On Friday, 26. October 2007 at 11:40 pm, J P wrote:
once the installation is setup everything appears to be hard-coded to
that directory structure. [...] playing with the openpkg installation
script openpkg-20071019-20071019.sparc64-solaris9-openpkg.sh it
appears that the USERNAME, GROUP, and
On Tuesday, 3. July 2007 at 10:19 pm, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Can it be that this is a 32-bit Linux distribution *user-land*
running with a 64-bit Linux *kernel* on a 64-bit *hardware*?
We did some research on this topic recently. I published our findings now.
OpenPKG: 32bit vs. 64bit
On Monday, 11. June 2007 at 6:26 pm, Dan Cox[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few peculiarities with the OpenPKG run control system are causing
some end user confusion when working with services. (Using
openpkg-20070608) [...] Thoughts/comments?
Thanks a lot for the detailed report, Dan. All
Wilson Jason[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-03-01 04:26:
This I have done and worked out the order of the parameters is
important.
Using 'syslog(target=remote)' fails, but
'syslog(remotehost=localhost,target=remote)'
works.
The remotehost parameter needs to be specified before you
Doug Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-02-28 20:23:
I take it relative paths are no longer supported?
Previously I had the line -r . in my ~/.openpkg/build file.
I don't wanna say relative paths are supported because the openpkg setUID
wrapper may change directory under certain
Wilson Jason[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-02-28 02:00:
Could someone please help me with configuring postfix to sends its logs to
both a local file and to a syslog server?
For debugging aid please have a look at the last paragraph of
Ralf S. Engelschall[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-02-23 11:04:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007, Victor G. Bolshakov wrote:
As i understand, openpkg-tools not work with local fs mirror from
OpenPKG 2.20070221:
Sure, it is. Just specify -r file:///path instead of -r /path on the
openpkg build command
Luka,
luka6000[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-12-13 16:28:
I'm having problems trying to build kolab on solaris 10, openpkg
2.20061018
as of today it is not a good idea to use kolab from the OpenPKG repository.
The Kolab project is using OpenPKG but they needed some adjustments to make
their
Doug Henry[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-11-30 14:24:
I am trying to compile openpkg stable 1018 snapshot on a 64-bit machine.
Once the 32-bit stuff starts building I get the attached error.
Sounds to me like the problems which were fixed in the following checkins. In
short terms OpenPKG
but the current
community has little need for desktop apps - and probably little knowledge in
building them. We welcome contributions and continuously seek for new
activists in the OpenPKG Foundation ...
--
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vice President and
Director Engineering Production
On Monday, 25. September 2006 at 2:40 pm, Bernhard Reiter[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
there is no manpage shtool-rotate on the system.
GNU shtool is a highly modular application which can be found in various levels
of completeness through the field. The shtool rotate command ships as part of
the
On Wednesday, 20. September 2006 at 10:04 am, Sascha Wilde[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeking information on how to configure logfile rotation in OpenPKG,
especially min size, and age of files to rotate, as well as the number of
rotated versions to hold before deletion are of interest.
It
Re Simon!
On Saturday, 1. July 2006 at 6:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to follow the instructions given and have found a problem.
# $prefix/bin/openpkg build -ZaKB | sh
FATAL: errors occured while building:
pine-4.64L-2.20060622: pine searches a frood called 'MTA'
That means pine
On Sunday, 2. July 2006 at 3:44 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like openpkg-import is not included in the 2.20060628 branch.
The package was omitted by intention. The openpkg-import package is only little
more than an idea. In fact it breaks the fundamental concept of OpenPKG being
Re Martin!
On Wednesday, 28. June 2006 at 10:52 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, the OpenPKG registration process is still a big annoyance and hindering
adoption/usage of OpenPKG a lot.
We introduced the registry because we needed some statistics about the OpenPKG
world. Past experience
] http://cvs.openpkg.org/fileview?f=openpkg-re/releasenotes.txt
http://cvs.openpkg.org/rlog?f=openpkg-re/releasenotes.txt
Have fun!
--
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vice President and
Director Engineering Production, OpenPKG Foundation e.V
just drop me a note and I'll be glad to send an invitation
to him as long as stock lasts. I need his first and last name
and a valid email address to send the electronic ticket to.
[1] http://www.linuxtag.org/
I'm looking forward to see you at the show.
--
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vice
-facto vote for your platform.
Expect future analyses will be performed to further drive the project.
Thank you!
--
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vice President and
Director Engineering Production, OpenPKG Foundation e.V
Bill Campbell[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2006-02-09 05:15:50:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006, Doug Summers wrote:
Could someone post a quick example of how to rotate logs based on size
and/or age with FSL? I'm most interested in rotating after 60 days and
keeping all compressed archives.
You can find
There is a new obmtool [1] available from ZfOS [2] for use in the new
OpenPKG Registry world order. New features are mirror support, choice
of download tool with fallbacks and user/pass support. The latter
especially understands and obeys the URL rewriting of those instances
who utilize that
Simon,
Simon J Mudd[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-29 19:42:55
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 openpkg]# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa | grep openpkg
awk: cmd. line:3: fatal: Invalid range end: /^([A-Z][A-Z0-9_]+[A-Z0-9]=[
!#$%(-_a-~]+)? *(#.*)?$/
openpkg-tools-0.8.37-2.4.0
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005, Tim Gallagher wrote:
I am running a Debian 3.1 Sarge install and have no idea how to
install OpenPKG. I am trying to test out Kolab for a friend, the
install is in OpenPKG rpm's. How can I install OpenPKG.
Installing Kolab
-
Hi,
I want to setup a closed user group chat accessible by a variety of
clients. Multiple (=3), individual users should authenticate, talk
(=type, not voice) together and their discussion should be logged to a
file.
Tried a lot of OpenPKG packages and failed. IRCd does not have
authentication at
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Just add to your prefix/etc/rc.conf:
postfix_log_numfiles=20
postfix_log_minsize=
As already pointed out the
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004, Steffen Hansen wrote:
This one seems quite serious:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html
We will definitely create an UPD package.
I can promise Monday. Maybe sooner.
Thanks for pointing out.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable Wireless
Re Stephan,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004, Stephan Buys wrote:
Is it possible to upgrade OpenPKG-2003-06-06 to OpenPKG 2.[x ...]
yes, it is. But not that simple because versions before openpkg-20030802
behave like OpenPKG 1.x release and care must be taken when upgrading
from 1.x to 2.x, see the
Re Aaron!
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004, Aaron Bostick wrote:
[...] I have discovered I can upgrade my hosts to newer releases just
by changing the index build uses when curling for packages.
For example, every host has .openpkg/build with something like this in
it:
-f
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
i can't login to the cvs-server as anonymous:
Fixed. We upgraded to OpenPKG 2.2 and the default of the CVS
package changed to not run the pserver daemon by default.
We should have better asked the experts ... :-)
PS: michael, this seems to be an
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004, Martin Brodbeck wrote:
Ah, you moved from the Kolab list. Welcome.
I tried to install a kolab2 snapshot but there seems to be a problem with the
openpkg perl package perl-5.8.4-2.1.0.src.rpm.
Trying to rebuild the src.rpm I got the following error message. [...]
I
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Some perl scripts use #!/usr/bin/perl
I recommend you replace that with /opkg/bin/perl.
Could I just symlink ln -s /opkg/bin/perl /usr/bin/ ?
I do not recommend replacing such a critical part of the OS
Folks,
there are two issues with the EVAL classified snmpdx package
you should be aware of.
INFINITE LOOP
A compatiblity problem between snmpdx and perl. Problematic version
combinations cause a infinite loop in snmpdx that consumes large amounts
of CPU horsepower and fills the
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004, Sivasakthi wrote:
Re,
I'm trying to download the files but the ftp error [...] I decided
to use FTP Commanded to connect but what username and password [...]
login as anonymous, any password including empty is valid.
$ ftp ftp.openpkg.org
Connected to
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
When compiling postfix with[_whoson yes ... patch does not apply]
I posted a replacement patch for this yesterday or the day before. I
think there's a new version of postfix in the CURRENT tree that
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex,
How should I proceed to upgrade all packages [from 2.0] to the
equivalent of release 2.1 ?
my approach manually upgrading a instance from 2.0 to 2.1 is:
- read and understand the release notes [1] :-)
- backup the instance, especially the
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Rangarajan, Mukund (Cognizant) wrote:
I am trying to bootstrap OpenPKG on the new SuSe 9.1 platform and am
running into a couple of issues. I am running SuSe Professional 9.1.
./lib/.libs/librpm.a(rpminstall.o)(.text+0x15bb): In function mktemp' is dangerous,
better
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Rangarajan, Mukund (Cognizant) wrote:
Mukund,
Is it possible to change the PATH value when executing openpkg
rpmbuild [...]
your assumption of PATH being controlled by OpenPKG during the build
process is correct. We introduced a sane build environment in OpenPKG
1.1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004, Simon J Mudd wrote:
Re Simon,
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
If you know better than rpm that a binary package can be used on a
particular system or you just want to give it a try then convince rpm
using the --ignoreos or --ignorearch
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Simon Mudd wrote:
Re,
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
I also tried to adjust the shtool [...] producing the following 2 files:
openpkg-2.1.0-2.1.0.ix86-rhel3.0-ope.rpm
openpkg-2.1.0-2.1.0.ix86-rhel3.0-ope.sh
This installed [...] but
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004, v8625 wrote:
Dear v8625,
I updated kernel on RedHat 9.0 [...]
as discussed on this list using /usr as a prefix was at least a brave
action. You must assume important parts of you OS were overwritten by
OpenPKG. I don't know whether it is worth the time repairing the
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex, I'm lazy.
2) openldap - sasl - apache chicken-and-egg problem
Please browse or search the mailing list (i.e. MARC), this was discussed
before. Hint: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openpkg-usersm=107091431817004
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex,
[apache build problems with_suphp yes]
at the end apache was build and a rpm -qip apache-...rpm includes:
apache::with_suphp = yes
Does I miss some prerequisit again ?
Is mod_suphp build eaven with the above messages ?
The rpm -qi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex,
To build apache with php it requires php, so I build and installed php first.
only the with_suphp requires the php package. Even mod_php uses the php
that is embedded into the apache package and does not require the php
package.
openpkg
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re Alex,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
I will have my credential in OpenLDAP and will uses sasl to allow
postfix check authentications against the LDAP, so just for this I
build OpenLDAP --without_sasl sasl --with_ldap
I know
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Re Alex!
Due to build perl-* I tryed to build x11 with
openpkg build x11 | sh
where I got a lot of errors starting with:
** ERROR: SOME X11 INFORMATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED!!
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, F. Even wrote:
Re Frank.
Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, F. Even wrote:
If the error persists the first actions digging down are a man
strtoll and a look in libc having that function defined [...]
That looks to be the problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex!
Should I expect any known problem using OpenPKG over RH-7.3 ?
RHL9 is a obsoleted platform in OpenPKG 2.0 which means there are no
binaries available for anything but CORE packages. It is very likely
that we'll throw out our machine past the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
openpkg-1.9.2-2.0.2.src.rpm [*]
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
To build the packages I used openpkg-tools in ver 1.3 that could check
dependencies and build them first if needed.
OpenPKG 1.x had openpkg-tool and OpenPKG CURRENT (to be used for
2.0, too) has openpkg-tools (note the 's'). Find more details
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, F. Even wrote:
It dies in pretty much the same place trying to go from 1.9.1-2.0.1.
OK, I assume you give 1.9.3 or a very recent CURRENT a try, too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm --rebuild openpkg-1.9.1-2.0.1.src.rpm
snip
main.c:1014:2: #error lack of strtoll() needs fixing
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alexander,
I couldn't find the openpkg-tools source in any of the 2.0 ftp
directories. I do found a package in the CURRENT branche with this
name. Should I use this one? Is it intencionaly not in the 2.0 branch?
Yes and yes. The openpkg-tool has
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004, Matthias Kurz wrote:
David!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
What is the proper way to enable various pieces of software
installed under OpenPKG?
Whether the services are enabled or disabled by default is controlled
by $openpkg_rc_def [...]
Matthias
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
How do I get the rpm rebuilds to keep the rpm-tmp.* file around so I can
look for information on why something failed? It looks like when I do a
rebuild even if it fails the rpm-tmp.* file is automatically removed
before I have a chance to review
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
Dear David,
I'm getting an error when attempting to bootstrap OpenPKG-2.0 on RedHat
Enterprise Linux 3.0. The error is as follows:
./lib/.libs/librpm.a(rpminstall.o)(.text+0x12a8): In function `rpmInstall':
/usr/lib/nptl/librt.so: undefined
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
I looked through the online documentation but can't seem to find any
reference as to what the id or tag identifies. [...]
Most of the mystery was already revealed. You find information in the
news.txt [1] and upgrade.txt [2] documents. Search for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004, Stephan Buys wrote:
Hi all,
We are interested in creating a LiveCD for the Kolab server and I was
wondering what the absolute minimum system requirements would be to get
OpenPKG running? And possibly run most of your distributions' functions
from within OpenPKG.
A
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
David,
I don't see the openpkg-tool in the SRC repository for the release [...]
Please hunt for string openpkg-tool in
http://cvs.openpkg.org/openpkg-re/upgrade.txt
and have a look at packages dropped from release.
Short info is: openpkg-tool is
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
Nevermind. My error. ;-)
Good for us to hear that :-) I was just verifying. To get an idea what
OpenPKG thinks what most of the user/group names/ids are, try this:
$ ${PREFIX}/bin/openpkg rpm --eval '%{l_value -s -a}'
Use uppercase -A to dump
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004, Clemens von Musil wrote:
Clemens,
I want to install an openPKG environenment with apache and openLDAP on a
machine, that allready runs those two servers.
Esepecially for the apache would a two-instances-on-one-machine-solution
be extremely comfortable to me.
What I
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004, Julien TOUCHE wrote:
few comments on an apache setup with current/solaris9 (php part)
[...]
- why gdbm in apache, by default ? (with_gdbm_ndbm)
http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=14710
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable Wireless
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
David!
I have a series of questions after reading through the FAQ, Tutorial and
some of the handbook. They are:
1. Is the 2.0 release currently on schedule for Q1/2004?
Yes.
2. Is there a script of some sort that will automatically rebuild
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ok, so I have two more questions here. :-)
David,
5. Will OpenPKG work with apt-get (i.e. we setup our own repository and
use apt on our remote hosts to grab their appropriate updates)?
We tried and failed. Besides some technical difficulties
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004, Christopher M. O'Malley wrote:
Problem in the .spec file, I suspect, but I'm not sure how to fix it..
(not sure what the working directory is at that point when it fails..)
Anyone else seen/fixed this?
Thanks for the report. Ralf fixed the building. Now go for the
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Hi,
What are OpenPKG's plans for supporting a Red Hat Linux
beyond Red Hat Linux 9? The choices appear to be
1) Fedora Project
2) Red Hat Enterprise Linux
yes :-)
OpenPKG v1.3 does support RedHat Linux 9
OpenPKG CURRENT almost runs on all of
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
When I tried this morning, I got:
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /.
Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Connection refused
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Thanks Thomas.
I just sent a new ticket to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (description of new
oracle-barebone package submission) but did not get an acknowledgement.
Should I temporarily send new tickets to openpkg-dev instead?
Dennis
Yes, please.
--
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cópia Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must search in previus OpenPKG emails. What I'm interested is a port
from a
KDE project (I gues) that within others should easyer smtp
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, Stephan Buys wrote:
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 12:50, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, Stephan Buys wrote:
Could you provide me with a short C program that would demostrate how to
use FSL directly?
I could then provide the Perl wrapper for that C
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far so good, but while does the rc command doesn't also use a rc?.d
structure [...]
Because it has to work equally well on BSD, Linux and Solaris.
BSD does not have run levels other than single-user and multi-user
and the Linux world doesn't
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in a package that is only avaiable in CURRENT
In such a situation you usually can install OpenPKG 1.3 [...]
Note that openpkg-1.3.1 is forward compatible and can build,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must search in previus OpenPKG emails. What I'm interested is a port from a
KDE project (I gues) that within others should easyer smtp authentication.
Kolab?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable Wireless
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I ever used the prebuild apache package from the distro I used, and extra
apache modules where offen separate packages (like mysql, php, perl), I'm not
shure how to proceed with OpenPKG.
looking at rpm -qpi apache-1.3.28-1.3.2.src.rpm it seema
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I live without PAM ?
I need to implement a server with common web services (http with apache, ftp
with pureftp, mail with Courier and Postfix, dns with bind) that I plan to
administrat with ISPman that mantains an LDAP database for all
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I whant to enable sasl in OpenLDAP, that required me to install sasl. This in
turn have an option to enable LDAP, but if set, it requires OpenLDAP to be
installed.
How should I proceed ?
Do I need to install OpenLDAP without sasl to be able
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I proceed do be noticed of updates [...]
Alex,
you'll find information about OpenPKG security issues on a
dedicated web page [1]. That page also explains on which mailing
lists security advisories are posted and how to subscribe to the
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003, F. Even wrote:
On 11/14/03 2:02 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003, F. Even wrote:
Sorry that our documentation still lacks those details. [...]
Is there anything I can do while using 1.3?
It is a common practice to use a
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
[...]
I see your point, But as I explain in another message, here at the
University, we need to have mail clients such as pine default to pointing to
the standard OS sendmail
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
--On Mittwoch, Oktober 01, 2003 13:28:14 -0400 Dennis McRitchie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
2) MTA
I assume that this is referring to a Mail Transport Agent. [...]
MTA is a virtual package
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:45:23PM -0400, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Hi,
What is the recommended way to reinstall the same package [...]
rpm -e openldap.
rpm -Uvh openldap.
Please note that, beginning with OpenPKG v1.3, -e (erase)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003, Tom Brown wrote:
why does the tarball for openssh-3.7p1.tar.gz have [...]
when the advisory http://www.openssh.com/txt/buffer.adv [...]
it's like 3.7.1 doesn't have all the changes in it?! If I'm right, and
others have missed this, there may be a lot of folks with a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003, Vinod Kutty wrote:
I have an openpkg 1.2 install for which I'd like to compile imapd. There
isn't one readily packaged for 1.2, so I tried rebuilding the 1.3 src.rpm
(actually, I tried 20030731 first).
[...]
's;\(@[EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003, Martin Andrews wrote:
Dear Martin,
Finally working with fsl again. fsl-l2tool helped some, but a logger
type tool that actually read the fsl config would be great. [...]
I put this good idea on the wishlist.
Still
struggled with the fsl.postfix configuration.
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Martin Andrews wrote:
struggled with the fsl.postfix configuration. Syntax or other errors in
the fsl.postfix file caused postfix to dump core. Ug. [...]
The fact that changes in the fsl or errors in configuring lead to
Martin,
here are examples that i have tested to work successfully.
Verify syslog.conf was prepared. The syslog.conf(5) wants to see tabs
not spaces, i marked the output manually to make that clear.
$ grep mail.info /etc/syslog.conf
mail.info\t\t\t/var/log/maillog
Check if syslog is
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
I also want to point out that the OSSP l2 library comes with a nifty
command line l2tool which allows a user to quickly try a l2spec. This
is half the way towards fsl. Unfortunately the l2tool is not installed
along OpenPKG fsl so you either have
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Ingo T. Storm wrote:
BTW: SUNWhea, SUNWarc, SUNWtoo, SUNWlibm is what you need on top of a
SUNWreq install in order to be able to be able to compile apache. But
I guess they will be required for almost any compile at all.
Ingo,
to get all OpenPKG packages up'n'running
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003, Ingo T. Storm wrote:
short version: When rebuilding dhpd-xxx-1.2.1 on Solaris 9, make
install expects /usr/ucb/install which is not there. I this a bug or
am I not meeting the minimum requirements? [...]
Since all my systems are rather minimal solaris installs,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Andrews, Martin wrote:
I notices that gcc is getting installed on all my machines because perl
(perl-5.8.0-1.2.0) has gcc as a runtime dependency. Is that right?
I've put this into the FAQ.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003, Vinod Kutty wrote:
Just looking for suggestions on:
1. Naming the root dir of an openpkg installation?
Re Vinod,
i already tried some variants in the past and here's my current personal
proposal. It's all based around the factors
- OpenPKG's location id that makes it
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003, Vinod Kutty wrote:
Just a suggestion:
Would it make sense to have the default, out-of-the-box config of
openssh's sshd_config use these options:
UsePrivilegeSeparation yes (current default = no)
PermitRootLogin no (current default = yes)
in order to
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
[...]
Does the *.src.sh script benefit much from compression? [...]
Hmmm yes, indeed. You're right, it does not benefit much. [...]
FAQ updated, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=6627
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002, Ian Alexander wrote:
Problem is related to not having vsnprintf/snprintf on host system (in
my case, solaris 2.5.1). The first patch fixes this problem in rpm.
You will also need to apply the second patch to the openpkg.spec.
Hope this helps someone else out there.
Nicola Frosini wrote:
Can anyone help me to install OpenPKG on a Linux Red-Hat 6.2
Thanks a lot !
Nicola
What's the problem? I'm using OpenPKG successfully on RedHat 6.x
Here're a list of versions i'm using:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.2.12-32 #1 Mon Oct 25 19:26:01 EDT 1999 i586
92 matches
Mail list logo
