Hi,
I am a solaris newbie and want to develop a high performance multi connection
(above 1k) socket server on solaris. At beginning I found a topic in
docs.sun.com, it tought me that I could use aio and thread pool to finish my
work. Then I wrote the basic thread/aio code of my server, but wh
the book's name is 《solaris internals》
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Whether it is technically best (or even good) or not,
> Windows is the de facto OS for laptops - it works,
> people like it (in some cases a lot) and vote with
> their wallets, and that makes it best. I have run
> Solaris on a laptop, and it was, frankly, OK. No
> better. Lots of reasons, but tha
John Plocher wrote:
It sounds like the answer is probably along the lines of
"don't do this right now; come back in 6 to 12 months and
ask again..."
Sounds reasonable to me.
The most consistent feedback (ok, vats of vitriol) that
I get about the OpenSolaris download process is two-fold:
1) wh
The page and link was posted on slashdot. Enough said.
Regards
Anil
On 2/23/07, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Enright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Several weeks (months?) ago Sun had some sort of online deal where
> they would ship free S10 and Sun Studio 11 CDs out for free. A f
>I believe I know some of the answers/reasons for (2), but
>it would be *really good* if they could be spelt out on the
>dlc.sun.com site as well as sun.com/downloads.
If we have a better understanding of the reasons, it might be possible
to come up with a, possibly stripped down, "torrentable" r
James C. McPherson wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
It sounds like the answer is probably along the lines of
"don't do this right now; come back in 6 to 12 months and
ask again..."
Sounds reasonable to me.
The most consistent feedback (ok, vats of vitriol) that
I get about the OpenSolaris download
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
It sounds like the answer is probably along the lines of
"don't do this right now; come back in 6 to 12 months and
ask again..."
Sounds reasonable to me.
The most consistent feedback (ok, vats of vitriol) that
I get about the
James C. McPherson wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
[...]
1) why is there no link to the solitary sparc or x86
dvd iso image? People *really* hate having to start
5 or 6 separate downloads when they have the connection
to sustain a single iso download.
As a qui
I asked this question in the ZFS forum, but I'm starting to think that this is
more of a general question. So here goes: I have a media fileserver running
with Windows XP at the moment, but I would like to change to OpenSolaris ZFS
because of the safeguards, since I lost a bunch of HD movies a f
Would you have a problem with DVD-only images for SX:CE? Do you have
systems you use for OpenSolaris that don't have DVD drives and that
you can't netinstall from another system or Live Upgrade from a mounted
image?
No problem for me. But YES for a bunch of students who are trying to get
th
>But what makes this project stand out from the regular stuff is that I
>only use the media file server a couple of hours 3-4 nights a week,
>watching movies in the home theater or on the bedroom flatscreen. Or
>when copying new stuff to it. So is it possible to make OpenSolaris go
>into S3 sleep
>Are the engineering benefits got out of abandoning CD-ROMS greater than
>the loss of a few (?) developers, students and users ?
This is something we need to discuss; and what alternatives there might
be.
Driving upward the installer footprint, requiring "live" upgrade and
other current pla
On 2/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are the engineering benefits got out of abandoning CD-ROMS greater than
>the loss of a few (?) developers, students and users ?
This is something we need to discuss; and what alternatives there might
be.
Driving upward the installe
On 2/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are the engineering benefits got out of abandoning CD-ROMS greater than
>the loss of a few (?) developers, students and users ?
This is something we need to discuss; and what alternatives there might
be.
Driving upward the installer
In appliances forum, I was told that event ports could solve my problem, I will
learn more detail. Did I post wrong forum?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Would you have a problem with DVD-only images for SX:CE? Do you have
systems you use for OpenSolaris that don't have DVD drives and that
you can't netinstall from another system or Live Upgrade from a mounted
image?
Like others have mentioned, what I think should be done is to have one
sm
Thanks! That really answers my question, I will simply use one of the outputs
on my Phidgets board to send a 250 ms button press to the computer running the
ZFS system. So now my next question will of course be how long startup time
such a system will have before the network shares are available
James C. McPherson wrote:
2) why don't Sun provide a torrent?
Some of the third-party software in Solaris requires certain
agreements be made with those who redistribute. BitTorrent
could be seen as allowing redistribution by people who haven't
agreed to those license terms. If we someday m
>Thanks! That really answers my question, I will simply use one of the
>outputs on my Phidgets board to send a 250 ms button press to the
>computer running the ZFS system.
>So now my next question will of course be how long startup time such a
>system will have before the network shares are avail
Thans for the tips! My BIOS is a limiting factor, I know. It takes around 30
seconsd to run through, with the RAID and PCI ATA controller (which I btw need
to find out if works with OpenSolaris). As for disabling services I hope
there's a tutorial somewhere... I'm old enough to be familiar with
Ananth Shrinivas wrote:
Would you have a problem with DVD-only images for SX:CE? Do you have
systems you use for OpenSolaris that don't have DVD drives and that
you can't netinstall from another system or Live Upgrade from a mounted
image?
No problem for me. But YES for a bunch of students
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Ananth Shrinivas wrote:
Would you have a problem with DVD-only images for SX:CE? Do you have
systems you use for OpenSolaris that don't have DVD drives and that
you can't netinstall from another system or Live Upgrade from a mounted
image?
No proble
On 2/24/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Ananth Shrinivas wrote:
>>
>>> Would you have a problem with DVD-only images for SX:CE? Do you have
>>> systems you use for OpenSolaris that don't have DVD drives and that
>>> you can't netinstall f
>
> On 2/23/07, class="gmail_sendername">Alan Coopersmith < href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">alan.coopersmit
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
> rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;
> padding-left: 1ex;">
> Due to some changes planned in the wa
Regarding Casper's and Bill's posts about a single-CD + network network
based install: This topic came up in install-discuss too, and over there
Dave Miner just wrote:
Date: Sat Feb 24 09:52:39 2007
From: Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [install-discuss] distributed locations for install
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Ananth Shrinivas wrote:
[...]
No problem for me. But YES for a bunch of students who are trying to
get their feet wet with OpenSolaris. There is already some
bad-mouthing about how the Developer Edition needs a truckload of RAM
to j
Given a set of full+OEM packages for a particular architecture, and the cluster
definitions
and install software of course, what tools (I hope you guys don't do it by
hand) are used to
build CD and DVD images? (not counting mkisofs or mkfs -F udfs or the like,
just what's used to
generate the d
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
More so when Developer Edition can actually run fine
with half the RAM that is required to install it.
Moinak -- I think that's 128 MB, correct? Don't you need way more than 128
to effectively run a SX Developer Edition Desktop
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
In that case another alternative is to have the download center
generate a shell script on the fly that will have all the wget,
md5sum and sundry with URLs valid for the particular login
session and proxy settings being detected from the browser's
settings.
.. And t
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
2) why don't Sun provide a torrent?
Some of the third-party software in Solaris requires certain
agreements be made with those who redistribute. BitTorrent
could be seen as allowing redistribution by people who haven't
agreed to those license
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
...
what tools (I hope you guys don't do it by hand) are used to
build CD and DVD images?
...
then perhaps the community could better participate in the development of
more automated means of generating media images, download files, etc for
more di
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> On 2/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Question we can ask ourselves as community are:
>>
>> - Can OpenSolaris distributions fill the "low-end" void?
>
>
> from the opensolaris web page: "To build OpenSolaris from the source,
> y
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
>>
>>> More so when Developer Edition can actually run fine
>>> with half the RAM that is required to install it.
>>
>>
>> Moinak -- I think that's 128 MB, correct? Don't you need way more
>> than 128
Esc twice is a (t)csh'ism. Try tcsh or csh and you'll probably get what you're
looking for.
If you're using csh, you may need to: set filec ESC
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
Are you shipping S10 Update 3 now? Also, how can I get hold of more Solaris 10
logo stickers - Sun part number 819-1362-10.
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris
Hi,
to the 10th Sun anniversary, Sun made a big celebration at the Cebit
and people like Andy have been present.
What's up this year? Will there be a celebration between March 15th and
March 21st in Hannover?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
General note: The email below contains some of the old history of dtksh
in Solaris and some background why the ksh93-integration project was
created. I would prefer to take this as a page in a history book and
_not_ as opportunity to come up w
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > Eric Boutilier wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> >>
> >>> More so when Developer Edition can actually run
> fine
> >>> with half the RAM that is required to install
> it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Moinak -- I think that's 128 MB, correct? Don't
> y
Shawn Walker wrote:
>>
>>Let's face it, a development machine should have a
>>minimum of 1GB per core.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>
>
>No, it depends on what you're developing for. If you're developing *with* and
>for Java, sure, you need that much memory (only half joking).
>
>
>
Oops, I forgot Java, in
Would Sun
adopt that version? I have no clue.
As I said... if dtksh cannot be fixed using an upgrade it should be
removed ASAP.
I'd be interested to play with this, I think this kind of thing can be a
really neat and powerful tool, i've used xdialog in the past, which did
an ok job, i'm act
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > James C. McPherson wrote:
> >> 2) why don't Sun provide a torrent?
> >
> > Some of the third-party software in Solaris
> requires certain
> > agreements be made with those who redistribute.
> BitTorrent
> could be seen as allowing redistribution by people
> who have
> Thank you for your frank feedback.
>
> In order to help us to improve OpenSolaris and
> StarSuite please provide
> more details what particularly didn't work to your
> expectations. You
> mentioned missing documentation, can you explain what
> type of task you
> where about to perform? Where
43 matches
Mail list logo
