On Sunday 15 April 2007 04:30, Istvan Gabor wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> When I edit index/table in openoffice writer the window's
> content does not fit the window and because of this some
> options can't be set. I have the suse version of openoffice
> OpenOffice_org-2.0.4-38.3
> OpenOffice_org-kde-2.0
Istvan Gabor wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> When I edit index/table in openoffice writer the window's
> content does not fit the window and because of this some
> options can't be set. I have the suse version of openoffice
> OpenOffice_org-2.0.4-38.3
> OpenOffice_org-kde-2.0.4-38.3
> OpenOffice_org-Qui
On Monday 02 April 2007 04:54, James Knott wrote:
> Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> On 4/1/07, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> > > James Knott wrote:
> > >> I find I get dependency errors.
> > >> "Unresolved dependencies:
> > >> Updating OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1.i586[Sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-04-05 at 11:43 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > are back in the /usr/lib/ooo-2.0 directory, instead of 2.1, as the
> > previous version was.
>
> The /usr/lib/ooo-2.0 directory is intended. We do do want to change the
> directory ever
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 02:17, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
> It seems that more than 50% of the time if I press a menu in openoffice
> X goes 100% cpu and hangs the desktop. Cannot switch to virtual
> consoles or use control-options backspace to kill X.
>
> setting render accel off and/or NoFlip on se
On Monday 02 April 2007 04:54, James Knott wrote:
> Yes, I had those sources configured, but I had to add the DVD. After
> that, I was able to do the OO update. However, I noticed that the files
> are back in the /usr/lib/ooo-2.0 directory, instead of 2.1, as the
> previous version was.
The /us
Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
> The Monday 2007-04-02 at 21:45 -0400, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>
> >> There are some options in OOo to disable 3D that might help.
> >>
> > I have tried /usr/lib/ooo-2.0/program/soffice uncommenting export
> > SAL_NOOPENGL=true;
> > to no avail. Are there some more 3d variabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-04-02 at 21:45 -0400, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
> > There are some options in OOo to disable 3D that might help.
> >
> I have tried /usr/lib/ooo-2.0/program/soffice uncommenting export
> SAL_NOOPENGL=true;
> to no avail. Are there some
Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
> The Monday 2007-04-02 at 20:17 -0400, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>
> > See this with opensuse 10.2 and various versions of office and the
> > nvidia driver.
>
> There are some options in OOo to disable 3D that might help.
>
I have tried /usr/lib/ooo-2.0/program/soffice uncomment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-04-02 at 20:17 -0400, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
> See this with opensuse 10.2 and various versions of office and the
> nvidia driver.
There are some options in OOo to disable 3D that might help.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-
It seems that more than 50% of the time if I press a menu in openoffice
X goes 100% cpu and hangs the desktop. Cannot switch to virtual
consoles or use control-options backspace to kill X.
setting render accel off and/or NoFlip on seem to reduce the frequency
but not enough.
Any ideas?
See this
newbies should stick with the versiosn released in the release media...
But I still have to see a newbie that know or respect that rule...
On 4/1/07, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>
>> I find I get dependency errors.
>> "Unresolved dependenc
Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>
>> I find I get dependency errors.
>> "Unresolved dependencies:
>> Updating OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1.i586[System packages] to
>> OpenOffice_org-2.1-14.2.i586[20070331-213355]
>> There are no installable providers of xml-commons-apis for
>> OpenOffice_
James Knott wrote:
> I find I get dependency errors.
> "Unresolved dependencies:
> Updating OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1.i586[System packages] to
> OpenOffice_org-2.1-14.2.i586[20070331-213355]
> There are no installable providers of xml-commons-apis for
> OpenOffice_org-2.1-14.2.i586[20070331-213355]
>
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-01-07 10:51]:
> [...]
>
>> I find I get dependency errors.
>>
>> "Unresolved dependencies:
>> Updating OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1.i586[System packages] to
>> OpenOffice_org-2.1-14.2.i586[20070331-213355]
>> There are no installable pro
* James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-01-07 10:51]:
[...]
> I find I get dependency errors.
>
> "Unresolved dependencies:
> Updating OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1.i586[System packages] to
> OpenOffice_org-2.1-14.2.i586[20070331-213355]
> There are no installable providers of xml-commons-apis for
> OpenO
Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
> Fred A. Miller wrote:
> > Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an
> upgrade
> > install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
>
> You can find newest SUSE-custumized OOo packages under
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/OpenOffice.org/ directory.
> So, add
On Friday 30 March 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri 30 Mar 2007 13:08, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> > I would love to get a few smaller companies off of the MS Office
> > bandwagon, as part of a stealth campaign to move them away from
> > windows all-together.
>
> _
>
> - maybe, VMware w
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 08:08 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/30/07, JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > That was just a bogus groklaw report. We simply patch OO like every
> > other distro, we just happen to patch more (and with features) because
> > we have a good sized team worki
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:20 +0100, Jonathan Ervine wrote:
> > 2)does Novell (or OOo) maintain a windows release with the added VBA
> > and fonts support? If so -- where is it?
> >
> > I would love to get a few smaller companies off of the MS Office
> > bandwagon, as part of a stealth campaign to m
On Fri 30 Mar 2007 13:08, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> I would love to get a few smaller companies off of the MS Office
> bandwagon, as part of a stealth campaign to move them away from
> windows all-together.
_
- maybe, VMware will be a comfortable path :)
[ i do not know for sure, but vmwar
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:48 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:43 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
> > stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
> > OpenOffice.org
Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/30/07, JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> That was just a bogus groklaw report. We simply patch OO like every
>> other distro, we just happen to patch more (and with features) because
>> we have a good sized team working on OO. We send it all upstream
>>
On 3/30/07, JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That was just a bogus groklaw report. We simply patch OO like every
other distro, we just happen to patch more (and with features) because
we have a good sized team working on OO. We send it all upstream
however and most of it eventually ends
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:16 +0200, Andreas wrote:
> Jonathan Ervine schrieb:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
> >> stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
> >> OpenOffice.org". The
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:43 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
> stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
> OpenOffice.org". The latest release I have is Build 2.0.4.7.
I didn't see any listed
Is this the NOVELL-Fork of OOo or the release of the OOo project ?
I read somewhere NOVELL forked sometime ago to put in features that
won't get in the regular OOo build, like better file-filters for MS-Office.
Therefore the NOVELL thingy was not based on the most modern release.
I wouldn't call
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:16 +0200, Andreas wrote:
>
>> Is this the NOVELL-Fork of OOo or the release of the OOo project ?
>> I read somewhere NOVELL forked sometime ago to put in features that
>> won't get in the regular OOo build, like better file-filters for MS-Office
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:16 +0200, Andreas wrote:
> Is this the NOVELL-Fork of OOo or the release of the OOo project ?
> I read somewhere NOVELL forked sometime ago to put in features that
> won't get in the regular OOo build, like better file-filters for MS-Office.
> Therefore the NOVELL thingy
Jonathan Ervine schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
OpenOffice.org". The latest release I have is Build 2.0.4.7.
You can get later openSUSE 10.2
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2007, 12:43 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi all,
>
> How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
> stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
> OpenOffice.org". The latest release I have is Build 2.0.4.7.
>
>
have you ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
> stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
> OpenOffice.org". The latest release I have is Build 2.0.4.7.
You can get later openSUSE 10.2 editions of OpenOffice.org
Hi all,
How soon will there be an openSUSE 10.2 RPM for OOo 2.2? I would like to
stick to the OOo that was "created by Novell, Inc. based on
OpenOffice.org". The latest release I have is Build 2.0.4.7.
:-)
Al
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
In my continuing quest to get bytecode Truetype fonts (Tahoma) rendered
correctly under 10.2 and OpenOffice 2.1 (as it was on 10.0), I have
recompiled the freetype-1.3.1 lib.
Looking for the enable define for bytecode interpreter I found that it
was already enabled. ie in ft_conf.h.in
#undef TT
Fred A. Miller wrote:
> Correct, but then, that was what I was "digging" at. This is wrong, IMHO.
> Newbies coming from MickySoft have NO idea about how to add a repository nor
> even why they should have to. Come to think of itthat's a good
> point. ;)
>
I like the current system be
On Thursday 29 March 2007, Robert Lewis wrote:
> Impress does not play sound on Linux.
> However, it does with Openoffice on XP.
>
> I have had an exchange with the developer and now understand
> what is causing the delay on Linux. He offers this as a work around
> while they are sorting out the
Impress does not play sound on Linux.
However, it does with Openoffice on XP.
I have had an exchange with the developer and now understand
what is causing the delay on Linux. He offers this as a work around
while they are sorting out the real solution.
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.ph
* Fred Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-27-07 16:41]:
> Thanks! Smart still won't add this repository, but Yast did, and it's
> updating now.
it might not be smart's fault :^)
from the cl: smart channel --edit
add: [openoffice]
type = rpm-md
name = openoffice
baseu
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:43:26PM -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:31:36 pm Reinhard Gimbel wrote:
> > Hello Fred, hello community !
> >
> > Satoru Matsumoto wrote / schrieb:
> > > Fred A. Miller wrote:
> > >> Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:31:36 pm Reinhard Gimbel wrote:
> Hello Fred, hello community !
>
> Satoru Matsumoto wrote / schrieb:
> > Fred A. Miller wrote:
> >> Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an
> >> upgrade install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
> >
> > You can find newest
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 1:15:52 am Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
> Fred A. Miller wrote:
> > Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an
> > upgrade install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
>
> You can find newest SUSE-custumized OOo packages under
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/Op
Hello Fred, hello community !
Satoru Matsumoto wrote / schrieb:
> Fred A. Miller wrote:
>
>> Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an upgrade
>> install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
>
> You can find newest SUSE-custumized OOo packages under
> http://software.opensuse.org/do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred A. Miller wrote:
> Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an upgrade
> install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
You can find newest SUSE-custumized OOo packages under
http://software.opensuse.org/download/OpenOffice.org/ directory
Why hasn't SUSE finally gotten with the program and made OO 2.1 an upgrade
install via Yast, Smart, etc.?
Fred
--
If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.
If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-03-19 at 07:57 +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Is there any updates available yet?
Like "OpenOffice_org-2.1-0.1", for instance? Under the projects tree. But
I haven't tested that particular "feature" yet.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:02, Simon Roberts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have SuSE 10.2 installed, and have just noticed that if I present a
> slideshow in OpenOffice (the version bundled with 10.2) the thing "crashes"
> when you exit a slideshow. It's curious, it doesn't seem to die per se, nor
>
Hi all, sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this. I would appreciate any
help with this, or a pointer on a more appropriate place to look.
I am using openSUSE 10.2.
I am trying to put some presentations together using OpenOffice Impress
(version 2.0.4, build 2.0.4.7), and I want to include
Yes, I have same experience. But never happen to other distro such as
Kubuntu.
So, is there any patch from suse to fix this?
Adrianus
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 08:25 +0800, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
> >
> > The Tuesday 2006-12-19 at 15:02 -0800, Simon Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > I
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 02:40, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> The Tuesday 2006-12-19 at 15:02 -0800, Simon Roberts wrote:
> > I have SuSE 10.2 installed, and have just noticed that if I present a
> > slideshow in OpenOffice (the version bundled with 10.2) the thing
> > "crashes" when you exit a slides
Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
> The Tuesday 2006-12-19 at 15:02 -0800, Simon Roberts wrote:
>
> > I have SuSE 10.2 installed, and have just noticed that if I present a
> > slideshow in OpenOffice (the version bundled with 10.2) the thing
> > "crashes" when you exit a slideshow. It's curious, it doesn't see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2006-12-19 at 15:02 -0800, Simon Roberts wrote:
> I have SuSE 10.2 installed, and have just noticed that if I present a
> slideshow in OpenOffice (the version bundled with 10.2) the thing
> "crashes" when you exit a slideshow. It's curi
Hello,
In the Message;
Subject: Re: [opensuse] openoffice firefox plugin
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date & Time: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:04:07 +0100
[Roger] == Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has written:
Roger> I would like to have this netscape fea
>>> On 21-02-2007 at 17:04, Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 15:48:35 Garry Saddington wrote:
>
>> All software is from a straight install of OpenSuSE 10.2. I have
manually
>> copied nsplugin from oo2 dir to the browser plugins but nothing has
>> changed
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 15:48:35 Garry Saddington wrote:
> All software is from a straight install of OpenSuSE 10.2. I have manually
> copied nsplugin from oo2 dir to the browser plugins but nothing has
> changed. regards
nsplugin is executable program, not a shared object file that can be
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 13:35, Carl Hartung wrote:
> On Wed February 21 2007 04:48, Garry Saddington wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 23:52, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> > > garry wrote:
> > > > I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to
> > > > view an .odt docume
On Wed February 21 2007 04:48, Garry Saddington wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 23:52, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> > garry wrote:
> > > I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to
> > > view an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are
> > > there any o
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 23:52, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> garry wrote:
> > I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to view
> > an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are there any
> > other instructions to get this working. I have a Windows laptop fo
garry wrote:
> I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to view
> an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are there any
> other instructions to get this working. I have a Windows laptop for work and
> the plugin worked first time without any tweaking.
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 22:20, Carl Hartung wrote:
> On Tue February 20 2007 12:38, garry wrote:
> > I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to view
> > an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are there any
> > other instructions to get this working.
On Tue February 20 2007 12:38, garry wrote:
> I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to view
> an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are there any
> other instructions to get this working. I have a Windows laptop for work
> and the plugin worked first
I have enabled this plugin in OpenOffice as directed. When I try to view
an .odt document in firefox all I get is a blank grey page. Are there any
other instructions to get this working. I have a Windows laptop for work and
the plugin worked first time without any tweaking.
I have openSuSE 10.2.
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Jay Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Tried it and it worked, thanks for your help. While we're on the subject,
>> any
>> idea when Novell or OpenSuSE will make the OpenSuSE edition of
>> OpenOffice.org 2.1
>> or are they waiting for the next release.
>>
>
M Harris wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:18, Jay Smith wrote:
>
>> While we're on the subject, any
>> idea when Novell or OpenSuSE will make the OpenSuSE edition of
>> OpenOffice.org 2.1 or are they waiting for the next release.
>>
> You probably won't want it...
>
>
>
>LinuxWorld: Other parts of the deal -- was there anything in there that was
>actually relevant to improving interoperability between --?
>
>Allison: No, Iâm sorry. I know what youâre going to ask. I mean that part
>I
>found amusing rather than anything else because the whole point of it
Unsubscribe to this forum
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 February 2007 18:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.0.4, should one upgrade?
Jay Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tri
Jay Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tried it and it worked, thanks for your help. While we're on the subject, any
> idea when Novell or OpenSuSE will make the OpenSuSE edition of OpenOffice.org
> 2.1
> or are they waiting for the next release.
OpenOffice.org 2.1.3 is currently in our facto
On Thu 15 Feb 2007 05:31, Jay Smith wrote:
> it's not easy for many
> businesses to have both Linux and Windows in the office
- Virtual Machines are doing their Miracle . . . looks like it IS
becoming 'easy' :)
friendly greetings
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
On Thursday 15 February 2007 12:31 am, Jay Smith wrote:
> while on the subject, the other two things on the Novell MS pact also
> inclube interoperability, which is a big deal.
LinuxWorld: Other parts of the deal -- was there anything in there that was
actually relevant to improving interoperabil
It's not heresy at all. The ODF Alliance has no real problem with it. The new
Microsoft XML format and ODF don't work together yet. With this plan, they will.
ODF will still be ODF and MS XML will be MS XML. They are just making sure they
translate each other. OpenOffice is it's own project handled
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:18, Jay Smith wrote:
> While we're on the subject, any
> idea when Novell or OpenSuSE will make the OpenSuSE edition of
> OpenOffice.org 2.1 or are they waiting for the next release.
You probably won't want it...
... because it will be the
On Wed Feb 14 18:03 , "Joshua Raphael P. Fuentes" sent:
>The cleanest way to install rpms is installing by rpms.
>
>just use "rpm -Uvh ", this will upgrade the existing
>package installed. As for my experience with openoffice, you must
>install it with a wild card. For ex (rpm -Uvh *).
>>
T
Jay Smith wrote:
> Would it be better to upgrade to 2.1.0,
Probably wouldn't hurt, and might help.
> if so, what's the "cleanest" way to
> install all the rpms? Is there a repository for it? Thanks for your help.
>
go to your favorite closest mirror, projects directory, OpenOffice. HTH
--
J
Jay Smith wrote:
Hey,
So I have OpenOffice 2.0.4, no big deal. I noticed that when people send me
things in *.doc format, it is distorted, in particular, pictures, tables, and
frames. Does anyone else have this problem? If you do, how did you solve it?
Would it be better to upgrade to
Hey,
So I have OpenOffice 2.0.4, no big deal. I noticed that when people send me
things in *.doc format, it is distorted, in particular, pictures, tables, and
frames. Does anyone else have this problem? If you do, how did you solve it?
Would it be better to upgrade to 2.1.0, if so, what's th
Aschwin Marsman wrote:
> I would like to upgrade OpenOffice on openSUSE 10.0 to the latest
> version. I searched for updated packages on e.g. the build service
> but didn't find any. Is there a location with the latest OpenOffice
> version specially build for openSUSE 10.0? I would like a specific
Hi,
I would like to upgrade OpenOffice on openSUSE 10.0 to the latest
version. I searched for updated packages on e.g. the build service
but didn't find any. Is there a location with the latest OpenOffice
version specially build for openSUSE 10.0? I would like a specific
package i.s.o. the version
On Thursday 11 January 2007 15:11, Robert Lewis wrote:
> This is probably the wrong Forum for this topic.
yes, you shall be flogged twelve times wtih a wet noodle for posting such
questions here!
> Does anyone known when OpenOffice will deal
> with wav files attached to powerpoint slides?
Nev
On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 00:24 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:52 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> >> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 1
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:52 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
This is probably the wrong Forum for this topic.
Does anyone known when OpenOffice will deal
with wav files attached to powerpoint slides?
I find when I run OpenOffice on an XP machine
the multimedia stuff attached works but on Linux
it never has. Possibly a secuity issue?
All these wav file at
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:52 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> >> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
> On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
> >
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO
some many mo
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
> >> On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
> >>> Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO
> >>> some many months ago
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO
some many months ago but the original icon from the 10.2 install
remained...
Thanks, Basil. I'
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
> On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
> > Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO
> > some many months ago but the original icon from the 10.2 install
> > remained...
>
> Thanks, Basil. I'd already
On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO
> some many months ago but the original icon from the 10.2 install
> remained...
Thanks, Basil. I'd already created a new launcher but was curious if your
experience was the s
Carl Hartung wrote:
On Thu January 11 2007 08:08, Basil Chupin wrote:
I've just installed 2.1 in Suse 10.2 without any drama.
Hi Basil,
I've done as you described and my 10.2 OOo menu entries disappeared. I'd have
thought the included SUSE desktop integration package would've dealt with
tha
On Thu January 11 2007 08:08, Basil Chupin wrote:
> I've just installed 2.1 in Suse 10.2 without any drama.
Hi Basil,
I've done as you described and my 10.2 OOo menu entries disappeared. I'd have
thought the included SUSE desktop integration package would've dealt with
that. How about you?
Car
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:58:32AM +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
Peter Bradley wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Basil Chupin:
Well you really do need the "new features" because OO 2.1 fixes a
security hole.
Download the tar.gz file from OO.org itself then unpack it. It is all
RPMs wh
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:58:32AM +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> Peter Bradley wrote:
> >Ysgrifennodd Basil Chupin:
> >>
> >>Well you really do need the "new features" because OO 2.1 fixes a
> >>security hole.
> >>
> >>Download the tar.gz file from OO.org itself then unpack it. It is all
> >>RPMs
Peter Bradley wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Basil Chupin:
Well you really do need the "new features" because OO 2.1 fixes a
security hole.
Download the tar.gz file from OO.org itself then unpack it. It is all
RPMs which you then install (together with the SuSE oriented file in
desktop-integration su
Ysgrifennodd Basil Chupin:
Well you really do need the "new features" because OO 2.1 fixes a
security hole.
Download the tar.gz file from OO.org itself then unpack it. It is all
RPMs which you then install (together with the SuSE oriented file in
desktop-integration sub-directory) using "rp
Malte Gell wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 22:08, James Knott wrote:
Now that OpenOffice v2.1 has been released, are there any plans for a
Novell version to follow?
There are packages with newer versions of OOorg for SUSE Linux, but
these packages are not officially supported, use at your
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 00:40 -0500, James Lockie wrote:
> Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Anyone know when OpenOffice 2.1 is going to arrive in
> > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/ ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hans
> >
> >
> When it's ready. :-)
>
Meaning in time for Valentines
Hans du Plooy wrote:
Hi guys,
Anyone know when OpenOffice 2.1 is going to arrive in
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/ ?
Thanks
Hans
When it's ready. :-)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys,
Anyone know when OpenOffice 2.1 is going to arrive in
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/ ?
Thanks
Hans
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have SuSE 10.2 installed, and have just noticed that if I present a slideshow
in OpenOffice (the version bundled with 10.2) the thing "crashes" when you exit
a slideshow. It's curious, it doesn't seem to die per se, nor do any damage,
but it insists that it crashed and must recover th
Did anyone manage to use digital signatures with OpenOffice in SuSE 10.2?
--
Regards,
Lívio Cipriano
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 14 December 2006 18:23, John Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2006 07:44, Hugo Costelha wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 December 2006 14:01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-14-06 02:26]:
> > > > Er, question:
> > > > At who's risk do I use the
On Thursday 14 December 2006 07:44, Hugo Costelha wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2006 14:01, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-14-06 02:26]:
> > > Er, question:
> > > At who's risk do I use the Officially Supported OOorg packages?
>
> If you buy the boxed set y
201 - 300 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
