[ Mar 5 23:16:15 Executing start method ("/usr/sbin/smbd -D"). ]
ld.so.1: smbd: fatal: libavahi-core.so.6: open failed: No such file or directory
You're running into a newly introduced issue
7023783 Samba goes to maintenance on 159 due to missing libavahi-core.so.6
I expect this will be resol
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
Yes, the xVM packages are still present in 2010.11 although there are
known issues with them. And though the packages are there and I can't
speak to the dom0 roadmap, I should point out the following approved
ARC case from
It sounds like you may be running into 6914346 which is documented in
the release notes:
6914346 upgrade from OpenSolaris 2009.06 (111b2) to 130 fails with stale
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914346
After updating to build 130 or beyond, the system may panic
Your question is probably better asked on the mailing list dedicated to
IPS at least until the issue is root caused. I've cc'ed that list and
Bcc'ed opensolaris-discuss.
I have tried on both b133 and b134 to install Sun Studio 12u1,
Netbeans, Openoffice, and to do a system update. I am using a
You may be running into the following issue
6932552 early calls to cv_reltimedwait() are even less safe post 6919691
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6932552
The work-around is to boot with the GRUB splashimage, foreground and
background lines deleted and the ",console=
I've noticed that since b132 my laptop freezes under load. Just dies
without any message other than "memory pressure, tcp defensive mode
on". Probably short of memory. I've _only_ 1GB which used to be quite
ok for a laptop.
Are you certain it's actually frozen or just being *very* slow? If you
129: Xen manager did not even start
130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white
I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a.
Although I believe both of these issues have been resolved, did you
examine http://defect.opensolaris.org and/or
http://bugs.opensol
Logged as bug 13241: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
Looks like I can't upgrade (although I'm hoping there is a workaround).
If I let it run to completion, I see:
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILESXFER (MB)
Completed
OpenSolaris, at least according to David Comay & Co., is going for
Linux / GNU crowd directly, hence the forced-at-all-and-any-cost
replacement of System V utilities to GNU userland
Actually, that's never been stated as a goal in any form. What has
been said is there is a large com
While running OpenSolaris snv_116 I did an upgrade which created a new
BE running OS snv_118. I restarted OS and chose OS snv_118 to boot.
What I see is the OS boot screen with the progress bar moving and it has
been doing that for about an hour. Has anyone had success with this?
A reminder th
Other known issues in this repository update
6811922 PCIE init err info failed BDF 0x0 on snv_109 (Ultra 20 M2)
I asked about this before but never got a complete answer. Let's try again...
I have an Ultra 20, not an Ultra 20 M2, does that mean thi
[ I've moved opensolaris-discuss to the Bcc ]
> The utilities in question do not support Linux specific features. Why do you
> believe you will be able to feed back such enhancements for Solaris to the
> upstream?
Is it your personal experience that this is the case or can you point
to mail archi
> What is the strategy to "fix the utilities"? Will the GNU utilities be
> modified to be supersets of their Solaris counterparts? What is the strategy
> for the cases where the default behavior is different between the Solaris
> version and the GNU version (and/or when the GNU version is non-POSIX
> It would be better to go with the ATT AST tools
> (http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/). AST supports many of the
> BSD and GNU command line options missing in the native Solaris
> userland and conform to POSIX.
If those tools are truly compatible with the GNU variants and track
feature cha
> How exactly? by modifying the gnu tools? including some gnu and some
> solaris tools where the later do not challenge the familiarity? or
> modifying solaris' tools?
That's still to be determined although a number of people have been
looking at this. In some cases, the existing OpenSolaris tool
> i'm surprised that gnu chmod is installed, what are the advantages
> comparing to solaris chmod?
> It's very annoying when using ACLs.
The default environment at the moment is to prefer the GNU tools as
that is the more familiar environment for most developers and
end-users; over time, the plan
> Same for me after installing package SUNWtoo, and the fact that they have
> removed the failsafe from the 05/08 version makes this one hell of a disaster.
Before trying to install SUNWtoo, did you follow the steps documented
at the front of the release notes (labeled "Important Package Update
I
> I'm using the GUI guest OS installer in virt-manager. Here is my setup for
> the VM:
I believe there are changes to virt-manager(1) and/or virt-install(1M)
that are required to support 2008.05 as a PV guest. I would suggest
sending your question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the xVM team
know what t
[ Removed opensolaris-discuss from the Cc and Bcc'ed advocacy-discuss
and opensolaris-discuss. Folks, can we try to exercise some basic
email etiquette here? ]
>> Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
>> either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an
> It is when you consider that pcn does not work and the ae driver does.
As Alan mentioned, a number of folks have been looking into "ae". One
issue that several folks identified (at least on the Indiana prototype)
is that "ae" seemed to lock up on bulk transfers while the "pcn" driver
did not:
[ Bcc'ing advocacy-discuss and opensolaris-discuss to reduce cross-posting ]
Peter,
> It would help a lot if the aims of this project were clearly explained
> and enunciated, because I for one haven't a clue what they are, and
> the more I think about it and look at what has been announced and
>
>> Can you provide some details on why you think Indiana is or will be any
>> less standard's compliant than SXCE is? It may very well turn out that
>> it may be less compliant but that hasn't occurred yet and so I'm just
>> trying to understand where you're coming from.
>
> If Indiana is/becomes
> Not everyone agrees with you on this. It is my understanding that SXCE
> releases will continue, and until such time as standards compliancy is
> actually considered a goal of Indiana, it is of little interest.
> Frankly, if forced to discontinue my reliance on SXCE, I will likely go
> to ShilliX
> The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards compatibility has been broken.
First of all, you're talking about a prototype and nothing more. Such
an artifact is similar to the BFU archives available from many projects
on opensolaris.org and the ISO represents the (initial) output of a
project.
> So, I gave Solaris 10 (11/06) a shot. Solaris barfed all over me; like
> a girlfriend you love but who just can't get it together, it wouldn't
> get past the initial display probe and gave me an unintelligible (read
> bank) GUI screen. So it was a text based install, which I don't mind,
> as wi
> For example knowing that libreadline is under the GPL
> rather than the
> LGPL or CDDL would be good information, particularly
> since libtecla is
> available as an alternative set of functionality.
One idea some of us have thrown around is to provide a command to provide this
information giv
These ARC cases are for integration to Solaris, so /opt is inappropriate,
and /usr is correct.
Oh in that case, I agree. *Provided* that the CoolStack stuff will replace
the current stuff on the Solaris distribution media.
Just for clarification, the integration that Stefan is working on isn'
Stefan,
2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration installs Apache in
/usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing Apache 2.0.x. Valid
arguments have been made pro, and against this approach, with the suggestion
that Apache 2.2.4 installs in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving the e
It would be good to capture this request using http://bugs.opensolaris.org/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1
A nit however, there are no such things as local zones. :-) The proper name is
"non-global zones".
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The issue was introduced during the development of Solaris 10 and not via
OpenSolaris. It's present in all Solaris 10 releases (although thanks to
Secure by Default in Solaris 10 11/06, the port in question is disabled by
default in the current version).
A reminder that official patches are n
+1
dsc
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ryan,
You might try asking directly on security-discuss as that's where the SSH
minded folks hang out.
dsc
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
By the way, you might be able to boot up Belenix's LiveCD by including the
option "-B disable-ath=true" on the GRUB multiboot line.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The Atheros NIC is supported by Nevada's bundled "ath" driver but there are a
few chipsets that are affected by
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6472427";>
6472427
which causes a hard hang when the driver attaches. It appears that the AR5005G
may be one of the affecte
Yes, it is. Both the ability to cap physical memory (memory sets) as
well as the ability to cap virtual memory (swap sets).
Will it be available in sol 10 next release as well ?
No, not in the upcoming Solaris 10 update release. These particular
features are not yet in Solaris Express, eith
Have you considered requesting such support via
http://www.opensolaris.org/bug/report.jspa
Having such requests for enhancements let the community know about the missing
functionality and provides a way to track its progress (at the moment, modulo
any issues with bugs.opensolaris.org!)
Please
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up the
DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some inqueries myself but the DLJ folks might know the answer and
certainly would want to know ab
Thanks for the update. I take it the workaround (copying files)
will also work for b46?
I believe so although I haven't tried it myself.
dsc
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> emm Solaris Exress 5/06?
That's the *next* release of Solaris currently under development which will
follow Solaris 10.
It's codenamed Nevada.
> I remember the version of my solaris10 is 6/06 (it
> should not be an Express,
> just a formal release) just like following:
>
> bash-3.00# unam
I believe the issue is resolved in snv_48.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Starting with Solaris Express 5/06 (as well as the upcoming Solaris 10 update),
you can
assign extra privileges to a zone using the "limitpriv" property. In your
particular example,
you would perform the following for a zone named "myzone"
# zonecfg -z myzone
zonecfg:myzone> set limitpriv="defa
http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Download
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sorry, that should be copy /usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/fonts.alias.all
over to
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/fonts.alias
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I believe another work around (if the install media isn't available) is to just
copy /usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/fonts.alias.all over to
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
This is a known issue and is being tracked as
6445132 CDE stopped using the correct system interface fonts
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> really just a placeholder or an information page. It
> may be reasonable for
> admin purposes ( or just common sense ) to create a
> "ports" section on the
> OpenSolaris site but at the moment there are no other
> ports. Unless we see
> a port to either x86 or Sparc as a "port" when they
> alre
This issue is currently being tracked under
6419446 RFE: zoneadm should dlopen libzfs.so to avoid patch accumulation
problems
But note that you're not required to use ZFS with zones - you just need, at
this time,
the relevant ZFS packages installed.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> I would like to know if the observed behavior listed
> below is the expected one, because I was a little bit
> surprised about it.
>
> - nis/server and nis/client are disabled after
> upgrade although they were enabled before
I believe you're encountering
6447397 Solaris 10 Update 2 up
There isn't a way at this time to change a package's status after it's been
installed.
Please feel free to file a RFE at bugs.opensolaris.org as this ability might be
useful.
As a workaround, I believe you can pkgrm(1M) the existing package and then
pkgadd(1M)
it again, this time specifying the
> - patchadd -R /a 118844-27
> u will see an error indicating 'gzip: not found'.
> It does not complain that the patch installation
> failed. After rebooting the system, the system will
> not boot.
This is a known issue and it tracked as
6401926 new-boot KU can not be applied from
> One of the rare things I like in Linux, is how Linux
> solved this: regardless of the networking HW, all
> interfaces are named "eth[0-N]", for example eth0,
> eth1, ... , ethN.
>
> Perhaps this would be a solution to consider? There
> can still be bge0, and iprb0, iprb1 or ce0 in the
> system,
> To be particular, if I have a Solaris kernel tunable
> pertinent to Oracle on Solaris 8, what do I do with
> this tunable on Solaris 10 when the tunable is marked
> as "obsolete"?
You would set (if required) a corresponding resource control. For more
details, see the
following chapter from the
It appears the SX 5/06 release is now available from the usual link
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Could you make the complete install_log file available somewhere for us to
peruse?
I suspect the details there might shed light on what happened with the
installation.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ope
Unfortunately, I can't speak to a date but the work is well underway.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
No, this functionality is not yet available in Solaris Express.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> This is one place where he might have a half valid
> point. There should be some better mechanism to
> patch a zone without having to bring it up. There
Agreed which is why in Solaris 10 1/06 it doesn't actually
boot the zone if it's not running - instead, it "mounts" the zone's
file systems
> One more clarification, do we have a plan
> to introduce a layer or a kernel module
> in uts to leverage underline HW capabilities
> for resource management and allocation
> per processor usage. Specifically, due to
> the maturity of the cores, and core afiliation
> and evolution of CMT on Solar
Many, if not all, of the presentations are available here
https://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/os-presentations/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
In addition to the Solaris Internals book, please also review the proposed
OpenSolaris
Development Process draft
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/os_dev_process/
which describes in some detail a set of high-level design principles for the
project.
This message posted from op
As yet, Solaris is unable to cap the memory usage of a zone as an container,
only the individual projects/tasks/users from within the zone.
That's correct.
Is the above facility upcoming?
Yes, it is. Both the ability to cap physical memory (memory sets) as
well as the ability to cap virtual
> The build infrastructure is fairly straighforward.
> What's not straightforward,
> is the development process. OpenSolaris process is
> based on the Solaris process,
> you can read about it here:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/os_dev_process/
Just a minor clarification - alt
Here are a couple of resources which go into this
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/resources/comay/zones-opensolaris.pdf
(slides 30 through 32)
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/application_in_zone.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
o
So, this all begs the question, why isn't Sun making more of an
effort to define a workable OpenSolaris process for interface
review. There should be something on the http://www.opensolaris.org/
website addressing this topic, even if it just says "We are
working on figuring it out. Here are the
65 matches
Mail list logo
