Dear All,
I have installed open solaris on IBm Server.
When i am configuring network interface using console.i am not able to do it.
I ran dladm show-link, it shows bge0 status is unknown.
I have tried all the possible menthods to configure.
Request you to help me to resolve the issue.
Thanks for your support... I found the cause. Because of default tomcat
installed on sun solaris 10 x86 platform, is using Jdk 1.4 by default. I
installed separate tomcat with JDK 1.6 and now ,
opengrok is working properly
Thanks again...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 06.07.2010 16:21, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Oracle's interest in opensolaris is for the sake of improving solaris,
for use in servers. They have nothing to gain (except lots of headache)
by trying to make opensolaris good as a desktop operating system. They
cannot displace windows or osx
All I'm reading is that you think Oracle/Sun has such a great QA process (I
have no doubts about it) that it can ignore users' bug reports, they are just
going to prove what you've already found, which is sufficient for the
purposes of releasing your software.
This show how much *some*
On 07/ 6/10 04:36 PM, chuck bowers wrote:
I have been doubly stymied: I cant install my Epson CX94000 printer, and cant
find any printed help on the matter. The shelf model installation process is
filled with mystery (e.g., select from two unknown drivers) and unknown terms
(queue). I
Thanks for the clarification Alan :)
On 6 Jul 2010, at 22:46, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ben wrote:
While OpenSolaris isn't an open source project, isn't Indiana an open source
project?
That question seems to be confused about both what OpenSolaris is
and what open source is.
Indiana
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:16:00 -0700, Gary wrote:
Wow! I knew about the 90 day eval, but wasn't aware that included a
purchase of the DVD set?
Maybe the car companies should look into that kind of a deal. Someone
buys a car, but it isn't really theirs, they only get an eval for 5 years,
On 7 Jul 2010, at 04:11, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
i don't know about you, but personally I'd rather spend my time on my family,
social life, or developing useful pieces of infrastructure instead of trying
to figure out why compiz isn't working with the Intel embedded video chip on
an
On 7 Jul 2010, at 03:58, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
[Open]Solaris .. It's too tied to the Sun (and the old planetary) marketing
themes
Since Oracle just reverted the name of Sun Java System Web Server to one of its
original names, iPlanet Web Server, seems if anything they're trying to
On 7 Jul 2010, at 09:36, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
All I'm reading is that you think Oracle/Sun has such a great QA process (I
have no doubts about it) that it can ignore users' bug reports
I don't believe that at all. I don't know of any bug report that Oracle/Sun has
'ignored', now or in
On 7 Jul 2010, at 12:23, Calum Benson wrote:
Even your bug report contains identical information
(Sorry, that's supposed to say Even if your bug report contains identical
information...)
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation Ireland Ltd.
mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com
Since Oracle just reverted the name of Sun Java
System Web Server to one of its original names,
iPlanet Web Server, seems if anything they're
trying to preserve the old planetary marketing names
for Sun products...
If that actually happened, that demonstrates that while
Oracle may do better
If anything, at least iPlanet Web Server is much easier to say, and rolls off
the tongue better than Sun Java System Web Server.
Plus, I took an eCommerce class for iPlanet at a SUN education training center
in Dallas years ago.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
If anything, at least iPlanet Web Server is much
easier to say, and rolls off the tongue better than
Sun Java System Web Server.
Plus, I took an eCommerce class for iPlanet at a SUN
education training center in Dallas years ago.
Insofar as this is simply undoing the damage from the
last
On 7 Jul 2010, at 13:22, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Since Oracle just reverted the name of Sun Java
System Web Server to one of its original names,
iPlanet Web Server, seems if anything they're
trying to preserve the old planetary marketing names
for Sun products...
If that actually
i have created an additional loopback interface for
denying ARP reply for a certain ip, here are the
commands i have run:
ifconfig lo0:1 plumb
ifconfig lo0:1 x.x.x.x -arp netmask 255.255.255.255
up
secondly i need to make it permanent , so i tried the
following to insert into
the
On 07/ 6/10 10:48 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
But retrofitting a 25-year old multi-million line code base to be completely
thread-safe, much less thread-hot, is not a small task. And since we already
have GPU's that run 128 or 256 operations in parallel without adding
any threads to the core
Gary wrote:
If one purchases a Solaris 10 DVD set from Oracle, they have a valid license.
Does that permit one to download patches?
Who needs Closed source Solaris, when you have OpenSolaris, and other
Opensolaris distributions, anyway?
___
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nikola M
Gary wrote:
If one purchases a Solaris 10 DVD set from Oracle, they have a valid
license. Does that permit one to download patches?
Who needs Closed source
There is a lesson to be learnt herethe smaller the user group the greater
the costs of support and development.
It could be that Opensolaris is the ansawer but it needs a large user group and
wide appeal otherwise it will end up under these terms..
--
This message posted from
there IS a commercial benefit in trying to get (back) into
graphics workstations. The customer looking for a serious workstation
usually has less difficulty paying for quality than the user looking for
a webbrowser-in-a-box.
A lesson to be learnt from Mac's success.people see value in the
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jones
There is a lesson to be learnt herethe smaller the user group the
greater the costs of support and development.
It could be that Opensolaris is the ansawer
Hi Calum,
Calum Benson píše v út 06. 07. 2010 v 21:19 +0100:
On 6 Jul 2010, at 20:50, Rafael Barros Felix de Sousa wrote:
Without the open source community (usually made of hardcore users with
extensive knowledge of computing who usually work in IT companies or
universities) support,
Unless I misunderstand blackhole routing may be more what you are looking for?
route add -net x.x.x.x -netmask 255.255.255.0 interface_ip -blackhole
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Who needs Closed source Solaris, when you have OpenSolaris, and other
Opensolaris distributions, anyway?
I do. Why do you ask?
Why do anyone need to use something closed and proprietary when there is
open product available ?
(Opensolaris and distributions)
mongaron wrote:
i have created an additional loopback interface for denying ARP reply for a
certain ip, here are the commands i have run:
ifconfig lo0:1 plumb
ifconfig lo0:1 x.x.x.x -arp netmask 255.255.255.255 up
secondly i need to make it permanent , so i tried the following to insert
Calum Benson calum.ben...@oracle.com wrote:
It certainly happened, here's the latest mapping of
old Sun names to new Oracle names:
http://www.oracle.com/us/sun/sun-products-map-075562.
html
I'm not a great fan of some of them, but Oracle
does at least have a rather better history
At least IBM doesn't make it IBM AIX, IBM WebSphere, IBM Tivoli, IBM DB2, IBM
FileNet, IBM Lotus, etc. I'm going to vomit if they keep making everything
Oracle this or Oracle that.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
FWIW, the Gutenprint driver shipped in OpenSolaris supports this Epson
printer, so it should show up in the print manager
(system-config-printer) or CUPS web interface as an option for make/model.
-Norm
On 07/ 6/10 11:17 AM, Ghee Teo wrote:
On 07/ 6/10 04:36 PM, chuck bowers wrote:
I
Gary wrote:
At least IBM doesn't make it IBM AIX, IBM WebSphere, IBM Tivoli, IBM DB2, IBM
FileNet, IBM Lotus, etc. I'm going to vomit if they keep making everything
Oracle this or Oracle that.
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/aix/index.html - IBM AIX
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:07:30PM -0700, mongaron wrote:
i have created an additional loopback interface for denying ARP reply for a
certain ip, here are the commands i have run:
ifconfig lo0:1 plumb
ifconfig lo0:1 x.x.x.x -arp netmask 255.255.255.255 up
secondly i need to make it
On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Calum Benson wrote:
On 7 Jul 2010, at 04:11, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
i don't know about you, but personally I'd rather spend my time on my
family, social life, or developing useful pieces of infrastructure instead
of trying to figure out why compiz isn't
I've edited /etc/resolv.conf and added the nameservers... But I still can't
resolve the hosts' IPs...
It seems that everything is okay... I just can't understand what is going wrong.
Thank you for your help!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Oracle didn't develope any of them, they bought SUN. My plastering their name
on everything they are giving the impression they created it. Big difference.
And Oracle is really paying you to scour IBM sites to refute an opinion?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 7 Jul 2010, at 18:18, David Brodbeck wrote:
Is there any real reason to run compiz, other than so you can watch your
windows go up in flames or break into little tiny cubes when you close them?
I don't think anybody really uses those :) Some of the more subtle effects are
quite useful,
Well Sun Studio is now called Orcale Solaris Studio (OSS).
How does it fit with the Lniux [ex]Sun Studio version?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There is no direct, visible commercial benefit for
oracle to try to
displace ubuntu in the desktop market. There is
however a drawback
for Oracle's commercial success in case that Solaris
is no longer viable
on the desktop.
Jörg
Heartily agreed! But I am also looking at this
On 7 Jul 2010, at 18:43, Gary wrote:
Oracle didn't develope any of them
But they do now.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation Ireland Ltd.
mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com Solaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions
On 07/ 7/10 12:43 PM, Gary wrote:
Oracle didn't develope any of them, they bought SUN. My plastering their name
on everything they are giving the impression they created it. Big difference.
From your choice of words and some of the other statements in your
post, I will assume that you
Hello,
My setup is a single disk with ZFS on the root fs. With UFS the superblock is
8KB from the beginning of the disk. Is there a way for me to find how much
this offset is in ZFS?
I have tried 'od -A x-x c1t2d0s0 | grep 00ba b10c' , but it does not find
any matches.
--
This message
I'm well aware of what IBM bought.
So maybe you should engage your brain next time before you leap to conclusions.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Mike Toms mjack...@unitrends.com wrote:
Hello,
My setup is a single disk with ZFS on the root fs. With UFS the superblock
is 8KB from the beginning of the disk. Is there a way for me to find how
much this offset is in ZFS?
I have tried 'od -A x-x c1t2d0s0
On 07/ 7/10 02:21 PM, Gary wrote:
I'm well aware of what IBM bought.
That didn't seem apparent to me from my initial read of your reply,
though it's possible that I misunderstood or missed some prior context
where that was clearly imparted.
I'll go back to this for just a minute, since
On 07/ 7/10 01:43 PM, Gary wrote:
And Oracle is really paying you to scour IBM sites to refute an opinion?
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/79229
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 07/ 8/10 01:18 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Calum Bensoncalum.ben...@oracle.com wrote:
It certainly happened, here's the latest mapping of old Sun names to new Oracle
names:
http://www.oracle.com/us/sun/sun-products-map-075562.html
I'm not a great fan of some of them, but Oracle does
hwc. Hardware cursor movement on Xsun was handled
inside the
kernel driver, offloading some of the work from the X
process.
hwc did improve the interactive feel of the desktop,
even if
part of it was only aesthetic.
Yes, I appreciate that on SPARCs with suitable hardware running Xsun.
One
I'm wanting to fire up a new SSD for an L2ARC on a ZFS box I've put together,
and was looking at some of the new drives. Many of the faster ones, with great
read speeds, are SATA-6G compatible, and I'm wondering if any of you has gotten
these cards to work.
In particular, the Asus U3S6:
I don't think anybody really uses those :) Some of
the more subtle effects are quite useful, though,
such as the Exposé-like window switching.
So close to perfection - but this bug still bugs me:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10161
--
This message posted from
Adding my two cents:
I use OSOL as my everyday workstation OS. I prefer it to Ubuntu (very slightly,
see below), and definitely over WinXP and Win7. One MAJOR reason is that it
doesn't break. Ubuntu is always updating, and that reboot always involves a bit
of nervousness until the login screen
you are right i should have said what is my goal.
i am using SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris.
i am not running a zone with the same IP address ,actually no zones are running
at all.
The problem i am trying to fix is called LVS: The ARP Problem,
I have a suggestion. Let's call it Oracle [S]olaris [U]nix [C]ommunity [K]iller
[S]ystem until we see a real release.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Actually, there are some important features still missing in FreeBSD:
InfiniBand support, pNFS, Xen dom0 for x86_64, HA clustering suite, etc. But,
FreeBSD is always free! Not everyone needs all those missing features. Consider
that FreeBSD is and will always be free, it makes more sense to
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nikola M
Why do anyone need to use something closed and proprietary when there
is
open product available ?
(Opensolaris and distributions)
I don't know. Why does anyone
If I considered Solaris viable for the long-term (which I won't until we can
get answers from our sales team on all the policy questions), I would use it
for both desktop and laptop if I could.
Clearly I'd like at least some development systems to run the same OS as my
production servers.
yeah .. not quite as quirky in ubuntu - but the real thing in compiz/emerald
that drives me nuts is the sheer volume of configuration options - i think
apple got it right to simplify the visual effects down to a few key ones and
make them really simple for people to configure/use
personally
You seem to be operating under the delusion that a commercial support contracts
are magic bullets for protection from unplanned outages. Let me assure you in
reality it is far from it. Indeed, in many instances in house experts can
offer more expedient resolutions, especially for issues that
On 07/ 8/10 03:26 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
[context would be nice]
You seem to be operating under the delusion that a commercial support contracts
are magic bullets for protection from unplanned outages. Let me assure you in
reality it is far from it. Indeed, in many instances in house
57 matches
Mail list logo
