RE: simple gp issue

Yes - Subnets, Sites, Site link, Drag/drop in that order. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 > -Original Message- > From: Paul Everett [mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org] > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:59 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: si

RE: simple gp issue

Ah! Both DC's are in the Default-first-site and no defined subnets. Is it a simple process to create another site, define the subnets for each site and move one of the DC's to it? -Original Message- From: Michael Waltonen [mailto:walto...@umn.edu] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:09 PM

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

In the meantime since your replies to this thread just seem to be MS bashing – what is the problem you need help with. Perhaps someone here can assist. Pro cases are callback support and I think even for a Sev A crit-sit it’s supposed to be a two hour SLA on the callback during business hours onl

RE: simple gp issue

However, if your user's IP is not defined in a sited-subnet, it randomly picks one from anywhere in the domain. -Mike -Original Message- From: bounce-8782551-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8782551-8243...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Phil Brutsche Sent: Mond

Re: simple gp issue

Windows machines are supposed to use the information (sites and the related subnets) you entered into Sites and Services MMC applet to determine the closest DC and use that for logins. Paul Everett wrote: > Is there any way to ensure that my users get their GPO’s from the DC at > their location?

RE: simple gp issue

Yes, once replication occurred I got the expected behavior. Getting GPO's from different DC's explains the painfully slow logins for this user. 3-4 minutes applying user settings (from the remote DC). Is there any way to ensure that my users get their GPO's from the DC at their location?

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

That's not saying much! From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Support: Number?? $10 says it will still be better than Adobe's support could _ever_ be. David Lum //

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

$10 says it will still be better than Adobe’s support could _ever_ be. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 1:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

Yes just called back and case was re-assigned. Person I spoke to couldn't reach remote tech support: phone systems appeared down. Must be an MS phone system... >>> Did you properly define the case severity with the call router? Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c – 312.731.3132

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

Did you properly define the case severity with the call router? Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c – 312.731.3132 From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 1:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Suppo

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

Thanks all, yes there was another name and I e-mailed that person and he never responded. So I called tech support back and was told I would be contacted "shortly" for resolution. It only happens to be a critical system. That was hours ago. Microsoft could learn a lot from Sunbelt's support.

RE: simple gp issue

I always force replication when working with GPs, makes testing that much faster, as well as running gpupdate on the client side. Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (6

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Agreed Jonathan, lets just drop it. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Link wrote: > Let's not. This thread runs the risk of devolving into a political thread > rather easily. > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kim Longenbaugh > wrote: > >> Maybe if you posted the link or source of

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Let's not. This thread runs the risk of devolving into a political thread rather easily. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kim Longenbaugh wrote: > Maybe if you posted the link or source of info, it would be easier to > comment. > > > -- > > *From:* Christopher Bodna

RE: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Maybe if you posted the link or source of info, it would be easier to comment. From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Way OT: Census ad campaign Saw it was a

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

If the US Census did only what it was supposed to do, which is to simply count the number of bodies in a household, then it wouldn't take $300 million to do the job. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Christopher Bodnar < christopher_bod...@glic.com> wrote: > Saw it was a slow day on the list and

RE: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Or how about the millions the IRS spent to send letters to those that will get a stimulus check back in 2008... From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Way OT: Census ad campaign Saw it was a s

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Gee! What did they do?!?! Buy air time during the Super Bowl? On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christopher Bodnar < christopher_bod...@glic.com> wrote: > From what I’ve read so far the $300 million is just for the advertising > campaign. > > > > > > > > Chris Bodnar, MCSE > Sr. Systems Engineer

RE: Way OT: Census ad campaign

>From what I've read so far the $300 million is just for the advertising campaign. Chris Bodnar, MCSE Sr. Systems Engineer Infrastructure Service Delivery Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com Ph

RE: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Well, if it’s any consolidation, (it may not be for you, but it was for me) a very, very , very teensy part of that was spent on 250,000 lapel pins, for which the order came right to my little manufacturing company here in Massachusetts… so, it kept American workers working for a couple of month

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

Are you just talking the Ad Campaign or the whole shooting match? I do know a few years ago that the Census was trying to get some hand held PDA type device developed so that the Census taker/interviewer had some neat little gizmo to go house-to-house with, but they dropped that about a year and a

Re: Way OT: Census ad campaign

I'm sure a correct census count is necessary to see how many people there are in the other 49 states to pay Nebraskas share ;-) From: Christopher Bodnar To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Jan 04 11:33:07 2010 Subject: Way OT: Census ad campaign Saw it was a slow

Way OT: Census ad campaign

Saw it was a slow day on the list and thought I'd vent a little. Anyone else see this yet? Or think this number is astronomical for what they are trying to accomplish? I just keep thinking how many Head Start programs this could fund or arts programs could be re-instated with this kind of money

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

There is only 1 phone number or contact name in the signature? I find that very strange. For example I've got a case open right now, and it has 4 names with full contact information for each (main contact, backup contact, technical lead, manager). And this has been my experience for years with MS.

Re: Microsoft Support: Number??

800-936-4900 Haven't used it in a while - Original Message - From: "Tom Miller" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Monday, January 4, 2010 11:08:34 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Microsoft Support:  Number?? So I opened a case with Porcusoft last week.  Never got a cal

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

1800936-4900 From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Microsoft Support: Number?? So I opened a case with Porcusoft last week. Never got a call even

RE: Microsoft Support: Number??

800-936-4900. Tell the call router you want to speak to the next available engineer in the queue. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:09 AM To: NT System Admin

Microsoft Support: Number??

So I opened a case with Porcusoft last week. Never got a call even though *I thought* I had it scheduled support. Turns out the assigned tech's hours are Wednesday - Sat. I tried to call the main number on his signature, I get disconnected unless I try his extension (which the friendly automa

RE: WSUS - solved!

Yes it is! Pushing it via SMS is working nicely, although my original batch filed had “Pause” at the end, SMS doesn’t like that rookie mistake. “How come it shows started but no success?” DOH! Dave From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 20

RE: OT Cisco CSA EOL?

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/49121?source=NWWNLE_nlt_security_2009-12-18 From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: 04 January 2010 13:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT Cisco CSA EOL? Anyone else hearing that the next version of Cisco CSA will be the la

RE: OT Cisco CSA EOL?

Yes, V6.0 is going to be the last version. Also we have found out the hard way that Cisco CSA 6.0 is not that reliable, and has totally changed from Version 5.0 ( Basically they opened up everything and you have to lock it down, as compared to having it locked down and opening only what is nee

OT Cisco CSA EOL?

Anyone else hearing that the next version of Cisco CSA will be the last? And if so could you give me a general idea of who your source is please. I am hearing it in multiple places but the sources are not totally reliable. I want to make sure of my info before I stuff our recent purchase of the

RE: simple gp issue

Computer and User GPOs can be applied separately (as they occur at different times in the startup cycle) Running gpupdate /force should force both to be updated at the same time. However, if machines are getting policies from different DCs, and replication hasn’t occurred yet, then differing re