7 Aug 2003 11:26 am, Tony S. Sykes wrote:
> Exactly.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Dell TFT 17"Flat Screen
>
>
> Now
Original Message -
From: "John Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 20:46
Subject: Re: [newbie] Dell TFT 17"Flat Screen
> I see, so in regards to TFT's it's not a case then of a beam of
> electrons
as an
article on it which will explain it a lot better than me.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Dell TFT 17"Flat Screen
I see, so in regards to TFT's it'
chard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:11 PM
To: NEWBIE 1
Subject: [newbie] Dell TFT 17"Flat Screen
OK, so this is an offer from a UK supplier and I asked them what
resolution is it capable of. They replied,
Its native resolution is 1280 x 1024. It'll go h
t). There is no flicker on tft's like crt's so don't worry
about that. I think they are a lot better (less power hungry too).
Thanks,
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:11 PM
To: NEWBIE 1
Subject: [n
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 11:40, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
> >Refresh rates for TFT's are behind the curve unfortunately to some
> >degree... so waiting for an 85hz refresh might be a year or so John.
> >
> >But worth the wait... :)
> >
> >Femmeley
> >
> >
> >
> Is that so, then what is your curre
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 05:38, Tom Brinkman wrote:
FWIW, I wouldn't buy one on specs. You need to see it in a
store's showroom. Then get the model number an buy it online after
checking for Linux compatibility and performance. The one's you see
in a store are runnin Wins
Heather/Femme wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 13:07, John Richard Smith wrote:
Thanks,
You know it's so much more reassuring to hear first hand from people
with experience with equipement new to oneself.
I think I'm going to wait till the right offer for a 19" 1280x1024 at
maybe 85Hz?
is that
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 13:07, John Richard Smith wrote:
>
> Thanks,
> You know it's so much more reassuring to hear first hand from people
> with experience with equipement new to oneself.
>
> I think I'm going to wait till the right offer for a 19" 1280x1024 at
> maybe 85Hz?
> is that about rig
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 05:38, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>FWIW, I wouldn't buy one on specs. You need to see it in a
> store's showroom. Then get the model number an buy it online after
> checking for Linux compatibility and performance. The one's you see
> in a store are runnin Winsux. Same for on
--- John Richard Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so this is an offer from a UK supplier and I
> asked them what
> resolution is it capable of. They replied,
>
> Its native resolution is 1280 x 1024. It'll go
> higher with interpolation
> but the image quality suffers. TFTs aren't like CRT
On Saturday August 23 2003 02:07 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> I think I'm going to wait till the right offer for a 19"
> 1280x1024 at maybe 85Hz?
> is that about right for the refresh rate, eventually comes
> along.
>
> John
That's what I'm doin ... waitin. Don't expect prices to come
dow
Alex Weiss wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:45:54 +, John Richard Smith
wrote:
Alex Weiss wrote:
I've got a samsung 191T at 1280 x 1024
it goes for $749 before a $100 rebate
I like it alot
see it here:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=1051384581717&skuId=4801753&type=
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:45:54 +, John Richard Smith
wrote:
>
> Alex Weiss wrote:
>
> >I've got a samsung 191T at 1280 x 1024
> >it goes for $749 before a $100 rebate
> >I like it alot
> >
> >see it here:
> >
>
>http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=1051384581717&skuId=4801753&type=produ
I've got a samsung 191T at 1280 x 1024
it goes for $749 before a $100 rebate
I like it alot
see it here:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=1051384581717&skuId=4801753&type=product
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:10:54 +, John Richard Smith
wrote:
>
> OK, so this is an offer from a UK
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 10:10, John Richard Smith wrote:
> OK, so this is an offer from a UK supplier and I asked them what
> resolution is it capable of. They replied,
>
> Its native resolution is 1280 x 1024. It'll go higher with interpolation
> but the image quality suffers. TFTs aren't like CRT
16 matches
Mail list logo
