On 02.11.2012 10:53, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/2/12 9:46 AM, jan iversen wrote:
Thanks for offering your help, I will definitively come back to that.
Just one question, is there a design document or something where I can read
how the new makefile concept is going to work ?
maybe this helps y
t;
>>> On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> See below please.
>>>>>
>>>>> THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
>>>&g
ote:
>
>> you See below please.
>>
>>
>> On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
>>>
>>> See below please.
>>>>
>>>> THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped
On 01.11.2012 18:31, jan iversen wrote:
you See below please.
On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
See below please.
THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
I was of the simple idea, that we pursued a simple build
you See below please.
On 1 November 2012 18:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
>
>> See below please.
>>
>> THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
>>
>> I was of the simple idea, that we pursued
On 01.11.2012 17:57, jan iversen wrote:
See below please.
THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
I was of the simple idea, that we pursued a simple build process made up of
gnuMake and an addon to gather for the shortcoming of gnumake in respect of
cascaded makefiles
See below please.
THANKS for your VERY informative answer, it helped me a lot.
I was of the simple idea, that we pursued a simple build process made up of
gnuMake and an addon to gather for the shortcoming of gnumake in respect of
cascaded makefiles.
I hope to see your presentation on video
On 31.10.2012 22:20, jan iversen wrote:
Hi
I have been searching for detailed internal information about how the build
process works with build and dmake (gnumake).
I have seen the relationship in the single directories (prj/build.lst
prj/d.lst and makefile.mk), but I cannot find a central
Hi
I have been searching for detailed internal information about how the build
process works with build and dmake (gnumake).
I have seen the relationship in the single directories (prj/build.lst
prj/d.lst and makefile.mk), but I cannot find a central makefile.
If I understand life, there should
Hi all,
thanks for looking.
Herbert Duerr schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On 29.10.2012 22:26, Regina Henschel wrote:
I get an immediately crash, when I try to switch to presentation mode
(=F5) in Impress. It is a debug build of r1403340 on WinXP. But I'm not
sure, whether there is something wrong
Hi Regina,
On 29.10.2012 22:26, Regina Henschel wrote:
I get an immediately crash, when I try to switch to presentation mode
(=F5) in Impress. It is a debug build of r1403340 on WinXP. But I'm not
sure, whether there is something wrong in my build and I need to make a
new, clean build. It
- Original Message -
>
> FWIW,
>
> I am getting this with today's build:
>
> /usr/local/openoffice-r1403590/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so:
>
> Undefined symbol "_ZThn448_N3svt11OWizardPage14initializePageEv"
FWIW,
I am getting this with today's build:
/usr/local/openoffice-r1403590/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so:
Undefined symbol "_ZThn448_N3svt11OWizardPage14initializePageEv"
cheers,
Pedro.
- Original Message -
> From: Regina Hens
Hi all,
I get an immediately crash, when I try to switch to presentation mode
(=F5) in Impress. It is a debug build of r1403340 on WinXP. But I'm not
sure, whether there is something wrong in my build and I need to make a
new, clean build. It would be nice, if someone can test it.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:10:35PM +0200, jan iversen wrote:
> I have made a build --all, after which I use configure to set other options.
>
> Now is there any way I can clean all objects etc. from the previous build.
>
> I thought
> build --all --clean
> would do i
I have made a build --all, after which I use configure to set other options.
Now is there any way I can clean all objects etc. from the previous build.
I thought
build --all --clean
would do it, but build does not recognize --clean
I cannot find it in wiki.
thanks in advance for help.
JanI.
Answering myself:
On 19.10.2012 15:19, I wrote:
Option (c) could be even better: removal of both the dangerous
conversion BitmapColor::operator sal_uInt8() and the implicit
construction of a BitmapColor from a sal_uInt8.
But binfilter depends on their behind the scenes conversions and nobody
sh
On 18.10.2012 14:14, Armin Le Grand wrote:
[...]
..but will convert BitmapColor to sal_uInt8 (because there is a inline
operator in the class BitmapColor), then casting to sal_uInt32 (since
ColorData is a typedef to sal_uInt32) and thus would be wrong. Sigh.
Herbert is right, these operators are
Hi Damjan,
okay, done. Revisions are 1399608 and 1399610, so use the latter please.
Sincerely,
Armin
On 18.10.2012 14:14, Armin Le Grand wrote:
Hi Damjan,
On 18.10.2012 12:02, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Armin Le Grand
wrote:
--snip--
--s
angerous. I found two ways:
(a) extract RGB by feet from BitmapColor and construct a Color with it
(b) use the 'operator Color()' : '== aBitmapColor.operator Color()'
Where (a) will need more code, and (b) looks ugly.
I tend to (b) currently...
Build nearly finished...
Sincer
; --snip--
>
>
>>
>> It's most definitely NOT fixed, even in revision 1399319:
>>
>> [ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
>> /path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d.cxx: In member
>> function 'sal_uInt8
>> drawingla
Hi Damjan,
On 17.10.2012 20:12, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
Hi,
--snip--
It's most definitely NOT fixed, even in revision 1399319:
[ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
/path/to/AOO/main/drawing
;
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error
>>> when building:
>>>
>>> [ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
>>> /path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d.cxx: In member
On 10/16/2012 9:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Damjan Jovanovic
...
Hi
With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error
when building:
[ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
/path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture
Hi Herbert,
On 17.10.2012 13:48, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 17.10.2012 10:29, Armin Le Grand wrote:
I made some changes, got no errors on win (what means nothing as we
know). It's strange since ColorData is just a typedef (to sal_Int32) and
I see no way to auto-convert BitmapColor to it, s
On 17.10.2012 10:29, Armin Le Grand wrote:
I made some changes, got no errors on win (what means nothing as we
know). It's strange since ColorData is just a typedef (to sal_Int32) and
I see no way to auto-convert BitmapColor to it, so 'operator Color()' in
class Color should be used.
BitmapColo
On 02.10.2012 17:53, Andrew Rist wrote:
The linux32 buildbot is not able to download all of the required
resources during bootstrap:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/268/steps/compile_2/logs/stdio
I just commited a change that replaces the use of the Perl module
Hi,
On 17.10.2012 06:24, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Damjan Jovanovic
...
Hi
With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error
when building:
[ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
/path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source
- Original Message -
> From: Damjan Jovanovic
...
>
> Hi
>
> With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error
> when building:
>
> [ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
> /path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3
Hi
With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error
when building:
[ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d
/path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d.cxx: In member
function 'sal_uInt8
drawinglayer::texture::GeoTexSvxBitmapEx::impGetTranspa
On 10/16/2012 02:45 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 10/16/2012 09:13 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/16/2012 05:07 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Can someone with karma on buildslave20 please do this?
[...]
If this is a backend thing (on the vm for the buildbot), a jira ticket
to infra is probably needed.
On 10/16/2012 09:13 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/16/2012 05:07 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Can someone with karma on buildslave20 please do this?
[...]
If this is a backend thing (on the vm for the buildbot), a jira ticket
to infra is probably needed.
According to the FAQ on contacting infra ("Do
On 10/16/2012 05:07 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
For the last few weeks the linux32 buildbot failed to produces binaries
due to failed downloads in the bootstrap step:
perl: symbol lookup error: [...]
Parser.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr
On 02.10.2012 20:42, Andrew Rist wrote:
I'
For the last few weeks the linux32 buildbot failed to produces binaries
due to failed downloads in the bootstrap step:
perl: symbol lookup error: [...]
Parser.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr
On 02.10.2012 20:42, Andrew Rist wrote:
I'm mucking around with adding $agent->env_proxy; t
2012/10/12 Regina Henschel
> Hi Simon,
>
> Shenfeng Liu schrieb:
>
>
>
>> I went through all the implemented features and enhancements for 3.5.0,
>> added/removed the Target Milestone value to some of the records.
>> And I created a query *TargetTo350FEATURE_Fixed* that can be easier for us
>> to
Hi Simon,
Shenfeng Liu schrieb:
I went through all the implemented features and enhancements for 3.5.0,
added/removed the Target Milestone value to some of the records.
And I created a query *TargetTo350FEATURE_Fixed* that can be easier for us
to write release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/
On 10/11/12 4:59 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> 2012/10/10 Marcus (OOo)
>
>> Am 10/09/2012 03:58 AM, schrieb Shenfeng Liu:
>>
>> 2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jürgen, *
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012
2012/10/10 Marcus (OOo)
> Am 10/09/2012 03:58 AM, schrieb Shenfeng Liu:
>
> 2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile
>> >
>>
>> Hi Jürgen, *
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>>> The build bo
king this , but would be nice to leave
the build cleaner and more stable...
I finally got to checking out the buildsys branch and building it.
Before I describe the problems that I have I would like to ask if you
have made changes beyond adapting the license headers?
At his point I have done
2012/10/10 Gavin McDonald :
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012 3:57 AM
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
>&g
+1 for using mirrors system to distribute milestone build.
2012/10/10 Marcus (OOo)
> Am 10/09/2012 03:58 AM, schrieb Shenfeng Liu:
>
> 2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile
>> >
>>
>> Hi Jürgen, *
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, J
On 10/9/2012 4:27 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 01.10.2012 06:16, Andrew Rist wrote:
I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env
with he branch, and was having the usual issues.
Thanks.
Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012 3:57 AM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
>
> I'm a little confused by this thread as I see a
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2012 6:41 PM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
>
> I think it's also a good way to use some testing dedica
Am 10/09/2012 03:58 AM, schrieb Shenfeng Liu:
2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Jürgen, *
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
The build bots are still not build the same as we do for the binary
releases (please correct me if I am wrong). Means as long as we don&#
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> re 2: This looks like a serious problem. Without understanding the goal of
> these changes, it is hard to come up with a fix.
ause130 migrated udkapi to gbuild...
looks like you picked up "udpaki: empty d.list" by Michaerl Stahl
without pic
I'm a little confused by this thread as I see a whole set of install
bits at http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
Am I missing something?
(note: linux32 is not building right now and has no bits, and the bits
for all builds are deleted on a failed build which is a buil
On 01.10.2012 06:16, Andrew Rist wrote:
I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he
branch, and was having the usual issues.
Thanks.
Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build
cleaner and more stable...
I
cripts
>>> to automatically download the latest build from apache
>>> buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my
>>> testing machine. Then perform the testing on my local machines.
>>> Currently the tests include only build verification test ca
2012/10/9 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 10/9/12 9:17 AM, Zhe Liu wrote:
>> No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts
>> to automatically download the latest build from apache
>> buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my
>&g
On 10/9/12 9:17 AM, Zhe Liu wrote:
> No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts
> to automatically download the latest build from apache
> buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my
> testing machine. Then perform the testing on
No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts
to automatically download the latest build from apache
buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my
testing machine. Then perform the testing on my local machines.
Currently the tests include only
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2012 3:44 PM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
>
> Hi all,
> I setup several testing machines to do daily build te
Hi all,
I setup several testing machines to do daily build test for daily
builds from buildbot. I found there is no archive package for Windows.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
But archive package is available for Linux. For example,
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice
2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile
> Hi Jürgen, *
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > The build bots are still not build the same as we do for the binary
> > releases (please correct me if I am wrong). Means as long as we don't
>
Hi Jürgen, *
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> The build bots are still not build the same as we do for the binary
> releases (please correct me if I am wrong). Means as long as we don't
> have build bots which are building with the same configura
Am 10/08/2012 04:58 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 10/8/12 3:36 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm just back from China Mid-Autumn/National-Day holidays. So I'd like to
pick up the milestone build topic again.
thanks for picking it up again, we should definitely start wit
On 10/8/12 3:36 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> Hi, all,
> I'm just back from China Mid-Autumn/National-Day holidays. So I'd like to
> pick up the milestone build topic again.
thanks for picking it up again, we should definitely start with snapshot
builds asap
> We already g
Hi, all,
I'm just back from China Mid-Autumn/National-Day holidays. So I'd like to
pick up the milestone build topic again.
We already get the support from QE team for the test plan. So I think we
need to do the following:
1. build out the milestone build. I saw from the buildbot th
Pedro Giffuni
>To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org"
>Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 3:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
>
>The buildsys branch looks broken here:
>
>...
>Configure completed
>
>Run ./bootstrap in /usr/ports/editors/openo
The buildsys branch looks broken here:
...
Configure completed
Run ./bootstrap in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main to
provide build tools and get third-party packages
===> Building for apache-openoffice-3.4.1391327,1
chmod: /solenv/bin/build.pl: No such file or direct
comply with infra's policy.
>
> When updating components I have, in general, stopped uploading the
> src tarballs to SVN
> in favor of distributing them though ooo-extras @apache-extras: (not all are
> used)
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/downloads/
e tarballs from svn is an important project, and I am
not suggesting going back or anything.
That said, the change has caused instability in the build. In
addition, I am having problems with this process
in two separate places, so I think this represents an issue with the build.
When updating co
g the
src tarballs to SVN
in favor of distributing them though ooo-extras @apache-extras: (not all are
used)
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/downloads/list
The build scripts are ready for it but it seems like the buildbot doesn't like
fetching more
stuff (?). Can we ha
its home
server and that the Perl module that handles the HTTP error triggers the
loading of a library that does not exist or exists in a wrong (old) version.
If that is true, then updating Perl might fix this.
-Andre
I have a similar problem on my local build with the resources for
vigra, zlib
The linux32 buildbot is not able to download all of the required
resources during bootstrap:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/268/steps/compile_2/logs/stdio
I have a similar problem on my local build with the resources for vigra,
zlib, jpeg, boost (and dmake) not
I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he
branch, and was having the usual issues.
Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build
cleaner and more stable...
A
Sent from my iThingie
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Pedro
Hi Ariel;
- Original Message -
> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date.
>> Can I start committing stuff or should Andrew do it?
>
> IMHO only
Hi Pedro,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date.
> Can I start committing stuff or should Andrew do it?
IMHO only Andrew, as Oracle representative, can commit the patches. The
idea is to ensure that patch
- Original Message -
...
> I have created a branch called "buildsys". Run
>
> svn co
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/branches/buildsys
> buildsys
>
> to obtain your local copy.
>
There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date.
Can I star
rsion: 1.0 > ../
wntmsci12.pro/class/ConnectivityComplexTests/MET
A-INF/MANIFEST.MF
echo "Solar-Version: 350m1(Build:9610)" >> ../
wntmsci12.pro/class/ConnectivityCo
mplexTests/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
cd ../wntmsci12.pro/class/ConnectivityComplexTests && zip -u -rX
../C
Hi Ariel/ALL,
I solved my earlier problem.
Problem was that I checked out svn repository from command prompt in
windows xp. And svn command updated every file with CRLF line endings.
So, when I tried to build using build guide , soltools was giving me errors
like that.
Solution was :
1) check
Hi Ariel/ALL,
I solved my earlier problem.
Problem was that I checked out svn repository from command prompt in
windows xp. And svn command updated every file with CRLF line endings.
So, when I tried to build using build guide , soltools was giving me errors
like that.
Solution was :
1) check
We already ignore USE_STLP_DEBUG for OS2. Should we add
> Windows to the list?
> >
>
> Not having CDEFS+=-D_STLP_DEBUG means that we will have no
> additional checking stuff in a DEBUG=yes build. Right?
>
It means we lose the STLport specific debugging. We will
lose it anyw
boost update causes
trouble to stlport and why it only affects Windows.
Google lead me to
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html
"My best guess is the /D_STLP_DEBUG define which enables enhanced
debugging magic (iterator valid
helped to go on with the build, just
like Armin's solution; but the build still breaks in sw in a PRO build
with DEBUG=yes. So the problem is still there, and started
coincidentally with boost update. It looks like the only way to know if
this was a coincide, or the root cause, is to revert in a
why a boost update causes
>>> trouble to stlport and why it only affects Windows.
>>
>> Google lead me to
>>
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html
>>
>> "My best guess is the /D_STLP_DEBUG
now how bad it is to always link against stl for
> hatchwindowfactory, even without debug build. What do You think?
Your assumption is a good one, I remember seeing this in other cases in
the past.
But there are other possible reasons. Using a template library might be
fine without linking
o
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html
>
> "My best guess is the /D_STLP_DEBUG define which enables enhanced
> debugging magic (iterator validation etc.) which might not be binary
> compatible with Boost."
>
Nice find! The
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes trouble
> to stlport and why it only affects Windows.
Google lead me to
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td437230
Hi Oliver;
- Original Message -
...
>
> I can confirm that an PRO build (_not_ using configure option
> --enable-dbgutil)
> with DEBUG=yes breaks in module sw.
> To fix this build breaker you need to add link library stl into library swd -
> a
> similar change a
Hi Ariel and others,
> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile
...
>
> The solution provided by Oliver removed the header, and the use of the
> boost smart pointer with it, it helped to go on with the build, just
> like Armin's solution; but the build still breaks in sw in a PRO build
was fixed by orw@ but, from what we
discussed, there was no need to revert the boost update (and yes, I
did offer to revert it then).
The solution provided by Oliver removed the header, and the use of the
boost smart pointer with it, it helped to go on with the build, just
like Armin's sol
t; discussed, there was no need to revert the boost update (and yes, I
> did offer to revert it then).
The solution provided by Oliver removed the header, and the use of the
boost smart pointer with it, it helped to go on with the build, just
like Armin's solution; but the build still breaks
On 25.09.2012 15:21, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi *,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:56:32PM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
I put the patch up at
http://people.apache.org/~arist/patches/ooo-gbuild-cws-patches.tar.gz
Thanks. Do you know whether these patches can be applied without
further changes?
Hi,
On 26.09.2012 19:18, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I have started build with --enable-werror and --enable-dbgutil
I get the following errors:
c:/AOO_2012_09_git/trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/svdtrans.cxx(1100) :
error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file
not know how bad it is to always link against stl for
hatchwindowfactory, even without debug build. What do You think?
Ah, I see. The problem is we would be adding a dependency to stlport
*always* and in theory we are hoping to get rid of it ;-).
There is no option to do --without-stlport or to
Xue Fei,
I think BVT + fidelity automation will be good.
And since we are still facing the buildbots limitation, we can start from
only some of the platforms and expand to more gradually.
Thanks!
- Simon
2012/9/27 Xue Fei Duan
> For milestone build, I think BVT + fidelity automat
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:48:33PM -0700, Andrew Rist wrote:
> How could we have the buildbots build the 'official snapshots'?
Unfortunately, both Linux build bots are not suitable for producing
Developer Snapshots/release builds. The following is the result of
running AO
For milestone build, I think BVT + fidelity automation(load/save some
samples) running is ok. we needn't have extra test plan on it, how do you
think about it?
-Xue Fei
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Ji Yan
>
> > Simon,
> >
> &g
On 9/24/2012 4:47 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/24/12 8:01 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/09/2012 Shenfeng Liu wrote:
3. Deliver milestone builds to harvest our development fruits. A
milestone
build is:
(a) a development snapshot that contains the features/enhancements
that
terested in this specific case but more in a general agreement how we can
>address such problems.
My workflow is different to what you can expect from a professional developer
for many reasons, but what I tend to do is this:
- My build system is based on FreeBSD's ports tree but I do u
t is
> > ready for trunk.
> >
> > The boost update as it is seems to be not ready enough and breaks other
> > important things, in this case debug support (which is of course
> > important for developers) on Windows.
> >
> >
>
>
> Please n
ify things (remember data in a vector?) gets compiled. I do
> not know how bad it is to always link against stl for
> hatchwindowfactory, even without debug build. What do You think?
>
Ah, I see. The problem is we would be adding a dependency to stlport
*always* and in theory we are hop
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/26/12 6:19 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
>> On 26.09.2012 17:57, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi Armin
>>>
>>> Armin Le Grand schrieb:
>>>> Hi List,
>>>>
>>>> with cu
Hi all,
I have started build with --enable-werror and --enable-dbgutil
I get the following errors:
c:/AOO_2012_09_git/trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/svdtrans.cxx(1100) :
error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated
c:/AOO_2012_09_git/trunk/main/svx/sou
opers) on Windows.
>
Please note that no one has identified yet the issue: it's highly likely
that Armin has a dirty environment due to a previous (pre-boost) build
but if he starts with a clean build it will go fine. Again, quite a few people
reported a working debug build after the
On 9/26/12 6:19 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 17:57, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Armin
>>
>> Armin Le Grand schrieb:
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> with current trunk I cannot build svtools with debug, e.g.
>>>
>>> cd svto
On 26.09.2012 17:57, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Armin
Armin Le Grand schrieb:
Hi List,
with current trunk I cannot build svtools with debug, e.g.
cd svtools
make clean
make clean debug=t
make -sr -j8 debug=t
-> Lots of unresolved externals from stl. Yes, I'm using stlport, and
I'
7;t do Windows and I can't help really
> help there beyond trivial fixes.
yes I know and now we have a further problem that potentially is related
to this.
My main intention is that we agree on a general approach how we can
address such problems in the future. And the easiest way is to
1 - 100 of 1611 matches
Mail list logo
