Hi Ralf,
Ralf Bode wrote:
Okay Armin,
will deal now with src-dist
but, why am i not able to use binary?
only for "enable" p6spy ?
or in generall better to use SRC?
The reason is I personal only use the src-version, thus I don't know
much about the possibilities of the binary-version.
Several
Okay Armin,
will deal now with src-dist
but, why am i not able to use binary?
only for "enable" p6spy ?
or in generall better to use SRC?
for Struts e.g. i allways use the binary-version
greetings,
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi,
>
> Ralf Bode wrote:
>
> > Hi Armin,
> >
Hi,
Ralf Bode wrote:
Hi Armin,
i used the bin-version.
how am i now able to enable p6spy?
in OJB.properties i found no key for it!
you have to use the source version.
greetings,
is it possible, that this is a bug?
(not setting the foreign-key?)
hmm, I don't think so. There was a bug when equal
Hmm, what I get for writing docs without stepping through code
carefully enough.
Armin has pointed out that using anonymous keys for PK's is going to
bomb if used in a clustered environment (or anywhere that persistent
objects are serialized and migrated) and he is completely correct!
Anyone u
Hi Armin,
i used the bin-version.
how am i now able to enable p6spy?
in OJB.properties i found no key for it!
greetings,
is it possible, that this is a bug?
(not setting the foreign-key?)
--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
Ralf,
>
> hmm, your test is now similar to the tests
an id (eg updatePerson(int personId, String newName, String
newJobTitle,...)).
Any thoughts?
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February 2004 12:34
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Installation of OJB
Hi Ralf,
it does deal with anonymous f
Hi Ralf,
hmm, your test is now similar to the tests in OJB test-suite. These
tests pass without problems (against hsql, sapDB, mySQL,...).
How does the generated sql look like? You can use p6spy to log all
generated SQL. If you run your test within OJB-suite you only need to
enable p6spy in bu
hallo armin,
it is the same behavor!
field "autoid" in table "kunde"
is also "null" ...
mmm (1.0rc5 - downloaded yesterday morning)
libs in classpath:
commons-collecton
commons-dbcp
commons-lang
commons-pool
db-ojb10rc5
(and mysql...) :-)
i did:
Auto auto = new Auto();
auto.setFarbe("blau");
K
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Bode wrote:
Hi Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
hier is my code (a simple test-example)
CAR:
ok, from my knowledge you should do
package de.ralle;
import java.io.Serializable;
//the CAR
public class Auto implements Serializable{
private Integer id;
private String farbe;
pu
Hi Armin, Brain and the rest :-)
hier is my code (a simple test-example)
CAR:
package de.ralle;
import java.io.Serializable;
//the CAR
public class Auto implements Serializable{
private String farbe;
public Auto() {
}
public String getFarbe() {
r
Hi Brian,
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Feb 3, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Armin Waibel wrote:
doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't achieve this.
?! See my previous post. Also, the code in the howto was tested!
Can you show me an test were a PK field was declared anonymous. I have
written some
hi brain,
an example would be nice,
i know, that i can not access an anonymous-key
in java :-)
the reason why i find this useful is, because of
having clean JavaBeans for database.
not blown up with eg carId (when i am also reffering
to a car)
but armin told, that anonymous-keys not available in
Hi Ralf,
it does deal with anonymous fields, but only in conjunction with 1:1
references. Please post class-descriptor and source for Customer, Car.
regards,
Armin
Ralf Bode wrote:
Hi Armin.
okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
dealing with anonymous-keys.
so i do like suggested in 1:1-mappin
On Feb 3, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Armin Waibel wrote:
doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't achieve this.
?! See my previous post. Also, the code in the howto was tested!
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
I declare PK's anonymous quite frequently. I will post an example when
I get in to work =) Basically it works just like normal, you still
refer to it by the name attribute (though I tend to use THIS_STYLE for
names for anon keys to make sure it is clear you cannot de-reference
them in the Java.
Hi Armin.
okay i didn´t know about 1.0rc5 isn´t
dealing with anonymous-keys.
so i do like suggested in 1:1-mapping.
but then in my Beans i have
int carId
Car car;
i do now:
setCar(Car c){
car = c;
carId = c.getId();
}
but i think this is redundant, isn´t ?
now i am very confused on dealing wit
Hi,
Ralf Bode wrote:
Hi Armin,
thanks for your patience, first!
but the things with declaring PK_Fields
i read at:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
i did everything like told me :-)
the document is written nice and understandful,
doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't
Hi Armin,
thanks for your patience, first!
but the things with declaring PK_Fields
i read at:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
i did everything like told me :-)
the document is written nice and understandful,
but only the little thing
froeign-key is null in my case...
did yo
Hi Ralf,
> but in my case the own id´s
> of a class where anonymous too,
> is that the matter?
AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this stuff.
Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field anonymous.
Recommend you to setup a test case similar to the examples in test suite
or docu (http://db.
Hi Armin, again...
...sorry...
i looked in samples you told me!
(thanks for tipps!)
but i have all so like
1:1-relationship
org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group
org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente
(access="anonymous" for reffered ids)
but in my case the own id´s
of a class wh
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Bode wrote:
hi ... again :-(
it is really frustratingly...
i turned OTM->true
made:
customer.setCar(car)
broker.store(customer);
I don't know what's wrong with your test, but this will definitely work
with the PB-api.
You can find many examples in test suite, e.g.
...broker.Anonym
hi ... again :-(
it is really frustratingly...
i turned OTM->true
made:
customer.setCar(car)
broker.store(customer);
but same...
customer is in DB, car not!
:-(
i have read in aritcle in german-javamag
on OJB there was said "all is nice"
or am i to stuid?
i though it would be possible
to store
Objects are not automatically stored by reachability -- the car isn't
inserted because it is attached to Customer. This *can* actually be
done in the OTM if Car is a truly dependent object (otm-dependent
attribute), but in the PB an object must be made explicitly persistent.
broker.store(ca);
b
Hi Brian,
now i got an "anonym" id
(very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans
no technicals in it :-)
i made
cu = new Custiomer();
ca = new Car();
cu.setCar(ca);
broker.store(cu);
now only a customer was in DB
i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor:
now i have a car and a customer,
but cust
Anonymous keys:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
-Brian
On Feb 2, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Ralf Bode wrote:
Thanks Brian,
but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ?
now i have (in classes):
CUSTOMER
car: Car
carId: int
CAR:
id: int
(and the XML desc for it like in mail before)
am
Thanks Brian,
but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ?
now i have (in classes):
CUSTOMER
car: Car
carId: int
CAR:
id: int
(and the XML desc for it like in mail before)
am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in
database-table CUSTOMER?
after:
broker.store(customer); ?
thanks again, and thanks
On Feb 2, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Ralf Bode wrote:
so please not be angry (because of lots questions)
(i last worked with 0.94... sorry)
Thanks advice!
Ralf
Of course not! Your questions are particularly helpful as they point
out weaknesses in the docs =)
On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous F
Thanks!
now OJB 1.0.rc5 works fine
it makes me now PKs automaticly
thanks
but it doesn´t deal with
foreignkey
customer --> car
i do
cu = new Customer();
cu.setName("foo");
car = new Car();
car.setColor("blue");
cu.setCar(car);
...
broker.store(cu);
okay
in DB is a new car and a new customer.
Your primary key should be one of the primitive wrappers, ie Integer
instead of int.
If you use an int then it is initialized to 0, which is saved into the
database as it is a valid int =( If you want autoincrement to work you
need to use the Integer (or Long) wrapper. When the pk is null, it w
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Bode wrote:
why must i set the PK in my code?
customer.setId(123);
i described it in XML
primarykey="true"
autoincrement="true"
there is no need to set the PK
but got Errsos, when i dont set up
the PK.
hmm, stack trace will be helpful. I assume you use the default sequence
manag
Message-
From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2004 16:47
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Installation of OJB
Thanks
i am still dealing now without its internals ;-)
i didn´t figured it out on page!!
Thanks Brenden,!!!
one short question - then i am
quiet! :-)
why must i
Thanks
i am still dealing now without its internals ;-)
i didn´t figured it out on page!!
Thanks Brenden,!!!
one short question - then i am
quiet! :-)
why must i set the PK in my code?
customer.setId(123);
i described it in XML
primarykey="true"
autoincrement="true"
but got Errsos, when i don
I think Thomas may have hit on the best general purpose option, using
the Torque tools he has recently written, as the ojb-core schema is
pretty readily accessible.
-Brian
On Feb 2, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Larry V. Streepy, Jr. wrote:
I struggled with this same problem when learning and working wit
I struggled with this same problem when learning and working with OJB.
My final solution was to run the build of OJB and then setup my project
build to extract the generated SQL (the schema.ddl file) and copy it
into my build area and use ant sql tasks to generate the tables. I know
that this
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Brian McCallister wrote:
> I have considered including the torque stuff in the ojb-blank project
> before, and opted against it as I thought I might be pushing too much
> complexity on users then.
>
> Right now there isn't an *ideal* way to create the internal tables as
> m
I have considered including the torque stuff in the ojb-blank project
before, and opted against it as I thought I might be pushing too much
complexity on users then.
Right now there isn't an *ideal* way to create the internal tables as
most of the time people don't need them (though the hi/lo s
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Daniel Perry wrote:
> I've always intended to figure this out, but never got round to it. I'm
> currently writing java code (semi generated by eclipse), then hand coding
> the repository and ddl files. Now having to build versions of software for
> multiple databases, i am g
>>If you want to start with the Java source (and have control over it), then
>>the easiest way would be to use the XDoclet module, in which case it
>>bascially amounts to adding special javadoc tags to your source code, and
>>then invoking an ant task in your build file that creates the repositor
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, [iso-8859-1] Ralf Bode wrote:
> Hi thank you,
>
> but i really do only search a "small" solution,
> whichs only builds my internal ojb-talbes.
>
> if was, i would load a deliverd
> obj-core.sql into my database.
>
> this would be enough, i am on a "lerning-trip"
> so tools l
ge...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 February 2004 10:43
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: RE: Installation of OJB
>
> Thanks Brendan,
>
> but it doesn´t work!
> but this would be the way i likded ;-)
>
Hi thank you,
but i really do only search a "small" solution,
whichs only builds my internal ojb-talbes.
if was, i would load a deliverd
obj-core.sql into my database.
this would be enough, i am on a "lerning-trip"
so tools like xdoclet seams to be "overdosed"
greetings
--- Thomas Dudziak <[E
I'm not using any. So far I've not used any features that require them
but this may change...
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2004 10:43
To: OJB Users List
Subject: RE: Installation of OJB
Thanks Brendan,
but it doesn´t work
27;t want
> to deploy all the
> test tables with my final app...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 February 2004 09:55
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: RE: Installation of OJB
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> yes
Basically there are two easy ways to getting started, though I don't think
they are properly described in a tutorial yet.
If you have an existing database that you want to manipulate with OJB,
or you like to start with the database then create the Java source code
for it, then I suggest you look a
it all works, I don't want to deploy all the
test tables with my final app...
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2004 09:55
To: OJB Users List
Subject: RE: Installation of OJB
Hi Brendan,
yes i know, that i need its internal tables
perhap
to-use-db-sequences.html
>
> This doc more specifically covers what you need for
> deployment:
> http://db.apache.org/ojb/deployment.html
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Bode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 February 2004 08:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
TECTED]
Subject: Installation of OJB
Hi to all,
just a question about to install OJB
i read, that i have to load the sources and
run some build-scripts okay.
but is there an easy-way?
i only need a build-script for the binary-version
of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into
databa
Hi to all,
just a question about to install OJB
i read, that i have to load the sources and
run some build-scripts okay.
but is there an easy-way?
i only need a build-script for the binary-version
of OJB, that "installs" OJB-internal-tables into
database.
or is there a reason for "building" all
48 matches
Mail list logo
