Right now, we create pools for images, compute, volumes, and radosgw
creates a bunch, all are assigned to the default crush map.
from the Ceph side, In order to create a pool where we could separate
it from another pool is to create a ruleset in the cursh map to
isolate the devices, then the
Hi team,
I wasnt able to participate in fuel weekly meeting, so for those of you who
are curious
how to create roles with fuel client - here is documentation on this topic
[1].
And here is example how it can be used, together with granular deployment,
to
create new roles and add deployment logic
On 19/03/15 15:52, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155353/
Hi,
it all comes to the fact that DEVSTACK_GATE_INSTALL_TESTONLY=1 is not
specified in the requirements integration job. I think you need to set
it at [1]. In that case, your test requirements will
hi,
generally speaking it would be nice to have the possibility to define
availability zones. and this could be used as well to group, not only
computing resources, but also storage ones. for this if i am not wrong
there is already a discussion or blueprint on this from mirantis folks.
then i am
API extension is the only way that users know which features are
available unitl we support API microversioning (v2.1 or something).
I believe VLAN transparency support should be implemented as an
extension, not by changing the core resources attribute directly.
Otherwise users (including Horizon)
Hi everyone,
We just hit feature freeze[1], so please do not approve changes that add
features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a
feature freeze exception.
This is also string freeze[2], so you should avoid changing translatable
strings. If you have to modify a
Forwarding my reply to the other thread too...
Multiple threads on the same topic is confusing.
Can we use this thread if we continue the discussion?
(The title of this thread looks approapriate)
API extension is the only way that users know which features are
available unitl we support API
It is something different from what I see.
Repos can be called fuel-dev-utils and fuel-vagrant-dev.
P.
On 03/19/2015 09:43 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
we already have a package with the name fuel-utils please see [1]. I
-1'd the CR over it.
[1]
Hi,
So at the moment we have something that is half baked. Say we take the MTU
support as an example: There is a configuration flag ‘advertise_mtu’ (the
default value is False) – this is set by an admin, but a tenant can define the
mtu setting when creating a network.
So by default the tenant
Hi Graham, thanks for your suggestion. But in fact the initial import was a
simple while-curl scripts with no concurrency.
With this script, a request will not be sent unless previous one gets
reponse from designate-api. So I think it's not the rate of initial
importing but the number of records
Hi John,
Murano isn't official project and so we've started the election process
earlier, you could see dates in the first email in this thread. There was
only one candidate, so, voting itself was bypassed.
till 05:59 UTC March 17, 2015: Open candidacy to PTL positions
March 17, 2015 - 1300 UTC
Hello, Oleg Bondarev.
Sir, I could not find out any merit of multi subnets on one network, except the
following one.
- Migrate IPv4 to IPv6, so we need both subnet range on one network.
So I don't know very much the nesessery of max_fied_ips_per_port parameter.
All I know is only DB module and
Hi there,
Gnocchi 1.0.0a1 is out! You check it out at:
https://launchpad.net/gnocchi/+milestone/1.0.0a1
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gnocchi
Happy hacking,
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
/* Free Software hacker
http://julien.danjou.info */
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/18/2015 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 03/17/2015 09:13 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 16/03/15 16:38, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:53 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 03/10/2015 05:53 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Jan Provazník jprov...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
it
Mike, for HDS and Hitachi, the contact person is the same:
openstackdevelopm...@hds.com. Also, we have 5 drivers:
- HDS HNAS NFS
- HDS HNAS iSCSI
- HBSD FC
- HBSD iSCSI
- HDS HUS
This last one, HDS HUS, is deprecated by HBSD drivers and won't be
maintained, so you can add it in the removal list.
I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one
change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us
(HUSDriver) that is not maintained and also should be deprecated/removed.
Liu, the best argument here would be a report from your CI in this patch
Hi,
Anyone can help how to configure local.conf file for storage node via cinder
service in devstack.
Thanks and Regards,
Raghavendrachari kamsali | Software Engineer II | Embedded Computing
Artesyn Embedded Technologies | 5th Floor, Capella Block, The V, Madhapur|
Hyderabad, AP 500081
As pointed out by Pavel in yesterday's meeting, the refactor [1] cannot
assume that the DB transaction for IPAM operations will occur in a scope
different from the one for performing the API operation.
This is because most plugins, including ML2, use inheritance to perform
further operations on
Hi vinod, thanks for you reply. I have report a bug with related log
snippets here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1434479
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vinod Mangalpally
vinod.m...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi Zhang,
Thank you for reporting the bug. The number of records does
On 20 March 2015 at 15:49, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
The MTU issue has been a long-standing problem for neutron users. What
this extension is doing is simply, in my opinion, enabling API control over
an aspect users were dealing with previously through custom made scripts.
Great suggestion Kevin. Passing 0.0.0.1 as gateway_ip_template (or whatever
you call it) is essentially passing an address index, so when you OR 0.0.0.1
with the CIDR you get your gateway set as the first usable IP in the subnet.
The intent of the user is to allocate the first usable IP
Short version:
The RH1 CI region has been down since yesterday afternoon.
We have a misbehaving switch and have file a support ticket with the
vendor to troubleshoot things further. We hope to know more this
weekend, or Monday at the latest.
Long version:
Yesterday afternoon we started seeing
If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address
and allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a
CIDR from its prefixes, then the integer value solution is probably
marginally better than the fake IP one (eg.: 0.0.0.1 to say the gateway
is the
Hi everyone,
This is a quick note that Spec proposals are now open for Keystone for the
Liberty cycle. By open, this means that specs can be proposed against
Liberty with the intention to kick-start the review cycle on specs for the
next cycle a bit earlier and help prevent piling all the new
A couple more responses were submitted but 1500 on Tuesdays is still in
first place. Since there was no further discussion, we'll meet next week at
1500 on Tuesday in #openstack-meeting-4 (no Monday meeting). I've edited
the meetings wiki to indicate this. If you have topics to discuss at the
Hi Mike,
I think what we are talking is huawei-volume-ci, not huawei-ci. It is
huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000 FC
driver.
Regarding to only report failures when a patch really does break your
integration, I think huawei-volume-ci probaly should be
The MTU values are derived from the config values only.
If the tenant tries to set the MTU directly, that is rejected.
Rob
From: Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.commailto:gkot...@vmware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hello Fuelers,
I'm kindly insisting on merging the following 2 patches into 6.0
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161721/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161722/
These patches are going to implement IBP-reconnect [3].
Additionally, it closes one of customer-found bug [4] related to
Mike,
Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress.
Jay
On 03/20/2015 05:59 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote:
I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I
expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI.
There's one of us (HUSDriver) that
Make sense to me. Susanne
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com
wrote:
Hi lbaas'ers,
Now that lbaasv2 has shipped, the need for a regular weekly meeting is
greatly reduced. I propose that we cancel the regular meeting, and discuss
neutron-y things during
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2015 09:01 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 19/03/15 15:52, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155353/
Hi,
it all comes to the fact that DEVSTACK_GATE_INSTALL_TESTONLY=1 is
not specified in the requirements
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Jan Provazník jprov...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/18/2015 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
So is this eventually going to live in Tuskar? If so, I would point out
that it's going to be awkward to move it there if it starts out as a
separate thing. There's no good way
Hi Dmitry,
Sounds good to me! ;-)
Imre
On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0
[1]. If you're not interested in discoverd, you may safely skip it.
Hi all!
Do you know what time is coming? Release time! I'm hoping
I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in discussions
and updating progress on these drivers since their submission.
I will point out a discussion in the Nov Core meeting where I brought up the
challenge around FC environments and the response I received:
16:10:44
This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0
[1]. If you're not interested in discoverd, you may safely skip it.
Hi all!
Do you know what time is coming? Release time! I'm hoping to align this
ironic-discoverd release with the OpenStack one. Here's proposed plan,
I agree with a lot of your desires, but not your reasoning as to why the
changes are problematic. Also, your statements about API changes are
pretty reasonable and probably want writing down somewhere so that future
specs are evaluated against them.
Firstly, if we add to the core Neutron
Hello,
For information, I solved my problem by uninstalling the package librabbitmq
which is not installed in the stable icehouse release of Openstack RDO.
This library causes my problem.
Best regards,
Romain Ziba.
De : ZIBA Romain
Envoyé : jeudi 19 mars 2015 18:11
À :
I’ve come across a use case for allowing dynamic keys to be made
secret. The hardcoded list is good for common keys, but there will be
cases where masking a custom value is useful without having to add it
to the hardcoded list.
I propose we add an optional parameter that is a list of secret_keys
+1 For on demand meeting.
On demand lbaas meetings will happen in neutron meeting and not in Octavia
meetings, right?
Sent from Surface
From: Susanne Ballemailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 20 March 2015 20:20
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Thank you, Dmitry.
I agree!
Best Regards,
Yuiko Takada
2015-03-20 23:32 GMT+09:00 Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com:
Hi Dmitry,
Sounds good to me! ;-)
Imre
On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0
[1]. If you're
On 03/19/2015 07:13 PM, liuxinguo wrote:
Hi Mike,
I have seen the patch at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165990/
saying that huawei driver will be removed because “the maintainer does
not have a CI reporting to ensure their driver integration is successful”.
Looking at this patch,
Hi OpenStack Developers!
I want to remind you that bug triage [1] is important part of contribution
to any project[2]. We've got a lot of not triaged bugs in Cinder [3].
Please, do not hesitate to triage bugs in Cinder [4] to make upcoming Kilo
release better.
You can ask any questions via
You can follow the basic instructions here in FAQ:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers
Ramy
From: Kamsali, RaghavendraChari (Artesyn)
[mailto:raghavendrachari.kams...@artesyn.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:20 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject:
Hey folks,
I have manually updated the Fedora 21 Atomic image via rpm-ostree upgrade.
This image includes kubernetes 0.11 which some people have said is required to
use kubectl with current Magnum master. I don’t have time for the next week to
heavily test, but if someone could run this
Hi Tim,
I think what you are saying is a reasonable goal in terms of high-level
Congress policies not having to depend on the domain-specific solver / policy
engines. As long as there are Congress adapters to transform the user’s
policies to something that domain-specific solver understands
Hi guys,
I am in charge of a third party CI (for Cinder). My setup is based on
Jenkins + gerrit trigger plugin. As you may know, its hard to customize
the message in the Gerrit Verified Commands config. In particular, its
not possible to add white/empty line. And you need white lines if you
have
I'm running Juno with ceilometer and trying to produce a new meter which is
based on vcpus * F (where F is a constant that is different for each
hypervisor).
When I create a VM, I get a new sample for vcpus.
However, it does not appear to fire the transformer.
The same approach using cpu
Hello Asha,
I missed this later email, sorry.
The content type on the PUT call determines the type of the secret (the first
POST call only creates the metadata for the secret).
This older wiki page might help clarify things:
Yes, currently our CI is not stable now, but it is really reporting, and have a
look at all the other CI’s report, I think some of them are really not stable
too.
The server of review.openstack.org is located at the United States (U.S.) and
the network is really not good between our CI and
Dmitry,
Thank you! Great!
pshige
2015-03-21 0:18 GMT+09:00 高田唯子 yuikotakada0...@gmail.com:
Thank you, Dmitry.
I agree!
Best Regards,
Yuiko Takada
2015-03-20 23:32 GMT+09:00 Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com:
Hi Dmitry,
Sounds good to me! ;-)
Imre
On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry
It is huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000
FC driver, not huawei-ci. I am sorry for these two ci names so similar.
And I think the point is: Does the requirement is really a stable CI, and if
one CI is not stable, can it make a exemption like NetApp FC
Hello Asha,
First, please add '[barbican]' to the subject line to indicate this thread is
of Barbican interest only. So for example, the revised subject line would look
like:
Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Unable to send PUT request to store the secret
You appear to be doing a two step secret
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I noticed
something that may be problematic.
The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonically increasing
MAX_API_VERSION value in nova/api/openstack/api_version_request.py. When you
want to make a change you
At present, the only configuration in which ironic is tested is as part of
a complete OpenStack cloud. While this is also the most common usage,
there has been significant interest in running Ironic outside of OpenStack
contexts as an independent service for provisioning hardware in trusted
That is correct.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:11 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
+1 For on demand meeting.
On demand lbaas meetings will happen in neutron meeting and not in
Octavia meetings, right?
Sent from Surface
From: Susanne Balle
Sent: Friday, 20 March 2015
On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote:
Hi MIke,
My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the
change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the
ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we
are in the process of going
On 03/11/2015 06:48 PM, John Belamaric wrote:
This has been settled and we're not moving forward with it for Kilo. I
agree tenants are an administrative concept, not a networking one so
using them for uniqueness doesn't really make sense.
In Liberty we are proposing a new grouping mechanism, as
Glad to see this FFE. The Cisco Cloud Services team is very interested in the
Reseller use case, and in a couple of possible extensions of the work.
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/kilo/reseller.html
In order to track this, and for Kyle's sanity, I have created these two RC1
bugs:
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1434667
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1434671
Please, let's make sure that whatever approach we decide on, the resulting
code fix targets those two bugs.
On 12:33 Fri 20 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote:
I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in
discussions and updating progress on these drivers since their submission.
I will point out a discussion in the Nov Core meeting where I brought up the
challenge around
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Is the action of creating a subnet from a pool better realized as a
different way of creating a subnet, or should there be some sort of
pool action? Eg.:
POST /subnet_pools/my_pool_id/subnet
{'prefix_len': 24}
which
+1 Would like to hear feedback hoping that deprecation is viable.
Carl
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed
On 03/20/2015 02:51 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about this instead?
POST /v2.0/subnets
{
'network_id': 'meh',
'gateway_ip_template': '*.*.*.1'
'prefix_len': 24,
'pool_id': 'some_pool'
}
At least that way it's
On 09:41 Fri 20 Mar , Jay S. Bryant wrote:
Mike,
Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress.
This was not a mistake. As Walt has mentioned that CI run failed anyways. Also
if you take a look at Huawei's CI reporting history, it's not that often AND
not reliable
Hi All,
It was brought to my attention that the recent changes with the vnic_type
possibly should not include the colon in the property value.
In the earlier versions of the review the colon was not in the property,
and was appended later.
On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote:
Hi MIke,
My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the
change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the
ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about this instead?
POST /v2.0/subnets
{
'network_id': 'meh',
'gateway_ip_template': '*.*.*.1'
'prefix_len': 24,
'pool_id': 'some_pool'
}
At least that way it's clear the gateway attribute is not an IP,
Hello everyone,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent,
or if the agent manages only a single resource.
Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm curious
On 03/20/2015 04:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
[...]
*https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152401/
Post time: 3-18 23:08:45
This patch also has NO Huawei Volume CI check results.
It has results on patches 5, 6, 7, 25, 26, 28, and 45. 45 was the only
successfull one. To see all of them
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought about doing *s but in the world of Classless Inter-Domain
Routing where not all networks are /24, /16, or /8 it seemed a bit
imprecise. But, maybe that doesn't matter.
So do a CIDR host address: 0.0.0.1/24 can
On 03/09/2015 09:05 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
POST /v2.0/subnets
{'network_id': 'meh',
'gateway_ip': '0.0.0.1',
'prefix_len': 24,
'pool_id': 'some_pool'}
would indicate that the user wishes to use the first address in the
range as the gateway IP, and the API would return something like
Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com writes:
Hi Michael,
Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com writes:
For specs approved in Juno or Kilo, there is a fast track approval
process for Liberty. The steps to get your spec re-approved are:
- Copy your spec from the specs/oldrelease/approved
Hi All ,
I am unable to send the PUT request using the CURL command for storing the
secret .
root@barbican:~# curl -X POST -H 'content-type:application/json' -H
'X-Project-Id: 12345' -d '{secret: {name: secretname, algorithm:
aes, bit_length : 256, mode:
cbc}}'
Hi:
The LBaaS API tests are failing to run because test_pools.py(and other tests as
well) are importing data_utils from tempest.common.utils.
Looks like data_utils is moved to tempest_lib now and the API tests need to
change to import from tempest_lib.
Is someone tracking this?
We are
Dear Horizon community,
I would like to request an FFE for the review we have out currently for
the firewall feature in the project dashboard.
The review is at - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162552/
This feature is very important for the neutron FWaaS community to move the
firewall feature
Hi Weiting,
1. Add a schedule feature to run the jobs on time:
This request comes from the customer, they usually run the job in a
specific time every day. So it should be great if there
is a scheduler to help arrange the regular job to run.
Looks like a great feature. And should be quite easy
Excerpts from Matthew Van Dijk's message of 2015-03-20 15:06:08 +:
I’ve come across a use case for allowing dynamic keys to be made
secret. The hardcoded list is good for common keys, but there will be
cases where masking a custom value is useful without having to add it
to the hardcoded
On 19 March 2015 at 23:59, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote:
Forwarding my reply to the other thread too...
Multiple threads on the same topic is confusing.
Can we use this thread if we continue the discussion?
(The title of this thread looks approapriate)
API extension is the
Hi Tim
I've check your case on my devstack. And I've received new hs06 meter
in my meter list.
So something wrong with your local env.
Cheers,
Igor D.
Igor Degtiarov
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc
www.mirantis.com
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
I’m
Hi MIke,
My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change
at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA
drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the
process of going through internal security review, which is expected to
+1 from me.
On 03/18/2015 03:04 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote:
Igor (u_glide on IRC) joined the Manila team back in December and has
done a consistent amount of reviews and contributed significant new core
features in the last 2-3 months. I would like to nominate him to join the
Manila core
Hi Geoff,
I'm very happy to know that companies like Cisco wants to use Reseller.
When we start the Hierarchical Multitenancy implementation we had some use
cases in mind, there is:
- Organize a divisional department of a company.
- Reseller
- Merge/Acquisition
- Contracting parties
The first
Hi, folks!
Today we released third milestone of Kilo release - 2015.1.0b3 [1], in
this milestone we completed 11 blueprints and fixed 13 bugs. We
finally completed a number of big features that we were working whole
cycle: Integration with Congress, Environment Templates and so on.
Release of
Neil,
yes, see example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155116/ - you file
against the /approved directory
-- dims
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote:
Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com writes:
Hi Michael,
Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com
Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com writes:
Neil,
yes, see example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155116/ - you file
against the /approved directory
Thanks!
Neil
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
Template is totally the wrong word. It is a host address without a network.
The prefix is there for the same purpose, to OR it back into a network
address.
I just want us to stop inventing things that already exist. You
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a question purely out of curiousity. Why is Neutron averse to the
concept of using tenants as natural ways of dividing up the cloud -- which
at its core means multi-tenant, on-demand computing and networking?
From
On 03/20/2015 03:02 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Is the action of creating a subnet from a pool better realized as a
different way of creating a subnet, or should there be some sort of
pool action? Eg.:
POST
On 03/20/2015 03:37 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a question purely out of curiousity. Why is Neutron averse to the
concept of using tenants as natural ways of dividing up the cloud -- which
at its core means multi-tenant,
Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes:
Hello everyone,
Hi Assaf,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP
agent,
or if the agent manages only a single resource.
Are the setups
Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes:
Hello everyone,
Hi Assaf,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP
agent,
or if the agent manages only a single resource.
Are the setups
On 2015-03-20 13:37:49 -0600 (-0600), Carl Baldwin wrote:
From what I've heard others say both in this thread and privately to
me, there are already a lot of cases where a tenant will use the same
address range to stamp out identical topologies. It occurred to me
that we might even being
i can confirm it works for me as well... are there any noticeable errors in the
ceilometer-agent-notifications log? the snippet below looks sane to me though.
cheers,
gord
From: idegtia...@mirantis.com
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:35:56 +0200
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re:
Hi All ,
Now the command for put request has been successful .the content type for
the header needs to be text/plain.
I thought that the datatype for the data parameters would determine the
content type of the header.
For ex : In this case the data is passed in the following format
- Original Message -
Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes:
Hello everyone,
Hi Assaf,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP
agent,
or if the agent manages
On 19/03/15 06:17, VACHNIS, AVI (AVI) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at this interesting blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-lifecycle-plugpoint and I
hope you can easily clarify some things to me.
I see the following statements related to this BP:
* [in problem description
On 20/03/15 14:33, Rob Pothier (rpothier) wrote:
Hi All,
It was brought to my attention that the recent changes with the vnic_type
possibly should not include the colon in the property value.
In the earlier versions of the review the colon was not in the property,
and was appended later.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/20/2015 02:51 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about this instead?
POST /v2.0/subnets
{
'network_id': 'meh',
'gateway_ip_template':
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
How is 0.0.0.1 a host address? That isn't a valid IP address, AFAIK.
It isn't a valid *IP* address without the network part. However, it
can be referred to as the host address on the network or the host
part of the IP address.
this seems reasonable... this might fall into same category ironic generated
metrics (and any other source that has their own defined list of metrics beyond
ceilometer's list). there was discussion on how to properly handle these cases
[1][2]
[1]
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
