On 11/15/11 9:55 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Harry Putnamrea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Is there some different way to change host name in oracle-solaris 11?
There is no /etc/nodename file. and I find the only place under /etc/
the hosts' current name is referenced is
On 12/29/10 3:05 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
I keep finding some basic SMF how to guides, but none seem to be able to answer my quandary: There
are command line substitutions in some of the manifests exec strings %m,
%i, etc. Where can I find information about what substitutions are available
What does 'dladm show-link' show?
On 10/16/10 12:56 PM, Willian wrote:
Here are the commands i've typed. And additionally, a image of my screen.
j...@opensolaris:~$ svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
j...@opensolaris:~$ svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
On 08/25/10 02:07 PM, Tom Chen wrote:
Hello,
I just installed a recent version of Solaris Express, snv143. I noticed that
somehow, it is difficult to manually setup ip address to a port that is not
configured by default.
I used to use ifconfig to manually plumb and assign IP addresses, but
Detlef drew...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
with b111a now I can boot again my Toshiba M9.
1.I discoverred that Power Management seems no longer to work.
(The fan is blowing like hell and kstat -m cpu_info shows in
currentClock_Hz 200100
but
supported_frequencies_Hz
Dinarto wrote:
Thanks, Mark.
I'm checking the server as it's installed at customer's premises.
But, have you checked section #1, whether my informations that were filled
there are correct or not ?
There is no way for me to verify the information that you are supplying.
However, your
Dinarto wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to test WAN Boot.
I refer to this URL for WAN Boot :
http://www.herckb.com/2007/10/04/guide-to-wan-boot-with-solaris-10/
with the script-ready in this URL :
http://www.herckb.com/bvhuploads/2007/10/wanboot.zip
WAN Boot Server IP : 10.2.248.138.
Client
Mark Wagner wrote:
I've got a SunBlade 100 running a fairly recent copy of OpenSolaris. Is
there some way to keep it from powering down the hard drives when they've
been idle for a while?
Well, you could disable power management altogether (see autopm in
power.conf(4)). Or you can just
Roman Morokutti wrote:
Go and check your laptop BIOS setup for energy saving modes when
on batteries first.
I have done this. Checking the BIOS showed me that there is no
configuration for such settings.
The laptop is a Compaq nx6325 with BIOS 68TT2 (F.07) from HP.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was adjusting PERMS in /etc/default/sys-suspend and noted the absence of a
CDDL there.
That file comes out of the CDE consolidation. I don't know that is is
covered by the CDDL.
# uname -a
SunOS charon 5.11 snv_79a i86pc i386 i86pc
#
# cat sys-suspend
#
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Luke Deller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris nv83a is reporting similar errors on my Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6
motherboard using a quad-core Q6600 CPU. The following two lines are
repeated for CPU instance 1, 2 and 3:
Mar 4 23:19:06 behemoth
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Mark Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Luke Deller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris nv83a is reporting similar errors on my Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6
motherboard using a quad-core Q6600 CPU
Rocky, I patched the Solaris CPU driver to enable bit 1 of the _PDC. Are
you willing to give it a try? If it fixes the problem with your system,
then I'll see about getting the fix integrated into Nevada.
I've attached the driver and an install script. The driver is the 64-bit
driver. If you
Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
Rocky wrote:
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm
getting the same syslog
Mark Haywood wrote:
Rocky wrote:
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really
don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings
all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm getting the
same syslog messages
Rocky wrote:
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really
don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings
all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm getting the
same syslog messages on a number of
Rocky wrote:
ssdt_1_CpuPm.dsl contains the following ASL for
\PR.CPU1:
Scope (\_PR.CPU1)
{
Name (HI1, 0x00)
Name (HC1, 0x00)
Name (TLD1, 0x00)
Method (_PDC, 1, NotSerialized)
{
CreateDWordField (Arg0, 0x08, CAP1)
Store (CAP1, PDC1)
If
Rocky wrote:
I'm getting the same messages, SpeedStep is enabled in the BIOS, I'm using an
Intel Celeron E1200.
Feb 8 22:34:06 unknown cpudrv: [ID 805513 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _PSS
package not found.
Feb 8 22:34:06 unknown cpudrv: [ID 978953 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi:
Interesting. \_PR.CPU1._PSS just returns \_PR.CPU0._PSS. I've never seen
this logic in any of the ACPI tables I've ever looked at before. This
might be another ACPI related bug. Can you tar up all the files dumped
by iasl and send them?
Rocky wrote:
Attached is the .dsl files from above
ssdt_1_CpuPm.dsl contains the following ASL for \PR.CPU1:
Scope (\_PR.CPU1)
{
Name (HI1, 0x00)
Name (HC1, 0x00)
Name (TLD1, 0x00)
Method (_PDC, 1, NotSerialized)
{
CreateDWordField (Arg0, 0x08, CAP1)
Store (CAP1,
It's a possibility that you are hitting:
CR 6605212 SpeedStep can't find _PSS for Processor declared by Alias
Can you check to see if you have an Alias defined for P001 in one of
your *.dsl files? If so, then that is the problem and it is fixed in b77.
Mark
Lurie wrote:
My configuration is:
be greatly appreciated.
Thank you again for your time.
-LSA
Mark Haywood wrote:
I'm fairly certain that the Turion X2 and the Athlon X2 6000+ are both
K8 based which means Solaris is not able to power manage them. The
Athlon X2 6-series that I referred to are (from what I've read
assume that
the Athlon X2 6000+ and up will have the fix. Thanks.
-LSA
Mark Haywood wrote:
list.serv.address wrote:
On the topic,
Does anyone know if the new Phenom (Quad core AMD brand) chips
will have the same power stepping issues as the X2 AMD chips do? Are
any
list.serv.address wrote:
On the topic,
Does anyone know if the new Phenom (Quad core AMD brand) chips will
have the same power stepping issues as the X2 AMD chips do? Are any of
the newer AMD X2 chip revisions going to fix this issue?
The Phenom Quad-Core processors are based on the
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Well, there is an mdb hack (enable cpudrv_direct_pm)
along with a couple
of ioctl(2) calls (PM_DIRECT_PM and
PM_SET_CURRENT_POWER) that could
give you direct control over the frequency. I'm not
convinced you really
want to go there though
I would like to 'go there'.
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
The ability to reduce the speed would be useful. I
do notice the batteries die a lot quicker on this
laptop (Sony VGN-SZ4XWN/C dual core 2.0 GHz Intgel
Due 2 core T7200 CPU) when on Solaris than Vista.
Do you have autopm enabled? If not, see
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max
power
of 200
0 MHz
BTW, It seems that whoever wrote this bit of code
needs to learn about SI units, since I thought power
was measured in Watts, not MHz. I thought MHz was a
unit
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Currently, there is no way to force a processor to a
lower frequency. A
feature we'll be adding to Solaris soon.
As for what determining what frequencies your
processors are running at,
you can find that out from the cpu_info kstat.
$ kstat -m cpu_info -s
Mark Haywood wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Also useful would be a message when the speed is
reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 200
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Also useful would be a message when the speed is
reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 200
0 MHz
but dont see any if the speed is reduce - I've
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
i have a core2 duo intel laptop running indiana and
after seeing messages like:
Nov 8 20:23:43 saturn cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info]
NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 1833 MHz
in dmesg, i was wondering if there is a way to force
the
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
Currently, there is no way to force a processor to a lower frequency. A
feature we'll be adding to Solaris soon.
As for what determining what frequencies your processors are running at,
you can find that out from the cpu_info kstat.
isnt there any mdb hack we
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Mark Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Mark Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, if I'm reading your messages correctly, you've got two
drivers
34 matches
Mail list logo
