I can not access other cwiki pages either, saying "503 Service Temporarily
Unavailable"...
- Simon
2012/9/20 Alexandro Colorado
> Having issues getting in the cWiki URLs:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
>
> was this a planned outage?
>
> --
On 9/19/12 5:25 PM, Daniel Vandersluis wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-14, at 3:38 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Am Freitag, 14. September 2012 um 20:56 schrieb Daniel Vandersluis:
>>> I apologize if this is the wrong place for this message.
>>>
>>> I am trying to compile a Ruby gem that connects to Ope
RGB ES wrote:
2012/9/19 Dennis E. Hamilton
I recommend that the process continue. My only objection is that having
secret nominations is not compatible with the Apache Way ...
I recommend that no one accept nominations privately and that those who
have already sent theirs via any back-channel u
On 19.09.2012 17:19, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 17 September 2012 22:16, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
I'm organising the Open clipart library into categories. We could use
this then as a useful resource to complement AOO. Any thoughts about
the best way to implem
On 9/20/2012 11:13 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 22:05 , Yong Lin Ma wrote:
Louis,
You are on the list. So to Ian. You may understand the process. There
will be far more ten
on the final PMC roster. This is a chance to give others credits,
especially those not been ment
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the
On 12-09-19, at 17:05 , Ross Gardler wrote:
> I don't object to this process. But lets be clear, PMC membership is
> *not* a popularity contest, it's a recognition of merit. So the number
> of nominations is irrelevant, more nominations just means that the
> individual has been seen by more peop
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 22:05 , Yong Lin Ma wrote:
> Louis,
> You are on the list. So to Ian. You may understand the process. There
> will be far more ten
> on the final PMC roster. This is a chance to give others credits,
> especially those not been mentioned on any lists yet.
As you have no do
Rob;
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
Greetings All;
In order to stimulate some discussion on user documentation I have added the
hollowing page to the User Documentation Plan on the Plannig Wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User
Having issues getting in the cWiki URLs:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
was this a planned outage?
--
Alexandro Colorado
PPMC Apache OpenOffice
http://es.openoffice.org
Louis,
You are on the list. So to Ian. You may understand the process. There
will be far more ten
on the final PMC roster. This is a chance to give others credits,
especially those not been mentioned on any lists yet.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> I would agree
Hi, all,
I have a fix for a macro issue. Can anyone help review?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121045
Regards,
Jianyuan
Congratulations to the team and hope we keep improving and keep the
user as the goal of the product.
On 9/19/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
> +1 - great news!
>
> On 19 September 2012 16:23, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>>> What a great news!
>>> Congratulations
Great job! Let's keep on rolling...
On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:43 AM, "Marcus (OOo)" wrote:
> Am 09/19/2012 05:23 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>>> What a great news!
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>>
>> I'm especially proud of the recognition the communit
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
if an unfiled bug is reported to me and I confirm it independently
(based on how it was reported to me), may I set it directly to confirmed?
This is what I do most of the times and I would say it's fine: after
all, the bug at that point is confirmed by two indepe
On 09/19/2012 10:25 AM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
I not agree fully.
In lot of cases I submit a bug found by others, submitted on forums,
checked by me before I submit a new bug.
In these case the "confirmed" could be the best deafault.
In other cases the "unconfirmed" is the best deafult valu
On 09/19/2012 08:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set t
R,
On 12-09-19, at 16:06 , Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi at all
>
> I have a bit a crazy Idea. I plane a Tour across same Countrys of
> Europe, only with my floorball sick, my bicycle and my computer. The
> main goal is to go from floorball club to floorball club and make a
> training together. T
I don't object to this process. But lets be clear, PMC membership is
*not* a popularity contest, it's a recognition of merit. So the number
of nominations is irrelevant, more nominations just means that the
individual has been seen by more people. Sometimes merit stuff is not
visible to many, e.g.
Hi,
Ji Yan schrieb:
I believe default status is "CONFIRMED" or not is not Regina's concern.
Yes. It is about the fact, that people who are not simple users but
involved here in the project produce a lot of duplicate or invalid issues.
To
reduce "DUPLICATED" defect, it require reporter sea
Here's my list. Limiting to 10 is indeed a challenge, there are about 5
other people that I would definitely have nominated...
Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
Drew Jensen (atjensen)
Kay Schenk (kschenk)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Marcus Lange (marcus)
Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
Regina Henschel (regina)
RGB.E
Hi at all
I have a bit a crazy Idea. I plane a Tour across same Countrys of
Europe, only with my floorball sick, my bicycle and my computer. The
main goal is to go from floorball club to floorball club and make a
training together. The traveling I will do all with my bicycle. The
focus is clarly o
2012/9/19 Dennis E. Hamilton
> +1
>
> There is absolutely nothing wrong with a list process for individuals
> nominating 10 persons for the PPMC. Furthermore, let's have just one
> procedure in place at a time. When this one is concluded, there will be
> occasion to reflect and determine the ne
Hi Andrew;
- Original Message -
...
>
> I have been provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to AOO
> trunk:
>
> ause131
> ause130
> writerfilter10
> gnumake4
> sd2gbuild
>
> As I understand it this is mostly gbuild stuff that we did not want to apply
>
+1
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a list process for individuals
nominating 10 persons for the PPMC. Furthermore, let's have just one procedure
in place at a time. When this one is concluded, there will be occasion to
reflect and determine the next steps.
The tabulation will be very
Am 09/19/2012 05:23 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
What a great news!
Congratulations!
I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did not happen. It
required a lot of effort,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 21:26 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>
> On 09/19/2012 10:38 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> >
> > On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > How would you deal with "opacity here as to how these names were
> > > suggested"? These are individual's stated pr
I have been provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to
AOO trunk:
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
gnumake4
sd2gbuild
As I understand it this is mostly gbuild stuff that we did not want to
apply to 3.4.x as it might destabilize the build.
This was provided to me by
On 09/19/2012 10:38 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir wrote:
How would you deal with "opacity here as to how these names were
suggested"? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing
more, nothing less. Unless we require that everyone give a
complete, d
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> But more important is the question how we can move forward with the
> already planned improvements of this feature (see the wiki pages).
I guess in the usual way: someone sits down, and writes code ;)
> Especially t
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> How would you deal with "opacity here as to how these names were
>> suggested"? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing more,
>> nothing less. Unless we require that everyone
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 17:01, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again;
I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
configuration changes from the previous patchset.
T
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir wrote:
> How would you deal with "opacity here as to how these names were
> suggested"? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing more,
> nothing less. Unless we require that everyone give a complete,
> detailed justification for every name they pick,
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 10:29 , "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
> -1
>
> This procedure lacks transparency and accountability. It is incompatible
> with how project governance is accomplished.
>
> My recommendation is that those who have some reason to require anonymity
> with regard to their nomi
On 09/18/2012 05:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
InfoWorld is out with their 2012 "Bossie" awards (Best of Open
Source).
As far as I can see we are the only open source project that won two
awards!
In the "desktop applications" category we received an award for the
OpenOffice application:
http://www.
Did you mean to do this on the [PMC] Proposed PMC List thread, not the
[DISCUSS] thread?
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynch [mailto:ianrly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 09:22
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed PMC List
Ok, Andrew pe
Ok, Andrew persuaded me ;-)
Andre Fischer (af)
Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
Andrew Rist (arist)
Armin Le Grand (alg)
Donald P. Harbison (dpharbison)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Kazunari Hirano (khirano)
Louis Suarez-potts (louis)
Marcus Lange (marcus)
Peter Junge (pj)
But I can think of several others tha
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 17:23 schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> > What a great news!
> > Congratulations!
> >
>
>
> I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
> OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did not happ
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 12-09-19, at 10:05 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>> I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
>>> Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of e
I believe default status is "CONFIRMED" or not is not Regina's concern. To
reduce "DUPLICATED" defect, it require reporter search BZ carefully to find
if there is any similar defect opened before, but how to query BZ it
depends on reporter's knowledge and which keyword he used. We cannot make
zero
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 17:10 schrieb O.Felka:
>
> > > We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
> > > their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has
> > > to re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
> > > So we should trust the QA who has 'ca
+1 - great news!
On 19 September 2012 16:23, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>> What a great news!
>> Congratulations!
>>
>
> I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
> OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did not happen
On 2012-09-14, at 3:38 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
> Am Freitag, 14. September 2012 um 20:56 schrieb Daniel Vandersluis:
>> I apologize if this is the wrong place for this message.
>>
>> I am trying to compile a Ruby gem that connects to OpenOffice through UNO. I
>> have it working perfectly un
On 12-09-19, at 10:05 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
>> Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
>> development? As I'm not on this list—and
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> What a great news!
> Congratulations!
>
I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did not happen. It
required a lot of effort, especially by SourceForge and Apache Infr
We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has
to re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm' privileges.
I don't see much overhead; on the contrary, every careful
Hi,
>
> On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> Hi again;
>>>
>>> I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
>>> configuration changes from the previous patchset.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> I will try
On 9/19/2012 07:47, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from CONFIRME
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0200, O.Felka wrote:
> Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> >>
> >>>Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
> >>>your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
> >>
>
> >I agree with Oliver, the default st
-1
This procedure lacks transparency and accountability. It is incompatible with
how project governance is accomplished.
My recommendation is that those who have some reason to require anonymity with
regard to their nominations (that is what it is, individuals are asked to make
10 nomination
2012.09.19. 14:49 keltezéssel, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann írta:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else shou
Hi Olaf,
O.Felka schrieb:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the re
2012/9/19 O.Felka :
> Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>
>>>
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>>>
>>>
>
>> I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
> Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
> development? As I'm not on this list—and I'm not suggesting I ought to be—I
> think that someo
I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
development? As I'm not on this list—and I'm not suggesting I ought to be—I
think that someone like Ian, who's work is so involved with OO and has
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the reporter has canconfirm privil
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating s
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:25, Ross Gardler wrote:
From the ASF perspective the proposal below is good to go. We do need to
ensure the decision making process is documented and recorded.
Thanks for the feedback.
As the ApacheCon EU 2012 is not far away, I will make up my mind already about a
deta
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
>> Hi Regina,
>>
>>> Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
>>> your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>>
>> i am pretty sure that i d
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> Hi Regina,
>
> > Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
> > your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>
> i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when submitting a
>From the ASF perspective the proposal below is good to go. We do need to
ensure the decision making process is documented and recorded.
We also need to ensure we work with the treasurer to get the money to
individuals.
>From a mobile device - forgive errors and terseness
On Sep 18, 2012 4:37 PM,
Hi Regina,
> Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
> your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when submitting a
new issue,
default status is "confirmed" - and you have to select "Show Advan
On 9/19/12 1:47 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
> status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
>
> For comparing do a search with:
> Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
> and status changed
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from CONFIRMED
and resolution is any of DUPLICATE, INVA
Hello,
>Another words, is there any ways that can let me add a customized side
>panel to document and spreadsheet by extension?
An issue exists: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=41087
See my comment to the bottom: an extension allows a workaround
On 9/19/12 1:08 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/19/12 12:57 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen, Dali,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Pane
On 9/19/12 12:57 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Jürgen, Dali,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
>>> a extension.
>>> Is ther
Hi Jürgen, Dali,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
> > a extension.
> > Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized pan
On 9/19/12 11:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
>> a extension.
>> Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
>> document and spreadsheet?
>>
>> An
I don't think I could do this fairly so I'm abstaining :-)
For me, if people think I can be useful I'm happy to be included but
equally I understand there are people much more qualified and with
more time and resource to commit than I can so no real problem for me
to be excluded.
On 19 September
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
> Dear all,
> I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
> a extension.
> Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
> document and spreadsheet?
>
> Another words, is there any ways that can let me add
On 17 September 2012 22:16, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
>> I'm organising the Open clipart library into categories. We could use
>> this then as a useful resource to complement AOO. Any thoughts about
>> the best way to implement making the categorised libr
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again;
I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
configuration changes from the previous patchset.
Thanks
I will try.
The build with --enable-dbgutil still bre
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
document and spreadsheet?
Another words, is there any ways that can let me add a customized side
panel to document and spreadsheet
Here's my list of 10:
Andrew Rist (arist)
Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
Donald P. Harbison (dpharbison)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Kazunari Hirano (khirano)
Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
Raphael Bircher (rbircher)
RGB.ES (rgb-es)
Yang Shih-Ching (imacat)
Yong Lin Ma (mayongl)
(Would have been easier if I were
What a great news!
Congratulations!
- Simon
2012/9/19 Rob Weir
> InfoWorld is out with their 2012 "Bossie" awards (Best of Open Source).
>
> As far as I can see we are the only open source project that won two
> awards!
>
> In the "desktop applications" category we received an award for the
>
On 9/18/2012 2:11 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
This is the discussion thread - reply to the other thread with your list!
I am opening up a thread for Proposed PMC Lists.
* I have included below the last pass of the Active/Inactive/Retired
list. This is for reference, as nothing in that list is
On 18/09/2012 02:23, Rob Weir wrote:
> This brought to our attention on Google+:
>
> https://plus.google.com/b/114598373874764163668/116726439814896173562/posts/b9ydzhxmZKs
>
> If I understand correctly, the contents of the roaming profile are
> copied to the local machine at login time, and then c
On 18/09/2012 02:13, Rob Weir wrote:
> I've recently seen a few requests for ability to download AOO via a
> torrent. something we do not currently provide.
>
> I see that OOo did this for legacy versions:
> http://www.openoffice.org/distribution/p2p/
>
> According to the scripts on this page, it l
On 17/09/2012 19:01, Dave Fisher wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> 8. Going through the one-click purchase of the $0.00 software, I was not sent
> the executable. Instead, I was sent an "Amazon OpenOffice 34 by Apache"
> downloader executable. I ran it. It is
80 matches
Mail list logo
