Why is 6401605 no longer in the database?
Good question.
The FAQ says that it can be related to security considerations.
For info, the last time I saw the bug entry it was assigned.
Regards,
J-F
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Also, is there any thought of how broad a range of
HPQ machines are affected by
this issue?
As far as I know all the affected machines are built around an ATI Radeon PCI-E
chipset.
Regards,
J-F
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 10:40 pm, changho.kim wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner have
difficulty in input command by keyboard. if user don't familiar with
keyboard, they want GUI program.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner
have difficulty in input command by keyboard.
if user don't familiar with keyboard, they want GUI
On Monday 24 April 2006 09:59 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
another impressive (heavily used and proven) build environment is
the Sun GNOME (JDS) ports system based on pkgbuild.
Don't forget about pkgsrc either, AFAIK, they're off happily building packages
as well.
--
Alan DuBoff - Sun
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim
wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every
solaris beginner
have difficulty in input command by keyboard.
if user don't familiar with keyboard, they
Also, is there any thought of how broad a range
of
HPQ machines are affected by
this issue?
As far as I know all the affected machines are built
around an ATI Radeon PCI-E chipset.
Are you sure. The Apple MacBook uses ATI Radeon PCI-E
and OpenSolaris runs on it.
---Bob
This
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 01:31 -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim
wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every
solaris beginner
have difficulty in input
As far as I know all the affected machines are built
around an ATI Radeon PCI-E chipset.
I have the same impression.
Are you sure. The Apple MacBook uses ATI Radeon PCI-E
and OpenSolaris runs on it.
Are you sure, Bob? The Apple Intel iMac that I have access to
uses an Intel's ICH7M
Also, is there any thought of how broad a range
of
HPQ machines are affected by
this issue?
As far as I know all the affected machines are built
around an ATI Radeon PCI-E chipset.
Are you sure. The Apple MacBook uses ATI Radeon PCI-E
and OpenSolaris runs on it.
Same as the
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a
bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or
Windows.. why bother
with Java then? Besides to do simple management
thingy natively you need
an extra layer, like JNI... I don't think its the
right way to go
frankly...
Are you sure. The Apple MacBook uses ATI Radeon
PCI-E
nd OpenSolaris runs on it.
---Bob
As I said, AFAIK the affected machines are built around ATI Radeon Express
chipset.
Acer Ferrari seems to have no problem but the Acer Aspire 5024 WLMI, which is
similar has. The problem occurrs
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 02:22 -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a
bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or
Windows.. why bother
with Java then? Besides to do simple management
thingy natively you need
an extra layer,
Why is 6401605 no longer in the database?
Good question.
The FAQ says that it can be related to security considerations.
Or it has be re-assigned to a new Category, that isn't exported to
bugs.opensolaris.org.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Also, is there any thought of how broad a range
of
HPQ machines are affected by
this issue?
As far as I know all the affected machines are
built
around an ATI Radeon PCI-E chipset.
Are you sure. The Apple MacBook uses ATI Radeon
PCI-E
and OpenSolaris runs on it.
Hey! I didn't want to start this flame.. :-)
But I really do not see how Java fits in OS
management GUI were you
don't really need its multi-platform capabilities and
associated
difficulties.
I asked questions. I said nothing about flames.
And yes by multi-platform we need to
Yes but I did think somebody reported that other Acer Turion
models had the same problem. I thought it was just HP and
Compaq models that had some sort of ACPI problem but the
but that it's related to now:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6413401
is related to a
I recently installed Build 37 on an HP nx9600 laptop.
/usr/X11/bin/scanpci reports:
pci bus 0x cardnum 0x1e function 0x02: vendor 0x8086 device 0x266e
Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) AC'97 Audio controller
Which is handled by the SUN supplied audio810 driver.
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:45, Erast Benson wrote:
Though the ultimate goal is to do a lot more, the
prototype for the
Visual Panels project (screenshots, demo, and source
at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/vpanels/
currently contains a basic SMF GUI. Please check it
Besides, doing this in java isn't all that hard. The downside
is the memory footprint.
One issue with running the GUI in Java is getting the security
and authentication right; this often requires roll-your-own which
is way too hard for most to get right.
Casper
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 22:50 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 22:40 -0700, changho.kim wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner have
difficulty in input command by keyboard.
Jean-François Ndi writes:
Why is 6401605 no longer in the database?
Good question.
The FAQ says that it can be related to security considerations.
For info, the last time I saw the bug entry it was assigned.
It is assigned. I don't see any marks on it, though, that would
indicate
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, doing this in java isn't all that hard. The downside
is the memory footprint.
One issue with running the GUI in Java is getting the security
and authentication right; this often requires roll-your-own which
is way too hard for
I am going to be moving to Pittsburgh in a couple months and was
wondering if anyone would be interested in getting an OpenSolaris user
group going there.
On a side note, I would really apperciate it if someone would take over
for me with trying to get a NYC group going.
Bill
rushmores.net
Can the SMF GUI tool be incorporated into the current Java Web Console that
allows GUIized ZFSadministration? One tool - many uses.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
...
I think we should do what we do best, give away software, I know what
I'm about to say is a bit impossible because of the time constraints,
cost and others. Do we still have that band of brothers DVD? I was
thinking about giving it away, shipping it even,
Q: How can I add a filesystem to an existing zone?
3. Export the device associated with the disk partition to the non-global zone,
create the filesystem in the non-global zone and mount it (has potential
security issues)
To my understanding, the security issue is to associate SCSI devices to
I like the idea a lot. We don't have the "Band of Brothers" ISO yet
though. We do have what Stephen Lau has been handing out which is based
on the Solaris Express Community Edition. Would that work?
Any ideas on how many we might go through in a given month? We can make
the ISO and DVD
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 02:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same as the Ferrari 4000. Also ATI Radeon PCI-E.
Last night I had installed a Ferrari 4006, the new model.
The screen did act slightly different, but a fix from Henry Zhao did get
things working for me (thanks to AlanC and StuartK
Oh, another thing I'd like to add. Ubuntu community very concerned about
whether to ship their ISOs as DVD or as CD media. They claim (and I
think it is very true) that a lot of their potential users still do not
have DVD drive and will not have for a long time. I think the
requirement would be to
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:31:23AM -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Though the ultimate goal is to do a lot more, the prototype for the
Visual Panels project (screenshots, demo, and source at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/vpanels/
) currently contains a basic SMF GUI. Please check
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:45:35AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or Windows.. why bother
with Java then?
We actually think it would be really valuable for people to be able
to
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 15:19 -0700, David Powell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:45:35AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or Windows.. why bother
with Java then?
We actually
On 4/26/06, Sara Dornsife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea a lot. We don't have the Band of Brothers ISO yet though.
We do have what Stephen Lau has been handing out which is based on the
Solaris Express Community Edition. Would that work?
Any ideas on how many we might go through
Jürgen Keil wrote:
I recently installed Build 37 on an HP nx9600 laptop.
/usr/X11/bin/scanpci reports:
pci bus 0x cardnum 0x1e function 0x02: vendor 0x8086 device 0x266e
Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) AC'97 Audio controller
Which is handled by the SUN supplied
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 02:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same as the Ferrari 4000. Also ATI Radeon PCI-E.
Last night I had installed a Ferrari 4006, the new model.
The screen did act slightly different, but a fix from Henry Zhao did get
things working for me
This is the even more tested edition and, in my opinion, really solid:
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=8PartDetailId=Sol-Express_Sub-SP_x86-G-FTransactionId=try
This edition has ZFS included and while this is not a GA release it is
really excellent. I have been running
Hi!
Does anyone know whether it is possible to use C99 features in a shared
library which is used by older applications ?
For example would it be possible to use C99 features such as |int
getrpcbynumber(int arg1, /* ... */) { char buff[arg1]; /* ... */ }| in a
library such as libnsl
* Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-26 17:53]:
Ok, we're in the Google Summer of Code. Thanks so much for all the
excellent project ideas, and thanks to Simon Phipps for initiating the
process to get us involved.
Nice work, Simon and Jim.
- Stephen
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know whether it is possible to use C99 features in a shared
library which is used by older applications ?
For example would it be possible to use C99 features such as |int
getrpcbynumber(int arg1, /* ... */) { char buff[arg1]; /* ... */ }| in a
library
The Virtual Console project would provide multiple consoles and
switch between Xserver and consoles for Solaris. There are two areas
of work envisioned:
1. Multiple consoles
2. Switch between Xserver and consoles
This project is affiliated with the Device Driver community, and would
have its own
41 matches
Mail list logo
