Easy Crashing with 3.4.1 RC2

Dear all, I've been using 3.4.1 since last Friday. It became very easy to crash. I'm not sure if this is a local problem or not. Has anyone experience the same issue with me? I'm still diagnotise. I hope this is only a local problem. -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' PGP Key http://www.

[INFO] Apache Whisker

Hi, I have contacted our colleagues of the Apache Rat project to ask some questions about the rat scan. One of them, Robert Donkin, made me aware of another tool of the Apache Creadur project (of which Rat is one sub-project): Apache Whisker. It helps in creating legal documentation, such a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/

Hi André Please go ahead. have a look to main/basic/ too. this surce seems to be the old TT, and we don't use it anymore. Greetings Raphael Am 23.08.12 03:27, schrieb Zhe Liu: > +1. Please do it. Too many modules for testing. We am refactoring > them. In future, testing code will be placed in

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

On 23.08.2012 02:43, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the offici

[call for review] One fix about performanc​e improvemen​t(xls loading)

hi, all I have one fix need for review. Please check the below for details, thanks! One is about xls saving: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120586 Root cause: in spreadsheet filter process, 'updaterowheights' will be performed for all the objects in the document. Resolution: In f

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

On 8/23/12 2:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> We are really getting ahead of ourselves. >> >> We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - >> Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only

Re: [Call-for-Review] Some issue about memory leak in Aoo3.4

Some more memory leak bugs, please help to have a review. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=113600 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=113605 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120669 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120662 https://issues.apache.org/oo

Is there difference of Author Field create by UNO API and UI Insert->Fields->Author

Hi All, I am tring to use UNO API create and load an Author field, I found below difference. 1. Author Field created by UNO API, after save the document od MS Doc format, field will be lost 2. Author Field create by UI Insert->Fields->Author, when access the field by UNO API, there is no Pro

[QA][CallForReivew]A script test create, load, save Subject Field

* *Hi ALl, I create a script test create, load and save Subject field, would you pls help review. The patch get be get from here. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120672 Best Regards DongJun Zong

Re: Is this a UNO API bug?

I already read this document. But the update is not effect for Page Number field. The method update() of the interface com.sun.star.util.XUpdatableaffects only the following field types: - Date and time fields are set

Re: Is this a UNO API bug?

Is the page number field? Hmmm, I inspected one and it supports update(), not refresh(). So no, I don't think that I mean refresh(). Can you insert the field and then, since you still have a copy of the field, call update()? This is supported by com.sun.star.util.XUpdatable Read this: ht

[QA CALLFORREVIEW] Add methods in SCUtil and TestUtil, create test case to check cell alignment.

Hi, all One patch for UNO automation test script has been submitted with *Bug 120671 * . In this patch: 1. Modify save method, create method to clear temp directory. 2. Add more random method. 3. Test case to check cell alignment. Pls help to

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:36:56PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> > We'll nede Juergen to upload that and SF to copy it. With the time >> > zone difference (Hamburg versus California) this will not happen >> > quickly. >> > >> > Looking a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/

+1. Please do it. Too many modules for testing. We am refactoring them. In future, testing code will be placed in one module "test". See http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor 2012/8/22 Andre Fischer : > Hi all, > > The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files i

How to insert Table with AutoCaption in swriter?

Hi all, I want to use UNO api to verify swriter's AutoCaption configuration. In order to whether it is feasible, I made the following steps: Step 1, I manually configure swriter's AutoCaption via menu Tools-->Options-->OpenOffice.org Writer-->AutoCaption, check "OpenOffice.org Writer Table" to au

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:36:56PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > > We'll nede Juergen to upload that and SF to copy it. With the time > > zone difference (Hamburg versus California) this will not happen > > quickly. > > > > Looking at the download stats I see it gets around 400 downloads per > > day.

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We are really getting ahead of ourselves. > > We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - > Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the > official SOURCE release. > > I lo

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On 23/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote: I've also updated the Japanese and French NL pages. The Italian and Spanish pages seem to be hooked into the same Javascript we use on the main download page, so I'm hoping they will point to the 3.4.1 release automatically when we push the updates to that script.

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew: >>> >>> OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far >>> >>> The Mac en_US language pack points to: >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openoffic

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) > wrote: > > Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew: > > > >> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > >>> > >>> Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Wed, Aug 22,

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew: > >> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> >>> Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: > > One more incorrect link >>

Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?

Am 08/21/2012 10:15 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 08/21/2012 01:19 PM, schrieb Nicolas Christener: Hi all :) On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: [...] I've updated the starting webpage at "http://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html": @Maho,Pedro,Yuri,Nicolas: Like stated

[VOTE][RESULTS] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

The community vote has passed. Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA +1 RGB-ES Rory O'Farrell Carl Marcum Reizinger Zoltan Keith N. McKenna Kay Schenk Roberto Galoppini Imacat Andrea Pescetti Regina Henschel Graham Lauder Jürgen Lange T.J. Frazier Rob Weir Dave Fisher Peter Junge Christian Gr

Re: BAD link

Am 08/23/2012 01:58 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew: On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: One more incorrect link The SDK release notes points to: http://oo

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew: > > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> >>> Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: > One more incorrect link

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22.08.2012 11:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> We are really getting ahead of ourselves. >>> >>> We have a leg

Re: BAD link

Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew: On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: One more incorrect link The SDK release notes points to: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/sdk/index.html T

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/22/2012 11:29 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have >> already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org. >> Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet.

Re: BAD link

Original Message From: drew To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:26:50 -0400 > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: One more incorrect lin

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/23/2012 01:27 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >> >>> Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew: >>> OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far The Mac en_US lan

Re: BAD link

Am 08/23/2012 01:27 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew: OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far The Mac en_US language pack points to: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ back to

Re: BAD link

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew: >> >> OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far >> >> The Mac en_US language pack points to: >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ >> >> back to it.. > > > It seems the l

Re: BAD link

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: > >> One more incorrect link > >> > >> The SDK release notes points to: > >> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/sdk/index.html > >> > > > > That one a

Re: BAD link

Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: One more incorrect link The SDK release notes points to: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/sdk/index.html That one appears to be dead in the live page as well: http://www.openoffice.org/sdk/index.html I

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

Am 08/22/2012 11:29 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org. Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet. For example this article is being spread via Twitter: http://majo

Re: BAD link

Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew: OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far The Mac en_US language pack points to: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ back to it.. It seems the langpacks for en-US are completely missing: http://sourceforge.net/projects/o

Re: BAD link (was: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2_

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drew wrote: > One more incorrect link > > The SDK release notes points to: > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/sdk/index.html > That one appears to be dead in the live page as well: http://www.openoffice.org/sdk/index.html It is supposed to be a link to release

Re: BAD link (was: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2_

One more incorrect link The SDK release notes points to: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/sdk/index.html //drew On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 18:41 -0400, drew wrote: > OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far > > The Mac en_US language pack points to: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/ope

BAD link (was: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2_

OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far The Mac en_US language pack points to: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ back to it.. //drew On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 00:15 +0200, Jürgen Lange wrote: > For me it's working also. After checking the links, I have download

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

For me it's working also. After checking the links, I have downloaded the german version for windows, have installed it (Windows XP SP3) and made first tests. All is working fine so far. Jürgen Am 23.08.2012 00:09, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew wrote: On Wed, 2012-

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

Am 08/22/2012 11:19 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/22/2012 10:18 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have >> already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org. >> Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet. >>

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have > already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org. > Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet. > > For example this article is being spread via Twi

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org. Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet. For example this article is being spread via Twitter: http://majorgeeks.com/Apache_OpenOffice.org_For_Windows

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/22/2012 10:18 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) >>> wrote: Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > > On 0

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

Am 08/22/2012 10:18 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/2

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Michal Hriň wrote: > Dňa Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:40:05 +0200 Rob Weir napísal: > > >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >>> On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) > wrote: > >> Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > Am 08

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >>> >>> >>> On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > > > On 08/21/

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

Dňa Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:40:05 +0200 Rob Weir napísal: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrot

Re: "Social integration" for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG01- see comments inline > > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Phillip Rhodes > > > wrote: > > > Per Rob's email about the "Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache > > > OpenOffice 4.0" I wa

Re: [ooo-site]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh wrote: > > Hello webmaster, there is a broken link, > http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download > > >

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On 8/22/12 7:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:24:31 +0200 >> Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On 8/22/12 4:03 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: Agreed, Moderator is a great tool to rank our ideas. >>> >>> 196 people have submitted

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> >> >> On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> >>> Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 8/21/12 9:1

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:24:31 +0200 > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 8/22/12 4:03 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: >> > Agreed, Moderator is a great tool to rank our ideas. >> >> 196 people have submitted 164 ideas and cast 1,852 votes until now >>

Re: OOO: missing group write permissions under /dist

On 8/22/12 5:20 PM, sebb wrote: > Checking /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator > > The following entries don't have group write enabled. > This can cause problems later, so please fix, > Thanks! > > 54214290 6 drwxr-sr-x 3 jsc incubator 3 Aug 21 19:32 ./ooo/3.4.1 > 54214291 6 drwxr-sr-x 2 jsc incu

NewWikiMainPage

Hi, I am finding that a lot of the links on the Open Office Page are broken. I am trying to get the English (Canada) Open Office Dictionary and this link is broken. Thanks, Ken Cole

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:24:31 +0200 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/22/12 4:03 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > Agreed, Moderator is a great tool to rank our ideas. > > 196 people have submitted 164 ideas and cast 1,852 votes until now > > Juergen > > > > > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir wr

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 8/21/12 5:45 PM,

OOO: missing group write permissions under /dist

Checking /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator The following entries don't have group write enabled. This can cause problems later, so please fix, Thanks! 54214290 6 drwxr-sr-x 3 jsc incubator 3 Aug 21 19:32 ./ooo/3.4.1 54214291 6 drwxr-sr-x 2 jsc incubator 14 Aug 21 19:32 ./ooo/3.4.1/source

Defect Status wiki

Thanks for Rob's defect chart! While, I think there are more defect status worthy to trace to give people the overall picture of AOO quality status. So I created a AOO Defect Status Reportwiki to list what in my mind. I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/

+1 Please go ahead. It will make the test project more clearly. Thanks. 2012/8/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann > Hi, > > > On 22.08.2012 11:28, Andre Fischer wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files >> in its >> source. These contain xslt trans

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On 8/22/12 4:03 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > Agreed, Moderator is a great tool to rank our ideas. 196 people have submitted 164 ideas and cast 1,852 votes until now Juergen > > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu >> > >> wrote: >>>

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

Agreed, Moderator is a great tool to rank our ideas. On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu > > > wrote: > > Back to the topic... :) The page looks great! I submitted 1 UI proposal > and > > voted for some others... > > > > So far: 117 pe

Re: "Social integration" for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

KG01- see comments inline On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Phillip Rhodes > > wrote: > > Per Rob's email about the "Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache > > OpenOffice 4.0" I was perusing the Google Moderator doc[1] and came > > across this suggest

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

Hi, On 22.08.2012 11:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on

Re: svn commit: r829379 - in /websites/production/ooo-site: cgi-bin/ content/

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:54 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> >>> On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Why? Could very well have a "publish all changes" mode (the current only option) alongside the "cherry picking" (publi

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

Hi all, +1 Let us go! :) Thanks, khirano On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the > optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our > willingness/readiness to govern ourselves. If this vote passes then

Re: svn commit: r829379 - in /websites/production/ooo-site: cgi-bin/ content/

On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> >>> Why? Could very well have a "publish all changes" mode (the current >>> only option) alongside the "cherry picking" (publish only selected file) >>> mode. >> >> This thread sta

[QA][CallForReview][Automation[UNO]Test create, load, save Page Count field

Hi All, I create a script test page count field, including create, load save. Pls help reivew, patch could be get from here. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120660 Best Regards DongJun Zong

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/

Hi, On 22.08.2012 11:28, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files in its source. These contain xslt transformations, no code. The xslt transformations, however, still contain the old license headers. Instead of cleaning this up (rep

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the rat

[PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/

Hi all, The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files in its source. These contain xslt transformations, no code. The xslt transformations, however, still contain the old license headers. Instead of cleaning this up (replace the license headers, add exceptions to

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

Hi, On 21.08.2012 14:34, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on

[QA][Call For Review] SD SVT case

hi, all I developed a sd SVT case, it contains several operations on sd: 1) Create a new sd file 2) New slide 3) Insert table 4) Insertpictures 5) Insert slide from other external file 6) Slide show settings 7) slide show 8) save and close 9) loop 1~8 and check memory And this patch also updates

Re: Unable to download OpenOffice via SourceForge

-- "La lumière s'évapore sur la plaine chaude de la vallée close. L'été nous assome de toute sa clarté." 100.000 soleils Am 22.08.2012 um 09:46 schrieb Roberto Galoppini : . > > Really sorry for the inconvenience, as Peter Oliver confirmed it has been > fixed. > > Roberto Th

Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposed adaptation when AOO 3.4.1 is released.

Hi, On 14.08.2012 16:22, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, currently, an update service is active for OOo 3.3, OOo 3.2.1 and OOo 3.2 for all languages and platforms for whose we have a released AOO 3.4 package. When we have AOO 3.4.1 released I am planning the following adaptations of the upda

Re: Où m'adresser pour aide technique

Hi, You can get OpenOffice.org 1.1.5 from http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/stable/ The md5sums are on http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/md5sums/1.1.5_md5sums.html Kind regards Regina marc.dames...@free.fr schrieb: Monsieur, J'ai téléchargé le dernier Open Office 3.4 il ma

Re: Unable to download OpenOffice via SourceForge

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22.08.2012 08:19, Peter Pöml wrote: > >> >> Am 22.08.2012 um 04:16 schrieb Rob Weir : >> >> Hi Dave, >>> >>> Roberto's probably long asleep at this hour, so I hope you can pass this >>> on >

[QA REPORT] Long run report of r1372282

Hi all, I finally finished long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4.1 build r1372282, on my ubuntu10.04. - Here is my scenario: 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. 2. Input some simple text in it. 3. Save and then reopen it. 4. Repeat the above steps. - Here is the lo

Re: [DISCUSS]: I would like to propose a new conversion mode parameter

+1,sounds a good idea,it will extend the usage areas of Aoo with better performance and expectation. On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 08/21/2012 03:38 AM, schrieb Lei Wang: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >> >> Am 08/20/2012 04:54 PM, schri

Re: Is this a UNO API bug?

You mentioned force update, do you mean use refresh() method ? I have tried by below code, still can't work. public void createPageNumber(XComponent component) { XMultiServiceFactory sevriceFactory = (XMultiServiceFactory) UnoRuntime.queryInterface(XMultiServiceFactory.class, component);

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On 8/21/12 11:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>

Où m'adresser pour aide technique

Monsieur, J'ai téléchargé le dernier Open Office 3.4 il marche très bien ce dont je Vous remercie. Mais à titre technique je voudrais sur un ancien ordinateur window millenium télécharger la version qui devrait marcher la 1.1.5. Je n'y arrive pas je suis toujours redirigé vers des versions

Re: [Call-for-​Review] Bug 120568 Hyperlink of Graphihc with Anchor Type "As Character" lost after save as doc format.

Huai Dong,please provide your test cases that will make the scope more clear..thanks. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Huaidong Qiu wrote: > Please review the patch for 120568, here is the issue link > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120568 > -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng