-Original Message-
From: Jihui Choi [mailto:jihui.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2012 1:54 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Wright [mailto:gwright2...@hotmail.es]
Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2012 2:01 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4
I often wonder why somebody that has Microsoft Office would have
On 01/06/2012 Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
here is the full Slovenian translation for Apache OpenOffice 3.4:
http://ooo.siccla.net/gsi/apacheOO/3.4.0/GSI_sl.sdf.gz
Thanks Martin, Robert, it's great to see that you are continuing the
OpenOffice localization effort! I assume your updates are
On 02/06/2012 09:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 01/06/2012 Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
here is the full Slovenian translation for Apache OpenOffice 3.4:
http://ooo.siccla.net/gsi/apacheOO/3.4.0/GSI_sl.sdf.gz
Thanks Martin, Robert, it's great to see that you are continuing the
OpenOffice
Graham Wright wrote:
Is there an English language pack for 3.4 in the pipeline at all?
Language packs for English (US) are at
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html#tested-lp
while language pack for British English (en-GB) are at
Yes, of course, it is available under the new Apache 2 license.
We are also localizing LibreOffice under its own licence.
Lp, m.
2012/6/2 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
On 01/06/2012 Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
here is the full Slovenian translation for Apache OpenOffice 3.4:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Jihui Choi,
This message acknowledges receipt of your ICLA, which has been filed in the
Apache Software Foundation records.
If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the project PMC that
your ICLA has been
2012/6/2 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Graham Wright [mailto:gwright2...@hotmail.es]
Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2012 2:01 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4
I often
1) If I go to the extension site and type español on the search box,
I obtain several pages of results, but many of of those pages have
only one or even no extensions!
Clicking on the Tag Español gives better results.
2) Recently, a volunteer on the ES forums uploaded several ClipArt
extensions:
On 6/1/12, Graham Wright gwright2...@hotmail.es wrote:
On 02/06/2012 03:40, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Jihui Choi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Alexandro Coloradoj...@oooes.org
wrote:
When you install it you agreed to open doc files in OpenOffice
Basically
When the US gov went to word from wordperfect sometime around 1994, pretty
much everybody who interacted with the government went to MS Office within
a year or so.
I expect we will see a similar effect from Brazil and other governments
moving to OFF.
When I installed 3.4 on windows 7 and on Ubuntu
+1 to start graduation process.
To me it seems that just as in an apprenticeship system, graduation does
not imply perfection or mastery of the endeavour, but readiness to attempt
journeyman-level work.
Wolf
http://evergreen-community-01.lyrasistechnology.org
http://sourcefreedom.com
Apache
On 6/2/12, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
When the US gov went to word from wordperfect sometime around 1994, pretty
much everybody who interacted with the government went to MS Office within
a year or so.
I expect we will see a similar effect from Brazil and other governments
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Jihui Choi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
When you install it you agreed to open doc files in OpenOffice
Basically installing AOO doesn't
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Sorry to highlight something more here...
The draft (which I insist is clearer that the resolved FAQ)
says, under License Categories:
Pedro, your logic violates every principle of interpretation. If
something was in a
2012/6/2 Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org:
On 6/2/12, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
When the US gov went to word from wordperfect sometime around 1994, pretty
much everybody who interacted with the government went to MS Office within
a year or so.
I expect we will see a similar
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Ross;
I don't think it's my turn since my issues remain unresolved.
I think Ross's idea was to stop batting this back and forth at a high
level, and instead focus on a specific file. So get into the details
rather than
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:35 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, AOO installer on windows ask for file association, but maybe
not with enough insistence: while I agree that the next, next, end +
needed OK without thinking culture on this day computer world is
plain wrong, it is not our
FWIW, part of migrating to a TLP involves relocating
your svn tree to top-level, thereby breaking any links
to svn urls in 3.4.0's source tarball. No we do not
support redirects for svn.a.o, and I doubt Subversion
does either.
I trust 3.4.1 will therefore address this issue properly
going
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW, part of migrating to a TLP involves relocating
your svn tree to top-level, thereby breaking any links
to svn urls in 3.4.0's source tarball. No we do not
support redirects for svn.a.o, and I doubt Subversion
Furthermore addressing this issue from a legal perspective
misses the point- the org will certainly permit you to
distribute Category-B sources for things that only are useful
when compiled on the target host. The point is that
you should be distributing dependencies from either the
mirrors using
On 02/06/2012 Jihui Choi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:35 PM, RGB ES wrote:
AFAIK, AOO installer on windows ask for file association, but maybe
not with enough insistence: while I agree that the next, next, end +
needed OK without thinking culture on this day computer world is
plain wrong,
Ack. To avoid complications we could do the
svn promotion as a 2-stage copy + delete, where
the delete happens post 3.4.1 release.
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Moving
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Questions relating to research!
We aren't in order to adjust.
Sorry long text.
Legend:
- Questions
--Response options.
Will this question be international? or is it local? An
international survey might have
--- Sab 2/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Pedro, your logic violates every principle of
interpretation. If something was in a draft
and then was removed from the draft, that
suggests that there was not consensus for it to
remain.
I think the issue is strictly policy
hi, Herbert
I have already reconfigured the build env by appending --enable-verbose,
then rebuilt SAL.
The error message is the same.
-
Entering
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
Also, if we follow Andrea's proposal, we don't link to the NL home
page, but to the NL's download page directly. (If I understand
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/06/2012 Jihui Choi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:35 PM, RGB ES wrote:
AFAIK, AOO installer on windows ask for file association, but maybe
not with enough insistence: while I agree that the next, next, end
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 19:56, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the
Hi,
some notes inside.
Albino B Neto schrieb:
Hi.
Questions relating to research!
We aren't in order to adjust.
Sorry long text.
Legend:
- Questions
--Response options.
***
- How old are you ?
Why this question?
- What S.O you use ?
--Linux
--Mac
--Windows
--other [what]
The user
Madam or Sir,
About three weeks apart, I tried twice to download and install OpenOffice.
Maybe it's not downloading completely; but if I start trying to install, the
percent-complete indicator just stops moving about 3/4 of the way through.
My son introduced me to OpenOffice in '09. Now that
lumen54 wrote:
About three weeks apart, I tried twice to download and install
OpenOffice. Maybe it's not downloading completely; but if I start
trying to install, the percent-complete indicator just stops moving
about 3/4 of the way through.
The download page shows the option to choose another
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2012 um 00:41 schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
--- Ven 1/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
And computers need electricity, which is not free and
not available under a compatible license. I wish you
could keep focused or at least do an effort to
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Since discussion has turned to graduation I'd like to invite people to
consider who they would like to have as PMC chair. The first part of
this is understanding what the role of a PMC chair is.
Since someone
On 06/02/12 15:11, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
...
Well I am a committer in the only big UNIX-like
distribution that is carrying Apache OpenOffice
nowadays. We would really like to use a source
distribution through ASF mirrors but since the ASF
doesn't provide one that works well we have been
This situation doesn't seem to be diffusing itself,
even tho I have tried to explain that the 3.4.0 release
deps packaging does not comply with infra policy.
Surely there is a middle ground here- that the missing
release deps package simply be generated from those
tarballs in svn. So long as the
http://www.openoffice.org/cs/
I don't read Czech, but I was going over the NL pages to verify
download links, in preparation for when we enable the OOo 3.3
upgrades.
You can get a good sense of the page via http://translate.google.com
If any knows Czech, it would be good to confirm what
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
This situation doesn't seem to be diffusing itself,
even tho I have tried to explain that the 3.4.0 release
deps packaging does not comply with infra policy.
Surely there is a middle ground here- that the missing
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Moving Category-B tarballs (was Re: [PROPOSAL] Starting the
graduation process)
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Joe Schaefer
Am 06/03/2012 12:16 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
http://www.openoffice.org/cs/
I don't read Czech, but I was going over the NL pages to verify
download links, in preparation for when we enable the OOo 3.3
upgrades.
You can get a good sense of the page via http://translate.google.com
If any knows
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Moving Category-B tarballs (was Re: [PROPOSAL] Starting the
graduation
On 2012-06-02, at 18:37 , Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@Pavel: Could you sheet some light on the cz webpage? What do you think?
Should Pavel be disinclined to update these—I have no reason to think he would
be, and he's been involved with OOo and AOO for about as long as I—the Czech
community
Am 06/03/2012 02:22 AM, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
On 2012-06-02, at 18:37 , Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@Pavel: Could you sheet some light on the cz webpage? What do you think?
Should Pavel be disinclined to update these—I have no reason to think he would
be, and he's been involved with OOo and
43 matches
Mail list logo
