I need to know exactly when the snapshot gets committed to the disk so I can
backup my disk.
You access your disk (for backup purpose) via operating system. The OS will
show you the disk in the logical state in which it got after all write
operations, regardless of whether they were
-based, and new data *was* written to
disk, but changes were not committed, and new boot environment was not created
(process hung), and thus you see just your previous boot environment or
snapshot, and not see new data. ZFS preserves you from failed installations.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted
I was running 3.x version of Vbox
Have you tried to create a new virtual machine in the latest version of
VirtualBox rather than trying to run the buggy instance of older version VM?
This will require to install/configure OpenSolaris though, but this should not
be so hard to do.
--
This
:))) It was 06.06.2006 when Apple transitioned to Intel processors, am I wrong?
If seriously, November is too far date IMHO. Let's see what Oracle will present
at April 14th:
http://event.on24.com/r.htm?e=298093s=1k=12D718A6822685EE6AD2390FC381A7AEpartnerref=opensolaris
Dmitry.
--
This message
I expect this will be resolved in a build or two
But there are no new builds for OpenSolaris... Are you talking about Sol 11 or
OpenIndiana?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I think the only noticeable limitation with 32-bit processor is amount of RAM
supported. Otherwise it should be fast.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is an attempt to continue OpenSolaris development
independently of Oracle - see http://openindiana.org/ .
There are other OpenSolaris-based distributions, as Erik has mentioned. I would
add this link for them: http://www.genunix.org/ .
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I think that Solaris has a lot of unique and useful security features
including RBAC, zones, Trusted Solaris Extensions, and much more
useful audit features than Linux provides. I think RBAC/pfexec is a
lot more secure than using sudo or PolicyKit, for example.
Thanks Brian. I knew that I
is suitable
for a server.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It's better to use http://www.opencsw.org/ IMHO - they have more recent package
versions.
Sorry for not providing solution to your problem.
I follow the blastwave.org
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Windows + virtual machine + OpenSolaris would load CPU heavily, and high fan
speed is usual in this case.
Nothing running - do you mean OpenSolaris on bare hardware?
At present I'm running a virtual
machine (with Windows)
and Gnome but I get the same fan speed even when
there is nothing
a part of
your pool, and the new one is not), and then replace it again in the proper way
- with special commands before and after replacing.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
We haven't done any detach command. I simply went for the replacement.
Probably you can undo such replacement - plug back the faulty disk, then
import the pool, and only then something like
# zpool remove ...
replace the faulty disk with the new one
# zpool add ...
- Dmitry
What is the root password when i boot from live CD?
opensolaris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
available.
Returned to work, where server is *updating*. Re-checked repository settings in
Package Manager. The only repository there is
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release/ .
How comes that my server is updating?
When the update will be complete, I will report results.
- Dmitry.
--
This message
It has been updated to snv_134b . But why?
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks Alan.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
pay my own money to have a pleasure
knowing that I have a proper server.
There are countries where sysadmin's yearly salary is less than current price
for Solaris support contract. It's a shame to say so, but I am in one of them.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Not only one computer, but in the hardware environment identified by us.
Show them all your PCs, and they will choose :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
AFAIK, he needs to (automatically) create new users where username contains
only digits.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and the forum could be better organized like this one for example
I could not find a forum at openindiana.org at all... Is it exists?
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
My request is rejected with:
Your subscription is not allowed because the email address you gave is
insecure
Try to contact Alasdair Lumsden at alasdai...@googlemail.com - he is the
creator of OpenIndiana project.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
the problem, I am
visiting opensolaris.org .
All these follow us on twitter and see us on facebook simply irritate me,
especially when seen on front page of a serious site, like an official site of
a well-known company.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
If you haven't tried it, what do you base the assesment on. You know someone
who has done this, or heard of it being done somewhere?
I am running Windows 7 64bit at home as a host, and Windows XP, OpenSolaris and
OpenIndiana as guests under VirtualBox. No problems at all. I think that
). Virtualized
Windows 7 should work well for calculations such as rendering, but not
real-time rendering on screen. Virtual graphics card is far less good than a
real one.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
According to the Wikipedia article on Windows 7, Home Premium 64-bit edition
is limited to 16GB, and higher editions are limited to 192GB.
Thanks for the info, I didn't know.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
the system responded cannot open tank; no such pool
Is the tank pool listed in the output of zpool status?
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
What I'm asking here is if running a virtual windows 7 would be able
to take good advantage of the 24 GB or ram?
I think that VirtualBox will be fairly able to allocate most of the 24GB of RAM
to guest Windows 7 64bit. I did try myself though.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from
the license acceptance form displayed when the user actually installs from
these images lists additional uses including commercial and production
environments.
Obviously for those who are paying for support contracts.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
And realistically, having the source code is nice and all, but how many
people really compile ON anyways? Most folks just want something they can
download, install, and use.
Right.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
So to all ... thinking they have to switch to Linux ... You can still have
your Solaris for free
What about those who are using OpenSolaris for a production server? I think
running OS 2009.06 is an option, at least while it does not need any serious
security patches (not counting OpenIndiana
Well OpenSolaris 2009.06 has production pay-for support.
Well I'm not willing to pay, like the rest of the community (if I could
understand right community inclines),I just willing to use the latest OS from
Sun, which is officially free to use in production environment, and which is
the
From THE (alas, ex-company), which was...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
projects with more
than 400 inventions, and will be the result of more than 20 million person
hours of development and over 60 million hours of testing.
Can Illumos developers spend 20 million person hours of development?
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
only for evaluation and development purposes... We have to wait for the release.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Did Oracle really spend 1 man years?
Yes, I ask myself the same question :)
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Given that the development metric quoted there is the cumulative historic
investment in the existing code-base, Illumos would probably be just as
justified as Oracle in making the same claim.
Agreed. 20 million hours cannot refer to (Open)Solaris 10 - 11 improvements.
- Dmitry
us IPS source code after Solaris 11 is released?
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
your applications, and not for any other purpose.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There's also a community distro in the works, stay tuned.
Is this the Illumos project?
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I've never heard of any version of Solaris, commercial or otherwise,
that was purposely crippled to use only limited RAM, disk space,
and CPU cores.
That's because Solaris was under Sun, not under Oracle.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
to 1GB of memory, and use one CPU
on the host machine.
Note the word Express in the product name.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
What's your point? IBM has had DB2 Express for quite some time.
Every company has their own product naming guidelines. Express from IBM means
other thing than Express from Oracle.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
What are you talking about?
I am talking about *Oracle* product, which is limited in memory usage, disk
space usage, and CPU usage, and has word Express in the product name.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
be functionally
limited - compared to full Solaris 11.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I afraid that it may be functionally limited - compared to full Solaris 11.
... and compared to OpenSolaris :(
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
At the time when latest OpenSolaris source code is still available, a fork
attempt is possible. We see (and put our hopes into) the Illumos project. There
are Nexenta and others.
The question is: Which fork will receive the most stunning evolution? Solaris
11? Illumos? Other? The answer is not
to power up a small university
server.
Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
i think IPS repos might soon disapper
We still have http://www.blastwave.org/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
most OpenSolaris users today have no idea what ON is
Indeed, I had to (google) search to find out what ON is - to understand
better what Illumos project is all about.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I suggest ImOS (yeah, that's called I am OS, contrasted with I am a PC and
I am a Mac
- iOS ? (if not copyrighted already by Apple)...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is great to have a community-driven OS/Net consolidation, but... what the
point to do a secret preparation work and announce the project release date,
if we still cannot see any information on illumos.org on how to build the
OS/Net? Or maybe download any binary? We only know that the
SoLarry's OS
+1
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You may want to read up on the ancient Unix idea of setuid root software
before making such proclamations.
Sorry for this. I am not a UNIX guru, indeed.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
sound-juicer is started by a non-root user the process runs as root and writes
its files as root
If this is true, this is a huge security hole. Someone should investigate the
problem. As far as I could understand, Sound Juicer does not know root
password, however bypassing this somehow. Total
It's summer. Programmers gone mountain-climbing ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sorry, meant to reply to mdemarco...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
revolt against ORACLE and get OpenSolaris out of their hands
I afraid that they *own* this project/product.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have noticed that moderation is already in place. Some (maybe off-topic,
maybe not) posts are deleted almost immediately.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Unless you have very specific examples of said post removals, you should not
make such asssertions
Here you say that there is *NO* moderation.
I have two examples, though can cite them only using my memory, as they are
disappeared. Maybe not worth citing them actually.
As for moderation, it
Sorry, I have found *one* of the disappeared posts. It was strangely placed
in the post tree. Not sure about the other one.
And it is still unclear whether there is moderation here.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
We do occasionally remove things when they very clearly violate the TOU
Thank you. This answers my question.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Have you Network Auto-Magic, aka NWAM, disabled?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For me, installation of 2009.06 version on a 2-disk machine was fast and easy.
It was extremely slow however until I have changed my old worn-out CD-ROM drive.
What I would wish to see in the future, is an option to setup a ZFS mirror at
installation stage.
--
This message posted from
Knock it off you guys.
If you want to have legitimate discussion of the merits of different
platforms, by all means. But this is stupid. Please do jump ship, so you
won't care about this mailing list anymore.
Oh, what a hostility! Say Linux, and you're not an IT guy, but totally enemy!
BTW, you
RHEL, SLES, or possibly Debian
Would you recommend Fedora?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You shouldn't pay for reverse-engineered codecs (at least at Russia)
That is you say that taking stolen things is legal (but not anywhere)?
You shouldn't pay to capitalists for something that may be legally received
without any fee
If *legally*, indeed, I agree. How capitalists are involved in
rd...@znas:~$ ls -l /dev/dsk/c*d0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 апр. 19 09:03 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0 -
../../devices/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@9/pci15d9,5...@0/s...@0,0:wd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 апр. 19 09:03 /dev/dsk/c4t1d0 -
Simple:
it might be an EFI partition is required. It should be created with:
format -e
:)
rd...@znas:~$ ls -v /dev/dsk/c*d0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 апр. 19 09:03 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0 -
../../devices/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@9/pci15d9,5...@0/s...@0,0:wd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
pfexec format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c4t0d0 ATA-ST31000528AS-CC38-931.51GB
/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@9/pci15d9,5...@0/s...@0,0
1. c4t1d0 ATA-ST31000528AS-CC38-931.51GB
/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@9/pci15d9,5...@0/s...@1,0
2. c4t2d0 ATA-ST31000528AS-CC38-931.51GB
Does anybody know - Will the online upgrade process be more reliable in the
future versions?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn - just change the hosts line of /etc/nsswitch.conf to be:
hosts: files dns
I wonder why this is not the default setting. I had to apply exactly this
change in order to just surf the web.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Sadly no OpenVPN!
Yes, some kind of VPN client please!
Hope developers are listening...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Only to leave an never return.
But you're still here? ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
can nexenta become the fork?
Just my opinion:
1. It cannot. Nexenta is mostly Ubuntu with OpenSolaris kernel. Nexenta
engineers do not contribute (much) to OpenSolaris codebase. They are Oracle
(Sun) engineers who do.
2. The fork is not needed. OpenSolaris is actively developed at Oracle and
Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
134 dev build, is suitable for this?
can i upgrade it to realese in the future?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Yesterday I received a victim.
SuperServer 5026T-3RF 19 2U, Intel X58, 1xCPU LGA1366 8xSAS/SATA hot-swap
drive bays, 8 ports SAS LSI 1068E, 6 ports SATA-II Intel ICH10R, 2xGigabit
Ethernet
and i have 2 ways Openfiler vs Opensolaris :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I create lx zone on UFS and then move to zfs
(on ufs i saw trouble too)
[i]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bdump]$ df -hT
FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
none ufs179G 64G 116G 36% /
SQL CREATE TABLESPACE BITEST
DATAFILE
SIZE 4G AUTOEXTEND OFF,
SIZE 4G AUTOEXTEND
One more tunable disassembler can be found on:
https://maxwellassembler.dev.java.net/
It has definition of SparcV9 instruction set.
It was used to generate ssembler/disassembler in Java.
However, generation of disassembler in C still have to be implemented.
This message posted from
Hello all.
Where i can find information about differences between fletcher2, fletcher4,
and sha256 algorithms for ZFS checksums?
Thank you.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ok, sorry for my english, you are misunderstand me.
My question is very simple:
Whether is at Solaris what or a free-of-charge opportunity to receive updating?
(may be latter then Sun Service Plan-owners)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I have a href=http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=102448;some
problems with registration Solaris 10 06/06/a for receiving pathes without
Sun Service Plan. Whether there is any another FREE way for downloading
updates, for example as in Linux Fedora?
This message posted from
I remind, what it hang not only boot, but and at work.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm disappointed,
i'll change sysytem disks and install Windows 2003 x64, if it will work good,
i'll take leave of Solaris :)
maybe it is too early for production
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
big text, i attach it at first message
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
32G ram 4x dual Opteron
often, every time after (reboot, init 6)
sometime on power on
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
now i see hp.com
software and drivers
HP ProLiant DL585 Server, Sun Solaris 10 x86 Platform Edition
HP System Management Homepage for Solaris (x86) 10 2.0.0 [b]new 18 Jul 06[/b]
so it should be work
???
This message posted from opensolaris.org
can i use this method for debug acpica at boot?
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/danasblog?entry=solaris_acpi_ca_debug_output
I try it today later
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
i don't now, i'm muzzy
now i'll try to boot
with difeerent options
reboot -- -B acpi-user-options=
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
YES it's mine,
i have this bug with d585 and dl385 (i have both)
it has latest firmware
DL585 (A01) Servers version 2006.03.22 A (13 Apr 06)
DL385 (A05) Servers version 2006.03.01 (28 Mar 06)
tomorrow morning i'll continue testing, but i don't have many time
i belive you don't leave me
That is, if you power cycle the machine, it will boot
without hanging,
at least sometimes?
if power off, on - usually it boot (sometime not)
echo ::interrupts | mdb -k
ope the ::interrupts command is supported by S10
6/2006)
[b]# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k
mdb: invalid command
I just began to look at the ACPI code and spec. I
have no furher idea for now. If I have another one I
will let you know.
thanks, i wait impatiently ...
i must to make decision, use Solaris or not
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Is the hang with oracle reproducable? Does is always
hang when you
run a certain database command? For example when you
have
tablespace allocated to files on a logging ufs
filesystem, and you
drop such a file (= remove a big file from a logging
ufs filesystem) [*] ?
now i try to start
Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot
when I shutdown server and power on,
solaris sometimes start, and working good,
sometime hang
but after reboot (or init 6), usually boot hang on
SunOS Release 5.10 Version
Copyright ...
Use is subject to license terms
HELP!!!
This
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:21 -0800, Ché Kristo wrote:
James is right, look if you want to track pilot users just make them
register. Seriously...creating your own little secret society isn't going to
achieve anything.
we explained already why we do pilot program first.
the rest is just yours
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:28 +0100, Frank Hofmann - Solaris Sustaining
wrote:
indeed. Also having something like FUSE framework available for SunOS
platform should speed up development of variety of popular FSs, like
smbfs, googlefs, and others listed here:
.
Before anybody will start doing anything in this regard, lets contact
FUSE development list and ask them on what they think about this idea
and whether they are willing to help...
Dmitry
Jörg
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
is very clear. hello world filesystem could be written in less
than a 100 lines of code.
10+ language binding exists, including Java, C#, Python, Perl etc..
Dmitry
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 03:19 +, Bruno Delbono wrote:
Hi All,
It would swell if I/we get an option to mount a NTFS partition
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Serge wrote:
- sorry for the duplicate mail...
- sorry also for relating about what is not sticktly Openwin considerations.
But however a little : my FlightGear, as well pkg-get installed (with Mesa)
for x86 on a standard
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
