> I was always of the opinion that I could metadetach
> those failed sub-mirrors
> and then clear out any metadatabase's that may be on
> the physical devices ..
> then yank the disk because .. after all that there is
> no reason for there to
> be any IO right ?
That'd be the logical thing to thin
On 18/11/2007, Ché Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72
> > to b76...
> > >
> > > $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
> > > ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0:
> > open failed: No
Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>
>>> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>>
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>> The funniest thing: I'm still only a plain
>>
> contributor in the xwin-community, so is Moinak
> Ghosh!!!
>
>
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> The funniest thing: I'm still only a plain
contributor in the xwin-community, so is Moinak
Ghosh!!!
>
Have you emailed the X Window System Community and
asked for core contributor status
> Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72
> to b76...
> >
> > $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
> > ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0:
> open failed: No such file or directory
> > Killed
> >
> > truss gives:
> >
> > xstat(2
>
> Here is a real winner :
>
> # uname -a
> SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
> # cfgadm -al
> Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant
> Condition
> usb0/1 unknown emptyunconfigured ok
> usb0/2 u
> On Nov 18, 2007 11:07 PM, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> sun's manuals actually say you must run cfgadm
>
> Which makes a very good point that 'habbits' vs reading manuals should
> be in favor of reading manuals. Something I admittedly don't do
> enough.
I get fu
On 17 Nov 2007, at 03:29, Bryan wrote:
> Hello -
> I am getting a solaris 9 boot error -- I have a sun ultraSPARC 1
> 167MHz creator box' openboot 3.11 256MB RAM
This list is for the discussion of OpenSolaris, on which the eventual
successor to Solaris 10 will be based, and as such isn't a
>
> But can you get them in hard cover ? As a book I mean?
paperback, from iuniverse
http://corppub.iuniverse.com/marketplace/sun/0595285317.html
nacho
>
> Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> On Nov 18, 2007 8:31 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> let's have a look http://www.blastwave.org/man/cfgadm_1M.html
>> >>
>> > take a look at page 103 at the System Administration Guide: Devices
>> > and File Systems book
>> > it's 817-5093
>>
>> http://dlc.sun.com/p
On Nov 18, 2007 8:31 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> let's have a look http://www.blastwave.org/man/cfgadm_1M.html
> >>
> > take a look at page 103 at the System Administration Guide: Devices
> > and File Systems book
> > it's 817-5093
>
> http://dlc.sun.com/pdf/817-5093/
>>
>> let's have a look http://www.blastwave.org/man/cfgadm_1M.html
>>
> take a look at page 103 at the System Administration Guide: Devices
> and File Systems book
> it's 817-5093
http://dlc.sun.com/pdf/817-5093/817-5093.pdf
every now and again .. one must read the manuals. I once had the ent
On 18/11/2007, Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour of the less command
> > between b72 and b76. It now clears the screen at exit which I find most
> > annoying. Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
> >
Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour of the less command
> between b72 and b76. It now clears the screen at exit which I find most
> annoying. Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
>
> Anyway, why have the behaviour changed???
Yes. A fix we
>
> let's have a look http://www.blastwave.org/man/cfgadm_1M.html
>
take a look at page 103 at the System Administration Guide: Devices
and File Systems book
it's 817-5093
nacho
> Dennis Clarke
>
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Just try out if you do not understand the problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) MUCH more than intended is underlined
> >
> > Not that I can see. It appears to be working as I expect on my b76
> On Nov 18, 2007 10:47 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is one of those "oh I never knew that but wish I did topics" so I
>> figured I would make it into a thread and then see what we can learn from
>> each other.
>>
>> I'll tell ya, I have had no fun with dealing with a ma
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just try out if you do not understand the problem.
> >
> >
> > 1) MUCH more than intended is underlined
>
> Not that I can see. It appears to be working as I expect on my b76
> system and when I ssh into a GNU/Linux box I have access to.
If Caspe
On Nov 18, 2007 11:07 PM, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> sun's manuals actually say you must run cfgadm
Which makes a very good point that 'habbits' vs reading manuals should
be in favor of reading manuals. Something I admittedly don't do
enough.
Patrick
___
On Nov 18, 2007 6:57 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 10:47 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This is one of those "oh I never knew that but wish I did topics" so I
> > figured I would make it into a thread and then see what we can learn from
> > each
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
On Nov 18, 2007 10:47 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is one of those "oh I never knew that but wish I did topics" so I
> figured I would make it into a thread and then see what we can learn from
> each other.
>
> I'll tell ya, I have had no fun with dealing with a machine tha
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
> > > because I don't see one in b76 or b74.
> >
> > If you do not kn
This is one of those "oh I never knew that but wish I did topics" so I
figured I would make it into a thread and then see what we can learn from
each other.
I'll tell ya, I have had no fun with dealing with a machine that is Netra
class gear ( bullet proof ) which generally runs forever and ever
On Nov 18, 2007 8:14 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ sni sna snappie ]
> Depending on your storage HW, you have to still run some sort of SCSI quiesce
> equivalent on the device you plan to hot remove and hot plug.
>
As a funny coincidence I talked about this 'hotplug' saga with a S
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72 to b76...
> >
> > $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
> > ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file
> > or dir
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
> > because I don't see one in b76 or b74.
>
> If you do not know what I am talking about, I recommend you to repeat the
Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72 to b76...
>
> $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
> ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file or
> directory
> Killed
>
> truss gives:
>
> xstat(2, "/usr/sfw/lib/libcdio_p
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
> because I don't see one in b76 or b74.
If you do not know what I am talking about, I recommend you to repeat the
description I send before...
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (h
>You said that xterm was affected
yes, clearly if you change rmcup xterm will notice.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> The strange thing is, when I hot plugged the new disk
> in the whole machine
> went for a panic. Very annoying.
Depending on your storage HW, you have to still run some sort of SCSI quiesce
equivalent on the device you plan to hot remove and hot plug.
Contrary to the popular belief, hot plug
On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72 to b76...
>
> $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
> ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file or
> directory
> Killed
libcdio was removed due to a licensing
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > >Well, as I stated earlier, xterm was _not_ affected by this "bug" fix.
> >
> >
> > That may have been stated earlier but that does not make it true;
> > xterm *was* affected by this bug fix.
>
> I asume
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > >I asume that this "bug fix" now introduced the same kind of annoinganf
> > >buggy behavior with less that is known for a long time between Linux =
> > >and Solaris.
> >
> > Why on earth would you assume
On 18/11/2007, "Thommy M. Malmström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Well, as I stated earlier, xterm was _not_ affected by this "bug" fix.
> >>
> >
> >
> > That may have been stated earlier but that does not make it true;
> > xterm *was* affected by this bug fix.
> >
>
>
libcdio was removed in b75.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72 to b76...
$ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg
ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file or
directory
Killed
truss gives:
xstat(2, "/usr/sfw/lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0", 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT
xstat(2, "/usr/lib/libcdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I asume that this "bug fix" now introduced the same kind of annoinganf
> >buggy behavior with less that is known for a long time between Linux =
> >and Solaris.
>
> Why on earth would you assume that and not just read the fix which just
> rmcup and smcup?
You said th
>I asume that this "bug fix" now introduced the same kind of annoinganf
>buggy behavior with less that is known for a long time between Linux =
>and Solaris.
Why on earth would you assume that and not just read the fix which just
rmcup and smcup?
Casper
_
Here's a related question, that came up when I've tried Live Upgrade the
first time yesterday, trying to get from snv_72 to snv_76. Which failed.
The thing that blew the whole attempt up was that lucreate suddenly also
started copying /export and everything in it (everything starting with
/export/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Well, as I stated earlier, xterm was _not_ affected by this "bug" fix.
>
>
> That may have been stated earlier but that does not make it true;
> xterm *was* affected by this bug fix.
I asume that this "bug fix" now introduced the same kind of annoinganf
buggy behavio
>Anyway, I expect an editor to run the edit session in the alternate>
>screen and to switch back to the normal screen when ready.
>
>I expect a pager to display the file content in the normal screen and=
> to leave the content after the pager ends. Tis is how "more" works since ages
>and this is h
>Well, as I stated earlier, xterm was _not_ affected by this "bug" fix.
That may have been stated earlier but that does not make it true;
xterm *was* affected by this bug fix.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> >I would expect you to be a die-hard xterm user instead, in which case
> >you could just use the titleInhibit xresource property to get back the
> >behaviour you want.
>
>
> titeInhibit, not titleIhibit (it's derived from ti-te Inhibit; were
> ti and te are the termc
On 18/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >I would expect you to be a die-hard xterm user instead, in which case
> >you could just use the titleInhibit xresource property to get back the
> >behaviour you want.
>
>
> titeInhibit, not titleIhibit (it's derived from ti-te Inhib
>I would expect you to be a die-hard xterm user instead, in which case
>you could just use the titleInhibit xresource property to get back the
>behaviour you want.
titeInhibit, not titleIhibit (it's derived from ti-te Inhibit; were
ti and te are the termcap settings for smcup and rmcup.
Casper
On 18/11/2007, "Thommy M. Malmström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The init and term strings have been traditionally in "is" and "rs".
> >>
> >> The official termcap database from Eric Raymond includes:
> >>
>
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The init and term strings have been traditionally in "is" and "rs".
>
> The official termcap database from Eric Raymond includes:
>
> smcup=\E7\E[?47h
> rmcup=\E[2J\E[?47l\E8
>
> for xterm R6
>
> Let us disassemble:
>
> 'sc' -> '\E7'
On 18/11/2007, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > > > Seems as if there was a change in default
> > > behaviour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >If absolute cursor positioning did work before, it is obvious that
> >nothing was missing.
>
> Considering that both less and vi left arbitrary trash on the screen,
> it can be argued that they were missing.
>
>
> >Whether to clear the screen or not is a personal decisi
On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > > Seems as if there was a change in default
> > behaviour
> > > > of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> > > > cl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It fixed something which was broken since Solaris 2.0; it now works again
> as it did in SunOS 4.x and before.
>
> It's a religious issue and I think it now works again as it did in
> other OSes since a long time.
The problem is that these databases are wrong in many ca
>What is expected?
>Why do you believe they where missing?
If a terminal emulator needs special initialization to allow for
cursor addressing, then rmcup and smcup must be provided.
>If absolute cursor positioning did work before, it is obvious that
>nothing was missing.
Considering that both
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why do you assume this?
> >
> > Maybe you do not know how terminfo/termcap works.
>
> I know enough to still ask "why do you think the fix is incorrect?"
I still need to doubt
> > Let me add the output of my "cap" program that disaccembles term
>On 18/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It fixed something which was broken since Solaris 2.0; it now works again
>> as it did in SunOS 4.x and before.
>>
>> It's a religious issue and I think it now works again as it did in
>> other OSes since a long time.
>
>Indeed; it ha
> On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > Seems as if there was a change in default
> behaviour
> > > of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> > > clears the screen at exit which I find most
> annoying.
> > > Or is it the GNO
On 18/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It fixed something which was broken since Solaris 2.0; it now works again
> as it did in SunOS 4.x and before.
>
> It's a religious issue and I think it now works again as it did in
> other OSes since a long time.
Indeed; it has worked
It fixed something which was broken since Solaris 2.0; it now works again
as it did in SunOS 4.x and before.
It's a religious issue and I think it now works again as it did in
other OSes since a long time.
But it's largely a religious issue, as our internal mailing list
discussions on this sub
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour
> > > > of the less command betw
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour
> > > of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> > > clears the screen at exit which I find
On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour
> > of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> > clears the screen at exit which I find most annoying.
> > Or is it the GNOME terminal that h
> Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour
> of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> clears the screen at exit which I find most annoying.
> Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
> >
> > Anyway, why have the behaviour changed???
>
> Th
62 matches
Mail list logo
