Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 1/12/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the > >>> source files, and closing in

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Stephen Lau
Dennis Clarke wrote: On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the source files, and closing in on how to get the package tools published (i.e. in one delivery or two, with bi

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Build 29 or newer?

2006-01-12 Thread Stephen Lau
Cyril Plisko wrote: Bruce Riddle wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Rich Teer wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Karyn Ritter wrote: There was a legal issue with build 29. I don't have an exact ETA for new ISOs, but I think it will be early next week. I'm recommending that they just post 30. Let me kn

Re: [osol-discuss] New Community Proposal: Appliances

2006-01-12 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Thanks for this proposal, Phil. You have consensus and CAB approval, so we are moving ahead with this community. Please work with Eric Boutilier to get your community set up. Jim -- Jim Grisanzio, Community Manager, OpenSolaris http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/ Philip G. Harman wrote: I blame ZF

Re: [osol-discuss] Next Sol Express community edition?

2006-01-12 Thread Bruce Riddle
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Ben Miller wrote: > Will there be Solaris Express Community edition ISOs of b30 put up? It looks > like b28 is still currently up. If not what build will the next Community > edition be and what determines which build ISOs are put up for? > Karyn Ritter wrote that there

[osol-discuss] Next Sol Express community edition?

2006-01-12 Thread Ben Miller
Will there be Solaris Express Community edition ISOs of b30 put up? It looks like b28 is still currently up. If not what build will the next Community edition be and what determines which build ISOs are put up for? thanks, Ben This message posted from opensolaris.org __

Re: [osol-discuss] Articles

2006-01-12 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Bill Rushmore wrote: Are we at the point yet where members of the community can submit articles to the OpenSolaris site? We'd love to. I'd like to build out the articles page -- http://www.opensolaris.org/os/articles/ -- with community submissions (interviews, technical articles, features, pr

[osol-discuss] 3 new request-sponsor pubacks

2006-01-12 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Thanks to Juergen Keil for the three bug fixs below and to Frits Vanderlinden for sponsoring the fixs through to putback. 6350499 stale usb device link confuses login's ... Submitted: 12/21/05 by Juergen Keil Sun Sponsor: Frits Vanderlinden Putback to Nevada 32 (1/11/06) 635050

Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS group creation request.

2006-01-12 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-12 03:35]: > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 10:22, Alan DuBoff wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 09:58 am, Mark Sweeney wrote: > I see communities as being the long term high level thing and projects > being the shorter term or smaller scope things. > >

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 1/12/06, Glenn Lagasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > SNIP > > >The package sources are being actively worked on - the roadmap says > > >they'll be there this quarter, and we do believe that will be the case. > > > > so then .. maybe this quarter .. may

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: SNIP > >The package sources are being actively worked on - the roadmap says > >they'll be there this quarter, and we do believe that will be the case. > > so then .. maybe this quarter .. maybe not. Okay . > > There were binaries posted with redistribu

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 1/12/06, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the > >>> source files, and closing in on how

Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS group creation request.

2006-01-12 Thread Mark Sweeney
Hi Darren, As there are several *FS communities, like NFS, ZFS, UFS, so to maintain the same level of abstraction, I wanted to have a CIFS community. You raise a good point about how things should be organized. I suppose we could put all the *FS communities under a "Filesystems" community if t

[osol-discuss] Reminder: Chicago User Group

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Boutilier
It's been a few months since we first notifed opensolaris-discuss of the new OpenSolaris Chicago (Great Lakes) User Group. So if you live in the Chicago (or southern WI or northern IN) area and didn't know there was a local group... - A report and photos from the first meeting are here (scroll

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Dave Miner
Dennis Clarke wrote: On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the source files, and closing in on how to get the package tools published (i.e. in one delivery or two, with b

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Wiki

2006-01-12 Thread Venky
Sounds like the right time to introduce the OpenSolaris wiki! :) There is a brand new wikicity for OpenSolaris over here: http://opensolaris.wikicities.com/ I figure this would be a good place for members of the community to collaborate, contribute articles, etc... at least until we have an offici

[osol-discuss] Articles

2006-01-12 Thread Bill Rushmore
Are we at the point yet where members of the community can submit articles to the OpenSolaris site? Awhile back I built a VMware image that would give people a head start on OpenSolaris. Legally I can't distribute it and I am still trying to convince some people at Sun to distribute it. I thou

Re: [osol-discuss] We need a binary license for pkg* immediately

2006-01-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the > > source files, and closing in on how to get the package tools published > > (i.e. in one delivery or two, with binaries fi

Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS group creation request.

2006-01-12 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 10:22, Alan DuBoff wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 09:58 am, Mark Sweeney wrote: > > The Kernel/Networking insight group at Sun is developing a Solaris native > > CIFS client. > > > > The codebase we have started with is the Darwin OpenBSD port, which builds > > upon cod

Re: [osol-discuss] iwi interface not recognised

2006-01-12 Thread James C. McPherson
Kevin Prendergast wrote: I have a tecra S1 with an wifi intel 2100 interface, I downloaded the iwi driver and rebooted. Card still not recognised, does the driver support the 2100 card. Hi Kevin, according to http://opensolaris.org/os/community/laptop/wireless/ what you want is the "ipw" drive

Re: [osol-discuss] CIFS group creation request.

2006-01-12 Thread Alan DuBoff
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 09:58 am, Mark Sweeney wrote: > The Kernel/Networking insight group at Sun is developing a Solaris native > CIFS client. > > The codebase we have started with is the Darwin OpenBSD port, which builds > upon code originally developed by Boris Popov. > > So, I want to sta

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Build 29 or newer?

2006-01-12 Thread Cyril Plisko
Bruce Riddle wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Rich Teer wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Karyn Ritter wrote: There was a legal issue with build 29. I don't have an exact ETA for new ISOs, but I think it will be early next week. I'm recommending that they just post 30. Let me know if you need 29: the