On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:00:53 -0800 Justin wrote:
JT> Hello
JT>
JT> I'm running NetSNMP 5.7.3 on a VM Virtualbox with Ubuntu16.04
JT> and keep getting "Timeout: No response from localhost" when
JT> running the command "snmpget localhost -v 2c -c public
JT> sysUpTime.0"
You much specify optoins bef
etc
De : Abid Ayoub [mailto:abid.ay...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : Montag, 29. Juli 2013 13:41
À : Jurkiewicz Jean-Marc
Cc : Lee; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: Timeout
Hi,
after i enter :
term mon
debug snmp packets
i get : SNMP packet debugging is on
Abid
2013/7/29 Jurkiewicz
you see some ?
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards
>
> JM
>
> ** **
>
> *De :* Abid Ayoub [mailto:abid.ay...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* Montag, 29. Juli 2013 10:01
> *À :* Lee
>
> *Cc :* net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Objet :* Re: Timeout
>
> ** **
.net
Objet : Re: Timeout
Hi,
I get nothing, i get the same message : Timeout: No Response from
so , are there other solutions to solve this problem ?
Abid
2013/7/26 Lee mailto:ler...@gmail.com>>
On 7/26/13, Abid Ayoub mailto:abid.ay...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
> I think that the
On 7/29/13, Abid Ayoub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get nothing, i get the same message : Timeout: No Response from
> so , are there other solutions to solve this problem ?
If you're not getting any debug output from the switch that would mean
the packets aren't getting there. Probably because
>> >> - a
Hi,
I get nothing, i get the same message : Timeout: No Response from
so , are there other solutions to solve this problem ?
Abid
2013/7/26 Lee
> On 7/26/13, Abid Ayoub wrote:
> >
> > I think that the problem is in udp port or in ip adresse because there is
> > only one community string con
On 7/26/13, Abid Ayoub wrote:
>
> I think that the problem is in udp port or in ip adresse because there is
> only one community string configured and have already tried the command
> with "v2c" and "v3".
>
> So any idea how can i change the port used by net-snmp and be certain that
> cisco is con
Hi,
Thanks for the answer.
I think that the problem is in udp port or in ip adresse because there is
only one community string configured and have already tried the command
with "v2c" and "v3".
So any idea how can i change the port used by net-snmp and be certain that
cisco is configured to acce
Hi,
Thanks for the answer.
i have tried the mentioned OID but i get immer the same response.
Abid
2013/7/26 Jurkiewicz Jean-Marc
> Whar is wrong : the OID.
>
> Try.1.3.6.1.2.1.1
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards
>
> JMJ
>
> ** **
>
> *De :* Abid Ayoub [mailto:abid.ay...@gm
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Abid Ayoub wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the first time that i use net-snmp.
> So, i want to know the general configuration and other informations about
> my cisco switch using snmpwalk and snmpget.
> So , i use the following command:
>
> snmpget -c -v2c 1.3.6.1
2009/11/18 Barun Biswas
> snmpgetnext -d ... is resending the request 5 times and throwing "Time out:
> no response from server" error at the end.
With no returning packet dumps?
OK - so it's not the 16-bit ID problem.
Other possibilities:
- you are using different authentication credentials
ould you please help me?
Regards,
Barun.
From:
Dave Shield
To:
Barun Biswas
Cc:
net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date:
11/09/2009 10:19 AM
Subject:
Re: timeout error while executing snmpwalk
Sent by:
dave.shi...@googlemail.com
2009/11/5 Barun Biswas :
> I am getting "Timeout: No
2009/11/5 Barun Biswas :
> I am getting "Timeout: No response from x.x.x.x" error while tryign to
> execute snmpwalk from a solaris machine. The target machine is a Windows
> server. I have checked from the windows server whether snmp is working fine
> or not using snmputil. And I found that it is
Found a solution.
Big my mistake. There were firewall closed from client-server to
master-server
Best regards, Margus "Margusja" Roo
+3725148780
skype: margusja
msn: margu...@kodila.ee
homepage: http://margusja.pri.ee
Margusja wrote:
> 13:50:48 root[load: 1@monitoring-server ~# snmpgetnex
13:50:48 root[load: 1@monitoring-server ~# snmpgetnext -v1 -c sw -d
client-server system
Sending 37 bytes to UDP: [0.0.0.0]->[194.106.120.83]:161
: 30 23 02 01 00 04 02 73 77 A1 1A 02 04 7C E2 6D0#.sw|.m
0016: 3F 02 01 00 02 01 00 30 0C 30 0A 06 06 2B 06 01?..0.
What is the output of running
snmpgetnext -v1 -c sw -d client-server system
?
Dave
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect
If I use tcpdump in client-server:
10:26:48 root[load: 0@client-server ~# tcpdump -i eth0 port 161
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
10:32:14.174663 IP marvin.37634 > client-server.
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:37:29 -0800, Pete Kelly said:
PK> We are using the tools to collect traps from telephone network
PK> equipment, think cabinet along the highway, where there are lots (could
PK> be hundreds or thousands) of devices, none of which have a reverse DNS
PK> lookup entry.
) use reverse DNS
sometimes to verify sender address.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Kelly"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: Timeout while DNS lookups fail
>I don't follow the "Try specifying infosink or trapess by IP
> From: Pete Kelly [mailto:p...@cordell.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:25 PM
> I don't follow the "Try specifying infosink or trapess by IPaddress"
> comment. Is this referencing net-snmp configuration settings?
Yes.
> There is nothing on the machine on which net-snmp is ru
I don't follow the "Try specifying infosink or trapess by IPaddress"
comment. Is this referencing net-snmp configuration settings?
There is nothing on the machine on which net-snmp is running, that
references either an IP address or a name for the trap senders
specifically to try and eliminate
Try specifying infosink or trapess by IPaddress. It shouldn't query DNS if
address is already in dotted format.
Cheers,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Kelly"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 1:37 AM
Subject: Timeout while DNS lookups fail
> Greetings:
>
> We are using the
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout for snmpget
> From: Ambika Tripathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:20 PM
> Thanks for your quick reply. Okay I used 5.4.2.1
> version also with
> the same answer. After starting snmpd from
> /usr/l
; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout for snmpget
> From: Ambika Tripathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:20 PM
> Thanks for your quick reply. Okay I used 5.4.2.1
> version also with
> the same answer. After starting snmpd fro
> From: Ambika Tripathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:20 PM
> Thanks for your quick reply. Okay I used 5.4.2.1
> version also with
> the same answer. After starting snmpd from
> /usr/local/sbin/snmpd, I checked
> the ps -A | grep snmp and it was running. Wh
specify port 161 for this and how? What else setting /
configuration option should I check.
Br,
APT
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2008-11-17 02:08
To: Ambika Tripathy; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout for snmpget
> From: Amb
> From: Ambika Tripathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 1:49 AM
> I am using net-snmp-5.0.11.2 version source to test
> http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:Writing_a_MIB_Modul
> e example.
If you're doing tutorials, please use a more recent version, i
2008/4/24 Sathasivam, Elayaraja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have installed from rpm package. Not from source package.
But you've also said you get:
> $ rpm -q -f `which snmpd`
> file /usr/local/sbin/snmpd is not owned by any package
So the SNMP agent that you are actually running is *NOT*
fro
nmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response from localhost
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Sathasivam, Elayaraja
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:01 AM
> $ rpm -q -f `which snmpd`
> file /usr/local/sbin/snmpd is not owned by any
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Sathasivam, Elayaraja
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:01 AM
> $ rpm -q -f `which snmpd`
> file /usr/local/sbin/snmpd is not owned by any package
By default, `make install' will install all the files in
`/usr/local/bin',
Your confusion here is in how the binary packages (via the RPM SPEC)
v.s. a source tarball will handle the default configuration directory
prefix, combined additionally with what flags the Redhat RC script is
going to pass to the binary.
The default config dir is not going to be /etc/snmpd with t
ivam, Elayaraja
Cc: Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Timeout: No Response from localhost
On 22/04/2008, Sathasivam, Elayaraja
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed net-snmp-5.3.1-14.el5.x86_64.rpm,
> net-snmp-libs-5.3.1-14.el5.x86_64.rpm,
> net-snmp-utils-5.3.
On 22/04/2008, Sathasivam, Elayaraja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed net-snmp-5.3.1-14.el5.x86_64.rpm,
> net-snmp-libs-5.3.1-14.el5.x86_64.rpm,
> net-snmp-utils-5.3.1-14.el5.x86_64.rpm.
>
> And I updated the /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf as "rocommunity public". But I am
> getting the error as f
On 11/03/2008, simone marangoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snmpd doesn't work..Timeout:No Response from 127.0.0.1
What are the access control settings in your snmpd.conf file?
Is the agent actually running?
Dave
-
> "SR" == Smith Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SR> # snmpd -f -Le
SR> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
SR> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
SR> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:5
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:42 PM
> To: Kuczynski, Edward
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: Timeout: No Response from
EMAIL PROTECTED]; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Timeout: No Response from localhost.
On 21/12/2007, Kuczynski, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We ran into a problem having both readonly and r/w in the conf file for v2.
> It wouldn't hurt to comment out the r/w and
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0016: 08 00 00 00 9B 07 00 00 00 00 00 00
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Randy
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Smith, Randy; Dave Shield
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response from localhost.
P.S The result
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Randy
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Smith, Randy; Dave Shield
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response from localhost.
P.S The result I posted in the previous email of running the 'startup'
script
On 21/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, the results of this startup are as follows:
>
> # . ./startup
> 1513
> Simple Test
> DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance = Timeticks: (176) 0:00:01.76
> When I run the 'startup' script using my coworker's snmpd.conf file, I
> get
Timeout: No Response from localhost.
Now mounting
nfs mount: mount: /opt/SUNWspro: Device busy
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Randy
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:36 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response from localhost.
:00:01.76
Now mounting
nfs mount: mount: /opt/SUNWspro: Device busy
#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:16 PM
To: Smith, Randy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Timeout: No
On 21/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fyi, the conf file pasted earlier is one that a coworker devised on AIX
> using the snnpconf. However, interestingly, when I use the following
> snmpd.conf that I generated myself on Solaris, the 'snmpget -c '
> works fine.
Using wh
e save normal configuration tokens for snmpd in
SNMPCONFPATH/snmpd.conf.
# Only "createUser" tokens should be placed here by snmpd
administrators.
# (Did I mention: do not edit this file?)
#
-Original Message-
From: Kuczynski, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Dece
On 21/12/2007, Kuczynski, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We ran into a problem having both readonly and r/w in the conf file for v2.
> It wouldn't hurt to comment out the r/w and try again.
Would you care to expand on the problem you were seeing?
The usual issue with rw/ro clashes is when yo
We ran into a problem having both readonly and r/w in the conf file for v2.
It wouldn't hurt to comment out the r/w and try again.
Just a thought.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:01 PM
On 21/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could take a quick look at my conf file below
> and see why when I do the following:
>
> /opt/emc/dist/local/usr/bin/snmpget -v 1 -c whatever localhost
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysUpTime.0
>
> I get the following error me
Albert Chin wrote:
> Well, we rebuilt our 11.11 machine, applied the latest patches, and
> everything works now!
Are you speaking about HP or Net-SNMP patches? HP, I guess, I'm just
double-checking.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:55:55PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> We've built net-snmp-5.3.1 on HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.11/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> 11.23/IA. The snmpd.conf is:
> rouser public noauth
> rocommunity public
>
> We run snmpd as follows:
> # snmpd -f -Le -d
>
> An a RHEL 3/x86 machine we snm
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:21:13PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> > (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> > agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> > of init_mib():
Albert Chin wrote:
> Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> of init_mib():
> $ nm -BCpg /usr/lib/libnm.sl | grep init_mib
> 031096 T init_
Albert Chin wrote:
> Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> of init_mib():
> $ nm -BCpg /usr/lib/libnm.sl | grep init_mib
> 031096 T init_
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:07:25PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> > > is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> > is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
> > equivalent), I get:
> > stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs/.index", 0x7ef
Albert Chin wrote:
> It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
> equivalent), I get:
> stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs/.index", 0x7eff0dec) ERR#2 ENOENT
> stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs", 0x7eff0fd
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:44:18PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> Where should I look?
One problem I'm seeing is that in find_tree_node() from
snmplib/parse.c:
headtp = tbuckets[NBUCKET(name_hash(name))];
for (tp = headtp; tp; tp = tp->next) {
I added the following after the for loop:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 20/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > proxy_init: name = system
> > proxy: Unknown Object Identifier (system)
> > /tmp/snmp-test-45-29818/snmpd.conf: line 7: Error: illegal proxy oid
> > specified
>
>
> > Wher
On 20/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> proxy_init: name = system
> proxy: Unknown Object Identifier (system)
> /tmp/snmp-test-45-29818/snmpd.conf: line 7: Error: illegal proxy oid
> specified
> Where should I look?
As a temporary workaround - try tweaking the files
testi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:05:21PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> > >> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Other failures:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> >> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Other failures:
> >>> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> >>> 45: testing Prox
Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
>> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Other failures:
>>> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
>>> 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
>>> 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
>> Which
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Other failures:
> > 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> > 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
> > 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
>
> Which version of the agent
On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other failures:
> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
> 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
Which version of the agent are you using?
If possible, it would be *extremely* useful to try running
Other failures:
41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
Albert Chin wrote:
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = INTEGER: 1536
> Timeout: No Response from [host]
Please run the agent under gdb and get us a backtrace ("bt" and "list") at this
point. Does it hang/loop or crash?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
---
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:37:06PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > > > 11.23
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > > 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> > >
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> > the 11.11/PA server:
> > ...
> > .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = IN
Albert Chin wrote:
> We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> the 11.11/PA server:
> ...
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = INTEGER: 1536
> Timeout: No Response from [host]
>
> Any ideas?
Does "mak
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 16:59 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> I tried with "net-snmp-5.2.2", and it works.
> It gives output of commands:
> 1. snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.6
> 2. Also, I get proper outputs for my MIB.
That's what I half-suspected.
> What I conclude from
ld be solved if any of above two points
can be applied. Again, correct me if I am wrong in this.
Thanks again, for all your help.
Regards,
Ajay
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:35 PM
To: Ajay Hotchandani
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:21:54 -0700, "Chinmaya S. Narayana Reddy" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Chinmaya> Can anyone please tell me if I can configure timeout
Chinmaya> interval globally for snmp applications (like snmpget,
Chinmaya> snmpset, snmptable) instead of passing -t for each
Chinm
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 09:47 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> Thanks a lot for all your help.
>
> I see only outgoing dump,
[snip]
> Timeout: No Response from localhost.
Sorry - I'm out of ideas.
This looks exactly like an access control problem,
but your earlier comments seem to indicate
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response after output of last OID
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 11:27 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> > What happens if you try
> > snmpwalk -v 2c -t 60 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.6
> > ? (to give the agent more time to respond
paul> I tried the following command:
paul> snmpgetnext -v1 -c community localhost -r 0 -t 60
paul> IP-MIB::ipAdEntAddr.127.0.0.1
paul> Timeout: No Response from localhost.
But presumably it does work if you issue an 'snmpget' on
IP-MIB::ipAdEntAddr.127.0.0.1 ?
If not, then Wes' suggestion of
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:15:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
paul> I tried the following command:
paul> snmpgetnext -v1 -c community localhost -r 0 -t 60
paul> IP-MIB::ipAdEntAddr.127.0.0.1
paul> Timeout: No Response from localhost.
paul> Is this a known issue on 5.1.2?
That means you eit
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: "Timeout: No Response
from localhost" while browisng the MIB
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 16:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> While browsing the MIB with snmpwalk we get the following error when
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 03:24 -0800, venkayamma dudipally wrote:
> Hi ,
> I got the following problem on FC4 64 bit machine.
> Actually I installed the net-snmp package with the
> following rpms
>
> net-snmp-5.2.1.12-fc4.1,
> net-snmp-libs-5.2.1.12-fc4.1,
> net-snmp-utils-5.2.1.12-fc4.1,
> lm_sensor
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 11:27 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> > What happens if you try
> > snmpwalk -v 2c -t 60 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.6
> > ? (to give the agent more time to respond)
>
> Same output:
> "Timeout: No Response from localhost"
OK - so it's probably not simply the agen
6 10:53 PM
To: Ajay Hotchandani
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response after output of last OID
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:12 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> But with "net-snmp-5.2.1.2-fc4.1", when I give command
> "snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localh
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 16:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While browsing the MIB with snmpwalk we get the following error when
> we get to "IP-MIB::ipAdEntAddr.127.0.0.1 = IpAddress: 127.0.0.1":
>
> Timeout: No Response from localhost
What happens if you try
snmpgetnext -r 0 -t 60 ...
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:12 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> But with “net-snmp-5.2.1.2-fc4.1”, when I give command
> “snmpwalk –v 2c –c public localhost .1.3.6.1.6”, I get
> error as “Timeout: No Response from localhost”.
What happens if you try
snmpwalk -v 2c -t 60 -c public localhost .1.3.
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:18 PM
To: Ajay Hotchandani
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Timeout: No Response after output of last OID
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 18:45 +0530, Ajay Hotchan
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 18:45 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
> Means on FC4 64-bit, last OID of my MIB is last OID of system.
Please see the FAQ entry:
I can see the system group, but nothing else. Why?
Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponso
is not there and it gives error.
Kindly help me regarding this.
Regards,
Ajay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Anders
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:14 AM
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Timeout
Ajay Hotchandani wrote:
On FC4 64-bit (net-snmp-5.2.1-12), after output of last OID of my MIB, I
am getting following error:
Timeout: No Response from localhost
In “/var/log/snmpd.log”, I am getting following error message:
send response: Error building ASN.1 representation (build int size 4: s
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Please run "snmpget -DALL ..." and have a look for suspicious errors.
Thanks for the hint, the last part of the output has indeed an error.
The "error" is in the snmp_pdu_parse method (snmp_api.c), because
asn_parse_header(...) returns null.
To be more specific, there is a
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:34 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:32:41 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> The backoff code was removed in 1998
>
> Anyone have a good enough memory to remember why?
After 7+ years? Are you nuts, Robert?
I have enough difficulty remembering what got changed
(a
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:32:41 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:17 +0800, Lee Melvin wrote:
DS> > timeout WILL exponentially backoff in the future release of net-snmp?
DS>
DS> No.
DS> Things changed the other way.
DS>
DS> The backoff code was removed in 1998
Anyone have a good enough
i guess i did. any other suggestions are welcome
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "taner memet ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "net-snmp-users"
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: timeout probl
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 14:36 +0200, taner memet ali wrote:
> that are the correct adresses
*Which* are the correct addresses?
Have you tried the other suggestions I made?
Dave
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource
that are the correct adresses
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:34 +0200, taner memet ali wrote:
> i have installed the net-snmp binary on two windows pc's
What are the IP addresses of the two machines?
Is it:
machine 1 192.168.1.105
machine 2 192.168.1.106
or the other way round?
> rocommunity nwro 19
i have installed the net-snmp binary on two windows pc's and have
deactivated the original snmp agents on both machines. The machines are
connected in a simple LAN with each other (only network cable).
I have configured the snmpd.conf files on each machine with the "snmpconf -g
basic_setup" comman
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:17 +0800, Lee Melvin wrote:
> timeout WILL exponentially backoff in the future release of net-snmp?
No.
Things changed the other way.
The backoff code was removed in 1998
(see revision 1.53 of snmp_api.c)
> why the comments in snmp_api.h ?
Because that reflects the ear
then, timeout WILL exponentially backoff in the future release of net-snmp?
is it better if exponentially backoff ?
why the comments in snmp_api.h ?
struct snmp_session {
/*
* Protocol-version independent fields
*/
/** snmp version */
longversion;
/** Number of re
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:02 +0800, =?gb2312?B?wO4glUY=?= wrote:
> [Does] timeout really exponentially backoff ?
No.
Looking at the code:
static int
snmp_resend_request(...)
{
:
rp->retries++;
result = transport->f_send(...);
:
gettimeofday(&now, (struct timezone *) 0);
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Julien COGNE wrote:
Hello,
I'm using net-snmpd (version 5.1.2 ) with an OpenBSD 3.7 box.
I launch the snmpd server but when I try the following request :
alpha> snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost
I get the following result :
Timeout: No Response from localhost
I give the
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:00:02PM -0400, Reitberger, Susan wrote:
> I had a question about timeouts and requests.
> If I do a snmpget with a timeout of t on multiple elements,
> i.e. snmpget localhost -t5 sysUpTime.0 sysContact.0 sysDescr.0, does
> the timeout apply to the complete request or ea
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 20:35, muzzol wrote:
> here goes:
>
> snmpget -d -c public 192.168.123.254 system.sysDescr.0
>
> Sending 64 bytes to 192.168.123.254
> : 30 3E 02 01 03
There's your problem.
You haven't specified the SNMP version to use, so it's
defaulting to SNMPv3.
Try
snmpg
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
