the
>> bug occurs that ConTeXt uses the smallest optical size for every symbol
>> (independent of the size). This results in strange looking mathematics.
>> Maybe you can fix this, Hans?
>
mathematics. Maybe you can fix this,
Hans?
Yes, in that process i swapped text and scriptscipt sizes but it has
been fixed.
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH
page [2].
> >
> > [1] http://zeeba.tv/reconciling-unicode-math-with-latex2e-mathematics/
> > [2] http://www.ams.org/STIX/
>
> The video speaks about a file stix-tbl.txt containing those translation
> commands, but on [2], the stix
; (independent of the size). This results in strange looking mathematics. Maybe
> you can fix this, Hans?
>
> -Mathias
>
>
>> Am 11.05.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist :
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I posted this question on stack exchange
>> (https
d some trouble) support for optical sizes in fallbacks
and I suppose the bug has been introduced there. So at present the bug occurs
that ConTeXt uses the smallest optical size for every symbol (independent of
the size). This results in strange looking mathematics. Maybe you can fix this,
Neither is correct in a mathematics context. Use \bar.
On 05/10/2017 05:54 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are
> slightly different.
> I used \overline in LaTeX.
> But it takes more vertical space that c
r.
…
pages > flushing realpage 5, userpage 5
fonts > bodyfont '24.0414pt' is defined (can better be done
global)
tex error > tex error on line 7 in file
/Users/graph/Documents/Mathematics/MathModelling/MathModel2.tex: !
Infinite glue shrinkage inserted from
t '24.0414pt' is defined (can better be done global)
tex error > tex error on line 7 in file
/Users/graph/Documents/Mathematics/MathModelling/MathModel2.tex: ! Infinite
glue shrinkage inserted from \skip131
\handlenoteinsert ...enoteitself {#1}{#2}}\egroup
Thanks Aditya!
Seems like there is no double vertical bar in the ASCIIMATH specs. I
don’t use it anyway.
Sorry for making noise.
On 01/23/2017 09:05 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Henri Menke wrote:
>
>> Dear devs,
>>
>> In mathematics the norm
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear devs,
In mathematics the norm of something is usually denoted by the double vertical
bars, e.g. ||v||. This is not available in asciimath.
\usemodule[asciimath]
\starttext
$\asciimath{ x^* = min { x | sum_{kk} ||f(x_{kk}^{20})|| } }$
\stoptext
Dear devs,
In mathematics the norm of something is usually denoted by the double vertical
bars, e.g. ||v||. This is not available in asciimath.
\usemodule[asciimath]
\starttext
$\asciimath{ x^* = min { x | sum_{kk} ||f(x_{kk}^{20})|| } }$
\stoptext
Could you please add this to the parser
nTeXt (at least it says so at
> http://www.nieuwarchief.nl/homeitems.php?onderwerp=2&taal=1).
>
> I get curious. Does anyone here know what column mode (i.e.
> \startcolumn \stopcolumn, \startmixedcolumn\stopmixedcolumn,
> columnsets or even the new module newcolumnsets?) they use,
.
I get curious. Does anyone here know what column mode (i.e.
\startcolumn \stopcolumn, \startmixedcolumn\stopmixedcolumn,
columnsets or even the new module newcolumnsets?) they use, and how
they get mathematics to play with it without breaking the grid?
Also, if I start to write a new document with
expression.}
Normal text.
\stoptext
1. sf is not a valid argument for the second argument of \definefontfamily
2. You need a real math font for mathematics, a text font doesn’t work
because it lacks many parameter for math mode.
3. You can use the font fallback mechanism to replace certai
; [1] http://zeeba.tv/reconciling-unicode-math-with-latex2e-mathematics/
> [2] http://www.ams.org/STIX/
The video speaks about a file stix-tbl.txt containing those translation
commands, but on [2], the stix-tbl.* table files, not ending with .tx
e consuming.
Another input method is shown in the following video [1] where each
symbol get its own command, e.g. \mbfitx is equal to {\bi x}. The source
table mentioned in the video can be found on the STIX page [2].
[1] http://zeeba.tv/reconciling-unicode-math-with-latex2e-mathematics/
[2] http://
t
(It was btx:aps:eprints in the original post)
On 07/18/2016 10:54 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> It is common in physics (and probably mathematics) that papers are
> uploaded to an electronic archive prior to publishing them in the
> peer-review literature. In physic
Dear list,
It is common in physics (and probably mathematics) that papers are
uploaded to an electronic archive prior to publishing them in the
peer-review literature. In physical sciences this is https://arxiv.org.
To cite such articles one usually uses the following format, here on the
orkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/
estion to
you don't need to use it ...
depreciate $expression$ is, in my opinion (and apparently in the
opinion of others), ludicrous.
nobody says that it will disappear (but novel writers can of course make
$ into your favourite currency symbol)
P.S. I am a present writing a chapter
ssion$ is, in my opinion (and apparently in the
opinion of others), ludicrous.
Alan
P.S. I am a present writing a chapter on mathematics for a small
introduction on typesetting with ConTeXt, so this discussion is
highly relevant.
__
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:53 -0500
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math
> and regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use
> \math{..} or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua
> code:
> it is just plain ugly! (No TeXie would ever find $$ as
>> ugly...)
>
> I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math and
> regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use \math{..} or
> \mathematics{...} only when generating output f
cryptic \m{} for any reason:
it is just plain ugly! (No TeXie would ever find $$ as
ugly...)
I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math and
regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use \math{..}
or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua
On 2/16/2016 4:21 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
math should appear rather as displayed math.\def\m#1{\startimath
you being a mathematics-physics-chemistry mixed mode
\slated{bold}}
for example, would put the word "bold" into boldslanted?
normally \em will adapt itself
A natural use of this is, e.g. headers that get typeset in bold. What
if the title contains a word, say, in slanted (or, worse, some
mathematics)?
guess why we need real 'bold
On 02/13/2016 11:02 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:14:10 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> I guess \em is your friend here:
>
> Yes, silly me, of course \em nests well with bold
> as does mathematics:
> [...]
Alan, please, no derogatory remarks about
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:14:10 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> I guess \em is your friend here:
Yes, silly me, of course \em nests well with bold
as does mathematics:
\starttext
This is $τεχ$.
\bf This is $τεχ$.
\stoptext
A
hes so that
\bold{This text is \slated{bold}}
for example, would put the word "bold" into boldslanted?
A natural use of this is, e.g. headers that get typeset in bold. What
if the title contains a word, say, in slanted (or, worse, some
mathematics)?
There are a few font switches which
in bold. What
> if the title contains a word, say, in slanted (or, worse, some
> mathematics)?
Sorry, Alan, but I don’t see the point you’re trying to make.
I guess \em is your friend here:
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
{\bf Heading {\em One}}
{\bf Heading {\em One {\em
"bold" into boldslanted?
A natural use of this is, e.g. headers that get typeset in bold. What
if the title contains a word, say, in slanted (or, worse, some
mathematics)?
Alan
___
If your question is of i
many users.
I, personally, greatly prefer the MetaPost language, in particular its
ability to solve equations. This is extremely elegant and powerful, yet
is not at all intuitive for most users. The situation for plotting data
in MetaPost is much less evolved than for pgfplots. We have adapted
Jo
lso, E & V have different basic assumptions: Vim is much closer to the
Unix philosophy, while Emacs does a similar thing, but not on the OS
level, but within itself. IOW, Vim is built on top of Unix, and Emacs
largely "replaces" it.)
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.am
advantage) and/or you want just to copy a template from the docs (even
for a bit more sophisticated stuff), try Beamer.
Also, you might want to switch to a decent text editor. ;-P
Hth,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer
ds to ugly mathematics.
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.prag
las
(as we physicists tend to abuse) also leads to ugly mathematics.
Alan
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:30:22 -0500
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> > Wolfgang,
> >
> > Can you explain to us why it should be preferable for ConTeXt users
>
tly.
Best regards,
Bruce
Bruce M. Boghosian
Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tufts University
Bromfield-Pearson Hall, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> If you want to use your standalone version of ConTeXt,
>
> Thanks very much to everybody for all the informative help and advice.
>
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
> Bruce M. Boghosian
> Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tufts University
> Bromfield-Pearson Hall, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
>
ative help and advice.
Best regards,
Bruce
Bruce M. Boghosian
Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tufts University
Bromfield-Pearson Hall, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
___
If your question is of interest to o
uld
be very much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Bruce Boghosian
Bruce M. Boghosian
Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tufts University
Bromfield-Pearson Hall, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
___
If your question is of in
On 12/3/2015 3:16 AM, Maggyero wrote:
In both LaTeX and ConTeXt, we have two kinds of fonts:
— a text font: multi-letter words;
— a math font: single letter words.
In math mode, using LaTeX, text fonts can use both
— text spacing: $\textit{abc ffi}$ gives abc ffi;
— math spacing: $\mathit{abc f
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at 41
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at 41
On 11/30/2015 6:20 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that
Will Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX
package (\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)?
Because ConTeXt currently has the same math/tex
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that Will
Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX package
(\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)? Because ConTeXt
currently has the same math/text spacing issues in math mode that the ol
\definesymbol
[smallbullet]
[\raise.1ex\hbox{\mathematics{\scriptstyle\bullet}}]
Thanks! Where does the .1ex come from? Is that value derived from some
measurement, or does it just look about right?
I couldn't find a way to make
>> that end up in the right place.
>
>
> \definesymbol
> [smallbullet]
> [\raise.1ex\hbox{\mathematics{\scriptstyle\bullet}}]
>
Thanks! Where does the .1ex come from? Is that value derived from some
measurement, or does it just look about rig
y centered, such that it aligns
in the middle of where the regular-sized \bullet would be. I tried
using \inframed[height=\lineheight], but I couldn't find a way to make
that end up in the right place.
\definesymbol
[smallbullet]
[\raise.1ex\hbox{\mathematics{\scr
finetypeface[boldmath][mm][boldmath][modern][default]
\usemodule[cmscbf]
\usemodule[unicode-math]
\setupbodyfont[11pt]
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR{}\bTD{}Parcel \eTD\bTD{} \eTD\bTD Area
\eTD\eTR%
\bTR{}\bTD{} \eTD\bTD{}\mathematics{\lbraceuend} \eTD\bTD 1 \eTD\eTR%
\bTR
Hi,
I want to have the title of the chapters, sections and sub-sections in sans
serif Helvetica, body text and mathematics in Palatino.
Is this the right approach ?
Thanks,
Fabrice
\definetypeface [me] [rm] [serif][palatino] [default]
\definetypeface [me] [ss] [sans] [helvetica
"foo",
parents= { "bar" },
characters = {
[0x3A] = {
char = 0x2236,
class = "inner"
}
}
}
\stopluacode
\startTEXpage
$a: b$\par
\setupmathematics[domain=foo]$a: b$\par
On 7/16/2015 12:13 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
This seems to be best solution - exactly what I wanted to achieve:
\def\GG{\mathematics{G_G}}.
compare these two:
\def\GG{\ifmmode G_G\else$\GG$\fi}
\starttext
\edef\x{\GG}
\stoptext
and
\unexpanded\def\GG{\ifmmode
:
This seems to be best solution - exactly what I wanted to achieve:
\def\GG{\mathematics{G_G}}.
Thanks both for your help.
Best ragrds,
Lukas
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
R
- exactly what I wanted to achieve:
\def\GG{\mathematics{G_G}}.
Thanks both for your help.
Best ragrds,
Lukas
--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4
expands \GG which expands \GG
I want to just pass G_G in math mode, so it seems to me that "\ifmmode
G_G..." does the check.
The macro should write G + "lower index G" for both math and non-math
scope.
so
\def\GG{\ifmmode G_G\else$G\low{G}$\fi}
or
\def\GG{\mathematics
e. It seems that the
===
return {
mathematics = {
mapfiles = {
"mtpro2.map",
},
virtuals = {
["mtpro06a-regular"] = {
...
===
codes may have d
have changes, but
the basic infrastructure is still the same.
Thank you for sharing this article. It seems that the
===
return {
mathematics = {
mapfiles = {
"mtpro2.map",
},
, which is
fine) are converted to hyphens with the 'text' unit alternative (with
the default 'mathematics' unit alternative everything is fine):
2. The times symbol between the number and the 10^-3 (e-3) is
incorrectly spaced (as an ordinary math atom instead of a binary math
at
o hyphens with the 'text' unit alternative (with the default
'mathematics' unit alternative everything is fine):
2. The times symbol between the number and the 10^-3 (e-3) is incorrectly
spaced (as an ordinary math atom instead of a binary math atom) so doesn't
look good.
Mayb
add in this file the definition of the differential
operator which is so widely used in mathematics, so that users have at
their disposal once for all a proper implementation of this operator and
don't have to make their own hack:
+ \definemathcommand[diff]{\mathop{\mathlabel{d}}\mathopen{}}
And I think you should add in this file the definition of the
differential operator which is so widely used in mathematics, so that
users have at their disposal once for all a proper implementation of
this operator and don't have to make their own hack:
+ \definemathcommand[diff]{\mathop{\m
s}}
+ \definemathcommand [arccos] [nolop] {\mathlabel{\mathlabeltext{arccos}}}
etc.
And I think you should add in this file the definition of the differential
operator which is so widely used in mathematics, so that users have at
their disposal once for all a proper implementation of this
las[before={\switchtobodyfont[small]} ]?
I need to align formulas, so are not enough to \mathematics {}
Below is my fallback. You can do something smarter?
define a bodyfont (rm,mm,tt) where the math has an rscale of
On 3/10/2015 11:45 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Hello List.
I would like some elegant way to diminished font in math formulas...
Is there possibility anything as
\setupformulas[before={\switchtobodyfont[small]} ]?
I need to align formulas, so are not enough to \mathematics {}
Below is my
Hello List.
I would like some elegant way to diminished font in math formulas...
Is there possibility anything as
\setupformulas[before={\switchtobodyfont[small]} ]?
I need to align formulas, so are not enough to \mathematics {}
Below is my fallback. You can do something smarter?
Thanx
e region into account etc. - but as a proof-of-concept,
it works surprisingly well (i.e., fast).
> Greetings Jörg
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
___
itely possible.) So Org (the
format) has great support in Emacs Org-mode (an Emacs major mode).
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
___
> Idris
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:30:50 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/9/2014 1:36 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
since I'm really new to `context': are there any potential problems with
inserting white space in `\define' lines like `\define \Foo {
\mathematics{f(x)} }' which I might m
thnotations][\infull]
\mathnotation [KM] {\mathematics{K_m}} {Viscosity of membrane}
\starttext
\placelistofmathnotations
\section{Test}
We can use \KM\ to denote \infull{KM}.
\startformula
\KM = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
really thanks a lot for this tip. this seems to be the way to g
following:
\definesynonyms[mathnotation][mathnotations][\infull]
\mathnotation [KM] {\mathematics{K_m}} {Viscosity of membrane}
\starttext
\placelistofmathnotations
\section{Test}
We can use \KM\ to denote \infull{KM}.
\startformula
\KM = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
This way, you get
On 12/9/2014 1:36 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
since I'm really new to `context': are there any potential problems with
inserting white space in `\define' lines like `\define \Foo {
\mathematics{f(x)} }' which I might miss? `context' seems to ignore them
and they don&#
I need is a way of defining (potentially complex)
math-expressions via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations
(whatever) which I can then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...)
as well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeX
>> so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex) math-expressions
>>> via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations (whatever) which I can
>>> then use
>>> in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as
>>>
rmula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as
well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to write
\define\km{\mathematics{K_m}}
but there is not much to gain from this because you can enter math mode
in the text with \m{…}.
thanks
finitions/macros/abbreviations (whatever) which I can
> then use
> in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as well
> as in the body text.
>
> any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to w
On 11/10/2014 10:31 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention. However the following doesn’t result in what is
expected:
%% begin proof-qed.tex
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\mathortext\eqno\wordright
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention. However the following doesn’t result in what is
expected:
%% begin proof-qed.tex
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\mathortext\eqno\wordright]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a simple proof
]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
the \ifmmode is not honoured, and the change must have happened quite earlier
than a few weeks.
Maybe we should open a new thread as a bug in closecommand?
it probably has to do
=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
the \ifmmode is not honoured, and the change must have happened quite earlier
than a few weeks.
Maybe we should open a new thread as a bug in closecommand?
Best regards: OK
> On 09 Nov 2014, at 21:29, Mikael P. Sundqv
of]
> [number=no,
> closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
> closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
>
>
> \starttext
> \startproof
> This is a simple proof.
> \stopproof
>
> \startproof
> This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
> \startformu
Hi Mikael,
In my files I have the following which used to work, but it doesn’t work as
expected anymore, as you point out
\defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.]
\setupenumeration[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I once used
>
> \defineenumeration[proof][
> text=Proof,
> closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
> closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi,
> ]
>
> \starttext
> \startproof
&g
Hi,
I once used
\defineenumeration[proof][
text=Proof,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi,
]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a simple proof.
\stopproof
\startproof
This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
\startformula
1+1=2
On 4/13/2014 4:44 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Otared Kavian writes:
The \triangle operator is used for instance in the « symmetric
difference » of two subsets
Ah, good to learn something about pure mathematics. In my mathematics
degree, my tutor said, "You are very good at the ap
-math.lfg:
--
return {
name = "baskervald-math",
version = "1.00",
comment = "Goodies that give math support for the Baskervald ADF
font.",
author = "author",
copyright = "copyr
:
--
return {
name = "baskervald-math",
version = "1.00",
comment = "Goodies that give math support for the Baskervald ADF font.",
author = "author",
copyright = "copyrigth",
mathematics = {
virtuals = {
Otared Kavian writes:
> The \triangle operator is used for instance in the « symmetric
> difference » of two subsets
Ah, good to learn something about pure mathematics. In my mathematics
degree, my tutor said, "You are very good at the applied material,"
which was not meant
Am 04.03.2014 um 16:01 schrieb Fabrice :
> Hi Thangalin,
>> do you mean
>> presentation material to help students?
> Rather lessons (Mathematics) I'll put in pdf format on the platform at my
> high school.
> Thank you for the links, I'll take the time to loo
Hi Thangalin,
do you mean
presentation material to help students?
Rather lessons (Mathematics) I'll put in pdf format on the platform at
my high school.
Thank you for the links, I'll take the time to look.
Regard
> Hello ConTeXist.
>
> 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or
> it is a general problem of ConTeXt?
> 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of
> non-elementary mathematics?
> 2. Are you satisfied with the results, w
bove is awkward otherwise.
\startformula
area(f) = \iint_{\Omega} |{f_u\times f_v}|\, du dv
\stopformula
% limit not centered over double integral
\placeformula[-]
\stoptext
On Feb 16, 2014, at 5:30 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a series of exchanges on the list, on the
Hi all,
After a series of exchanges on the list, on the topic of how mathematics
typesetting is and should be in ConTeXt, I am writing you this message to ask
all those who use ConTeXt to typeset mathematics and who encounter various
types of difficulties, or shortcomings, to send me their
Hi Mikael,
as in my first answer use:
f''_xx or f''_{xx} if you need both xs'
I have tried it at it looks very similar to your LaTeX example.
Start another thread about the single prime as bug. Since this one is marked as
OT
and others more more knowledgeable might not be reading this.
regard
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> >
> > I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax
> as
> > in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since it
> > does n
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
> I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax as
> in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since it
> does not make sense to have \| yield a single bar since | does)
That is
14:18 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist :
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist :
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mika
vist wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
>> worked just fine.
>>
>> At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
>> research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept Co
dqvist :
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
>&
t;> I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
>>> worked just fine.
>>>
>>> At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
>>> research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
>>> and my c
201 - 300 of 743 matches
Mail list logo
