Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2004-01-03 Thread qibvigap
, Steven From: Richard Urwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high. Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:28:02 + On Monday 29 Dec 2003 1:45 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27, Steven Nelson wrote

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Steven Nelson
. From, Steven From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high. Date: Sun, 28

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Derek Jennings
On Monday 29 Dec 2003 11:51 am, Steven Nelson wrote: I will try to reply to the email the best I can. I thought the disk cache and the physical memory did not work together. Yes they do. Where else could the disc cache be other than in memory? If they do that would take up alot of space.

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 29 December 2003 11:51, Steven Nelson wrote: I will try to reply to the email the best I can. I thought the disk cache and the physical memory did not work together. If they do that would take up alot of space. What you are seeing is memory cache, not disk cache There is still a

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Steven Nelson
, Steven From: Derek Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high. Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:15:51 + On Monday 29 Dec 2003 11:51 am, Steven Nelson wrote: I will try to reply

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27, Steven Nelson wrote: I was thinking the disk cache was on the hard drive. Are u sure it is in the memory? I know in alot of the Windows versions I have used there was settings where you could enable a cache and set

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Lanman
On 12/29/2003 at 1:45 PM Anne Wilson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27, Steven Nelson wrote: I was thinking the disk cache was on the hard drive. Are u sure it is in the memory? I know in alot of the Windows versions I have used there was

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Richard Urwin
On Monday 29 Dec 2003 1:45 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27, Steven Nelson wrote: That is the problem, on all of the terminals that are avaible with Mandrake 9.2 none of them will let the left click menu appear. When I used Mandrake 9.1 there was one terminal that

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread et
On Monday 29 December 2003 02:28 pm, Richard Urwin wrote: On Monday 29 Dec 2003 1:45 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27, Steven Nelson wrote: That is the problem, on all of the terminals that are avaible with Mandrake 9.2 none of them will let the left click menu

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Steven Nelson
Will reply later today. From, Steven From: Richard Urwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high. Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:28:02 + On Monday 29 Dec 2003 1:45 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 29 December 2003 13:27

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-29 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday 29 December 2003 6:45 am, Anne Wilson wrote: chomp That is the problem, on all of the terminals that are avaible with Mandrake 9.2 none of them will let the left click menu appear. When I used Mandrake 9.1 there was one terminal that had

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-28 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 28 December 2003 08:39, Steven Nelson wrote: The computer states that I am using, physical memory is to high. I Steven, there are two issues here. First, when you had 1024MB RAM installed you should have been using the Enterprise kernel - built to correctly handle ram over around

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-28 Thread Steven Nelson
? From, Steven From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-28 Thread Anne Wilson
? From, Steven From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high. Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 08:53:58 + On Sunday 28 December 2003 08:39, Steven

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-28 Thread Derek Jennings
On Sunday 28 Dec 2003 8:39 am, Steven Nelson wrote: SNIP The disk buffers are changing in between 14.15mb-14.20mb and disck cache is staying at 306.79 (during using the computer in the current session regulary for five minutes). If someone knows how to correct this problem will they tell me?

Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high.

2003-12-28 Thread et
to correct the problem or ways to try and fix the problem if they know? From, Steven From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Physical memory is to high