Chris White wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer usi
Chris White wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer using
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
> me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
> examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer using
> the package wh
Shankar Unni writes:
>And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
>has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
Here is an unofficial install package of the new PostgreSQL 7.2:
http://www.entropy.ch/software/macosx/postgresql/
You can get an unofficial
Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Shankar Unni writes:
>>And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
>>has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
> When you are saying that there is no native Windows or OS X port, what
> were you referring to ??
Oh, P
The list seems having some problems. I've rereceived many emails, like
this one, which were sent via the list last week!!
Anyone else has the same problem?
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL
riginal Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trond=20
> > Eivind Glomsr=F8d
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:10 PM
> > To: Sinisa Milivojevic
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subje
Hi!
> "Sinisa" =3D=3D Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sinisa> Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d writes:
>> Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>=20
>> There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
>> tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL func
Shankar Unni writes:
>
>
> And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
> has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
>
> Cygwin is dandy, but I definitely don't trust a database that uses cygwin
> as an emulation layer underneath for basic file acce
Hi!
> "Sinisa" =3D=3D Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sinisa> Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d writes:
>> "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>=20
>> > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?=20
>>=20
>> PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (
"Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
everywhere, foreign keys, subselects, stored procedures, triggers,
etc), while MySQL is heavily optimized for handling big l
: Sinisa Milivojevic
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>=20
> > Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d writes:
> > > "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >=20
Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d writes:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>=20
> I said "everywhere" - you need to use Innobase to get foreign keys, a=
nd=20
> innobase/db3 to get transactions.
>=20
> --=20
> Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d
> Red Hat, Inc.
>=20
>=20
As EVERY binary and source we d
Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > It's enabled in the MySQL rpms we distribute as part of RHL as well, but
> > it's not the default type for created tables. Thus, most people won't be
> > usi
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:49:02PM +0200, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
> >
> > PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
> >
Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d writes:
> Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>=20
> There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
> tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL functionality not=
> being present.
>=20
> --=20
> Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d
> Red Hat, Inc.
Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
> > tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL functionality not
> > being present.
>
to choose PostgreSQL - subselects, triggers, user defined types,
etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trond=20
> Eivind Glomsr=F8d
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
Hi!
> "Sinisa" == Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sinisa> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
>> Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
>> tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL functionalit
Hi!
> "Sinisa" == Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sinisa> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
>> "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
>>
>> PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
Shankar Unni writes:
>And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
>has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
Here is an unofficial install package of the new PostgreSQL 7.2:
http://www.entropy.ch/software/macosx/postgresql/
You can get an unofficial
Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Shankar Unni writes:
>>And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
>>has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
> When you are saying that there is no native Windows or OS X port, what
> were you referring to ??
Oh, P
Shankar Unni writes:
>
>
> And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
> has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working on that?).
>
> Cygwin is dandy, but I definitely don't trust a database that uses cygwin
> as an emulation layer underneath for basic file acce
Alok K. Dhir wrote:
> That said, depending on your requirements, there are still compelling
> reasons to choose PostgreSQL - subselects, triggers, user defined types,
> etc.
And one big reason not: no native Windows port. Or Mac port (though that
has probably changed with OS/X - anyone working
to choose PostgreSQL - subselects, triggers, user defined types,
etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trond
> Eivind Glomsrød
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
> > tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL functionality not
> > being present.
>
Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> There is a slight difference between advanced, non-standardized
> tuning/backup/load-balancing like that and core SQL functionality not
> being present.
>
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
This dep
Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > It's enabled in the MySQL rpms we distribute as part of RHL as well, but
> > it's not the default type for created tables. Thus, most people won't be
> > usi
Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> It's enabled in the MySQL rpms we distribute as part of RHL as well, but
> it's not the default type for created tables. Thus, most people won't be
> using it. If memory serves, you need to set various options in
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > I said "everywhere" - you need to use Innobase to get foreign keys, and
> > innobase/db3 to get transactions.
>
> As EVERY binary and source we distribute ha
Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> I said "everywhere" - you need to use Innobase to get foreign keys, and
> innobase/db3 to get transactions.
>
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
>
As EVERY binary and source we distribute has Inno
ilivojevic
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> > Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > > "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> >
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:49:02PM +0200, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
> >
> > PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
> >
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> > "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
> >
> > PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
> > everywhere, foreign k
Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:
> "Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
>
> PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
> everywhere, foreign keys, subselects, stored procedures, triggers,
> etc), while M
"Vernon A Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has a lot of features MySQL don't have yet (transactions
everywhere, foreign keys, subselects, stored procedures, triggers,
etc), while MySQL is heavily optimized for handling big l
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 07:59, Vernon A Webb wrote:
> Hey All!
>
> Anyone know the difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL?
> Are the both pretty much the same? So far I like MySQL, but
> find that MS SQL is far greater, but only because it has
> much more. Anyone have any comments on the matter
Hi.
No, Postgres has much more. The biggest point is, that it has
Subselects ! But mySQL seems to be much faster in some points.
That´s all I want to tell :)
Greetz
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Vernon A Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:59 PM
To:
Hi Jani and Owen,
Owen if you are dumping the data using pg_dump, I think I may be
able to help. First suggestion is to dump the data and the data
schema separetly. use,
for schema: pg_dump -sxnc -f/tmp/schema.dump databasename
for data: pg_dump -qxnd -f/tmp/data.dump databasename
The data
39 matches
Mail list logo
