Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Gerald, At 07:40 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote: So what you're saying is that the hosts file is used only by the local machine, right? Correct! And is NOT used by bind, right? Correct! Oh dear ... Usually the resolv.conf on Linux would have a line order hosts bind. Which means look at hosts

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Dave Sherman
I have written up the necessary config files for your dns, Julian. They may need some tweaking, but they should match the setup you describe below. The named.conf goes in /etc. The other two files go in /var/named, and are the actual files which named (dns) uses to keep track on computers and IP

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Michael Viron
Who fulfills DNS requests for local machines if not anoka? I've been told that bind doesn't look at /etc/hosts, which brought my world crashing down. Now what? :-) Thanks for your patience with me, I'm sure we're nearly at the bottom of this. julian. if you are running DNS (named / bind), on

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Gerald Waugh
There's no point in a local machine going up to my ISP's nameserver to find name/address mappings for another machine on my computer is there? DNS for the local LAN has to be handled by a NS that has authority for my LAN. Who else could that be than my local Linux server running DNS? Yes

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Michael, At 09:38 AM 1/4/02 -0600, you wrote: Who fulfills DNS requests for local machines if not anoka? I've been told that bind doesn't look at /etc/hosts, which brought my world crashing down. Now what? :-) Thanks for your patience with me, I'm sure we're nearly at the bottom of this.

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Gerald, At 10:53 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote: There's no point in a local machine going up to my ISP's nameserver to find name/address mappings for another machine on my computer is there? DNS for the local LAN has to be handled by a NS that has authority for my LAN. Who else could that

[newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf? julian. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Dave Sherman
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 16:16, Julian Opificius wrote: Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf? julian. I could help, although you might be better served just reading the DNS howto. That's how I learned, anyway... Dave -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Gerald Waugh
On Thursday 03 January 2002 05:16 pm, Julian Opificius wrote: Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf? #== file named.conf on the master === options { directory /etc/named; # where the db files are allow-transfer {

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Hi Ed, This is what I sent to Ric Tibbets privately. He bravely offered to help. As I said to to him, I have configured a DNS server before - bind, on NT, but it was long enough ago that although I undertand the concepts of DNS well enough, I've forgotten some of the basic terms, and the linux

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Ed Tharp
I would expect that for this network, if it was me, to not use named, but set up a /etc/hosts file and an /etc/resolv.conf file, setting network search resoulution for hosts, resolver, dns. that way befor the dns was required, the computer searches the host file for the IP of the local

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Ed, I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought named was the guy that shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do i have it wrong? Second, what is resolv.conf all about? I noticed with surprise that I have one with the correct ISP DNS servers already in

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Gerald Waugh
On Thursday 03 January 2002 10:51 pm, Julian Opificius wrote: Ed, I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought named was the guy that shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do i have it wrong? YES Sorry to but in; if you are not going to use a local

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Ed, At 11:28 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote: On Thursday 03 January 2002 10:51 pm, Julian Opificius wrote: Ed, I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought named was the guy that shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do i have it wrong? YES Sorry to