In article <52dea1b6e3ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>,
cj wrote:
> Well, I now have a modified version of 'Fetch_NS' that works fine on
> the ARMini. In addition to actually fetching the latest release (if
> there is one) it will quit NetSurf, rotate the 4 previous backup
> versions
I like to kee
In message <52dea12cebch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>
cj wrote:
> In article <52de9a64e1ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
>Richard Ashbery wrote:
>> Peter - what I didn't clarify is that John's utility and curl works
>> correctly on the Iyonix (RISC OS 5.18) but not on BB (RISC OS
>> 5.19). I get
In article <08749dde52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
Peter Young wrote:
> That sounds interesting, and I will do that.
Well, I now have a modified version of 'Fetch_NS' that works fine on
the ARMini. In addition to actually fetching the latest release (if
there is one) it will quit NetSurf, r
In article
,
Chris Young wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:31:48 +0100, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Is this a RISC OS-only feature, as thumbnails get lost here after
> quitting?
Yes, but it's broken on RISC OS anyway.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:31:48 +0100, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > I'm at a loss to understand exactly what 'bitmaps' NetSurf could have
> > 'modified' in the course of the session, or where it's 'saving' them to.
> > All I know is that this is a horrendously inefficient operation!
>
> They're probably
In article <52de9a64e1ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> Peter - what I didn't clarify is that John's utility and curl works
> correctly on the Iyonix (RISC OS 5.18) but not on BB (RISC OS
> 5.19). I get the same "segmentation fault" you highlighted earlier.
The current version of
On 14 Oct 2012 Richard Ashbery wrote:
> In article , Peter Young
> wrote:
>> On 14 Oct 2012 Richard Ashbery wrote:
> And Netsurf 3.0 (Dev C1 #463) now works well, so more thanks.
Ditto here. Thanks for #463 & Fetch_NS
>>> Excellent utility John - great time saver - many thanks
>>
On 14 Oct 2012 Peter Young wrote:
[snip]
> Even odder: I was able to make Fetch_NS work using wget before I had
> to go out. After coming back and re-starting the machine, it now fails
> again with the "File name 'SCSI::armini.$.Internet.!Fetch_NS.^.". (I
> managed to garble this message upthre
In article <52de8f9e88ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>, cj
wrote:
> In article , Peter Young
> wrote:
> > unless I open the library so that cURL is booted.
> Are you putting the curl *binary* in to Boot:Library? If you are
> putting the !cURL *application* in Boot:Library it will not work
> becaus
In article , Peter Young
wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2012 Richard Ashbery wrote:
> >>> And Netsurf 3.0 (Dev C1 #463) now works well, so more thanks.
> >> Ditto here. Thanks for #463 & Fetch_NS
> > Excellent utility John - great time saver - many thanks
> Bewilderment continues here, I'm afraid. It se
On 14 Oct 2012 cj wrote:
> In article ,
>Peter Young wrote:
>> unless I open the library so that cURL is booted.
> Are you putting the curl *binary* in to Boot:Library? If you are
> putting the !cURL *application* in Boot:Library it will not work
> because nothing in Boot:Library is booted
On 14 Oct 2012 cj wrote:
> In article <8ff38ede52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
>Peter Young wrote:
>> would there be interest in
>> adding bits to the program, similar to the bits I had in my old
>> script?
> I have a script that does that and more, although I need to extend it
> to deal
In article <8ff38ede52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
Peter Young wrote:
> would there be interest in
> adding bits to the program, similar to the bits I had in my old
> script?
I have a script that does that and more, although I need to extend it
to deal with the case when the latest versio
In article ,
Peter Young wrote:
> unless I open the library so that cURL is booted.
Are you putting the curl *binary* in to Boot:Library? If you are
putting the !cURL *application* in Boot:Library it will not work
because nothing in Boot:Library is booted at boot time. Either
extract the cURL
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 02:08:09PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> On 13 Oct 2012, Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I'd like some feedback on this. Specifically;
> >
> > - Are people noticing any difference in load times?
>
> SARPC / RISC OS 6.20:
>netsurf-2012-10-02_20-23-02 17 secon
On 13 Oct 2012, Rob Kendrick wrote:
[snip]
> I'd like some feedback on this. Specifically;
>
> - Are people noticing any difference in load times?
SARPC / RISC OS 6.20:
netsurf-2012-10-02_20-23-02 17 seconds
NetSurf #461 15 seconds.
RPCEmu 0.8.9 / RISC OS 4.39:
On 14 Oct 2012 Peter Young wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2012 Richard Ashbery wrote:
And Netsurf 3.0 (Dev C1 #463) now works well, so more thanks.
>>> Ditto here. Thanks for #463 & Fetch_NS
>> Excellent utility John - great time saver - many thanks
> Bewilderment continues here, I'm afraid.
But
On 14 Oct 2012 Richard Ashbery wrote:
>>> And Netsurf 3.0 (Dev C1 #463) now works well, so more thanks.
>> Ditto here. Thanks for #463 & Fetch_NS
> Excellent utility John - great time saver - many thanks
Bewilderment continues here, I'm afraid. It seems that my previous
download was corrupte
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:29:33PM +0100, Martin Bazley wrote:
> The thing which is *really* annoying about using NetSurf on a USB drive
> is the enormous amount of time it takes to quit - up to thirty seconds
> on a bad day! This seems to be dependent on the amount of browsing done
> beforehand.
> > And Netsurf 3.0 (Dev C1 #463) now works well, so more thanks.
> Ditto here. Thanks for #463 & Fetch_NS
Excellent utility John - great time saver - many thanks
Richard
The following bytes were arranged on 13 Oct 2012 by cj :
> In article <20121013172217.gg7...@pepperfish.net>,
>Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > I would expect to see the most significant improvement on a
> > StrongARM RiscPC using the on-board IDE where the IO is a
> > significant bottleneck and time
21 matches
Mail list logo
