On 11/ 9/11 10:27 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Help spread the word!
Can you share a word or two on the plan for open source access? I ask
because you're posting this to what I thought was open source related
mailing lists..
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
Congratulations to the entire Solaris team for the work which went into this
release. I sat in a review today of Intel's Solaris engineering program,
presented by Bob Kasten. Very impressive accomplishment, gang!
Dave
Formerly "Intel Dave"
> -Original Message-
> From: Glynn Foster [mail
Our organization is currently in the middle of a multi-year project involving
multiple associate-organizations migrating a large software project from
Solaris 9 on SPARC to Solaris 10 on x86. I also have to admit that I am
somewhat biased as I believe that Solaris is one of, if not the best, Op
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"C. Bergström" wrote:
Did you pull the libc work from Garrett and drop that on there?
No, I just created a halfway clean base for starting with the emancipation
work.
Which compiler did you use to build onnv-gate?
OS-12.1
That's
build onnv-gate?
What are you doing for c++ and are the binaries from Solaris/OpenSolaris
able to run?
Which version of grub did you include on the ISO and or do you have any
other GPLv2 software linking against libc?
Where's the source to your patches? (I thought you have this all on
Berli
n't worry, I've re-opened it.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n't worry, I've re-opened it.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
he people who provide the code have constraints
placed on what is permitted by corporate lawyers, corporate
policies and even the US SEC (and other SEC-equivalents).
You don't screw around with those constraints.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jm
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Regarding the i18n code, do we have any sort of detailed specs on it such that
a motivated programmer could sit down with a stack of POSIX books and just
begin to hammer it out from first principals? I mean, without doi
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
2010/4/14 "C. Bergström" :
Umm..
#1 Roland is only handling the cli bits (Which with his help I replaced a
long time ago in osunix)
No, Roland has an own dropin replacement for libc_i18n.a using the
FreeBSD and AST sources as base for his work.
27;re referencing in libc. TOS
only handles the UNIX tm and certification. (I know I've talked with
them quite a bit) As others have talked about the Citrus wide character
support could be a relatively painless way to replace those as well.
Anyway.. I'm sure you could get things to
Using notes from this thread and the referenced pages, I image-updated build
111b to 132, installed osnet, redistributable, and sunstudio from the 2009Sep
tarball to set up for later builds. The image-update yielded SUNWonbld at
..0.132, and I secured the core tarballs and crypto bits from the
Thanks, Shawn, for the info and the blog pointer.
--JC
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The main opensolaris download page advises two things: that SXCE will no longer
be available past January 2010, but also that, "To build OpenSolaris from the
source, you first need to install a suitable OpenSolaris distribution, which at
this time is limited to the Solaris Express Community Rele
Only one of those addresses automatic/stack variables: Purify. Even then, for
Solaris you have to go back to Solaris 10u4 or so to get Purify support.
Yes, dtrace can find memory leaks. But that's kind of like using a crowbar as
a paperweight: it works, but there are a lot easier tools to us
Thanks for all the great information. It is very useful.
My inclination is to use the Sun compiler since that would expose my code to
the eyes of a different compiler (I find that to be a good thing in general). I
have a feeling that, considering the various pressures on my time, I may just
wai
Thanks for the information. I can see now that the headers get put into
/usr/include/gtk-2.0, which is not where the wxWidgets configuration program
expects to find them by default. Perhaps it can be told were to look...
I may install the wxWidgets package, but I am motivated to compile the libr
I'm attempting to compile wxWidgets on my OpenSolaris 2009.06 machine. The
configuration requires GTK related headers and such. For example, it attempts
to compile a test program that #includes gtk/gtk.h. Right now this fails as I
don't have that file installed. Is there a package for that? I sp
sage -
From: "Jonathan C. Bailey"
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:42:14 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SSH with public keys not working (not recognizing
the key file)?
Hmmm... Figured that...
BTW, I tried the same k
ser and as rsyncbackup without problem. I checked the
problem keys with ssh-vulnkey since they came from Ubuntu systems, but they are
marked as not blacklisted, so I'm lost again. Guess it's off to the security
list...
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Gerdts"
works.
BTW, I *did* turn root into a real user and added the 'PermitRootLogin yes'
line to sshd_config.
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Gerdts"
To: "Jonathan C. Bailey"
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:25:20 PM GMT -05:00 Colombia
Subject: Re: [o
c ntso" ssh-rsa KEY_TEXT rsyncbac...@ntso
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Pechanec"
To: "Jonathan C. Bailey"
Cc: "opensolaris-discuss"
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:47:51 PM GMT -05:00 Colombia
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SSH with public key
I seem to be having an issue with SSH from a Linux box to an OpenSolaris
2009.06 box. For some reason, the SSHd in OpenSolaris doesn't like my
authorized_keys file. Any idea as to why? It seems to be choking on the
command="" line. Any ideas?
debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type
'comm
Depends on what you mean by cheap, but I like the LSISAS3081E-R controllers.
They're PCIe SAS/SATA controllers. You will probably want to flash them with
the IT firmware rather than the IR firmware they're loaded with, but other than
that, they work great. Also, they run around $200 for 8 ports.
My experience with Adaptec SAS cards is that drives have to be in an array of
some kind before they're presented to the OS. I've been able to create
single-drive "arrays" on the Adaptec SAS controllers.
I suspect the Adaptec SATA controllers are pretty similar.
--
This message posted from open
Has anyone been successful in getting Freenx going on 2008.11?
I haven't been able to get any of the distributions floating around working.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.
(posting to this thread, too, since it seems to be the more active one)
It looks like Sun Studio 12 uninstaller is broken. I just noted the same
problem a few days ago, installing Sun Studio 12 on a new install of snv112. I
botched the install by doing it from the root home directory, which mean
It looks like Sun Studio 12 uninstaller is broken. I just noted the same
problem a few days ago, installing Sun Studio 12 on a new install of snv112. I
botched the install by doing it from the root home directory, which meant the
patch dry run failed (patchadd dry run runs as the user "nobody"
1. Hardware quality
Well, first off, with hardware you pretty much get what you pay for if you're
buying off-the-shelf gear. Yes, there are exceptions.
There's a reason that Dell is cheaper. For one example, I tried to used a Dell
SC440 in an IO-intensive role. The onboard SATA controller t
manifests are created from entire packages
just like any normal or sane packaging system you're still just as
likely to have unresolved dependencies or blockers. (I don't know for
certain a missing file can't pull for *any* manifest even one which
provides the same package at a d
Lurie wrote:
Do you have any clue how many patches Sun maintains
for packages in onnv-gate that never go upstream? Anyway.. they say
love is blind so it all seems fitting..
I am quite well aware of the patches in the on-nv gate, and they aren't as many as you
make them sound. Plus you a
Shawn Walker wrote:
C. wrote:
Do you know how many patches Sun maintains for packages that are never
accepted by upstream because they don't agree with the design or
implementation?
I can tell you with certainty that Sun works hard to ensure
contributions go upstream, it's ultim
Lurie wrote:
and in the end, we have yet-another-package-manager.
while I agree with you on some of the points, I have to say that I love IPS and
how it uses ZFS, if the code would have been based off some Linux package
manager then the changes would never go upstream due to the lack of
Erast wrote:
Just wanted to share this link as well:
Unrealistic worst case scenario: OpenSolaris likely will continue its
development on its own. Independent companies will start offering
OpenSolaris support as Nexenta Systems does today for its NexentaStor
product. The development may slo
Dennis Clarke wrote:
M. Oliver Ghingold wrote:
If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup?
The certification and registration process is time consuming and
expensive.
how expensive ? Are we talking internal costs and infrastructure or a fee?
Is this $1
Shawn Walker wrote:
C. wrote:
I'm not sure when I'll get to this, but I've started to brainstorm on
how to solve the offline install problem for IPS.. I've had a
wrapper shell script that is capable of pulling packages directly
from pkg.osol.o for a while. Yesterday I t
.
This is sweet!
Quick question.. am I missing it or I don't see an hg/svn repo for this
yet? Can you ping the list when it's on
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/ or available via hg repo.
Thanks!
./C
---
Community driven OpenSolaris Technology - http://www.osunix.org
f we had ports for more arches..
/me goes back to work..
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure when I'll get to this, but I've started to brainstorm on
how to solve the offline install problem for IPS.. I've had a wrapper
shell script that is capable of pulling packages directly from
pkg.osol.o for a while. Yesterday I took that and updated it to handle
th
recommend one that's suitable.
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Martin
I don't think you asked my permission to reproduce any part of my blog
so please find some restraint and not do that in the future.
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the time Apple
announced they were moving to Intel though.
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
w.com/trademark/trademark-domain-names/
or even better post your question to a legal forum or ask a lawyer..
Now I'm curious.. can you site a reference or which ™ you were scared of
using?
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
distro? For the sun stuff we
clearly know, but what about the others? sources, patches, build
recipe, spec files or equivalent.. just curious..
Thanks
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
looks interesting. Feel free to join #opensolaris-jp and say hi.
Thanks
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Miles Nordin wrote:
Yes things are mirrored..
http://hg.osunix.org/osunix-gate/
thanks, that's awesome!
Also realize that there's more sources/patches and a
lot of other things which are mirrored as well since onnv-gate alone
won't build itself.
You are saying that osunix-gate
I must say that I'm very discouraged to continue on these opensolaris-*
lists in the future. I think a few years ago when the program was first
inspired it was a community of optimism and less negativity. Proposed
constitution changes, acquisition rumors, and various other events
lately see
Miles Nordin wrote:
The thing I'd worry about most in such a catastrophe, would be forgetting
something. Has anyone actually mirrored all the branches in hg? Is it even
possible? Or you just expect it to be there?
Yes things are mirrored.. if people actually read the whole damn thread
in
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, C. wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of compromises
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it could
fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded version
which makes a lot of compromises?
You might have a look at MilaX and BeleniX.
But 8MB??? Forget about it.
N
Jonathan Blanchard wrote:
I just hope that the OpenSolaris community and innovation continues even in the
event of an acquisition. On the other hand it would fork and I wonder if
OpenSolaris would be able to continue on it's own...
I've bee working to try to create a sustainable developmen
For reasons which I don't care about Sun may not apply to be a gsoc
organization this year. However, I'm not discouraged from trying to
propose some exciting zfs related ideas. On/off list feel free to send
your vote, let me know if you can mentor or if you know a company that
could use it.
/
It's just a tarball you can extract to /opt/
gcc64.tar.gz <http://pkg.osunix.org/gcc/gcc64.tar.gz> == experimental 64 bit
version compiled with gnu ld
codestr0m-gcc-4.4.tar.bz2 <http://pkg.osunix.org/gcc/codestr0m-gcc-4.4.tar.bz2>
== really small c only 32 bit version compiled
exited with status 102 (database initialization failure)
Hi..
What happens if you follow what it says and
/lib/svc/bin/restore_repository or let it rebuild it completely?
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
works great as well.. The M2400/M4400 I heard had a
few problems, but can't confirm if those have been resolved. Let know
what bios revision or option you may need to tweak to get it working
./C
Hi
I made a mistake. The machine is actually a Dell Precision M2400. So
it seems we bought the
This thread seems to have become unproductive.. Can one of the /leaders/
(if there are any around) please bring this back on track, move this in
private or end it.
Thanks
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> This is what I ask for since a long time.
>>
>> Unfortunately, Sun does not seem to be interested in this as I already
>> enhanced
>> and fixed several utilities but there was no interest from Sun.
>>
>
> You mean no interest in creati
y to implement the low hanging fruit.. such as -i
in find and other things.. This way we try to keep the fast solaris
userland and add /mint/ where it makes sense instead of cp -rf gnu*..
Anyway.. this topic could go on for a long time..
Cheers
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
lude broken tools. (which is just common sense) If
you build newer versions of binutils there's bugs which may cause binary
corruption and other things.. I have a small list of gnu* brokenness if
interested, but most are known to those doing packaging.
./C
__
Hi all..
Apologies for cross posting this, but for those interested in an
entirely community driven OpenSolaris technology development effort
please feel free to subscribe to:
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/osunix-dev
Summary:
This list provides a place for new and old Open
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:17 PM, "C. Bergström"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alexander R. Eremin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:06 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>>>
>>>
Alexander R. Eremin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:06 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
>> Hi all..
>>
>> Apologies for cross posting this, but for those interested in an
>> entirely community driven OpenSolaris technology development effort
>>
Shawn Walker wrote:
> C. Bergström wrote:
>> 1) I've had some brief discussions with those involed on the tonic
>> team and while I hear lots of things about bugzilla being able to
>> accept patches blah blah.. When will it happen? I think in general
>> you g
Shawn Walker wrote:
> C. Bergström wrote:
>> Shawn Walker wrote:
>>> C. Bergström wrote:
>>>
>>> If have no idea why you think you can't do all of that using
>>> opensolaris.org, but good luck.
>> I emailed about having the ml created he
Shawn Walker wrote:
> C. Bergström wrote:
>
> If have no idea why you think you can't do all of that using
> opensolaris.org, but good luck.
I emailed about having the ml created here and was told I needed to
start a project.
I read the instructions at [1] and in all honestl
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "C. Bergström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> How do I replace the system libc?
>>
>> After I build it.. doing
>>
>> # Note.. cp libc and all other tools are 64bit..
>>
>> cp ./libs.so.1 /lib/amd64
&g
iv_addset(pset, priv) < 0) {
394 priv_freeset(pset);
395 return (NULL);
396 }
397 }
398 return (pset);
399 }
400
I'm hoping to fix this tonight..
Thanks
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
proper way to do
this.. I'll try mv next, but since they share so much of the same code I
doubt it will help.. (gnu move maybe.. ?) special utility on start-up..
some trick with mount?
Thanks
./C
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
open
e isn't available yet.. I'm addicted to the
quality of some of the code that SS12 and especially SSX is producing
otherwise I'd be 100% 1+.. I've been working on size optimizations which
code possibly pay off in the not too distant future for an embedded
platform.
Thanks
Try resizing your window after connecting.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It appears that you have a heap corruption problem.
Run your app under the dbx run-time memory checker:
dbx app
check -all -frames 16
run
If that doesn't isolate your issue, you can try using the watchmalloc library
and/or the race-condition thread capability in analyzer. See the man pages for
Hello!
I'm a newbie for crossbow.
I've tried to install "Crossbow Beta March 10 2008" according to the text "How
to BFU a System" step by step.
But after the step "Now apply the BFU (this one is for Crossbow beta). You must
use the full pathname!", i.e. "# bfu `pwd`/nightly-nd", I got a promp
> You need to do:
>
> Launch Button> Preferences>Apperance>Visual
> effects>none
>
> Log out & Log in.
>
> //Lars
Doesn't work. I'll try to attach a screenshot.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
op
I upgraded from SNV 89 to SNV 91 recently, and all the eye candy animation and
effects have slowed down SunRay displays enough to make it really, really
annoying to use.
Having text slowly fade in and out one fake line after another across the
screen when switching windows is painful after abou
How much RAM is on your server? And how big is your swap partition? 4-5 GB is
suspiciously similar to an amount of RAM you're likely to have on your server.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-d
The SUNWips driver should work.
I did have some panic issues when I was using the 32-bit version to access a
10-drive U2W array attached to a ServeRAID 4 card configured with 5 pairs of
mirrored drives all put into a ZFS raidz pool - the box would panic in the
driver when I hit the pool really
In case you are interested.
I recently sat in on a webcast with Sun talking about some of our work
optimizing OpenSolaris on Xeon. If you're curious about some of the
work we're doing, it's nice because I talk a little about the upcoming
Nehalem processor family and our work there.
http://
(after readok:) to a hard jump, but
quickly rejected that as reckless and very unlikely to work anyway. In the
meantime I found another post with this circumvention:
Boot install DVD
(C)onsole out of GRUB
Use chainloader +1
/and this worked/--the USB disk booted fine. But needing to keep the
You should be able to use the 32-bit library just fine under a 64-bit kernel.
If the library comes as a shared object, it won't even link to a 64-bit
executable at run time. And if it's a static archive (.a file), it won't link
into a 64-bit binary at link time.
This message posted from ope
soring CG?
>
> Sorry, what is CG?
> I'd like to help it as long as time I can spend and my English ability :-).
Community Group - in this case it's the Device Driver Community.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Micros
project page on Device Driver Community?
I think you need three "+1" vote to get started as a project.
I vote "+1" to this project proposal.
Who will be the project leads?
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.c
Michal Bielicki wrote:
> James C. McPherson wrote:
>> Manish Chakravarty wrote:
>>
>>> I am _seriously _ falling short on hardware requirements while trying
>>> to build KDE4 on Solaris I have _one_ machine right now, a sub notebook
>>>
>>
What does "ipcs -A" show? (I *think* Solaris 8 supports the "-A" option to
ipcs...)
Maybe there's a hint there. You should at least see the time of the last
semop() on the semaphores.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discus
>From: Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Why are there no 16 socket (or more) x64 (Xeon or Opteron) servers on
the
>market?
>
>1. is there no demand?
I had the chance today to pose this question to Intel's "Lead
Strategist" in the Digital Enterprise Group. His response was something
like this:
>
> The issue is NOT the fixed length input buffer in his
> program but rather
> the fixed length tty buffer in Solaris (256 bytes).
>
The point was that he has to drain the input as the buffer fills up.
I'd think using non-canonical input with min = 1 and time = 0 would work. Read
a char at
Wouldn't it be easier to just read the input using fgets(), fread(), etc. until
you get the entire string, then use sscanf() on the string you read?
Of course, there are a lot of issues with reading input like this. First and
foremost, how do you know when it's done? If you use a fixed-length
You might want to try running that app under dbx and using the run-time memory
checker to see if you can spot any errors:
dbx qlsc
(dbx) dbxenv rtc_auto_continue on
(dbx) dbxenv error_log_file_name /your/log/file
(dbx) check -all -frames 16
(dbx) run list -a wmc -q 8
(That's from memory, so if i
Once the crash dump starts getting written to disk, just hit stop-A again and
boot.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This should set it to 30 seconds:
ndd set /dev/tcp tcp_keepalive_interval 3
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dave - thanks for the feedback, will send to the appropriate engineer.
>From: Dr. David Kirkby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 6:27 AM
>
>Thank you Shawn. One of the things my laptop lacks on the Intel chip
set is
>any way to adjust the brightness level of the laptop's s
Well, we're trying. :-)
Sun has a great crew in Beijing working on the graphics drivers, and we
have a guy named Kan working with them who is relatively new on the
project. I don't believe we are taking the binary blob approach on
graphics because Intel graphics specs have been open for some
gen
Looks like a botched string conversion.
Biggest clue:
strlen(0x28)
That means the code is trying to take the length of a string with an address
really close to 0. That's pretty much guaranteed in this case to be either a
null pointer dereference, or a snprintf format-argument mismatch, where
Amen to that. Add Hierarchical Storage
I thought it ironic that the Linux world is spending this decade adding
the "business hardening" that we put into Unix in the late 80s and early
90s.
>From: Brandorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Also another interesting trend in Enterprise IT is that most of
ecoded wrong
4767154 Registers for fmul8x16, fmul8sux16, fmul8ulx16 decoded wrong.
4658958 dis misrepresents invalid opcodes
Thankyou in advance,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
___
opensolaris-discuss mail
> I'd be hesitant to use ad-hoc sources of information
> on the Internet unless I knew that information came
> from an authoritative source, such as from the
> engineer that worked on the product, or from someone
> that is a proven expert in the field. That presents a
> catch-22, because in order f
blogs yet, or should
I/we/... wait until it's solidified a bit more?
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer
Sun Microsystems
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:54:53PM +0100, a b wrote:
>
> > Most of those I know of rolled up their sleeves, and read and wrote
> > source code, not documentation.
>
> Right here.
> BTW, one's product is only as good as one's documentation and test suite.
>
> > What was the point you were trying
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:03:37AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > UNIX admin wrote:
> > > if I can learn once, and use anywhere
> > > and if I can write once, and use anywhere
> > > ergo I am more productive
> >
> > But this community is /not/ the Solaris admin
> > community,
> > it is a developme
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:11:37AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >you cant support source only packages and let your users compile them
> >anyway they want, there are simply too many variables to consider. I
> >think you actually void the support from redhat if you dont use one of
> >the pro
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:37:01AM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > There is a lot of cruft, like HOTLINE, ULIMIT, ORDER,
> > etc. Why there
> > is even a MAXINST parameter is a puzzle to me.
>
> One can have multiple instances of a single named package installed;
> that happens for example
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
