Hi,
On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
One other question: does this take care of OOo 3.2 upgrades as well?
Not yet planned nor tested, but I assume that the XML document only needs
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
One other question: does this take care of OOo 3.2
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 10:11, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.comwrote:
[snip]
One
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 11:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 10:11, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 12:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 04.06.2012 10:11, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
[snip]
Thanks.
Let see what happens, when we start tomorrow with the Italian OOo 3.3
update service.
Tomorrow at which time?
If nobody objects and nothing unforeseen happened I would
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 12:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 04.06.2012 10:11, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
[snip]
Thanks.
Let see what happens, when we start tomorrow with the Italian OOo 3.3
update
Hi,
Am 04.06.12 19:22, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Thanks.
Let see what happens, when we start tomorrow with the Italian OOo 3.3
update service.
Tomorrow at which time?
If nobody objects and
On 02/06/2012 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Andrea, that page looks actually like the localized version of
http://www.openoffice.org/download/ right?
Both seems a very good start, I think.
http://www.openoffice.org/it/download/ is now aligned with the
international and the Spanish page. It is
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
Also, if we follow Andrea's proposal, we don't link to the NL home
page, but to the NL's download page directly. (If I understand
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 19:56, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 23:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
(4) Choose the time frame for the first phase.
-- orw's proposal: 2012-07-05 until 2012-07-08 (if redirect can be
established on Tuesday, 2012-07-05 and task (3) can be finished until
Monday.)
You actually mean
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 18:46, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the update service only for a
part of the possible OOo 3.3 instances in order to check, if the traffic can
be handled. No
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 18:46, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the update service only for
a
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 19:56, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the update service only for a
part of the possible OOo 3.3 instances in order to check, if the traffic
Hi,
On 01.06.2012 11:05, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 18:46, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are
Hi,
next and refined steps - see below.
Please hold me back, if the schedule is too tough.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 31.05.2012 10:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the update service only for a part
of the possible OOo 3.3 instances
Hi,
some status update - see below
On 01.06.2012 11:58, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
next and refined steps - see below.
Please hold me back, if the schedule is too tough.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 31.05.2012 10:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are
Hi,
On 01.06.2012 14:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
(2) Get in contact with the ASF infrastructure team to get the redirect
established at a certain day.
-- orw is volunteering for this task
I will try to get in contact with ASF infrastructure team today.
I have submitted JIRA
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
next and refined steps - see below.
Please hold me back, if the schedule is too tough.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 31.05.2012 10:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and
Hi,
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
next and refined steps - see below.
Please hold me back, if the schedule is too tough.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 31.05.2012 10:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
next and refined steps - see below.
Please hold me back, if the
Hi,
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
(3) Fill the landing page [6] with content and links and activate tracking
for
this page.
-- at least one volunteer is needed here.
Instead of a new
On 01/06/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 01.06.2012 15:09, Rob Weir wrote:
Also, if we follow Andrea's proposal, we don't link to the NL home
page, but to the NL's download page directly. (If I understand
correctly).
Ok, I will update it.
Both http://www.openoffice.org/it/ and the
Hi,
On 30.05.2012 12:43, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML document
- Include entries for at
Hi,
On 30.05.2012 22:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roberto Galoppinirgalopp...@geek.net wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30.05.2012 22:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roberto Galoppinirgalopp...@geek.net
wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30.05.2012 22:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roberto Galoppinirgalopp...@geek.net
wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Am 05/31/2012 07:56 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30.05.2012 22:09, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roberto Galoppinirgalopp...@geek.net
wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM,
Rob Weir wrote:
One approach might be to have the landing page be the NL home page,
e.g., http://de.openoffice.org. These already exist, and either have
the download links on that page, or have text that explains how to
download.
Sure, this makes a lot of sense. Testing with the Italian
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
One approach might be to have the landing page be the NL home page,
e.g., http://de.openoffice.org. These already exist, and either have
the download links on that page, or have text that explains
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
(4) Choose the time frame for the first phase.
-- orw's proposal: 2012-07-05 until 2012-07-08 (if redirect can be
established on Tuesday, 2012-07-05 and task (3) can be finished until
Monday.)
You actually mean June, right? I mean, tests will start as soon as next
Thanks - I was about to point this out, too
I think it is more typo than plan...
;-)
A.
On 5/31/2012 2:59 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
(4) Choose the time frame for the first phase.
-- orw's proposal: 2012-07-05 until 2012-07-08 (if redirect can be
established on
or onlist
On 5/31/2012 3:09 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
Thanks - I was about to point this out, too
I think it is more typo than plan...
;-)
A.
On 5/31/2012 2:59 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
(4) Choose the time frame for the first phase.
-- orw's proposal: 2012-07-05
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML document
- Include entries for at least one languages for which we have currently no AOO
3.4
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term
solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roberto Galoppini rgalopp...@geek.net wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a
Am 05/30/2012 12:43 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term
solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML document
- Include entries for at
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term
solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 15:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
It looks like we can go with the static solution as a short-term
solution.
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
I would prefer the static solution as a short-term one which could be
working
next week.
For the dynamic solution a script is needed. I have no
On 5/23/2012 05:16, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML document
- Include entries for at least one languages for which we have currently
no AOO 3.4 installation package.
- Providing the XML document and possible variants on
On 05/23/2012 02:16 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
I would prefer the static solution as a short-term one which could be
working
next week.
For
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would make
sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3 versions.
I have already seen a post on the users mailing list that the update
functionality
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make
sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make
sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo
Hi,
On 18.05.2012 22:55, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
This may be possible, because this information could also coded into
the
User-Agent field of the HTTP GET request.
I don't get your meaning here.
Hi,
On 20.05.2012 12:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 18/05/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, please let me in more detail describe what I am observing:
For the static solution we would have a corresponding HTTP resource
(our XML document) at URL X. I see that the HTTP GET requests made by
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20.05.2012 12:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 18/05/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, please let me in more detail describe what I am observing:
For the static solution we would have a
On 18/05/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, please let me in more detail describe what I am observing:
For the static solution we would have a corresponding HTTP resource
(our XML document) at URL X. I see that the HTTP GET requests made by
the update functionality in AOO 3.4 and OOo 3.3
Hi,
On 17.05.2012 03:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 21:58, Kay Schenk wrote:
[snip]
One of the problems we will run into, esp for Linux (I don't know about
other platforms) is that
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 17.05.2012 03:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 21:58, Kay Schenk wrote:
[snip]
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would make
sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3 versions.
I have already seen a post on the users mailing list that the update
functionality is not working in OOo 3.3. I assume that corresponding
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3
versions.
I have already seen a post on the users
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 19:27, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3
versions.
I
On 05/16/2012 12:48 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 19:27, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make sense to reactivate a
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 21:58, Kay Schenk wrote:
[snip]
One of the problems we will run into, esp for Linux (I don't know about
other platforms) is that the user has a appended pkgfmt already on the
update URL, so in my experimenting, the update call failed because an
acceptable package was not
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 19:27, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would
make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3
versions.
I have
57 matches
Mail list logo