RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
Personally, Consultation would be my choice. You did what any good employee would do, when leaving, training the next person to take over the position, which means they are responsible, and not you.. If they need help from you, then its going to have to be after-hours and a per-hour charge for

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread James Rankin
Am I losing the plot, or did that reply just take about nine months to come through? 2009/11/24 Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org Personally, Consultation would be my choice. You did what any good employee would do, when leaving, training the next person to take over the position, which

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
[mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting former employer Am I losing the plot, or did that reply just take about nine months to come through? 2009/11/24 Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org Personally, Consultation

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Kennedy, Jim
I think the reply came through pretty quick, it just took Mr. Ziots 9 months to type it. :) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting former employer Am I losing the plot, or did that reply

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer I think the reply came through pretty quick, it just took Mr. Ziots 9 months to type it. :-) From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:34 AM

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread John Cook
+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Yeah it did :) Sorry, cleaning up emails, and just had to reply to that one. Z Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Andrew Levicki
Email is the lowest priority traffic innit. On 24/11/2009, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Am I losing the plot, or did that reply just take about nine months to come through? 2009/11/24 Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org Personally, Consultation would be my choice. You did what

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
:401-639-3505 From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Finally getting a slack day EZ? You've been uncharacteristically quiet these days

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread John Cook
...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Nope, I been buried up to my eye-brows in work and I head out for Vacation tomorrow... But yeah with the CISSP prep and test in Feb 2010, I have been busy... Z Edward

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Well good luck on that and enjoy the time off! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Don Ely
-- *From:* John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:40 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Supporting former employer Well good luck on that and enjoy the time off! *John W. Cook* *Systems Administrator

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Jay Dale
: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting former employer As hard as the test is, I think you will do fine... Especially with 6+ months of studying under your belt... What you really want to pray for is that your head doesn't explode after the test

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Jacob
CISSP.. I have a feeling someone will be busy on his vacation! I was when I studied for my PMP. From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Nope, I been buried up to my eye

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting former employer As hard as the test is, I think you will do fine... Especially with 6+ months of studying under your belt... What you really want to pray for is that your head doesn't explode after the test... I walked out of mine in a daze... On Tue

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Ziots, Edward
-639-3505 From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer CISSP.. I have a feeling someone will be busy on his vacation! I was when I studied for my PMP

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread John Hornbuckle
...@excaliburfilms.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer CISSP.. I have a feeling someone will be busy on his vacation! I was when I studied for my PMP. NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC
a day prepping... Hoping for the best! -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Yeah did a CISSP prep course also with 2 CISSP teaching at my workplace

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Don Ely
- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Yeah did a CISSP prep course also with 2 CISSP teaching at my workplace (yeah I set it up), so that helps reinforce what I need to know

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-11-24 Thread Jacob
, 2009 10:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer PMP is next on my to-do list this spring after I graduate. Did you pass the first time around? What are your thoughts in the process? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-24 Thread Sean Rector
+1 Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 8:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Those who would expect me to come back and do work for them for free

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Sean Rector
Consultant Sean Rector, MCSE From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Supporting former employer I changed jobs last December and left on good terms with everyone. I gave my 2-week notice, worked

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Jonathan Link
Yes. My fee is $X/hour. The rate can be reduced by walking the tech through this over the phone, rather than driving to your place of business. I covered this specific incident in detail before I left (if you have documentation of this, provide it). On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chris Blair

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread David Lum
I would not hesitate do both, with phone support being first if possible, good will goes a long long way. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Troy Meyer
My first response is like Sean's but it's a small world and like people to think nice things about me, so I probably give them one for free. After its working, I email the solution to the dt support guy along with CCing my previous manager and let them know that in the future I will be happy

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread John Hornbuckle
+1 John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Walk them through it. If it gets bad and you have to go in and do a bunch of work then consult it, or if it becomes a frequent event. I did it that way and the guy moved on later and way up. Then he hired me for the best gig I have ever had. What goes around sometimes comes around. From:

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Edward B. DREGER
CB Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:19:12 -0600 CB From: Chris Blair CB So how would you handle the situation? Without regard to former employment status; i.e., like any other colleague or friend. If it doesn't take much out of you, then there's no point in going out of your way to cause them grief.

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Roger Wright
I'd give whatever service I could to help as a freebie - this time - since you don't want to burn any bridges. Any future support provided would be billable. Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Chris Blair

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Cameron Cooper
Would offer your services to the former employer as a consultant job. This way they won't take your services for granted. ---___ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified Aurico Reports, Inc Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896 ccoo...@aurico.com

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Scot Parsons
, February 23, 2009 12:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Walk them through it. If it gets bad and you have to go in and do a bunch of work then consult it, or if it becomes a frequent event. I did it that way and the guy moved on later and way up. Then he hired me

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Christopher Bodnar
This is an extremely subjective topic. I think the biggest concern, especially in this economic environment, is don't burn any bridges. I'm in a similar situation. I left my previous employer a few months ago. A good friend of mine is still working there and has been roped into doing Windows

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Erik Goldoff
+1 on this response Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer My first response

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread gsweers
+1 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer I would not hesitate do both, with phone support being first if possible, good will goes a long long way. David Lum // SYSTEMS

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread John Hornbuckle
The number of responses from folks recommending against charging surprises me. I fall into the pro-charging category. I'm not saying be a jerk about it, but there's nothing at all unreasonable about viewing your time as being valuable. What *is* unreasonable is for a former employer to expect

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread David Lum
bad about him... David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Vue, Za
: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer +1 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer I would not hesitate do both, with phone

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Andrew Laya
- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer My first response is like Sean's but it's a small world and like people to think nice things about me, so I probably give them one

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread John Cook
) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer The number of responses from folks recommending against

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread John Hornbuckle
. Charging for my services doesn't mean I'm not. :) From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer You can't put a price on good will. My time is valuable, but my reputation as being helpful

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread David Lum
System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer But refusing to help a former employer for free shouldn't affect good will one way or another. If one of my techs left and later wanted to charge me for helping me with something, I would bear no ill will towards them for it. It would

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Ross
fellow employees this price too.. I don't get called to support them. imagine that. LOL From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 13:29 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting former employer Totally agreed. It's all a judgment call, every situation

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Erik Goldoff
: Supporting former employer The number of responses from folks recommending against charging surprises me. I fall into the pro-charging category. I'm not saying be a jerk about it, but there's nothing at all unreasonable about viewing your time as being valuable. What *is* unreasonable

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: But refusing to help a former employer for free shouldn't affect good will one way or another. Well, even if it *shouldn't*, it sometimes *does*. I find I have better luck planning my life around

RE: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Martin Blackstone
23, 2009 4:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting former employer On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: But refusing to help a former employer for free shouldn't affect good will one way or another. Well, even

Re: Supporting former employer

2009-02-23 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 23 Feb 2009 at 11:19, Chris Blair wrote: So how would you handle the situation? Would you take the time to fix it by walking the desktop person through it over the phone? Would you offer up your services as a consultant? I would tell them I can help free if we can get this done in X