2011 at 17:40:08 -0300 > > Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the > > attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. > > > > When I select the main html file, t

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Leonardo M . Ramé
On 2011-04-01 16:18:29 -0500, David Champion wrote: > * On 01 Apr 2011, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > > Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the > > attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. > > > > When I select the main html file, the default web browse

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Will Fiveash
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > On Apr 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > >If you're not afraid of Python you can try out viewhtmlmsg from > >my muttils package: > > Thanks for reminding me about these. I had installed them awhile ago and > never reme

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Tim Gray
On Apr 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: If you're not afraid of Python you can try out viewhtmlmsg from my muttils package: Thanks for reminding me about these. I had installed them awhile ago and never remember to use them. Works great!

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-02 Thread Christian Ebert
* Leonardo M. Ramé on Friday, April 01, 2011 at 17:40:08 -0300 > Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the > attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. > > When I select the main html file, the default web browser is opened and > I can see the html file

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-01 Thread Brandon Sandrowicz
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:18:29PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > To read such a message you need a program that is rfc2822-aware and > handled both HTML rendering and content-id chasing, or a view wrapper > that can save your message and all content-id attachments together (e.g. > to a directory)

Re: Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-01 Thread David Champion
* On 01 Apr 2011, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the > attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. > > When I select the main html file, the default web browser is opened and > I can see the html file alone, the images ar

Viewing HTML mails with images

2011-04-01 Thread Leonardo M . Ramé
Hi, when I receive HTML mails, I can see all its files in the attachments view, that is, the html itself, and all of its images. When I select the main html file, the default web browser is opened and I can see the html file alone, the images are not loaded. How can I let Mutt force showing the i

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-06 Thread senator galt
On Feb 5, 2008 2:44 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I gather from your other answer that it works "in principle" ;) > Yes. It does! :) > this looks like you made some mistake when pasting(?) the above > entry. Make sure there are no whitespaces after the backslashes, > check the q

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Ebert
* senator galt on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 at 12:05:57 -0700 > On Feb 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You can try out viewhtmlmsg from my python package at >> . I gather from your other answer that it works "in principle" ;)

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-05 Thread senator galt
On Feb 5, 2008 12:27 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does your Mutt version already support $my_variables? Don't know. how to check that? Version of my mutt:1.5.15 > You might want to start with a simpler entry for testing: > > macro index "viewhtmlmsg -s" yes. this works > Does

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Ebert
* senator galt on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 at 12:05:57 -0700 > On Feb 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You can try out viewhtmlmsg from my python package at >> . >> > I installed muttils and based on the suggestions in doc/exam

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-05 Thread senator galt
On Feb 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can try out viewhtmlmsg from my python package at > . > I installed muttils and based on the suggestions in doc/example-muttrc, I added this to my .muttrc macro index "\ set my_wait_key

Re: viewing html emails with images

2008-02-04 Thread Christian Ebert
* senator galt on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 14:19:39 -0700 > I often receive emails of type text/html. I've experimented displaying > them with links and firefox (with appropriate setting in my .mailcap). > Firefox seems to display the email text but not the images. Instead of > the images, I se

viewing html emails with images

2008-02-03 Thread senator galt
Hi, I often receive emails of type text/html. I've experimented displaying them with links and firefox (with appropriate setting in my .mailcap). Firefox seems to display the email text but not the images. Instead of the images, I see grayish box which indicates the image wasn't available. Is ther

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-15 Thread Wolf Wiegand
Hi, markus reichelt wrote: > * markus reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages > > > where the main part is text/html which references the other parts > > > which are typic

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread Christian Ebert
* Sertaç Ö. Yıldız on Sunday, September 09, 2007 at 00:13:34 +0300 > If you have w3m working with inline images, calling w3m (from a script¹) > to display those html messages is practically same as displaying them in > the pager area. > > ¹ similar to this one: http://zhar.net/projects/shell/mut

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread Sertaç Ö . Yıldız
[08.Eyl.07 20:32 +0200] M. Fioretti: Just for the record: did this discussion confirm for good that it is just not possible to see html messages, images included, _inside_ the mutt pager area or not? Can we still hope? If you have w3m working with inline images, calling w3m (from a script¹) t

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread markus reichelt
* "M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just for the record: did this discussion confirm for good that it is > just not possible to see html messages, images included, _inside_ the > mutt pager area or not? Can we still hope? I didn't follow it that closely because the whole thing was too mu

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 20:18:01 PM +0200, markus reichelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > the link for kmutt is dead, I put it up at > http://mareichelt.de/pub/notmine/kmutt-0.1.tar.gz > OK, thanks, I'll try to compile and use it next week. Just for the record: did this discussion confirm for good t

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 19:59:27 PM +0200, markus reichelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages > > where the main part is text/html which references the other parts > > which are typically

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread markus reichelt
* markus reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages > > where the main part is text/html which references the other parts > > which are typically images? > > http://marc.info/?l=mutt-

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-09-08 Thread markus reichelt
* Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages > where the main part is text/html which references the other parts > which are typically images? http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=107399558722761&w=2 -- left blank, right bald pg

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-09-01, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:14:36AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > > On 2007-08-31, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Matt Okeson-Harlow wrote: > > > > > > > w3m can be compiled to

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread Kai Grossjohann
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:14:36AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2007-08-31, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Matt Okeson-Harlow wrote: > > > > > w3m can be compiled to display images in an xterm. > > > > Very well. But how do we convert

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread M. Fioretti
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 23:34:57 PM -0500, Matt Okeson-Harlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > ...yes? The question was about getting it to display *images*, not > > frames and columns. > > w3m can be compiled to display images in an xterm. which is the point from which I started yesterday. The actua

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-08-31, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Matt Okeson-Harlow wrote: > > > w3m can be compiled to display images in an xterm. > > Very well. But how do we convert a multipart/related message with > text/html and image/foo parts into some

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread Kai Grossjohann
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Matt Okeson-Harlow wrote: > w3m can be compiled to display images in an xterm. Very well. But how do we convert a multipart/related message with text/html and image/foo parts into something that w3m can digest? I believe that some messages have text/htm

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-31 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 19:41]: > * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17:44]: > > In general, what mutt renders is the piped output of the programs > > listed as handlers for the specific MIME-types. So, if w3m can get > > images to display when used like this: >

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Matt Okeson-Harlow
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:44:26PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, August 30 at 08:33 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > > * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 20:07]: > >> On Thursday, August 30 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > >>> * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, August 30 at 08:33 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 20:07]: >> On Thursday, August 30 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: >>> * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17:44]: In general,

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 20:07]: > On Thursday, August 30 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > >* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17:44]: > >> In general, what mutt renders is the piped output of the programs > >> listed as handlers for the specific MIME-types. So,

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, August 30 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: >* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17:44]: >> In general, what mutt renders is the piped output of the programs >> listed as handlers for the specific MIME-types. So, if w3m can ge

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-30-07 17:44]: > In general, what mutt renders is the piped output of the programs > listed as handlers for the specific MIME-types. So, if w3m can get > images to display when used like this: > > $ cat foo.html | w3m -dump -T text/html >foo.txt; >

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, August 30 at 10:54 PM, quoth M. Fioretti: >it could surely be used to do what you need in a separate terminal >with a bit of wrapping, but, is there any way to make it work that way >when it's a display_filter, that is _inside_ the mutt wi

Re: Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread M. Fioretti
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 22:36:01 PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages > where the main part is text/html which references the other parts > which are typically images? Here is a related question/suggestion which I'

Viewing HTML messages with images

2007-08-30 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Does anyone have a solution for viewing multipart/related messages where the main part is text/html which references the other parts which are typically images? I envision something that saves all parts of separate files in a temp directory, then either tweaks the filenames so that the links from

Re: Viewing HTML difficulties in mutt 1.4

2002-10-20 Thread Mike Leone
Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 10 19, 02 at 07:52: > Mike Leone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > Hello. I seem to not be understanding something about viewing HTML email in > > mut. > > Hm right. Your mixing things up. No doubt. :-) > > I have

  1   2   >