Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-07 Thread GAPrichard
Allan, (Please note that as I write this on 6/7, I have not checked my email in several days.) Yes, I have learned a lot reading in the newbie list, and I've only been doing if for a couple of months. I've found that sometimes others on newbie ask about some problem I about to deal with.

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-03 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Garythis newbie list and its partner, the expert list, have a much broader knowledge base, especially for solving Linux Mandrake specific problems, than any paid email or phone support system could possibly have. I'm sure that you'll be able to solve your problem using one or both of these li

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-06-03 Thread Glyn Millington
Right! That gets my vote too... Glyn M. On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 03:28:17PM -0400, thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I agree with Joseph S. Gardner's comment (below). A firewall as part of > the initial installation of Linux-Mandrake (even for a newbie) is a good > idea. Some people

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-02 Thread michael
On Wed, 31 May 2000, you wrote: > YES > - Original Message - > From: Dacia and AzureRose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:58 PM > Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool > &g

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-02 Thread Marc
- Original Message - From: "Roman Bysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:33 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool | How about a compile wizard or is that asking for too much? | | Roman | | | Dac

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard
Let me be clear, I'm not complaining, rather I'm using my experiences and expectations to make a point. Poor support makes Mandrake look bad. I have been trying to get a sound configuration failure solved over two weeks and find Linuxcare to be nearly useless. They assume no reply in

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard
I agree with Joseph S. Gardner's comment (below). A firewall as part of the initial installation of Linux-Mandrake (even for a newbie) is a good idea. Some people will have cable modems and other things that are on all the time and thus have a need for a firewall before they know it or kn

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard
As I have mentioned elsewhere in newbie, I have just installed a couple of other "flavors" of Linux. It helps one appreciate Linux-Mandrake. One can begin doing things more quickly with what Mandrake has put on the desktop. I suggest, have RPMDrake ask if you want a desktop icon cre

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-01 Thread GAPrichard
In a message dated 5/28/2000 12:39:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Hugh why not simply us XFdrake ?> >> Didn't know I could. I know that I have a lot to learn, and this is the position many others are going to be in as they get fed-up with windows. One tries what

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-01 Thread Roman Bysh
How about a compile wizard or is that asking for too much? Roman Dacia and AzureRose wrote: > > That would be s cool! > > Dacia > --- "Joseph S. Gardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Denis, > > > > I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of > > a new kernel and then > > IN

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-01 Thread rharvey
YES - Original Message - From: Dacia and AzureRose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool > That would be s cool! > > > Dacia > --- "Jose

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Way Better Documentation

2000-05-31 Thread Ray Winbush
I think there has to be better documentation on the file structure of Linux.  I come from a Windows AND MacOS background and both of these systems are fairly intuitive in terms of how to save files to certain drives.  Linux documentation isn't as intuitive.   Ray Winbush 

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Install

2000-05-31 Thread Denis HAVLIK
:~>Denis, :~> :~>How about a "Dear Santa, I want it all" selection? I know I can get that :~>through the expert install but even this is confusing as there is a server / :~>workstation selection (and something else if memory serves me) and this fails :~>to make much sense. See what i proposed in

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Install

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner
Denis, How about a "Dear Santa, I want it all" selection? I know I can get that through the expert install but even this is confusing as there is a server / workstation selection (and something else if memory serves me) and this fails to make much sense. -- Joseph S. Gardner Senior Designer /

[newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner
Denis, I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of a new kernel and then INSTALL it! -- Joseph S. Gardner Handi Krafts www.handi-krafts.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux is like a wigwam... No windows, no gates. Apache inside Registered linux user #1696600 ICQ #63389227

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner
Anthony Huereca wrote: > I don't have M7.0 yet, but I like the idea of the different security zones. One > of the main complaints I've heard on this mailing list is lack of desciption of > what the different zones actually do. So tell the user what exactly is > happening when you select a certain

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-28 Thread Fran Parker
Hi Denis, This is Bambi (or Fran if you prefer) Is that the same for my thoughts on the next Mandrake as well Denis? :) (Hadn't seen any reference to mine either...didn't know if the comments were not received or not received well, or what :) Just kidding here, Denis :) But I would be interes

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Linux-Mandrake should build on features it has already in place. During > install the helpful information at the bottom of the screen could be actually > useful, and should occupy more of the screen (it's like an after-thought > now). In 7.1 if you hit the

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Linux-Mandrake should build on features it has already in place. During > install the helpful information at the bottom of the screen could be actually > useful, and should occupy more of the screen (it's like an after-thought > now). In 7.1 if you hit the

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-27 Thread Denis HAVLIK
:~>Since Denis did not comment on my suggestion, I think I have managed to get on :~>his /dev/null list... At the moment noone is on my /dev/null list - I am reading all the mail. I did not answer, because I cannot answer this one. I have noted it for further discussion and that is all. cu

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-27 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Dacia and AzureRosethat's 1100 meg of compressed data which translates to between 2.0 and 2.5 gig when installed. Alan Dacia and AzureRose wrote: > > how much disc space do they need? Are we talking 10s > or megs or 100s of megs? Sounds like 7.1 is around > 1100 megs for a full install a

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread GAPrichard
Linux-Mandrake should build on features it has already in place. During install the helpful information at the bottom of the screen could be actually useful, and should occupy more of the screen (it's like an after-thought now). The initial screen could be general info or good practice ad

[newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-27 Thread Jaguar
Since Denis did not comment on my suggestion, I think I have managed to get on his /dev/null list... I suggest making the Network setup specialized since more people are using NIC's with their highspeed connections. So possibly MDKSoft could have an install/DrakX configuaration section specific f

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-27 Thread Dacia and AzureRose
how much disc space do they need? Are we talking 10s or megs or 100s of megs? Sounds like 7.1 is around 1100 megs for a full install anyway. Is there a "minimum" install, what is in it? Perhaps the extra space could be gathered by dropping some of the redundent programs? If I need an extra 10

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread Michael
My dreams: a self configuring cd rw install program that would make it possible for a stoopoid like me to use the writing not just the reading function of his cd burner. More printer support or mandrake sponsored how-to's not some college kids hacked driver and cryptical install info... My pra

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION One Step Installation

2000-05-26 Thread Denis HAVLIK
:~>fails and then the computer hangs. Oh you can put in a choice too such as :~>Choose your installation method :~>1) Text install :~>2) DrakX :~> Already done :-)) In 7.1, just press and read the instruction. cu Denis -- - Dr. Deni

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-26 Thread Paul
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Anthony Huereca wrote: >Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! > >The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming >libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't >ever program, they will have to

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-26 Thread J Walker
Em qui, 25 mai 2000, Anthony Huereca escreveu: > Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! Agreed. > > The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming > libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't > ever program,

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-26 Thread Roman Bysh
Jim wrote: > > Great suggestion! > > - Original Message - Excellent. I am looking forward to it. Roman > From: "Anthony Huereca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 4:25 PM > Subject: Re: [newbie]

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION One Step Installation

2000-05-25 Thread Kenny
]>; "Expert list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Gael Duval" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:30 PM Subject: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION > Hi, folks! > > What follows is probably a single most important letter I ever posted on > these ma

RE: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Todd Watson
know they have the internet on computers now?" -Homer J. Simpson- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Huereca Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Liba

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Jim
Great suggestion! - Original Message - From: "Anthony Huereca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! A

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Denis HAVLIK
:~>Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! :~> :~>The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming :~>libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't :~>ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge head

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread linux
I agree with Juvenal's statement... Postfix and Sendmail seems to be the same situation. I prefer to learn Sendmail. Therefore, I think when under the "Expert" mode of the installation, the user should be prompted "Email server: (S)endmail? or (P)ostfix?" Frank Durante > I'm new to thi

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-05-25 Thread Anthony Huereca
I don't have M7.0 yet, but I like the idea of the different security zones. One of the main complaints I've heard on this mailing list is lack of desciption of what the different zones actually do. So tell the user what exactly is happening when you select a certain level. Or maybe, have like a ch

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Anthony Huereca
Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to track d

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread bascule
idea= allow setting of options such as 'setserial' for modems during the install i suggest this because after discovering that i need to do this after install to make my modem work (still don't know how to make it permanent) i tried to do an upgrade and get the cryptographic modules at the approp

Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread Juvenal
D]> Cc: Gael Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 25, 2000 2:42 PM Subject: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION >Hi, folks! > >What follows is probably a single most important letter I ever posted on >these mailing lists, so please read it very carefully! > >[ANNOUNCEMEN