Barry,
Thanks for considering my proposals.
I am happy with the encompasses, and I agree that it is better than
supports.
I think I don't understand the reason why the use cases are not going
to be part of the new charter (or maybe I misunderstood what subsequent
rechartering means).
The
-WG] Revised Charter
We've had a week and a half for comment, and there've been no
significant suggestions for changes to the charter proposal, so I'm
going to ask the ADs to take the attached charter to the IESG for
approval.
Igor suggested a change here, making it supports instead
Hey Barry, I'm confused. This thread is full of comments. Is there an
updated charter which addresses them?
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote:
We've had a week and a half for comment, and there've been no
significant suggestions for changes to the charter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Nov 2011Prepare re-chartering
I would like this removed.
I would like to see this WG closed when this list is complete and if there is
further work with enough interest, a new working group can be created.
Hi Eran,
we already
-WG] Revised Charter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Nov 2011Prepare re-chartering
I would like this removed.
I would like to see this WG closed when this list is complete and if there is
further work with enough interest, a new working group can be created.
Hi
David says...
Hey Barry, I'm confused. This thread is full of comments. Is there an
updated charter which addresses them?
Well, your earlier message doesn't suggest any changes, nor does
Dick's. Thomas's does, but he retracted them after he understood the
purpose of this rechartering (see
Thanks folks for your work in updating the charter.
I'll take a peek at this and get back about getting it put
in place in the next few days.
S.
On 09/05/11 15:29, Barry Leiba wrote:
David says...
Hey Barry, I'm confused. This thread is full of comments. Is there an
updated charter which
; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-
a...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Nov 2011Prepare re-chartering
I would like this removed.
I would like to see this WG closed when this list is complete
: Hannes Tschofenig; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-
a...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Nov 2011Prepare re-chartering
I would like this removed.
I would like to see this WG closed when this list
Barry,
I agree. Indeed, after ascertaining that the next rechartering is
scheduled for October, I personally see no problem with deferring the
use cases. (I thought that the current rechartering was already
post-2.0, which is what had confused me.)
With thanks for thorough follow-ups,
Leiba
Cc: oauth@ietf.org; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
Barry,
I agree. Indeed, after ascertaining that the next rechartering is scheduled
for
October, I personally see no problem with deferring the use cases. (I thought
that the current rechartering
, May 09, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: oauth WG; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
There are several things being held back to allow the core specification to
complete. For example, I would expect more expanded work on tokens.
There is also several
to the IESG.
EHL
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Igor Faynberg
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 12:18 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: oauth@ietf.org; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
Barry,
I agree. Indeed, after
On May 9, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
I want to see this working group reach its end when this charter is
fulfilled. At that point, a new working group can be requested to work on
other items. The new working group can continue using this list which I
assume will remain
)
makes me protective of it.
EHL
-Original Message-
From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:47 PM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; Phil Hunt; oauth WG; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
On May
We've had a week and a half for comment, and there've been no
significant suggestions for changes to the charter proposal, so I'm
going to ask the ADs to take the attached charter to the IESG for
approval.
Igor suggested a change here, making it supports instead of consists of:
OAuth consists
-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
Hi all,
Now that the Easter holiday is over, please review the following
revised OAuth charter and provide feedback by May 5th (one week from
today). Thanks!
Description of Working Group
The Open Web Authentication (OAuth) protocol allows
Blaine,
Looks very good to me.
A small editorial suggestion: Rather then say that OAuth consists of
mechanisms, I would suggest saying OAuth supports these mechanisms.
I alsonote the omission of the use cases. I suggest adding an item,
Submit OAuth Use Cases.George, Torsten, and
-1 on all of these.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Thomas Hardjono
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:20 AM
To: Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
Thanks Blaine
To: Thomas Hardjono; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-
a...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
-1 on all of these.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf
Of Thomas Hardjono
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:20
-Lahav [mailto:e...@hueniverse.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:48 PM
To: Thomas Hardjono; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-
a...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
-1 on all of these.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun
-Lahav [mailto:e...@hueniverse.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:48 PM
To: Thomas Hardjono; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth-
a...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter
-1 on all of these.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun
Hi all,
Now that the Easter holiday is over, please review the following
revised OAuth charter and provide feedback by May 5th (one week from
today). Thanks!
Description of Working Group
The Open Web Authentication (OAuth) protocol allows a user to grant
a third-party Web site or application
Thanks for getting this started.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Blaine Cook
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:37 PM
Description of Working Group
The Open Web Authentication (OAuth) protocol allows a user to grant a
24 matches
Mail list logo
