Am Montag, 19. Dezember 2005 08:51 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
My last information on this was that Thomas L. asked the Kolab project
to contribute their changes at the time before we released OpenPKG
2.5 but there was no response to him. Because of this nothing was
integrated AFAIK.
I do
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 16:28 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Hi Ralf,
But usually your are modifying
the packages to some extend AFAIK, hence because of this fact it already
makes sense that you provide the updates via Kolab (after fetching them
from us and optionally re-modifying, etc),
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 16:40 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
How stable is OpenLDAP with db 4.3.29
(in general and with OpenPKG in particular)?
How can the OpenPKG project guarantee stability with db 4.3?
So the conclusion would be:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 22:11 schrieb Bill Campbell:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Note that there is some competition between OpenPKG and the operating
system vendors. This is a problem for customers.
They want to have a tested Linux (the kernel) and core technologies
Am Dienstag, 13. Dezember 2005 23:16 schrieb David M. Fetter:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 19:42 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:08 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Does anybody read me?
We read. Not much to say when all there is are complaints, some of
which you admit
[Spawning issues that I feel are seperate enough.]
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
a) Bugtracker link not working; Status: Still unfixed, no feedback
aafter three ttempts or so.
Accepted. It is a shame that we
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
I believe that it has other reasons that the feedback form was not used
as planned. E.g. I saw the form, but I dislike forms like it so much,
that I did not use it, though
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
In some ways the system can be seen as being more restrictive
as what some commercial distributors of operating systems do
(free and non-free).
Restrictive? Hmmm. Everything
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
c) Long term maintenance ideas regarding GNU/Linux Enterprise
distributions. Status: I probably will have to resend
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Just to give you an idea what I tried to get feedback for
b) Berkeley DB stability decision for OpenPKG 2.4
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be possibilities to help.
I have experiences with running Request-Tracker(1), gforge and Roundup.
For Intevation,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
No, I see no real reason why your Kolab users _HAVE_ to register as
OpenPKG users, although it would great for us. But you are using just
a subset of OpenPKG for Kolab and for your users OpenPKG is just a
sub-technology. Your users feel
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Note that there is some competition between OpenPKG and the operating
system vendors. This is a problem for customers. They want to have
a tested Linux (the kernel) and core technologies (like libc,
filesystem) with certification for a
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 15:55 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be possibilities to help.
I have experiences with running
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Since OpenPKG 2.4, db 4.3 is used for OpenLDAP.
We had stability problems in the past and until August the recommendations
were clear to stay with db 4.2.
How stable is OpenLDAP with db 4.3.29
(in general and with OpenPKG in particular)?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 15:55 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
...
Note that there is some competition between OpenPKG and the operating system
vendors. This is a problem for customers.
They want to have a tested Linux (the kernel) and core technologies (like
libc, filesystem) with certification for a hardware.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:55:34PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
[snip]
[ Email originally send (but might be stuck in moderation)
From: Bernhard Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005
Hi,
I have now correctly got my system to register and it is checking
daily for any updates.
I notice that on http://registry.openpkg.org/?page=association the
active instance is marked with a date of the 30-11-2005.
Is this date supposed to show the last access to the OpenPKG system or
is it
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:08 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Hi Ralf, Hi Thomas,
Ping?
Does anybody read me?
I think there are many other potential reasons why users do not give
feeback. To me personally I have made several bad experiences with
contacting OpenPKG, even with important
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 19:42 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:08 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Hi Ralf, Hi Thomas,
Ping?
Does anybody read me?
We read. Not much to say when all there is are complaints, some of
which you admit are potentially your own doing. The
Hi Ralf, Hi Thomas,
so far I do not have a good gut feeling about the registry
and the way it was introduced.
But I am still trying to understand things,
as I was quite busy and could not answer sooner.
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2005 23:58 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Yes, David, I know that
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:08 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
I believe that it has other reasons that the feedback form was not used
as planned. E.g. I saw the form, but I dislike forms like it so much,
that I did not use it, though I am quite happy to give you feedback.
Now I have filled
What does it mean when a system doesn't have a heartbeat? I have three
systems that seem to be now set as Departure because they don't have a
heartbeat, but they aren't departed. Are the rest of the servers I
registered today going to show up as departed tomorrow?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer all of them to you. Let me
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
While I try to keep up on all the news and such here, I still miss a few
things here and there. However, I think that perhaps a few things may
not have been discussed like the specifics of what things and when
exactly they would be going offline
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
And please do not hesitate to give us YOUR important opinions,
complains, suggestions, wishes, etc. Either state them in public on
openpkg-users@openpkg.org or in private to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will try to answer all of them.
Hi Ralf!
What I am missing are
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
And please do not hesitate to give us YOUR important opinions,
complains, suggestions, wishes, etc. Either state them in public on
openpkg-users@openpkg.org or in private to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will try to answer all of them.
What I am
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Sorry for the delay. RSYNC access is resurrected. The difference is just
that plain anonymous-RSYNC is not possible because rsync(1) doesn't
support both anonymous and non-anonymous in parallel. If you have
registered with [EMAIL PROTECTED] you can now RSYNC again
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Sorry for the delay. RSYNC access is resurrected. The difference is just
that plain anonymous-RSYNC is not possible because rsync(1) doesn't
support both anonymous and non-anonymous in parallel. If you have
There is a new obmtool [1] available from ZfOS [2] for use in the new
OpenPKG Registry world order. New features are mirror support, choice
of download tool with fallbacks and user/pass support. The latter
especially understands and obeys the URL rewriting of those instances
who utilize that
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
i have three questions about the new registration-requirements:
does this mean, that i have to register every single instance of ofbiz
if i don't want to set up a mirror of the openpkg-ftp-server on my site.
If you use openpkg build and let it
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer all of them to you. Let me just share a few
personal points with you:
What has
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer all of them to you. Let me
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
i have three questions about the new registration-requirements:
does this mean, that i have to register every single instance of ofbiz
if i don't want to set up a mirror of the openpkg-ftp-server
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 09:11 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer all of them to
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:56 +0100, OpenPKG wrote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 2005-11-28
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
http://www.openpkg.org/ -- Munich, DE -- 2005-11-28 --
As a consequence of the changed environmental conditions of OpenPKG
during the year 2005, the OpenPKG
Simon,
Simon J Mudd[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-29 19:42:55
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 openpkg]# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa | grep openpkg
awk: cmd. line:3: fatal: Invalid range end: /^([A-Z][A-Z0-9_]+[A-Z0-9]=[
!#$%(-_a-~]+)? *(#.*)?$/
openpkg-tools-0.8.37-2.4.0
39 matches
Mail list logo
