Might be simpler to define the version in oak-parent
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, resc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: reschke
Date: Mon Mar 31 13:27:46 2014
New Revision: 1583325
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1583325
Log:
use the latest H2 DB throughout
Modified
You can define the version in dependencyManagement section and that
would be inherited by child projects. For e.g. there are entries for
junit, easymock etc. In child project you just define the groupId and
artifactId
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc
+1. I also missed getting a clean way to get blobId from Blob. So
adding this method would be useful in other cases also
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote
from node data. Yes it adds to
the complexity of backup but then such a feature is required then that
cost has to be paid.
Default setups currently do not use FileDataStore or BlobStore with
SegmentNodeStore. So as per defaults original design is still honored.
Chetan Mehrotra
to add
a separate method for that. But note that not all Blob implementations
have a blobId like in BlobStoreBlob.
For now there is no strong requirement for that. If need arises would
follow up this way
Chetan Mehrotra
to check the head revision
- cluster lease time = 1 min - This is the time after a cluster lease
would be renewed.
So we need to decide the time interval for Job for detecting recovery condition
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Amit Jain am...@ieee.org wrote:
Hi,
1) a cluster node
currently is not read from
NodeStore and in OSGi env is being provided by OSGi ConfigAdmin.
And more other settings like Index are currently stored as content
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Michael Marth mma...@adobe.com wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 08:06, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt
Test case failure on oak-solr
Failed tests:
testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:1 but was:0
testOffsetAndLimitWithGetSize(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:2 but was:0
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM
to distinguish between active
used blobs
regards
Chetan
Chetan Mehrotra
can be
accomodated on each node I think it would be better if the index is
access from file system
Are the above concerns valid and should we relook into how we are
using Lucene in Oak?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
[2]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak
much understanding of Lucene internal can someone review the
approach taken and see if there are some major issues with it
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12639366/OAK-1702-shared-indexer.patch
[2]
https://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene
not sure if this a problem with the usecase taken. Or the
Lucene Index cursor management should be improved as in many case the
results would be multiple but the client code only makes use of
initial few results
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main
1 5 5 6 7
68 10038
Profiling the result shows that quite a bit of time goes in
org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing.LZ4.decompress() (40%). This I
think is part of Lucene 4.x and not present in 3.x. Any idea if I can
disable compression?
Chetan
Would look further
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/FieldFactory.java#L44
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
Aside from the compression
I'm sorry but your test run exceeded 50.0 minutes.
Build failure is due to TimeOut
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Travis CI ju...@apache.org wrote:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #4073
Status: Errored
Duration
he wants to use depending on the
usecase.
Chetan Mehrotra
be
acceptable. This would enable scenarios where traversal would be too
costly and Lucene can still be used to provide required results in a
lot lesser time.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
In theory, the Lucene index could be used
of
META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver [1]. For such cases fragment bundles
can be avoided by having #1 monitor for such drivers and register them
programatically
3. DocumentNodeStoreService should only have a reference to DataSource
and use that
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7
and ensure
they are consistent from there on.
Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export
is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are
probably not required.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741
DocumentNodeStore against NodeStore interface
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/osgi_config.html#DocumentNodeStore
[2]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/DocumentNodeStoreService.java
On Tue
into the list and set the right type
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/osgi/design/raw/master/rfcs/rfc0197/rfc-0197-OSGiPackageTypeAnnotations.pdf
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741?focusedCommentId=13979465#comment-13979465
Hi,
I was checking the CI status for Oak trunk and it seems build are not
getting built at [1] and [2].
Do we have to enable it somehow?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds
[2] http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/
'
Chetan Mehrotra
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
All tests passed and All checks ok.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Davide Giannella
giannella.dav...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Davide
)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:10 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/67
in 1.0 would cause upgrade issue.
So should the change be reverted in trunk?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1587430
[2]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.0/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene
For the record I have implemented a DataSource provider bundle [2]
(based on above flow) as part of SLING-3574. That bundle can be used
to configure a DataSource in OSGi env
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3574
[2] https://github.com/chetanmeh/sling-datasource
Service Registry. If multiple BlobStore services
are registered then you can possibly specify a specific one by
configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter
(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium)
Chetan Mehrotra
specify a specific one by
configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter
(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium)
Assuming same is true for NodeStore services.
Did not get the query?
btw I have update the docs at [1] (update should reflect on github in
couple of hours)
Chetan Mehrotra
SecurityProvider should get registered. Do you have the Felix running
with WebConsole. Whats the status of the
'org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.SecurityProviderImpl'
Chetan Mehrotra
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Galo Gimenez galo.gime...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up Oak
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Galo Gimenez galo.gime...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running an old version of Felix, maybe that is the problem?
Looks like you are using an old version of SCR. Try to run with more
recent version of SCR.
Chetan Mehrotra
and then it should work fine
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm upgrading the OakSlingRepositoryManager used for Sling tests to
Oak 1.0, and it's not indexing PDFs anymore - it used to with oak 0.8.
After uploading a text file
a new module.
Chetan Mehrotra
benchmarking (possibly by
including the oak-run classes only
Various sub features in oak-run together do not still add much
complexity and are neatly seperated via various main methods. So
should be ok for now
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote
them in OSGi would again be tricky
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 27.5.14 4:48 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org
wrote:
We can turn the jar in to an OSGi container
And then access the token value from the passed credential attribute
in session login call.
Wanted to check if this approach is ok or it should be done in a different way?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/authentication/preauthentication.html
[2]
http://svn.apache.org
. OR refer to the jars (pre defined names) as part of Class-Path
attribute of oak-run manifest and place the required jars in same
directory. In that can you can just run the jar with java -jar
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
we
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
OAK-1645: Route find queries to Mongo secondary in MongoDocumentStore
This part still needs to be tested completely so I have set the fix
version now to 1.0.2
Chetan Mehrotra
Closeable
2. Have the actual implementations (i.e. SegmentNodeStore and
DocumentNodeStore) implement
Closeable and the close logic does an instanceof check to determine
if the NodeStore has to be
closed or not
Which approach to take?
Chetan Mehrotra
: Failed with seed -255091622
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.CompactionMapTest.testCompactionMap(CompactionMapTest.java:89)
And on running the testcase it indeed fails with that seed
Chetan
();
+}
+}
+}
+}
+
+}
Interesting test approach Marcel!!
Chetan Mehrotra
internal implementation details and you
would have to refer to code for that.
btw whats the higher level objective here. That might help us to clarify better
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Abhijit Mazumder
abhijit.mazum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is my first mail to Oak mailing
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Raquel Neves
raquel.ne...@alert-online.com wrote:
Timed out while waiting for a server that matches AnyServerSelector
Are you able to connect to Mongo via Mongo shell? Also can you try
connecting with host set 127.0.0.1
Chetan Mehrotra
was 23ms, measured granularity was 10.0ms)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:34 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/384
This is being tracked via OAK-1708. Julian do we still require it or
these can be removed now?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that even if the h2 dependency is now included with a 'test'
scope [0], we still
with the suggestion of returning one plan per
index.
btw any plans to add hint support to force usage of specific index?
Chetan Mehrotra
it
would be implementation specific
Chetan Mehrotra
. The Boolean query created would maintain the order and might be
faster if the result from first clause is small.
Would it make sense to retain the order of property restrictions?
Chetan Mehrotra
+1
All checks ok
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-08-01 11:45 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.4 release is available at:
https
Hi Davide,
Recently Ian pointed to Metrics [1] project which is related to such
timing measurements. It might be helpful to use this (via a wrapper)
to measure timings in critical areas in Oak. So have a look at that
also
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://metrics.codahale.com/
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014
be fine
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote:
Currently we use junit 4.10. By looking at the release notes of 4.11[0]
there's a nice improvement on the Assume that we use, being able to
provide a custom message.
(0)
https://github.com/junit
(ContentRepositoryImpl.java:161)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.repository.RepositoryImpl.login(RepositoryImpl.java:253)
... 43 more
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full
that this refactoring should be delayed (if that is to be
done) for some time till we get more stability in the two NodeStore
implementations.
Chetan Mehrotra
are exclusive.
So at minimum if you can provide a patch which allows the admin to
choose between the two it would allow us to experiment and later see
how we can put a max cap on cache size.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Vikas Saurabh vikas.saur...@gmail.com wrote:
we can
Lucene index defintions multiple
LuceneIndex instances would be returned by LucenIndexProvider and each
impl would return a single plan
Chetan Mehrotra
if we can have a cache policy which can put up a max cap on memory
taken and also allow limit of number of entries then that would give a
more deterministic control on tuning the cache
Chetan Mehrotra
/classifier
scopetest/scope
/dependency
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/08/2014 10:11, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
oops, you are right, that would be a bad idea. I thought this is about
a production class and not a test utility.
I
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
IMO, this should work, even if the value is not a ValueImpl. In this
case, it should fall back to the API methods to read the binary.
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
to expose the faceted data
bound to a system path. Otherwise we would need to expose the Lucene
API and OakDirectory
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-25 19:02 GMT+02:00 Lukas Smith sm...@pooteeweet.org:
Aloha,
Aloha
Hi,
Do we have any build bot running for 1.0 branch
Chetan Mehrotra
This was discussed earlier [1] and Jukka mentioned that there were
some restriction of deployment size. I tried pushing a snapshot
version sometime back and that got deploy fine. So I think we should
try to deploy artifacts again
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/ofvy3z5lyu5cw2i7
would need to add one for '{}' in log message to log the 'updates' argument.
Chetan Mehrotra
CopyOnReadDirectory support in OAK-1724
Further we also get the benefit of sharing the BlobStore between
multiple instances if required!!
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:27 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds
I have updated OAK-2082 with test run results. Looking at the result I
think FDS does provide a benefit in terms of lesser storage space.
Putting Lucene index on file system provides best storage efficiency
but then it would not work once we have TarMK failover implemented.
Chetan Mehrotra
where a new checkpoint gets created (Line
229) then that checkpoint would not be released and also would not be
recorded in index metadata. Such a checkpoint would prevent GC for a
long time.
Is that understanding correct?
Chetan Mehrotra
properly.
Yes thats the case I was referring to
Let's continue the investigation on OAK-2087.
This issue is different from OAK-2087 as that is only meant for
informational purpose. Opened OAK-2088 for this issue and would
followup there
Chetan Mehrotra
queries which involve property restrictions.
With this existing logic would not be modified and we can move ahead
with Lucene based property index. Later once we unify them we can
tackle this issue
Chetan Mehrotra
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.9.14 6:13 , Amit Jain wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.6
Michael
forward in OAK-2005.
Note that initial plan was to
1. Have current LuceneIndex moved to AdvanceQueryIndex
2. Then branch off the impl and make a new copy which has changes done
for Property index support
Chetan Mehrotra
for
storage of index nodes and then remove only those nodes
Chetan Mehrotra
HI Michael,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, mdue...@apache.org wrote:
+* upgrade : Upgrade from Jackrabbit 2
upgrade mode is only supported in oak-run-jr2 jar (as that only
packages JR2 classes) and is documented there [1]
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak
Hi Thomas,
Command line tool options are documented at the readme in oak-run
folder. See [1]. Or you are looking for something else?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-run#oak-runnable-jar
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Thomas Mueller muel
options
1. Make SolrQueryIndex implement AdvanceQueryIndex and thus
AdvanceFulltextQueryIndex
2. OR Duplicate AggregateIndex to have one impl for AdvanceQueryIndex
and other for QueryIndex
Doing #1 should not take much effort but still a change in existing impl.
Which route to take?
Chetan
on with Lucene index
related work (OAK-2005). Would it be ok if I do #1 i.e. Make
SolrQueryIndex implement AdvanceQueryIndex and thus
AdvanceFulltextQueryIndex bit later.
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chetan,
I think no. 1
Failure was because build bot picked only one change. For the build to
pass all 3 changes need to be picked up
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:10 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details
After discussing it Tomomaso offline would be going with option #3.
Opened OAK-2168 to track changes required in SolrIndex to support
AdvanceQueryIndex and later AggregateIndex
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tommaso,
also
Thats simple and precise solution to a nasty problem. :)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, mreut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mreutegg
Date: Wed Oct 8 15:59:30 2014
New Revision: 1630156
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1630156
Log:
OAK-2144: Intermittent Node not found
impl and add required meta info like index
path in that
2. Have some way of passing a payload in the IndexPlan itself which an
index impl can use to manage such info
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/chetanmeh/jackrabbit-oak/compare/chetanmeh:trunk...OAK-2005?diff=split#diff-12
[2] http
the right Lucene index
Chetan Mehrotra
[3] http://markmail.org/message/jjrkz7x7vwzunypa
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
While working on Lucene property index support I need to modify the
logic to support multiple Lucene Index definitions
attached to IndexPlan instance.
If I go extension route then I would need to decorate an existing
IndexPlan instance so quite a bit of redundant code. So would prefer
an attribute based approach.
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com
with persistence set to filesystem then I think currently we do not
the remove the existing index data which might lead to index
containing stale data.
Should we provide any sort of callback for indexers when reindex is requested?
Chetan Mehrotra
: Failed to delete
E:\slave14\oak-trunk-win7\build\oak-mk-api\target\oak-mk-api-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
- [Help 1]
[
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF
May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check
excludeosgi-conf/**/*.*/exclude
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:39 PM, alexparvule...@apache.org wrote:
Author: alexparvulescu
Date: Wed Oct 15 08:09:01 2014
New Revision: 1631967
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631967
, /test/n15, /test/n79, /test/n23,
/test/n81, /test/n80, /test/n56, /test/n18, /test/n52, /test/n13,
/test/n31, /test/n1, /test/n43, /test/n16, /test/n78, /test/n8, /test/n26,
/test/n87, /test/n83, /test/n65]
Oops. Would look into it now
Chetan Mehrotra
that its a 1.0.8+ feature
3. OR Have the docs at apache site include version in url.
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/1.0.8/docs/osgi_config.html
Chetan Mehrotra
files are used then any file would never be modified
and only new files would be created
Chetan Mehrotra
PS: Probably the question is more appropriate for Lucene DL but
checking here first to see if something in Oak is different from
default
.cfs - 955
_0.cfe - 194
segments.gen - 20
segments_1 - 81
_0.si - 266
-
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1633123
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
This blog post is interesting: they are using a physical switch (similar
of that time to create a directory as you
suggested above and reclaim old directory
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Then would use that UUID as the prefix ...
Sorry, that should be Then would use that _time_ as the prefix ... - I
but then
need to be sure if mapping the JCR path to filesystem (only for index
data) would be safe to use?
Chetan Mehrotra
purpose
Chetan Mehrotra
the mapping via JMX
Chetan Mehrotra
of
the node which is not seen as removed in trunk.
What I need is just a way to differentiate index state for a reindex
call and that can be managed easily via storing the creation time in
the index definition node which works easily with existing logic
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:51
readerPooling=false
perThreadHardLimitMB=1945
useCompoundFile=true
--
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1634504
this is not a
big issue as only binary references constitute state of the unmerged
branch. If such an issue is identified later then we can look into
implementing above mentioned mechanism
Opened OAK-2229 for this
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi
Hi Team,
I need to merge all changes done in oak-lucene so far to
branches/1.0/oak-lucene. Is it possible to do via direct command (kind
of [1]) or I would need to figure out all revisions done in oak-lucene
and specify them explicilty with svn merge command?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
http
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote:
I think merging explicit revisions is the only clean solution.
it is quite a bit of work, but makes sure we have the mergeinfo
tracked.
Thats what I feared. Would do it the right (hard!) way then.
Chetan Mehrotra
+1. All checks ok.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Amit Jain am...@ieee.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org
wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.8.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours
Hi Team,
I have updated the query documentation to provide details about
various features supported as part of Lucene Property Index at [1].
Kindly review it once to see if it captures the information correctly
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/lucene.html
!
Chetan Mehrotra
101 - 200 of 653 matches
Mail list logo
