Sorry if there's a better place to ask, but is
anyone using Nevada b40 on an x4100?
I'm seeing very long boot times (6+ minutes) which seem to be down
to slow SCSI bus detection, and I can't see the console anymore if I ssh
to the ILOM (although the KVM java app works fine).
Console was fine
Hello
Could you please help me in this issue :
I've installed Solaris 8 x86 on my laptop Amilo PRO V8010 but I can't access
the X-Window. The video device is Intel 915GM/GMS .
I've also installed the Solaris XFree86 Video Drivers and Porting Kit and I've
tried with XF86 i810 but it doesn't
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more modern aspects of syslog.conf such as the
use of
Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more modern aspects of syslog.conf
On 06/09/06 11:31, Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more modern
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 06/09/06 11:31, Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some
Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more modern aspects of
Is anyone planning to blog on the 14th? I'm
trying to gauge the apparent lack of interest...
This is a good idea, and I'm planning on coming up with something for that day.
-spp
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
I've installed Solaris 8 x86 on my laptop Amilo PRO
V8010 but I can't access the X-Window.
Solaris 8? Why would you still be using 8? Go download the most recent
Express release and give that a try. These lists (including opensolaris-help)
are geared towards OpenSolaris, the open source
Sorry if there's a better place to ask, but is
anyone using Nevada b40 on an x4100?
You'll probably find more help on the opensolaris-help list, rather than the
general purpose opensolaris-discuss list.
-spp
This message posted from opensolaris.org
+1
-spp
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 06/09/06 12:31, Darren J Moffat wrote:
What problem does this solve ?
Trawling syslog files with miserable Perl scripts and the like, trying to
rebuild structure from a not very well-formed or structured ascii text.
Writing a syslog event monitor should not involve grokking around in
that
amir wrote:
I've installed Solaris 8 x86 on my laptop Amilo PRO V8010 but I can't
access the X-Window. The video device is Intel 915GM/GMS . I've also
installed the Solaris XFree86 Video Drivers and Porting Kit and I've
tried with XF86 i810 but it doesn't work.
So is there someone who can help
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking to the NetBeans guys from Prague at JavaOne, and they are
very interested in OpenSolaris and in doing some stuff with our Czech
OpenSolaris user group. So, perhaps we -- as communities -- can start
collaborating in some way ... at least
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking to the NetBeans guys from Prague at JavaOne, and they are
very interested in OpenSolaris and in doing some stuff with our Czech
OpenSolaris user group. So, perhaps we -- as communities -- can start
collaborating in
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 06/09/06 12:31, Darren J Moffat wrote:
What problem does this solve ?
Trawling syslog files with miserable Perl scripts and the like, trying to
rebuild structure from a not very well-formed or structured ascii text.
Writing a syslog event monitor should not involve
Hi
On 06/09/06 13:56, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 06/09/06 12:31, Darren J Moffat wrote:
What problem does this solve ?
Trawling syslog files with miserable Perl scripts and the like, trying to
rebuild structure from a not very well-formed or structured ascii text.
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:47:27PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/vgatext.html
has a link to a tarball I hastily threw together of the resulting code.
PS: there are two points of interest in my code:
1. it
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
And also, I'm going to use my proximity to the rest
of Asia to poke
around throughout the entire region. I'll do very
little travel to the
US, actually -- probably only once a year. It will
be Asia first, Europe
second. But in terms of my online activities,
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 06/09/06 11:31, Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 19:46 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
No logo on this one at all :
http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0052/index.html
This is much darker than the first image.
Still very simple and very open.
Nice..
I do prefer this compared to the other one you have
Hi James
Thank you for your answer.
At the moment I have only Solaris 8 ...
Could you please clarify more Maybe with vesa ...
Thanks in advance for your kind support.
Amir
On 6/9/06, James C. McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amir wrote: I've installed Solaris 8 x86 on my laptop Amilo PRO
Gavin Maltby writes:
On 06/09/06 12:31, Darren J Moffat wrote:
What problem does this solve ?
Trawling syslog files with miserable Perl scripts and the like, trying to
rebuild structure from a not very well-formed or structured ascii text.
Writing a syslog event monitor should not
Call me crazy, but I hate the idea of putting crap (monitoring agents,
security agents, more generic accounts, etc) on the box.
Could we build a core syslog framework that would let us take those
errors and configure them for more than a loghost ... say any or a
specific host via SNMP in a way
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
download a newer version :)
Amir MABROUK wrote:
Hi James
Thank you for your answer.
At the moment I have only Solaris 8 ...
Could you please clarify more Maybe with vesa ...
Thanks in advance for your kind support.
Amir
On 6/9/06, *James C.
Sorry if there's a better place to ask, but is
anyone using Nevada b40 on an x4100?
I'm seeing very long boot times (6+ minutes) which seem to be down
to slow SCSI bus detection, and I can't see the console anymore if I ssh
to the ILOM (although the KVM java app works fine).
This is a BIOS
Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more modern aspects of syslog.conf
Just a reminder that the nominations close at the end of day Monday June
12 (CA time). Winners will be announced on June 14.
Send nominations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sara
Sara Dornsife wrote:
Based on the +1s, we are moving forward with this proposal. Get your
nominations in.
What is a
Nicolas Williams writes:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:12:33PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
Instead, syslog is a great dumping ground for all sorts of debug and
human-only messages, and will likely be treated that way indefinitely.
I would oppose an effort to apply structure on top of something
Nicolas Williams writes:
Yes, I'm well aware of that effort. I think it's misguided for
exactly the same reasons.
Have you said so on the WG list?
They were quite far along when I found out, plus I don't have the time
to fight every fight. If they're sure it's right, I'll defer, but I
Nicolas Williams writes:
Failing to produce those sorts of schema leaves you with just a
handful of code numbers plus free-form text wrapped prettily in XML.
Each message could reference the schema/dtd that it conforms to...
And existing MIBs could be re-used, perhaps.
I await that MIB
On Jun 9, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
If there is any evolution of the log file format, it will
be to use XML. XML and structured data have featured
heavily in discussions about advancing syslog and the
benefits are clear: data gets typed. If the protocol
data is formatted this way
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:12:33PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
Instead, syslog is a great dumping ground for all sorts of debug and
human-only messages, and will likely be treated that way indefinitely.
I would oppose an effort to apply structure on top of something that
is inherently without
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0800, Darren Reed wrote:
If there is any evolution of the log file format, it will
be to use XML. [...]
Sure, but the schema will have to be influenced by what the IETF SYSLOG
WG ends up doing w.r.t. structured messages.
Dan Price wrote:
If your blog does NOT appear on http://www.opensolaris.org/os/blogs,
and you would like it to, please send mail with your RSS feed to
add-my-blog AT sun DOT com, and we'll add you. This is the way
we'll make sure your blog entry is aggregated and archived with everyone
else's.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking to the NetBeans guys from Prague at JavaOne, and they are
very interested in OpenSolaris and in doing some stuff with our Czech
OpenSolaris user group. So, perhaps we -- as communities -- can start
collaborating in
Thanks to Richard Lowe and Juergen Keil for these three fixes below and
to Dana Myers and Liane Praza for sponsoring the work through to putback.
We now have a total of 26 non-Sun contributors who have worked with 33
Solaris engineers on request-sponsor, 421 bugs reported, 170
submissions, 78
Amir MABROUK wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
At the moment I have only Solaris 8 ...
Could you please clarify more Maybe with vesa ...
Hi Amir,
vesa is the generic VGA mode that XOrg (and XSun and XFree86)
support. It's the mode that the Solaris installer will use as
a fallback you can
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
If there is any evolution of the log file format, it will
be to use XML. XML and structured data have featured
heavily in discussions about advancing syslog and the
benefits are clear: data gets typed. If the protocol
data
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Darren Reed wrote:
To bring the syslogd shipped with Solaris up to a level that is
more in line with what is found in other systems today, I'd like
to propose a project to upgrade it.
Tasks currently scoped out for this project include:
- introduce some of the more
40 matches
Mail list logo
