Hi Everyone,
Sun has a booth at LinuxWorld SF this week, and several of us will be
there representing OpenSolaris. I plan to be there Monday afternoon and
most of Tuesday with my laptop running the latest bits.
I noted from his blog that Ben Rockwood will also be in attendance
representing
Hello John,
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 1:11:58 AM, you wrote:
JF Hi Robert,
JF fcinfo will be released along with a few other storage drivers, fibre
channel and iscsi to name a couple, sometime in the next 4 months. Sorry that I
can't be more specific at the moment.
JF You may already be
Hello!
Once I first come to the site it takes some efforts for me to find a location
of the documentation, which is appropriate for the very beginner (it is the
Quick Start chapter of Developer's Reference Guide).
I think it would be really helpful for the people who are new to the Open
Solaris
Hi,
TJ Yang wrote:
I read albertw's blog but I failed to understand how to use Solaris'
patch management system to be a modern PMS for OpenSoalris.
I would advocate the use of patches for updating packages. But I would
be very interested in seeing the things that people don't like about
On 8/8/05, Albert White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most of this email snipped
If a consensus develops among the distributions to go with a particular
high level management system then thats great. But its a separate
discussion from whether to use the SVR4 package architecture.
Cheers,
Hi,
TJ Yang wrote:
I read albertw's blog but I failed to understand
how to use Solaris'
patch management system to be a modern PMS for
OpenSoalris.
I would advocate the use of patches for updating
packages. But I would
be very interested in seeing the things that
people
snip
I just want to chime in here to let people know that
I have been
watching and reading with considerable interest. I
think that a few
steps need to be taken with Blastwave and after some
thought I am
going to make a few changes.
As soon as I have something concrete to talk about I
Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is true. If we look at the roadmap the install and
admin tools are scheduled for next year around April/May
timeframe. It's proably better to hold off until than
until the patch management can architectually include
those stable interfaces.
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Why do you believe this?
ksh88 vs ksh93 deltas are described as features or improvements by the
ksh93 maintainer.
ksh88 vs pdksh deltas are described as bugs by the pdksh maintainer.
Why do you believe that pdksh makes less
On 8/8/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is true. If we look at the roadmap the install and
admin tools are scheduled for next year around April/May
timeframe. It's proably better to hold off until than
until the patch management
On 8/8/05, Matt Ingenthron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a recent services engagement with a customer, one of the admins was
vi challenged. He was used to Linux where pico was found on many
systems. I helped him get pkg-get on the Solaris 10 system and
proceeded to pkg-get pine, which
I tried both options but all I got was either a garbled screen with only the
MonitorLayout option or a blank screen when I tried to set the PanelSize.
The garbled screen looks like it has multiple login screens that are being
displayed at various offsets. I did get pictures with my digital
I tried both options but all I got was either a garbled screen with only the
MonitorLayout option
or a blank screen when I tried to set the PanelSize.
Did you try both and what was in the log?
My Ferrari 4000 requires both PanelSize and MonitorLayout to be set
before it even displays
I have three video outputs on mine:
Panel/VGA/S-Video
I tried connecting an external monitor to the laptop and here is what I get -
no video on the screen either - I removed the MonitorLayout and PanelSize
options from the config before running:
(II) RADEON(0): LVDS port is not in connector
Hi Nickolay -
I'm a member of the documentation community. I'm working with others to
develop the documentation presence on the OpenSolaris site. I think this
is great feedback I am in the process of creating an index for the
documentation that is scattered around the web site and as you
On Aug 8, 2005, at 11:26 AM, John Plocher wrote:
As a result, Sun has developed a binary model (and here I do not
mean proprietary) that puts a premium on allowing things to maintain
compatibility - at a binary interface/API level - over time and over
release cycles.
Er, no offense, but
Hello,
Just as a reminder, the first meeting of the Front Range
OpenSolaris User Group is this Thursday!
Here's the information:
An OpenSolaris User Group is being formed in Colorado with
the goal of sharing information and promoting discussion
on interesting technical topics related to
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Er, no offense,
None taken.
Note that I wasn't saying that the installer (person) would never
wish to be able to perform developer tasks like building from source
to produce an installation. I agree that the ability to build everything
is important - to developers and
John Plocher wrote:
I also wasn't saying that source based systems don't have the concept of
an ABI. Rather, I was saying that, in general[1], processes based on the
presumption of build the entire system tend to not detect changes that
are source level compatible but still result in binary
Hi,
Have SunRay source code (SRSS and firmware) been open-sourced?
I have been looking, but have not found it. Is there a plan to do this?
Thank you,
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Snit Mo wrote:
Have SunRay source code (SRSS and firmware) been open-sourced?
No.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
snip
This is actually one of the big reasons the X.Org
open source community is
moving from a model of building the entire X Window
System as one big source
tree to a modular model, where each library, program,
and driver module is
individually built, to make it easier to catch API
ABI
22 matches
Mail list logo
